Mercado Minerals Provides Summary of Copalito Drill Program, Highlights New Renata Vein and Phase II Exploration Plans
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Mercado Minerals Ltd.
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-08-19 13:36:50 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Mercado Minerals announced the successful completion of its inaugural 25-hole diamond drill program at the Copalito Project in Sinaloa, Mexico, confirming and expanding mineralization across seven vein structures. The program yielded multiple high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including 1.20 metres at 1120 g/t AgEq, and increased the project's cumulative vein strike length from 8 km to 11 km. Additionally, the company discovered two new significant veins, El Pilar Sur and La Renata, and outlined a Phase II program to further explore and expand these promising targets.
Reasoning: The inaugural drill program at Copalito delivered strong high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, significantly expanded the known strike length of multiple veins, and led to the discovery of new vein structures, demonstrating high exploration success and potential for resource growth, despite the lack of on-property metallurgical data for AgEq calculations.
Positive factors
- Multiple high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including 1.20m at 1120 g/t AgEq and 0.80m at 675 g/t AgEq, demonstrate significant mineralization.
- The inaugural drill program successfully confirmed and expanded mineralization across seven vein structures, extending the cumulative strike length from 8 km to 11 km.
- Discovery of two new significant veins (El Pilar Sur and La Renata) and successful first-pass tests on previously undrilled structures indicate strong exploration potential.
- Comprehensive QA/QC procedures, including certified lab analysis and QP sign-off, enhance the credibility of the results.
- Clear Phase II exploration plans are outlined, targeting expansion of high-grade zones and initial testing of new discoveries.
Negative factors
- True widths for drill intercepts are not yet established, which introduces uncertainty regarding the actual thickness of mineralization.
- Metal equivalent calculations rely on 'typical recoveries based on metallurgical studies conducted on analogous epithermal vein deposits' and explicitly state 'No metallurgical work has been reported on the property', making the AgEq less reliable for this specific project.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 169
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept in COP-26-012 of 1.20 metres at 1120 g/t silver equivalent is exceptionally high-grade, well above the typical thresholds for epithermal deposits.
Evidence · text
“Including 1.20 metres of 34 g/t silver, 3.40 g/t gold, 19.00% lead, and 21.00% zinc (1120 g/t silver equivalent1)”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept in COP-26-001 of 1.20 metres at 1146 g/t silver equivalent is exceptionally high-grade, well above the typical thresholds for epithermal deposits.
Evidence · text
“including 1.20 metres of 848 g/t silver, 4.83 g/t gold, 0.20% lead, and 0.47% zinc (1146 g/t silver equivalent1).”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states 'Step-out drilling returned the two best intercepts on the vein to date' for El Pilar and 'Step-out drilling returned the 2026 drilling program's highest-grade intercept' for El Agua, indicating mineralization was extended beyond previous limits.
Evidence · text
“Step-out drilling returned the two best intercepts on the vein to date”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a detailed 'Quality Assurance/Quality Control and Chain of Custody' section, mentioning certified lab (ALS), QP sign-off, and specific methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control and Chain of Custody”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Footnote 2 explicitly states 'All intervals are drilled core lengths. Additional drilling is required to establish true widths,' indicating that true widths are not yet known for the reported intercepts.
Evidence · text
“All intervals are drilled core lengths. Additional drilling is required to establish true widths.”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: While metal equivalent assumptions are disclosed, they are based on 'typical recoveries based on metallurgical studies conducted on analogous epithermal vein deposits' and explicitly state 'No metallurgical work has been reported on the property,' which reduces the reliability of the AgEq for this specific project.
Evidence · text
“Silver-equivalent values are calculated assuming typical recoveries based on metallurgical studies conducted on analogous epithermal vein deposits and are not necessarily reflective of metallurgy on the property. No metallurgical work has been reported on the property.”
Exploration Drilling
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The program is described as an 'inaugural diamond drill program' and includes 'initial drill tests of several newly discovered and previously undrilled vein structures,' indicating a focus on discovering and extending mineralization.
Evidence · text
“inaugural diamond drill program”
New Discovery
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The surface exploration program 'discovered two new significant veins: El Pilar Sur and La Renata,' indicating new mineralized zones not previously identified.
Evidence · text
“discovered two new significant veins: El Pilar Sur and La Renata”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 169. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (169)
COP-26-019Copalito Project · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-019
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-019:118.0-121.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 403
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong silver equivalent intercept from the inaugural drill program, contributing to the expansion of a key vein, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- High silver equivalent grade of 403 g/t over a moderate width of 3.40m.
