Manhattan Uranium Identifies 3.70% eU3O8 over 5.2 ft in Compilation of 499 Historical Drill Holes at Lisbon Valley, Utah

Original announcement by newsfile on

Company
Manhattan Uranium Discovery Corp.
Ticker
MANU
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Utah
Primary commodity
Uranium
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-10 12:05:23 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Manhattan Uranium Discovery Corp. has compiled 499 historical drill holes at its Lisbon Valley uranium project in Utah, identifying a high-grade intercept of 3.70% eU3O8 over 5.2 ft in hole N-1. The compilation shows that 34% of holes hit mineralization averaging 0.28% eU3O8, comparable to the district's historical production grade. This work forms the foundation for 3D targeting and has generated 36 high-priority drill targets, though the data is historical and unverified.

Reasoning: Manhattan Uranium has completed a significant compilation of historical drill data at its Lisbon Valley project, revealing high-grade uranium intercepts and an average grade comparable to historical production, which provides a strong basis for future exploration targeting despite the inherent uncertainties of unverified historical eU3O8 data.

Positive factors

  • Compilation of a large historical drill database provides a foundation for future exploration.
  • Identification of high-grade historical intercepts, including 3.70% eU3O8 over 1.58m, indicates significant potential.
  • Average historical grades (0.28% eU3O8) are comparable to the district's past production grade (0.30% U3O8).
  • The project is located in a historically significant uranium-producing district with existing infrastructure.

Negative factors

  • All reported data is historical and has not been independently verified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values are derived from gamma logging and may not accurately reflect true U3O8 grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters used historically are not fully documented.
  • Reported intervals represent downhole lengths only, with no true thickness provided.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 39

Classification and evidence

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The entire news release is based on a compilation of 499 historical drill holes, explicitly stating the data is historical and unverified.

Evidence · text

“Manhattan Uranium Identifies 3.70% eU3O8 over 5.2 ft in Compilation of 499 Historical Drill Holes at Lisbon Valley, Utah”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'The gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters used by the historical operators are not fully documented, and the Company has not independently verified the original measurements or conversions.'

Evidence · text

“The gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters used by the historical operators are not fully documented, and the Company has not independently verified the original measurements or conversions.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states that 'Reported intervals represent downhole lengths, not true thicknesses.'

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals represent downhole lengths, not true thicknesses.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: The eU3O8 grades are metal equivalents derived from gamma logging, and the document notes potential disequilibrium and undocumented conversion parameters, making the assumptions opaque.

Evidence · text

“eU₃O₈ = equivalent U₃O₈ from historical downhole gamma (radiometric) logging, not chemical assays. Values assume secular equilibrium; disequilibrium, if present, may cause them to overstate or understate true uranium grades. Historical and unverified; for exploration targeting purposes only.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The scientific and technical information in the news release has been reviewed and approved by Galen McNamara, P.Geo., CEO and a director of Manhattan, who is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The scientific and technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Galen McNamara, P.Geo., CEO and a director of Manhattan, who is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 ").”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("CIL")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 39. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (39)

N-1Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.58496 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N-1
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.58496 m
From
237.81792 m
To
239.402952 m
Intercept Depth
237.81792 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N-1:237.81792-239.402952

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.7
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptionally high uranium grade, providing a strong target for future exploration, despite the inherent uncertainties of historical and unverified eU3O8 data.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional uranium grade (3.7% eU3O8) significantly above typical thresholds.
  • Highest-grade historical gamma intercept in the compiled database.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“3.7”

Context: 5.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

FW3-3Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.524 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FW3-3
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.524 m
From
248.68992 m
To
248.68992 m
Intercept Depth
248.68992 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FW3-3:248.68992-248.68992

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.94% eU3O8) well above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

FW3-2Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8288 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FW3-2
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.8288 m
From
247.9524 m
To
247.9524 m
Intercept Depth
247.9524 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FW3-2:247.9524-247.9524

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.93% eU3O8) well above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

