Max Resource Reports High-Grade Iron Ore (Fe) Results from Florália Hematite DSO Project in Minas Gerais, Brazil

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
MAX RESOURCE CORP.
Ticker
MAX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Minas Gerais, Brazil
Primary commodity
Iron ore
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver
Document categories
Metallurgy, Capital raise
Extracted
2026-08-21 22:58:14 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Max Resource reported successful dry magnetic test work at its Florália Hematite DSO Project in Brazil, yielding iron concentrates up to 69.5% Fe with recoveries up to 81%. The company also announced a successful AUD $2.73 million private placement for its subsidiary, Max Brazil, to support an upcoming ASX listing.

Reasoning: The announcement reports successful preliminary metallurgical test work for iron ore and a successful private placement, though it cautions that XRF results are not definitive chemical assays.

Positive factors

  • High-grade iron ore concentrates achieved (up to 69.5% Fe)
  • Strong recovery results from dry magnetic testing
  • Successful capital raise for Max Brazil subsidiary
  • Strategic infrastructure proximity mentioned

Negative factors

  • Results based on handheld XRF (not chemical analysis)
  • No internal standards or blanks inserted by company in assay stream
  • Project is still in early exploration stage (conceptual tonnage)

Facts used in scoring: 8

Classification and evidence

Bench Scale Onlynegative

Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: Test work described as preliminary dry magnetic tests on 80kg bedrock samples.

Evidence · text

“Max collected 6 bedrock 80kg samples (FL-001 to 006)”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative · Story-specific tag

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: Company explicitly stated they did not insert standards or blanks in the assay stream.

Evidence · text

“Max did not insert standards or blanks in the assay stream”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 8. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (8)

dry magneticiron_oreRecovery: 81 %Head Grade: 59.7Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
iron_ore
Ticker
MAX

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
dry magnetic
Sample
FL-001 6mm fraction sample

Recovery

Recovery
81 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
59.7
Head Grade Unit
%

Lab

Laboratory
Inbras Laboratory Brazil

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade iron concentrate achieved via magnetic separation.

Positive factors

  • High grade concentrate (69.5% Fe)
  • Strong recovery (81%)

Negative factors

  • XRF analysis used instead of chemical assay

Evidence · text

“FL-001: 69.5% Fe at 81% recovery from 59.7% 6mm fraction sample”
dry magneticiron_oreRecovery: 73 %Head Grade: 59.7Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
iron_ore
Ticker
MAX

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
dry magnetic
Sample
FL-002 6mm fraction sample

Recovery

Recovery
73 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
59.7
Head Grade Unit
%

Lab

Laboratory
Inbras Laboratory Brazil

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Standard recovery result for the test program.

Positive factors

  • Solid recovery and grade

Negative factors

  • XRF analysis used

Evidence · text

“FL-002: 66.9% Fe at 73% recovery from 59.7% 6mm fraction sample”
dry magneticiron_oreRecovery: 78 %Head Grade: 64.9Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
iron_ore
Ticker
MAX

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
dry magnetic
Sample
FL-003 2mm fraction sample

Recovery

Recovery
78 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
64.9
Head Grade Unit
%

Lab

Laboratory
Inbras Laboratory Brazil

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong results from the finer 2mm fraction.

Positive factors

  • High grade and recovery

Negative factors

  • XRF analysis used

Evidence · text

“FL-003: 68.7% Fe at 78% recovery from 64.9% 2mm fraction sample”
dry magneticiron_oreRecovery: 76 %Head Grade: 57.5Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
iron_ore
Ticker
MAX

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
dry magnetic
Sample
FL-004 12mm fraction sample

Recovery

Recovery
76 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
57.5
Head Grade Unit
%

Lab

Laboratory
Inbras Laboratory Brazil

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Results from the coarser 12mm fraction.

Positive factors

  • Acceptable recovery

Negative factors

  • Lower grade head feed

Evidence · text

“FL-004: 61.8% Fe at 76% recovery from 57.5% 12mm fraction sample”
dry magneticiron_oreRecovery: 78 %Head Grade: 46.2Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
iron_ore
Ticker
MAX

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
dry magnetic
Sample
FL-005 6mm faction sample

Recovery

Recovery
78 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
46.2
Head Grade Unit
%

Lab

Laboratory
Inbras Laboratory Brazil

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Recovery is good despite lower head grade.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery

Negative factors

  • Low head grade

Evidence · text

“FL-005: 60.2% Fe at 78% recovery from 46.2% 6mm faction sample”
dry magneticiron_oreRecovery: 67 %Head Grade: 47.8Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
iron_ore
Ticker
MAX

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
dry magnetic
Sample
FL-006 2mm fraction sample

Recovery

Recovery
67 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
47.8
Head Grade Unit
%

Lab

Laboratory
Inbras Laboratory Brazil

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Relatively lower recovery for this sample set.

Negative factors

  • Lower recovery compared to other samples

Evidence · text

“FL-006: 59.3% Fe at 67% recovery from 47.8% 2mm fraction sample”
Fact 7copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
copper
Ticker
MAX

Test Work

Sample
CS11 channel sample

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper-silver intercept at Sierra Azul.

Positive factors

  • Significant width and grade

Evidence · text

“1.6% Copper & 6 g/t Silver over 55.0m (CS11)”
Fact 8silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
silver
Ticker
MAX

Test Work

Sample
CS11 channel sample

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver byproduct in copper intercept.

Positive factors

  • Significant silver grade

Evidence · text

“1.6% Copper & 6 g/t Silver over 55.0m (CS11)”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.