- Intercept contributes to defining the El Pilar vein over 1,250 metres of strike.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“COP-26-019intersected 3.40 metres of 11 g/t silver, 3.53 g/t gold, 1.45% lead, and 4.41% zinc (403 g/t silver equivalent1) from 118 metres”
COP-26-019Copalito Project · silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-019
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 119.35 m
- To
- 120.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-019:119.35-120.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 675
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A bonanza-grade sub-interval within a significant intercept, indicating very high-grade mineralization, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade of 675 g/t over a narrow but high-grade interval.
- This sub-interval highlights a very high-grade core within the broader intercept.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“including 0.80 metres of 9 g/t silver, 5.37 g/t gold, 1.65% lead, and 10.05% zinc (675 g/t silver equivalent1)”
COP-26-018Copalito Project · silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-018
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.05 m
- From
- 117.4 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-018:117.4-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 264
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong silver equivalent intercept from the inaugural drill program, contributing to the expansion of a key vein, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade of 264 g/t over a good width of 4.05m.
- Intercept contributes to defining the El Pilar vein over 1,250 metres of strike.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“COP-26-018 intersected 4.05 metres of 9 g/t silver, 1.86 g/t gold, 1.19% lead and 4.08% zinc (264 g/t silver equivalent1) from 117.40 metres”
COP-26-018Copalito Project · silverGrade: 18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-018
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 120.8 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-018:120.8-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 635
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A bonanza-grade sub-interval within a significant intercept, indicating very high-grade mineralization, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade of 635 g/t over a narrow but high-grade interval.
- This sub-interval highlights a very high-grade core within the broader intercept.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“including 0.65 metres of 18 g/t silver, 3.80 g/t gold, 3.14% lead and 11.85% zinc (635 g/t silver equivalent1)”
COP-26-012Copalito Project · silverGrade: 30Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-012
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 30
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 124.75 m
- To
- 128.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-012:124.75-128.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 686
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A bonanza-grade intercept and the highest-grade of the program, significantly expanding the El Agua vein, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade of 686 g/t over a moderate width of 3.50m, representing the program's highest-grade intercept.
- This intercept expands the El Agua vein, which has a 950m strike length.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“COP-26-012intersected 3.50 metres of 30 g/t silver, 1.94 g/t gold, 9.47% lead and 14.61% zinc (686 g/t silver equivalent1) from 124.75 metres”
COP-26-012Copalito Project · silverGrade: 34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-012
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 127.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-012:126.0-127.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1120
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional bonanza-grade sub-interval, representing the highest-grade intercept of the program, indicating very high-grade mineralization, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Bonanza silver equivalent grade of 1120 g/t over a narrow but exceptionally high-grade interval.
- This sub-interval represents the highest-grade core of the program's best intercept.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“Including 1.20 metres of 34 g/t silver, 3.40 g/t gold, 19.00% lead, and 21.00% zinc (1120 g/t silver equivalent1)”
COP-26-023Copalito Project · silverGrade: 103Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-023
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 103
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 83.9 m
- To
- 91.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-023:83.9-91.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 200
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong silver equivalent intercept over a good width, contributing to the definition of a higher-grade zone within the El Agua vein, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade of 200 g/t over a significant width of 8.00m.
- This intercept helps define a higher-grade corridor within the El Agua vein.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“COP-26-023intersected 8.00 metres of 103 g/t silver, 1.11 g/t gold, 0.18% lead, and 0.86% zinc (200 g/t silver equivalent1)”
COP-26-023Copalito Project · silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-023
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48.4 m
- From
- 81.6 m
- To
- 130 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-023:81.6-130.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept indicating significant mineralization width, but with a lower silver equivalent grade and unestablished true width, and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept of 48.40m indicates significant width of mineralization.
- Contributes to defining a higher-grade corridor within the El Agua vein.
Negative factors
- Lower silver equivalent grade of 64 g/t for the broad interval.
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“within a broad 48.40 metre interval, helping define a higher-grade corridor of roughly 500 metres strike by 200 metres down-dip within the 950 metre strike length of the vein.”
COP-26-014Copalito Project · silverGrade: 340Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-014
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 340
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 26.2 m
- To
- 33.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-014:26.2-33.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 434
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong silver equivalent intercept from the inaugural drill program, contributing to the expansion of a key vein, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- High silver equivalent grade of 434 g/t over a good width of 7.60m.
