MGT: Annual Report to shareholders

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Magnetite Mines Limited
Ticker
MGT
Exchange
ASX
Region
South Australia
Primary commodity
Iron ore
Secondary commodities
Rare earth elements, Neodymium oxide, Gold, Copper, Silver, Silicon dioxide, Aluminium oxide, Phosphorus, Loss on ignition, Magnetite
Document categories
Resource update, Capital raise, Other, Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-30 07:21:10 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Magnetite Mines Limited's 2026 Annual Report highlights a strategic reset and capital raising efforts to advance its Razorback Iron Ore Project amidst evolving market conditions. The company secured Major Project Status for Razorback and is evaluating a more capital-efficient development pathway. While new, early-stage rare earth element drill results from Ironback Hill are encouraging, the reported iron ore resource estimates are re-statements of previous announcements, indicating low novelty for the main project.

Reasoning: The annual report details a strategic reset and capital raises to navigate challenging market conditions for its flagship Razorback Iron Ore Project, which is positive for project viability but indicates financial pressure. While new REE drill results are encouraging, the primary iron ore resource estimates are re-statements of prior announcements, limiting novelty.

Positive factors

  • Major Project Status awarded for Razorback Iron Ore Project
  • Maiden air-core drilling confirmed shallow clay-hosted REE mineralisation at Ironback Hill
  • Capital raising initiatives completed to support ongoing activities
  • Strategic reset implemented to pursue a more capital-efficient development pathway for Razorback

Negative factors

  • Resource estimates are re-statements of prior announcements, indicating low novelty
  • Strategic reset and cost reductions highlight financial pressures and challenges in previous development pathway
  • Ongoing need for capital raises and funding flexibility
  • High percentage of inferred resources in global estimate
  • True widths not known for REE drill intercepts
  • Presence of penalty elements (P, SiO2, Al2O3) in iron ore resources

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 57

Classification and evidence

Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The resource estimates are explicitly stated as re-statements of prior announcements, with no new material information.

Evidence · text

“The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the market announcements on 9 June 2023, 30 June 2025 and 4 September 2026, and in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill results for rare earth elements are reported as downhole lengths with true widths not known.

Evidence · text

“All intercepts are reported as downhole lengths; true widths are not known.”

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative · Story-specific tag

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: The iron ore resource tables include phosphorus (P), silicon dioxide (SiO2), and aluminium oxide (Al2O3) as grade components, which are common penalty elements or impurities in iron ore.

Evidence · table

“P %”

Context: Fe %

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion of the reported global mineral resource is classified as Inferred, indicating lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“INFERRED”

Context: 1,864

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.

Why it applies: The rare earth element results are from a maiden air-core drilling program, establishing initial mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Maiden air-core drilling at Ironback Hill confirmed shallow clay-hosted rare earth element mineralisation”

Capital Raiseneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company completed several capital raising initiatives during the financial year.

Evidence · text

“During FY2026, the Company completed capital raising initiatives totalling approximately $5.0 million before costs”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 57. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

PLAC0001Ironback Hill REE · rare_earth_elementsGrade: 380Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PLAC0001
Project
Ironback Hill REE
Commodity
rare_earth_elements
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
MGT

Geometry

Grade
380
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m
From
4 m
To
8 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PLAC0001:4-8

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
350
Cutoff Unit
ppm TREO

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rare earth element intercept from maiden air-core drilling confirms mineralization at Ironback Hill.

Positive factors

  • Rare earth element intercept
  • Maiden drilling confirms mineralization

Negative factors

  • Early stage exploration
  • True width not known

Evidence · text

“4m @ 380ppm TREO (66ppm Nd2O3) from 4m to 8m in PLAC0001”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states 'All intercepts are reported as downhole lengths; true widths are not known.'

Evidence · text

“All intercepts are reported as downhole lengths; true widths are not known.”
PLAC0001Ironback Hill REE · neodymium_oxideGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PLAC0001
Project
Ironback Hill REE
Commodity
neodymium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
MGT

Geometry

Grade
66
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m
From
4 m
To
8 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PLAC0001:4-8

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
350
Cutoff Unit
ppm TREO

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This neodymium oxide intercept from maiden air-core drilling confirms mineralization at Ironback Hill.

Positive factors

  • Neodymium oxide intercept
  • Maiden drilling confirms mineralization

Negative factors

  • Early stage exploration
  • True width not known

Evidence · text

“4m @ 380ppm TREO (66ppm Nd2O3) from 4m to 8m in PLAC0001”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states 'All intercepts are reported as downhole lengths; true widths are not known.'

Evidence · text

“All intercepts are reported as downhole lengths; true widths are not known.”

