# MAN: Drilling commenced at Berinka Pine Creek Gold-Copper Project

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/man-drilling-commenced-at-berinka-pine-creek-gold-copper-project--ff3a6893-dded-4313-a0ff-9072eadbafe9

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03150915

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-10-11T21:22:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-11T22:26:11.163Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-11T22:26:11.163Z

- Company: Mandrake Resources Limited

- Ticker: MAN

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: Northern Territory

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Copper

- Document categories: Other, Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-10-11 22:26:11 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Mandrake Resources Limited has commenced a 3,000m reverse circulation \(RC\) drilling program at its 100%-owned Berinka Pine Creek Gold-Copper Project in the Northern Territory. The program targets several never-before-drilled high-priority gold-copper targets associated with the deep-seated Giants Reef Fault. This new exploration phase is underpinned by significant historical gold-copper mineralisation, including 4m at 6.6g/t Au from 32m, which provides strong context for the current campaign.

Reasoning: Mandrake Resources has commenced a new drilling program targeting previously undrilled high-priority gold-copper targets in the highly prospective Pine Creek Orogen, supported by encouraging historical drill intercepts.

- Positive factor: new\_drilling\_program\_commenced

- Positive factor: targeting\_undrilled\_high\_priority\_targets

- Positive factor: located\_in\_prolific\_mining\_region

- Positive factor: encouraging\_historical\_results\_provide\_context

- Positive factor: qa\_qc\_procedures\_disclosed\_for\_recent\_drilling

- Negative factor: no\_new\_drill\_results\_reported

- Negative factor: true\_width\_not\_stated\_for\_historical\_intercepts

- Negative factor: qa\_qc\_for\_specific\_historical\_results\_not\_detailed

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 7

## Classification and evidence

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: The document includes a JORC Table 1 detailing QA/QC procedures for Mandrake's 2020/2022 and CALR's 2013 drilling programs.

Evidence · text

> JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The current 3,000m RC programme targets several, never-before-drilled high-priority gold-copper targets.

Evidence · text

> The 3,000m RC programme targets several, never-before-drilled high-priority gold-copper targets

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The release highlights renewed interest in the Pine Creek Orogen by other companies with significant gold resources, positioning Berinka within a prolific gold province.

Evidence · text

> Pine Creek is experiencing renewed interest, with Agnico Eagle \(~3Moz\)1, Vista Gold \(~10.5Moz\)2, Hanking \(~3Moz\)3, Patronus Resources \(~1.4Moz\)4 and PC Gold \(~1.5Moz\)5 actively advancing

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (7)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/man-drilling-commenced-at-berinka-pine-creek-gold-copper-project--ff3a6893-dded-4313-a0ff-9072eadbafe9#fact-drill-facts-0)

Berinka Pine Creek · gold

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Berinka Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: MAN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.6
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 32 m
- To: 36 m
- Intercept Depth: 32 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Berinka\_Pine\_Creek:32-36
- Mining Method: unknown

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-05-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade historical gold intercept provides encouraging context for the new drill program, though it is not new data and lacks specific QA/QC disclosure for this particular result.

- Positive factor: high\_grade\_intercept

- Negative factor: stale\_data

- Negative factor: no\_qa\_qc\_disclosure\_for\_specific\_historical\_results

- Negative factor: apparent\_width\_only

Evidence · text

> 4m @ 6.6g/t Au from 32m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only Mandrake Resources Limited I ACN: 006 569 12 www.mandrakeresources.com.au First Floor, 10 Outram S"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is from previous drilling reported in the 2019 prospectus, not new results from the current announcement.

Evidence · text

> All available historic drill intercepts are contained in the MAN prospectus - 24 May 2019.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: Specific QA/QC details for this historical intercept are not provided, though general QA/QC for other drilling is disclosed in the document.

Evidence · text

> Previous drilling at Berinka returned significant gold-copper mineralisation, including:

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that all downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres, with no true width reported for this intercept.

Evidence · text

> All downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres.

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/man-drilling-commenced-at-berinka-pine-creek-gold-copper-project--ff3a6893-dded-4313-a0ff-9072eadbafe9#fact-drill-facts-1)

Berinka Pine Creek · gold

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Berinka Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: MAN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6 m
- From: 18 m
- To: 24 m
- Intercept Depth: 18 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Berinka\_Pine\_Creek:18-24
- Mining Method: unknown

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-05-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good-grade historical gold intercept provides encouraging context for the new drill program, though it is not new data and lacks specific QA/QC disclosure for this particular result.