- Intercept contributes to expanding the 5 Señores vein to 800 metres strike length.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“COP-26-014 intersected 7.60 metres of 340 g/t silver, 1.22 g/t gold, 0.34% lead, and 1.18% zinc (434 g/t silver equivalent1) from 22.50 metres”
COP-26-014Copalito Project · silverGrade: 114Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-014
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 114
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.2 m
- From
- 22.5 m
- To
- 46.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-014:22.5-46.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 154
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept indicating significant mineralization width, but with a lower silver equivalent grade and unestablished true width, and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept of 24.20m indicates significant width of mineralization.
- Contributes to expanding the 5 Señores vein to 800 metres strike length.
Negative factors
- Lower silver equivalent grade of 154 g/t for the broad interval.
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“within a broader interval of 24.20 metres of 114 g/t silver, 0.50 g/t gold, 0.13% lead and 0.47% zinc (154 g/t silver equivalent1).”
COP-26-014Copalito Project · silverGrade: 569Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-014
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 569
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 28.4 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-014:28.4-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 714
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A bonanza-grade sub-interval within a significant intercept, indicating very high-grade mineralization, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade of 714 g/t over a narrow but high-grade interval.
- This sub-interval highlights a very high-grade core within the broader intercept.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · table
“569”
Context: 2.10
COP-26-001Copalito Project · silverGrade: 256Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-001
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 256
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 50.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-001:43.6-50.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 372
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong silver equivalent intercept from the inaugural drill program, contributing to the expansion of a key vein, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade of 372 g/t over a good width of 6.50m.
- Intercept contributes to expanding the 5 Señores vein to 800 metres strike length.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“COP-26-001intersected 6.50 metres of 256 g/t silver, 1.45 g/t gold, 0.32% lead, and 1.06% zinc (372 g/t silver equivalent1) from 43.60 metres”
COP-26-001Copalito Project · silverGrade: 848Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-001
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 848
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 44.6 m
- To
- 45.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-001:44.6-45.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1146
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t silver equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional bonanza-grade sub-interval, indicating very high-grade mineralization, but with unestablished true width and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Bonanza silver equivalent grade of 1146 g/t over a narrow but exceptionally high-grade interval.
- This sub-interval highlights a very high-grade core within the broader intercept.
Negative factors
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“including 1.20 metres of 848 g/t silver, 4.83 g/t gold, 0.20% lead, and 0.47% zinc (1146 g/t silver equivalent1).”
COP-26-022Copalito Project · silverIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-022
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A positive initial drill test confirming mineralization in a new area, but with a modest grade and width, unestablished true width, and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Initial drill test confirmed mineralization at depth in a previously undrilled area.
Negative factors
- Relatively low silver equivalent grade of 88 g/t over a narrow width of 0.60m.
- True width not established, introducing uncertainty.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · text
“COP-26-022 returned 0.60 metres of 88 g/t AgEq at El Medio.”
Fact 15Copalito Project · silverGrade: 111Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 111
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 177
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Good surface sample results from an extended known vein, indicating potential for future drilling, but with preliminary data and reliance on analogous metallurgical assumptions.
Positive factors
- Good silver equivalent grade up to 177 g/t from surface samples.
- Delineation of extensions to a known vein (El Medio) adds to project potential.
Negative factors
- Surface samples provide indicative grades but require drill confirmation.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are based on analogous deposits, not on-property metallurgy.