P-3Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.286 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P-3
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.286 m
From
230.24832 m
To
230.24832 m
Intercept Depth
230.24832 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P-3:230.24832-230.24832

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.65% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 7.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

81-124Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.048 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
81-124
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.048 m
From
214.41492 m
To
217.46292 m
Intercept Depth
214.41492 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
81-124:214.41492-217.46292

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.64% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.640”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

P-2Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79248 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P-2
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.79248 m
From
227.19792 m
To
227.19792 m
Intercept Depth
227.19792 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P-2:227.19792-227.19792

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.54% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 2.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

C-5Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.88392 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
C-5
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.88392 m
From
243.26808 m
To
243.26808 m
Intercept Depth
243.26808 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
C-5:243.26808-243.26808

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.52
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.52% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

P-1Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.88392 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P-1
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.88392 m
From
231.19968 m
To
231.19968 m
Intercept Depth
231.19968 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P-1:231.19968-231.19968

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.47% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

FW3-4Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8288 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FW3-4
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.8288 m
From
247.09976 m
To
247.09976 m
Intercept Depth
247.09976 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FW3-4:247.09976-247.09976

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.44% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

79-53Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.0668 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
79-53
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.0668 m
From
233.172096 m
To
234.238896 m
Intercept Depth
233.172096 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
79-53:233.172096-234.238896

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.42% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.420”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

C-10Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79248 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
C-10
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.79248 m
From
235.9176 m
To
235.9176 m
Intercept Depth
235.9176 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
C-10:235.9176-235.9176

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.41% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 2.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

T-5-71Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4572 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
T-5-71
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4572 m
From
176.69256 m
To
177.45216 m
Intercept Depth
176.69256 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
T-5-71:176.69256-177.45216

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.41% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.410”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

A-3Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.97536 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
A-3
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.97536 m
From
219.97416 m
To
219.97416 m
Intercept Depth
219.97416 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
A-3:219.97416-219.97416

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.4% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: 3.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

P-4Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24384 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P-4
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24384 m
From
202.692 m
To
202.692 m
Intercept Depth
202.692 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P-4:202.692-202.692

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.4% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

T-5-71Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4572 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
T-5-71
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4572 m
From
178.82736 m
To
179.28456 m
Intercept Depth
178.82736 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
T-5-71:178.82736-179.28456

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.4% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

_07-9Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3048 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
_07-9
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3048 m
From
202.11888 m
To
202.42368 m
Intercept Depth
202.11888 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
_07-9:202.11888-202.42368

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.39% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.390”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

_07-7Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4572 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
_07-7
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4572 m
From
203.401752 m
To
203.858952 m
Intercept Depth
203.401752 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
_07-7:203.401752-203.858952

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.37
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.37% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.370”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

106Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9812 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
106
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.9812 m
From
204.61704 m
To
204.61704 m
Intercept Depth
204.61704 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
106:204.61704-204.61704

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.35% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.350”

Context: 6.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

0-1Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9144 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
0-1
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9144 m
From
201.09228 m
To
201.09228 m
Intercept Depth
201.09228 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
0-1:201.09228-201.09228

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.35% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

FW3-9Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.0668 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FW3-9
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.0668 m
From
246.7356 m
To
246.7356 m
Intercept Depth
246.7356 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FW3-9:246.7356-246.7356

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.34% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

P-5Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39624 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P-5
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39624 m
From
229.18992 m
To
229.18992 m
Intercept Depth
229.18992 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P-5:229.18992-229.18992

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.31% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

C-6Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.94488 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
C-6
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.94488 m
From
212.81136 m
To
212.81136 m
Intercept Depth
212.81136 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
C-6:212.81136-212.81136

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, matching the district's historical production, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.3% eU3O8) matching the district's historical production grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: 3.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

79-22Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3048 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
79-22
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3048 m
From
219.986832 m
To
220.291632 m
Intercept Depth
219.986832 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
79-22:219.986832-220.291632

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, comparable to the district's historical production, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.28% eU3O8) above typical thresholds and comparable to district historical production.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.280”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