- Positive factor: good\_grade\_intercept

- Negative factor: stale\_data

- Negative factor: no\_qa\_qc\_disclosure\_for\_specific\_historical\_results

- Negative factor: apparent\_width\_only

Evidence · text

> 6m @ 3.1g/t Au from 18m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only Mandrake Resources Limited I ACN: 006 569 12 www.mandrakeresources.com.au First Floor, 10 Outram S"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is from previous drilling reported in the 2019 prospectus, not new results from the current announcement.

Evidence · text

> All available historic drill intercepts are contained in the MAN prospectus - 24 May 2019.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: Specific QA/QC details for this historical intercept are not provided, though general QA/QC for other drilling is disclosed in the document.

Evidence · text

> Previous drilling at Berinka returned significant gold-copper mineralisation, including:

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that all downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres, with no true width reported for this intercept.

Evidence · text

> All downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres.

### Fact 3

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/man-drilling-commenced-at-berinka-pine-creek-gold-copper-project--ff3a6893-dded-4313-a0ff-9072eadbafe9#fact-drill-facts-2)

Berinka Pine Creek · gold

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Berinka Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: MAN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.6
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 5 m
- From: 30 m
- To: 35 m
- Intercept Depth: 30 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Berinka\_Pine\_Creek:30-35
- Mining Method: unknown

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-05-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade historical gold intercept provides encouraging context for the new drill program, though it is not new data and lacks specific QA/QC disclosure for this particular result.

- Positive factor: moderate\_grade\_intercept

- Negative factor: stale\_data

- Negative factor: no\_qa\_qc\_disclosure\_for\_specific\_historical\_results

- Negative factor: apparent\_width\_only

Evidence · text

> 5m @ 2.6g/t Au from 30m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only Mandrake Resources Limited I ACN: 006 569 12 www.mandrakeresources.com.au First Floor, 10 Outram S"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is from previous drilling reported in the 2019 prospectus, not new results from the current announcement.

Evidence · text

> All available historic drill intercepts are contained in the MAN prospectus - 24 May 2019.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: Specific QA/QC details for this historical intercept are not provided, though general QA/QC for other drilling is disclosed in the document.

Evidence · text

> Previous drilling at Berinka returned significant gold-copper mineralisation, including:

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that all downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres, with no true width reported for this intercept.

Evidence · text

> All downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres.

### Fact 4

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/man-drilling-commenced-at-berinka-pine-creek-gold-copper-project--ff3a6893-dded-4313-a0ff-9072eadbafe9#fact-drill-facts-3)

Berinka Pine Creek · gold

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Berinka Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: MAN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6 m
- From: 5 m
- To: 11 m
- Intercept Depth: 5 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: historical:5-11
- Mining Method: unknown

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-05-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade historical gold intercept with copper credits provides encouraging context for the new drill program, though it is not new data and lacks specific QA/QC disclosure for this particular result.

- Positive factor: moderate\_grade\_intercept

- Positive factor: polymetallic\_mineralisation

- Negative factor: stale\_data

- Negative factor: no\_qa\_qc\_disclosure\_for\_specific\_historical\_results

- Negative factor: apparent\_width\_only

Evidence · text

> 6m @ 2.3g/t Au and 0.34% Cu from 5m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only Mandrake Resources Limited I ACN: 006 569 12 www.mandrakeresources.com.au First Floor, 10 Outram S"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is from previous drilling reported in the 2019 prospectus, not new results from the current announcement.

Evidence · text

> All available historic drill intercepts are contained in the MAN prospectus - 24 May 2019.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: Specific QA/QC details for this historical intercept are not provided, though general QA/QC for other drilling is disclosed in the document.

Evidence · text

> Previous drilling at Berinka returned significant gold-copper mineralisation, including:

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that all downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres, with no true width reported for this intercept.

Evidence · text

> All downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres.

### Fact 5

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/man-drilling-commenced-at-berinka-pine-creek-gold-copper-project--ff3a6893-dded-4313-a0ff-9072eadbafe9#fact-drill-facts-4)

Berinka Pine Creek · copper

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Berinka Pine Creek
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: MAN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.34
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 6 m
- From: 5 m
- To: 11 m
- Intercept Depth: 5 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: historical:5-11
- Mining Method: unknown

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-05-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade historical copper intercept with gold credits provides encouraging context for the new drill program, though it is not new data and lacks specific QA/QC disclosure for this particular result.