Evidence · table
“111”
Context: 450
COP-26-001Copalito Project · goldGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-001
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 50.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-001:43.6-50.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.45 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.45 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.45”
Context: COP-26-001
COP-26-001Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-001
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 50.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-001:43.6-50.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.32 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: COP-26-001
COP-26-001Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-001
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 50.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-001:43.6-50.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.06 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.06 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: COP-26-001
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 445Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 445
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 47.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:43.6-47.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 445 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1535.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 445 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“445”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 47.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:43.6-47.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.26 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.26 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.26”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 47.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:43.6-47.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 47.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:43.6-47.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.24 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 848Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 848
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 44.6 m
- To
- 45.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:44.6-45.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 848 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1017.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 848 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“848”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 4.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 44.6 m
- To
- 45.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:44.6-45.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.83 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.83”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 44.6 m
- To
- 45.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:44.6-45.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 44.6 m
- To
- 45.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:44.6-45.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.47 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-002Copalito Project · silverGrade: 30Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-002
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 30
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.7 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 79.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-002:63.2-79.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 501.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“30”
Context: COP-26-002
COP-26-002Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-002
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.7 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 79.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-002:63.2-79.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.18 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: COP-26-002
COP-26-002Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-002
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.7 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 79.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-002:63.2-79.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.21 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: COP-26-002
COP-26-002Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-002
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.7 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 79.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-002:63.2-79.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.72 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: COP-26-002
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 67 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:63.2-67
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 89 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 338.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“89”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 67 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:63.2-67
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.44 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 67 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:63.2-67
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.46 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.71
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 67 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:63.2-67
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.71 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.71 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.71”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 180Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 180
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 64.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:63.2-64.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 180 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 270.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“180”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 64.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:63.2-64.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.81 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.81 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 64.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:63.2-64.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.88 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 64.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:63.2-64.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.46 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.46”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-003Copalito Project · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-003
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 28.55 m
- To
- 35.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-003:28.55-35.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 89 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 645.3 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“89”
Context: COP-26-003
COP-26-003Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-003
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 28.55 m
- To
- 35.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-003:28.55-35.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.46 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: COP-26-003
COP-26-003Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-003
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 28.55 m
- To
- 35.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-003:28.55-35.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: COP-26-003
COP-26-003Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-003
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 28.55 m
- To
- 35.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-003:28.55-35.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.49 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: COP-26-003
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 149Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 149
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.25 m
- From
- 28.55 m
- To
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:28.55-32.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 149 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 633.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“149”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.25 m
- From
- 28.55 m
- To
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:28.55-32.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.73 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.25 m
- From
- 28.55 m
- To
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:28.55-32.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.19 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.25 m
- From
- 28.55 m
- To
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:28.55-32.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.77 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.77 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 234Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 234
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 31.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:30-31.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 234 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 444.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 234 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“234”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 31.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:30-31.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.51 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 31.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:30-31.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.14 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 31.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:30-31.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.51 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-004Copalito Project · silverGrade: 38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-004
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32.95 m
- From
- 43.9 m
- To
- 76.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-004:43.9-76.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1252.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“38”
Context: COP-26-004
COP-26-004Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-004
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32.95 m
- From
- 43.9 m
- To
- 76.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-004:43.9-76.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.26 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: COP-26-004
COP-26-004Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-004
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32.95 m
- From
- 43.9 m
- To
- 76.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-004:43.9-76.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.24 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: COP-26-004
COP-26-004Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-004
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32.95 m
- From
- 43.9 m
- To
- 76.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-004:43.9-76.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.65 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 21.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: COP-26-004
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 45.4 m
- To
- 61.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:45.4-61.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 69 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1104.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“69”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 45.4 m
- To
- 61.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:45.4-61.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.47 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 45.4 m
- To
- 61.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:45.4-61.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 45.4 m
- To
- 61.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:45.4-61.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 17.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 276Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 276
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- From
- 48.4 m
- To
- 49.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:48.4-49.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 276 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 234.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 276 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“276”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- From
- 48.4 m
- To
- 49.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:48.4-49.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.51 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- From
- 48.4 m
- To
- 49.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:48.4-49.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.51 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- From
- 48.4 m
- To
- 49.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:48.4-49.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.58 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.58 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.58”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 56.4 m
- To
- 57.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:56.4-57.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 46 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“46”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 56.4 m
- To
- 57.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:56.4-57.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 56.4 m
- To
- 57.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:56.4-57.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.29 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 56.4 m
- To
- 57.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:56.4-57.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.38 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.38”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 60.4 m
- To
- 61.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:60.4-61.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“39”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 60.4 m
- To
- 61.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:60.4-61.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.26 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.26 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.26”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 60.4 m
- To
- 61.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:60.4-61.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.53 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 60.4 m
- To
- 61.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:60.4-61.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.13 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.13 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.13”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-005Copalito Project · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-005
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.95 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 96.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-005:78.25-96.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 359.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20”
Context: COP-26-005
COP-26-005Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-005
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.95 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 96.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-005:78.25-96.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: COP-26-005
COP-26-005Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-005
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.95 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 96.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-005:78.25-96.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: COP-26-005
COP-26-005Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-005
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.95 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 96.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-005:78.25-96.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.53 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: COP-26-005
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 87.1 m
- To
- 90.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:87.1-90.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 53 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 172.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“53”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 87.1 m
- To
- 90.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:87.1-90.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.88 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 87.1 m
- To
- 90.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:87.1-90.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.51 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 87.1 m
- To
- 90.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:87.1-90.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.67 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.67 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 132Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 132
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 89.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:89-89.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 132 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 59.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“132”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 89.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:89-89.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.79 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.79 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.79”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 2.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 89.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:89-89.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.64 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.64”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 6.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 89.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:89-89.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.14 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.14”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-008Copalito Project · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-008
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 135.2 m
- To
- 137.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-008:135.2-137.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: COP-26-008
COP-26-008Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-008
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 135.2 m
- To
- 137.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-008:135.2-137.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.48 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: COP-26-008
COP-26-008Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-008
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 135.2 m
- To
- 137.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-008:135.2-137.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.35 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: COP-26-008
COP-26-008Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-008
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 135.2 m
- To
- 137.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-008:135.2-137.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.71 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.71 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: COP-26-008
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 136.7 m
- To
- 137.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:136.7-137.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 136.7 m
- To
- 137.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:136.7-137.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.00”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 136.7 m
- To
- 137.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:136.7-137.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.64 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 136.7 m
- To
- 137.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:136.7-137.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.33 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: incl.