Resource Estimates (55)

inferredIron Peak · iron_oreTonnes: 263000000Grade: 16.74Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:1916be994cdb9fb67079

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
263000000
Grade
16.74
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“16.74”

Context: 263

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredIron Peak · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 263000000Grade: 49.26Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:1916be994cdb9fb67079

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
263000000
Grade
49.26
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“49.26”

Context: 263

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredIron Peak · aluminium_oxideTonnes: 263000000Grade: 8.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
aluminium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:1916be994cdb9fb67079

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
263000000
Grade
8.5
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“8.50”

Context: 263

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredIron Peak · phosphorusTonnes: 263000000Grade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
phosphorus
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:1916be994cdb9fb67079

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
263000000
Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 263

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredIron Peak · loss_on_ignitionTonnes: 263000000Grade: 6.03Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
loss_on_ignition
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:1916be994cdb9fb67079

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
263000000
Grade
6.03
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“6.03”

Context: 263

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredIron Peak · magnetiteTonnes: 263000000Grade: 14.33Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
magnetite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:1916be994cdb9fb67079

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
263000000
Grade
14.33
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“14.33”

Context: 263

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedIron Peak · iron_oreTonnes: 344000000Grade: 17.63Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:25d147561732a39969ca

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
17.63
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.63”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedIron Peak · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 344000000Grade: 48.57Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:25d147561732a39969ca

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
48.57
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“48.57”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedIron Peak · aluminium_oxideTonnes: 344000000Grade: 8.33Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
aluminium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:25d147561732a39969ca

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
8.33
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“8.33”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedIron Peak · phosphorusTonnes: 344000000Grade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
phosphorus
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:25d147561732a39969ca

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedIron Peak · loss_on_ignitionTonnes: 344000000Grade: 5.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
loss_on_ignition
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:25d147561732a39969ca

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
5.9
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“5.90”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedIron Peak · magnetiteTonnes: 344000000Grade: 14.77Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Iron Peak
Commodity
magnetite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:25d147561732a39969ca

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
14.77
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“14.77”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback · iron_oreTonnes: 1601000000Grade: 17.07Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:697928579ad06172980f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1601000000
Grade
17.07
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.07”

Context: 1,601

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 1601000000Grade: 49.28Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:697928579ad06172980f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1601000000
Grade
49.28
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“49.28”

Context: 1,601

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback · aluminium_oxideTonnes: 1601000000Grade: 8.36Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
aluminium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:697928579ad06172980f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1601000000
Grade
8.36
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“8.36”

Context: 1,601

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback · phosphorusTonnes: 1601000000Grade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
phosphorus
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:697928579ad06172980f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1601000000
Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 1,601

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback · loss_on_ignitionTonnes: 1601000000Grade: 5.56Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
loss_on_ignition
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:697928579ad06172980f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1601000000
Grade
5.56
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“5.56”

Context: 1,601

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback · magnetiteTonnes: 1601000000Grade: 14.48Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
magnetite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:697928579ad06172980f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1601000000
Grade
14.48
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“14.48”

Context: 1,601

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback · iron_oreTonnes: 1629000000Grade: 17.78Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:3bd59b5046e00a869a9e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1629000000
Grade
17.78
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.78”

Context: 1,629

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 1629000000Grade: 48.59Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:3bd59b5046e00a869a9e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1629000000
Grade
48.59
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“48.59”

Context: 1,629

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback · aluminium_oxideTonnes: 1629000000Grade: 8.16Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
aluminium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:3bd59b5046e00a869a9e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1629000000
Grade
8.16
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“8.16”

Context: 1,629

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback · phosphorusTonnes: 1629000000Grade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
phosphorus
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:3bd59b5046e00a869a9e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1629000000
Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 1,629

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback · loss_on_ignitionTonnes: 1629000000Grade: 5.48Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
loss_on_ignition
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:3bd59b5046e00a869a9e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1629000000
Grade
5.48
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“5.48”

Context: 1,629

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback · magnetiteTonnes: 1629000000Grade: 13.88Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback
Commodity
magnetite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:3bd59b5046e00a869a9e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1629000000
Grade
13.88
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“13.88”

Context: 1,629

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore Project · iron_oreTonnes: 1864000000Grade: 17.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:79e9ea404feb475e848f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1864000000
Grade
17.02
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.02”

Context: 1,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 1864000000Grade: 49.28Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:79e9ea404feb475e848f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1864000000
Grade
49.28
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“49.28”

Context: 1,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore Project · aluminium_oxideTonnes: 1864000000Grade: 8.38Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
aluminium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:79e9ea404feb475e848f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1864000000
Grade
8.38
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“8.38”

Context: 1,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore Project · phosphorusTonnes: 1864000000Grade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
phosphorus
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:79e9ea404feb475e848f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1864000000
Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 1,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore Project · loss_on_ignitionTonnes: 1864000000Grade: 5.63Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
loss_on_ignition
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:79e9ea404feb475e848f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1864000000
Grade
5.63
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“5.63”

Context: 1,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore Project · magnetiteTonnes: 1864000000Grade: 14.46Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
magnetite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:79e9ea404feb475e848f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1864000000
Grade
14.46
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“14.46”

Context: 1,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore Project · iron_oreTonnes: 1973000000Grade: 17.75Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:91b81f21951070e6739e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1973000000
Grade
17.75
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.75”

Context: 1,973

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 1973000000Grade: 48.59Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:91b81f21951070e6739e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1973000000
Grade
48.59
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“48.59”

Context: 1,973

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore Project · aluminium_oxideTonnes: 1973000000Grade: 8.19Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
aluminium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:91b81f21951070e6739e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1973000000
Grade
8.19
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“8.19”