- Positive factor: moderate\_grade\_intercept

- Positive factor: polymetallic\_mineralisation

- Negative factor: stale\_data

- Negative factor: no\_qa\_qc\_disclosure\_for\_specific\_historical\_results

- Negative factor: apparent\_width\_only

Evidence · text

> 6m @ 2.3g/t Au and 0.34% Cu from 5m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only Mandrake Resources Limited I ACN: 006 569 12 www.mandrakeresources.com.au First Floor, 10 Outram S"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is from previous drilling reported in the 2019 prospectus, not new results from the current announcement.

Evidence · text

> All available historic drill intercepts are contained in the MAN prospectus - 24 May 2019.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: Specific QA/QC details for this historical intercept are not provided, though general QA/QC for other drilling is disclosed in the document.

Evidence · text

> Previous drilling at Berinka returned significant gold-copper mineralisation, including:

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that all downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres, with no true width reported for this intercept.

Evidence · text

> All downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres.

### Fact 6

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/man-drilling-commenced-at-berinka-pine-creek-gold-copper-project--ff3a6893-dded-4313-a0ff-9072eadbafe9#fact-drill-facts-5)

Berinka Pine Creek · gold

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Berinka Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: MAN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.8
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 7 m
- To: 10 m
- Intercept Depth: 7 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: historical:7-10
- Mining Method: unknown

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-05-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher-grade historical gold sub-interval with copper credits provides encouraging context for the new drill program, though it is not new data and lacks specific QA/QC disclosure for this particular result.

- Positive factor: good\_grade\_intercept

- Positive factor: polymetallic\_mineralisation

- Positive factor: higher\_grade\_sub\_interval

- Negative factor: stale\_data

- Negative factor: no\_qa\_qc\_disclosure\_for\_specific\_historical\_results

- Negative factor: apparent\_width\_only

Evidence · text

> 3m @ 3.8 g/t Au and 0.35% Cu from 7m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only Mandrake Resources Limited I ACN: 006 569 12 www.mandrakeresources.com.au First Floor, 10 Outram S"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is from previous drilling reported in the 2019 prospectus, not new results from the current announcement.

Evidence · text

> All available historic drill intercepts are contained in the MAN prospectus - 24 May 2019.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: Specific QA/QC details for this historical intercept are not provided, though general QA/QC for other drilling is disclosed in the document.

Evidence · text

> Previous drilling at Berinka returned significant gold-copper mineralisation, including:

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that all downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres, with no true width reported for this intercept.

Evidence · text

> All downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres.

### Fact 7

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/man-drilling-commenced-at-berinka-pine-creek-gold-copper-project--ff3a6893-dded-4313-a0ff-9072eadbafe9#fact-drill-facts-6)

Berinka Pine Creek · copper

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Berinka Pine Creek
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: MAN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.35
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 7 m
- To: 10 m
- Intercept Depth: 7 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: historical:7-10
- Mining Method: unknown

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-05-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher-grade historical copper sub-interval with gold credits provides encouraging context for the new drill program, though it is not new data and lacks specific QA/QC disclosure for this particular result.

- Positive factor: good\_grade\_intercept

- Positive factor: polymetallic\_mineralisation

- Positive factor: higher\_grade\_sub\_interval

- Negative factor: stale\_data

- Negative factor: no\_qa\_qc\_disclosure\_for\_specific\_historical\_results

- Negative factor: apparent\_width\_only

Evidence · text

> 3m @ 3.8 g/t Au and 0.35% Cu from 7m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only Mandrake Resources Limited I ACN: 006 569 12 www.mandrakeresources.com.au First Floor, 10 Outram S"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This intercept is from previous drilling reported in the 2019 prospectus, not new results from the current announcement.

Evidence · text

> All available historic drill intercepts are contained in the MAN prospectus - 24 May 2019.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: Specific QA/QC details for this historical intercept are not provided, though general QA/QC for other drilling is disclosed in the document.

Evidence · text

> Previous drilling at Berinka returned significant gold-copper mineralisation, including:

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that all downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres, with no true width reported for this intercept.

Evidence · text

> All downhole intervals are measured in downhole metres.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