COP-26-009Copalito Project · silverGrade: 83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-009
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.05 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 101.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-009:83.55-101.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 83 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1498.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“83”
Context: COP-26-009
COP-26-009Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-009
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.05 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 101.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-009:83.55-101.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.26 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: COP-26-009
COP-26-009Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-009
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.05 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 101.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-009:83.55-101.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: COP-26-009
COP-26-009Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-009
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.05 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 101.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-009:83.55-101.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.36 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: COP-26-009
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 141Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 141
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.15 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 89.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:83.55-89.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 141 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 867.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“141”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.15 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 89.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:83.55-89.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.15 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 89.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:83.55-89.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.15 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 89.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:83.55-89.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.51 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 234Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 234
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 85.85 m
- To
- 88.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:85.85-88.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 234 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 643.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 234 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“234”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 85.85 m
- To
- 88.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:85.85-88.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.73 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 85.85 m
- To
- 88.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:85.85-88.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 85.85 m
- To
- 88.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:85.85-88.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.86 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-010Copalito Project · silverGrade: 191Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-010
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 191
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-010:101-102
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 191 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 191.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“191”
Context: COP-26-010
COP-26-010Copalito Project · goldGrade: 3.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-010
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-010:101-102
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.84 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.84”
Context: COP-26-010
COP-26-010Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-010
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-010:101-102
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: COP-26-010
COP-26-010Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-010
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-010:101-102
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: COP-26-010
COP-26-011Copalito Project · silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-011
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 107.65 m
- To
- 111.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-011:107.65-111.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: COP-26-011
COP-26-011Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-011
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 107.65 m
- To
- 111.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-011:107.65-111.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.86 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: COP-26-011
COP-26-011Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-011
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 107.65 m
- To
- 111.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-011:107.65-111.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.49 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: COP-26-011
COP-26-011Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-011
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 107.65 m
- To
- 111.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-011:107.65-111.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.83 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.83 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: COP-26-011
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 108.6 m
- To
- 109.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:108.6-109.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 108.6 m
- To
- 109.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:108.6-109.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.15”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 108.6 m
- To
- 109.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:108.6-109.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.32 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 108.6 m
- To
- 109.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:108.6-109.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.27 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: incl.
COP-26-012Copalito Project · goldGrade: 1.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-012
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 124.75 m
- To
- 128.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-012:124.75-128.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.94 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.94 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.94”
Context: COP-26-012
COP-26-012Copalito Project · leadGrade: 9.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-012
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 124.75 m
- To
- 128.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-012:124.75-128.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.47 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 33.1 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.47 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.47”
Context: COP-26-012
COP-26-012Copalito Project · zincGrade: 14.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-012
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 124.75 m
- To
- 128.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-012:124.75-128.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.61 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 51.1 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.61 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.61”
Context: COP-26-012
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 127.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:126-127.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“34”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 127.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:126-127.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.40”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 127.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:126-127.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 22.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.00”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 127.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:126-127.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 25.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 21 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.00”
Context: incl.