Context: 1,973

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore Project · phosphorusTonnes: 1973000000Grade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
phosphorus
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:91b81f21951070e6739e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1973000000
Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 1,973

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore Project · loss_on_ignitionTonnes: 1973000000Grade: 5.55Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
loss_on_ignition
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:91b81f21951070e6739e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1973000000
Grade
5.55
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“5.55”

Context: 1,973

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore Project · magnetiteTonnes: 1973000000Grade: 14.04Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
magnetite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:91b81f21951070e6739e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1973000000
Grade
14.04
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“14.04”

Context: 1,973

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredIronback Hill · iron_oreTonnes: 1187000000Grade: 23.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ironback Hill
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:9909f5cb2f7b1da409a5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1187000000
Grade
23.2
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2018-11-20

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“23.20”

Context: 1,187

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.9 years before this release

inferredIronback Hill · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 1187000000Grade: 44.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ironback Hill
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:9909f5cb2f7b1da409a5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1187000000
Grade
44.4
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2018-11-20

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“44.40”

Context: 1,187

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.9 years before this release

inferredIronback Hill · aluminium_oxideTonnes: 1187000000Grade: 7.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ironback Hill
Commodity
aluminium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:9909f5cb2f7b1da409a5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1187000000
Grade
7.2
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2018-11-20

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“7.20”

Context: 1,187

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.9 years before this release

inferredIronback Hill · phosphorusTonnes: 1187000000Grade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ironback Hill
Commodity
phosphorus
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:9909f5cb2f7b1da409a5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1187000000
Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2018-11-20

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 1,187

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.9 years before this release

inferredIronback Hill · loss_on_ignitionTonnes: 1187000000Grade: 5.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ironback Hill
Commodity
loss_on_ignition
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:9909f5cb2f7b1da409a5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1187000000
Grade
5.4
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2018-11-20

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“5.40”

Context: 1,187

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.9 years before this release

inferredIronback Hill · magnetiteTonnes: 1187000000Grade: 12.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ironback Hill
Commodity
magnetite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:9909f5cb2f7b1da409a5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1187000000
Grade
12.9
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2018-11-20

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“12.90”

Context: 1,187

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.9 years before this release

inferredMuster Dam Iron Project · iron_oreTonnes: 1550000000Grade: 18.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Muster Dam Iron Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ba5445d9c20cf915d1ee

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1550000000
Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
15.2
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-11-03

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“18.70”

Context: 1,550

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

inferredMuster Dam Iron Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 1550000000Grade: 49.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Muster Dam Iron Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ba5445d9c20cf915d1ee

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1550000000
Grade
49.6
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
15.2
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-11-03

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“49.60”

Context: 1,550

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

inferredMuster Dam Iron Project · aluminium_oxideTonnes: 1550000000Grade: 8.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Muster Dam Iron Project
Commodity
aluminium_oxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ba5445d9c20cf915d1ee

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1550000000
Grade
8.8
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
15.2
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-11-03

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“8.80”

Context: 1,550

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

inferredMuster Dam Iron Project · phosphorusTonnes: 1550000000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Muster Dam Iron Project
Commodity
phosphorus
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ba5445d9c20cf915d1ee

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1550000000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
15.2
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-11-03

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 1,550

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

inferredMuster Dam Iron Project · loss_on_ignitionTonnes: 1550000000Grade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Muster Dam Iron Project
Commodity
loss_on_ignition
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ba5445d9c20cf915d1ee

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1550000000
Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
15.2
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-11-03

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“2.80”

Context: 1,550

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

Fact 48View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Ticker
MGT

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Capital raises provided necessary working capital but highlight the company's ongoing funding requirements.

Positive factors

  • Secured funding for ongoing operations

Negative factors

  • Indicates ongoing need for capital

Evidence · text

“a further $1.15 million renounceable rights issue in April 2026”

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 263000000Grade: 16.74Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:2ca1354e86ca4c15f9f3

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
263000000
Grade
16.74
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“16.74”

Context: 263

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 344000000Grade: 17.63Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:71d8c5b450eedbe2ba7a

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
17.63
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.63”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 607000000Grade: 17.24Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:d48ff5d450752ac3756c

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
607000000
Grade
17.24
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.24”

Context: 607

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 1601000000Grade: 17.07Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:8c7f4cd32bb3418500e7

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1601000000
Grade
17.07
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.07”

Context: 1,601

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 1629000000Grade: 17.78Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:8791a521c3082a2a9104

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1629000000
Grade
17.78
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant indicated resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.78”

Context: 1,629

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 3230000000Grade: 17.43Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:5c3e01329920daad45c0

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3230000000
Grade
17.43
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.43”

Context: 3,230

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 3837000000Grade: 17.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:6e28128a8c6d268ffc5f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3837000000
Grade
17.4
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
8
Cutoff Unit
% eDTR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a previously announced JORC-compliant inferred resource estimate, indicating large tonnage but low novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Re-statement of prior estimate
  • High inferred component
  • Presence of penalty elements (SiO2, Al2O3, P)

Evidence · table

“17.40”

Context: 3,837

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.