FW3-8ALisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.762 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FW3-8A
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.762 m
From
240.36072 m
To
240.36072 m
Intercept Depth
240.36072 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FW3-8A:240.36072-240.36072

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, comparable to the district's historical production, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.28% eU3O8) above typical thresholds and comparable to district historical production.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

C-2Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.85344 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
C-2
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.85344 m
From
200.07432 m
To
200.07432 m
Intercept Depth
200.07432 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
C-2:200.07432-200.07432

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.27
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, comparable to the district's historical production, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.27% eU3O8) above typical thresholds and comparable to district historical production.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 2.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

U-1Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.24968 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
U-1
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.24968 m
From
221.49672 m
To
221.49672 m
Intercept Depth
221.49672 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
U-1:221.49672-221.49672

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.27
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, comparable to the district's historical production, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.27% eU3O8) above typical thresholds and comparable to district historical production.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

_07-13Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3048 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
_07-13
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3048 m
From
183.093072 m
To
183.397872 m
Intercept Depth
183.093072 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
_07-13:183.093072-183.397872

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.22% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.220”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

T-3-11Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1524 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
T-3-11
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1524 m
From
222.74304 m
To
222.74304 m
Intercept Depth
222.74304 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
T-3-11:222.74304-222.74304

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.22% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

C-7Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15824 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
C-7
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.15824 m
From
219.946152 m
To
219.946152 m
Intercept Depth
219.946152 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
C-7:219.946152-219.946152

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.21% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 3.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

T-7-71Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6096 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
T-7-71
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6096 m
From
228.47488 m
To
228.47488 m
Intercept Depth
228.47488 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
T-7-71:228.47488-228.47488

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.21% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

81-113Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8956 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
81-113
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8956 m
From
216.609024 m
To
219.542304 m
Intercept Depth
216.609024 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
81-113:216.609024-219.542304

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.2% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.200”

Context: 9.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

A-8Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.97536 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
A-8
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.97536 m
From
185.13888 m
To
185.13888 m
Intercept Depth
185.13888 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
A-8:185.13888-185.13888

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.2% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 3.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N-4Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2192 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N-4
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2192 m
From
237.31008 m
To
237.31008 m
Intercept Depth
237.31008 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N-4:237.31008-237.31008

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.2% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

C-12Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2192 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
C-12
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2192 m
From
247.50096 m
To
247.50096 m
Intercept Depth
247.50096 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
C-12:247.50096-247.50096

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Strong uranium grade (0.19% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

79-29Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5052 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
79-29
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.5052 m
From
235.958496 m
To
239.006496 m
Intercept Depth
235.958496 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
79-29:235.958496-239.006496

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Moderate uranium grade (0.11% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.110”

Context: 11.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

79-34Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.048 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
79-34
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.048 m
From
248.892336 m
To
251.940336 m
Intercept Depth
248.892336 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
79-34:248.892336-251.940336

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Moderate uranium grade (0.11% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.110”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

79-39Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5052 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
79-39
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.5052 m
From
261.516096 m
To
265.021296 m
Intercept Depth
261.516096 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
79-39:261.516096-265.021296

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Moderate uranium grade (0.1% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: 11.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

79-42Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4384 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
79-42
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4384 m
From
226.980048 m
To
229.428048 m
Intercept Depth
226.980048 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
79-42:226.980048-229.428048

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Moderate uranium grade (0.1% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: 8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

81-106Lisbon Valley · uraniumGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5052 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
81-106
Project
Lisbon Valley
Commodity
uranium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
MANU

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.5052 m
From
218.537304 m
To
222.042504 m
Intercept Depth
218.537304 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
81-106:218.537304-222.042504

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% eU3O8
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate uranium grade, contributing to the overall prospectivity of the project, despite the historical and unverified nature of the data.

Positive factors

  • Moderate uranium grade (0.1% eU3O8) above typical thresholds.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and unverified by the company.
  • eU3O8 values may overstate or understate true uranium grades due to potential disequilibrium.
  • Gamma-probe equipment, calibration standards, and conversion parameters are not fully documented.
  • Interval represents downhole length only, not true thickness.

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: 11.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.