COP-26-013Copalito Project · silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-013
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- From
- 32.35 m
- To
- 35.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-013:32.35-35.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 81.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26”
Context: COP-26-013
COP-26-013Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-013
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- From
- 32.35 m
- To
- 35.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-013:32.35-35.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: COP-26-013
COP-26-013Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-013
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- From
- 32.35 m
- To
- 35.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-013:32.35-35.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.62 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: COP-26-013
COP-26-013Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-013
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- From
- 32.35 m
- To
- 35.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-013:32.35-35.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.6 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.60”
Context: COP-26-013
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 119Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 119
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 34.6 m
- To
- 34.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:34.6-34.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 119 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 41.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“119”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 34.6 m
- To
- 34.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:34.6-34.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.41 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 4.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 34.6 m
- To
- 34.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:34.6-34.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.27 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.27”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 8.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 34.6 m
- To
- 34.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:34.6-34.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.76 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.76”
Context: incl.
COP-26-014Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-014
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.2 m
- From
- 22.5 m
- To
- 46.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-014:22.5-46.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: COP-26-014
COP-26-014Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-014
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24.2 m
- From
- 22.5 m
- To
- 46.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-014:22.5-46.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: COP-26-014
COP-26-014Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-014
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24.2 m
- From
- 22.5 m
- To
- 46.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-014:22.5-46.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.47 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: COP-26-014
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 340Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 340
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 26.2 m
- To
- 33.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:26.2-33.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 340 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2584.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 340 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“340”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 26.2 m
- To
- 33.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:26.2-33.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.22 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.22 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.22”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 26.2 m
- To
- 33.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:26.2-33.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.34 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 26.2 m
- To
- 33.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:26.2-33.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.18 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.18 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 569Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 569
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 28.4 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:28.4-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 569 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1194.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 569 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“569”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 28.4 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:28.4-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.43 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.43 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.43”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 28.4 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:28.4-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.93 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.93 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 28.4 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:28.4-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.07 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.07”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-018Copalito Project · goldGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-018
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.05 m
- From
- 117.4 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-018:117.4-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.86 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.86 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.86”
Context: COP-26-018
COP-26-018Copalito Project · leadGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-018
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.05 m
- From
- 117.4 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-018:117.4-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.19 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: COP-26-018
COP-26-018Copalito Project · zincGrade: 4.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-018
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.05 m
- From
- 117.4 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-018:117.4-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.08 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 16.5 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.08”
Context: COP-26-018
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 117.4 m
- To
- 119.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:117.4-119.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 2.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 117.4 m
- To
- 119.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:117.4-119.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.36 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.36 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.36”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 117.4 m
- To
- 119.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:117.4-119.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.37 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 4.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 117.4 m
- To
- 119.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:117.4-119.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.15 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.15”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 120.8 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:120.8-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 120.8 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:120.8-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.8 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.80”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 3.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 120.8 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:120.8-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.14 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.14”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 11.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 120.8 m
- To
- 121.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:120.8-121.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.85 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.85 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.85”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-019Copalito Project · goldGrade: 3.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-019
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-019:118-121.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.53 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.53”
Context: COP-26-019
COP-26-019Copalito Project · leadGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-019
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-019:118-121.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.45 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.45”
Context: COP-26-019
COP-26-019Copalito Project · zincGrade: 4.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-019
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-019:118-121.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.41 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 15.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.41”
Context: COP-26-019
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 118.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:118-118.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 23 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 4.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 118.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:118-118.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.76 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.76”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 118.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:118-118.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 3.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 118.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:118-118.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.64 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.64”
Context: incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 119.35 m
- To
- 120.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:119.35-120.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 5.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 119.35 m
- To
- 120.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:119.35-120.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.37 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.37”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 119.35 m
- To
- 120.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:119.35-120.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.65 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 10.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 119.35 m
- To
- 120.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:119.35-120.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.05 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.05 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.05”
Context: and incl.
COP-26-023Copalito Project · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-023
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48.4 m
- From
- 81.6 m
- To
- 130 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-023:81.6-130
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: COP-26-023
COP-26-023Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-023
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 48.4 m
- From
- 81.6 m
- To
- 130 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-023:81.6-130
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: COP-26-023
COP-26-023Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- COP-26-023
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 48.4 m
- From
- 81.6 m
- To
- 130 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- COP-26-023:81.6-130
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 27.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: COP-26-023
incl.Copalito Project · silverGrade: 103Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 103
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 83.9 m
- To
- 91.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:83.9-91.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 103 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 824.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“103”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 83.9 m
- To
- 91.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:83.9-91.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.11 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · leadGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 83.9 m
- To
- 91.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:83.9-91.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.18 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: incl.
incl.Copalito Project · zincGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Copalito Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Sinaloa, Mexico
- Ticker
- MERC.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 83.9 m
- To
- 91.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:83.9-91.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.86 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: incl.
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.