Magnum Goldcorp Intersects Multiple High Grade Gold Intervals, Including 3.47 m of 13.90 g/t and 9.30 m of 4.51 g/t
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Magnum Goldcorp Inc.
- Ticker
- MGI
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-23 22:54:03 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Magnum Goldcorp announced encouraging drill results from its LH Property in British Columbia, including multiple high-grade gold intercepts such as 3.47 m of 13.90 g/t Au and 9.30 m of 4.51 g/t Au. The company is encouraged by the results and sees potential for an initial NI 43-101 compliant resource. While QA/QC was well-disclosed, the true widths of the intercepts remain unknown.
Reasoning: The drill program returned multiple high-grade gold intervals, which is encouraging for the project's potential to define a resource. Strong QA/QC disclosure adds credibility, but the lack of true width information and the presence of potential deleterious elements temper the overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Multiple high-grade gold intercepts, including several above 10 g/t Au.
- Detailed QA/QC procedures and lab information disclosed.
- Qualified Person (P. Geo.) sign-off on the technical content.
- Potential for a maiden NI 43-101 compliant resource in the near future.
Negative factors
- True widths of mineralized intercepts are unknown at this time.
- Presence of arsenopyrite indicates potential for deleterious elements (arsenic).
- Some high-grade intercepts are over narrow widths.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 45
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Several gold intercepts, such as 15.92 g/t over 1.57 m and 32.00 g/t over 1.14 m, exceed the exceptional threshold for underground gold.
Evidence · table
“15.92”
Context: 1.57
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details the laboratory (ALS Chemex), assay methods (ME-MS61, AuAA23, Au-GRA21), and mentions a Qualified Person (Rick Walker, P. Geo.).
Evidence · text
“Core submitted for analysis was limited to visually identified mineralized intervals... one half sent to the ALS Chemex lab in Kamloops, BC for initial preparation... Samples were initially analyzed using the ME-MS61 package... Gold was analyzed using the AuAA23 package... This news release has been reviewed and approved by Rick Walker, P. Geo.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'The true thickness of the mineralized intercepts documented in the 2022 program is unknown at this time.'
Evidence · text
“The true thickness of the mineralized intercepts documented in the 2022 program is unknown at this time.”
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: The document mentions 'arsenopyrite' as a sulphide content and that 'Arsenic over-limits were analyzed', indicating the presence of a penalty element.
Evidence · text
“at least 2% sulphide content (comprising pyrrhotite and/or arsenopyrite)... Arsenic over-limits were analyzed using the ME-OG62 package”
Maiden Resourceneutral · Story-specific tag
First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.
Why it applies: The company states its goal is 'to identify an initial NI 43-101 compliant resource in the near future'.
Evidence · text
“potential to identify an initial NI 43-101 compliant resource in the near future”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 45. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (45)
LH-22-53goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH-22-53
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.83 m
- From
- 34.57 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 251 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH-22-53:34.57-41.40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a narrow width, which is typical for early-stage exploration near underground workings. The grade is below the 'moderate' threshold for underground gold, but the width is reasonable.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.60”
Context: 6.83
LH-22-53silverGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH-22-53
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.83 m
- From
- 34.57 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 251 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH-22-53:34.57-41.40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: 6.83
LH-22-53goldGrade: 5.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH-22-53
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 251 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH-22-53:40.50-41.40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade gold intercept, exceeding the 'strong' threshold for underground gold, but its very narrow width limits its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“5.35”
Context: 0.90
LH-22-53silverGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH-22-53
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 251 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH-22-53:40.50-41.40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: 0.90
LH22-55goldGrade: 15.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.57 m
- From
- 12.59 m
- To
- 14.16 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:12.59-14.16
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional high-grade gold intercept, well above the 'exceptional' threshold for underground gold, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization, though over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade gold intercept.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“15.92”
Context: 1.57
LH22-55silverGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.57 m
- From
- 12.59 m
- To
- 14.16 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:12.59-14.16
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.93”
Context: 1.57
LH22-55goldGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.04 m
- From
- 26.84 m
- To
- 27.88 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:26.84-27.88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, which is less material for the project.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.38”
Context: 1.04
LH22-55silverGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.04 m
- From
- 26.84 m
- To
- 27.88 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:26.84-27.88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 1.04
LH22-55goldGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.79 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 244.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:230.31-244.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade over a moderate width, which is less material for an underground project.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade for underground mining.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: 13.79
LH22-55silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.79 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 244.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:230.31-244.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 13.79
LH22-55goldGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.09 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 231.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:230.31-231.40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, which is less material for the project.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“3.23”
Context: 1.09
LH22-55silverGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.09 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 231.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:230.31-231.40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 1.09
LH22-55goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.95 m
- To
- 236 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:234.95-236.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, which is less material for the project.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: 1.05
LH22-55silverGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.95 m
- To
- 236 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:234.95-236.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 1.05
LH22-56goldGrade: 13.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.47 m
- From
- 11.28 m
- To
- 14.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:11.28-14.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional high-grade gold intercept over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization and contributing positively to the project's potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade gold intercept.
- Moderate grade-width product.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“13.90”
Context: 3.47
LH22-56silverGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.47 m
- From
- 11.28 m
- To
- 14.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:11.28-14.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.53”
Context: 3.47
LH22-56goldGrade: 19.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 11.66 m
- To
- 13.26 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:11.66-13.26
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional high-grade gold intercept, well above the 'exceptional' threshold for underground gold, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization, though over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade gold intercept.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“19.31”
Context: 1.60
LH22-56silverGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 11.66 m
- To
- 13.26 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:11.66-13.26
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: 1.60
LH22-56goldGrade: 2.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.43 m
- From
- 20.4 m
- To
- 21.83 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:20.40-21.83
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, which is less material for the project.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.81”
Context: 1.43
LH22-56silverGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.43 m
- From
- 20.4 m
- To
- 21.83 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:20.40-21.83
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: 1.43
LH22-56goldGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.31 m
- From
- 20.76 m
- To
- 21.07 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:20.76-21.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade gold intercept, exceeding the 'strong' threshold for underground gold, but its extremely narrow width limits its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept.
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“10.60”
Context: 0.31
LH22-56silverGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.31 m
- From
- 20.76 m
- To
- 21.07 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:20.76-21.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“3.57”
Context: 0.31
LH22-56goldGrade: 3.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.67 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.67 m
- From
- 27.28 m
- To
- 28.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:27.28-28.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, which is less material for the project.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“3.01”
Context: 1.67
LH22-56silverGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.67 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.67 m
- From
- 27.28 m
- To
- 28.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:27.28-28.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 1.67
LH22-56goldGrade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.3 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 224.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:215.50-224.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, exceeding the 'moderate' threshold for underground gold, contributing positively to the project's potential.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good width.
- Moderate grade-width product.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“4.51”
Context: 9.30
LH22-56silverGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.3 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 224.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:215.50-224.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 9.30
LH22-56goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 216.13 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:215.50-216.13
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, which is less material for the project.
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.87”
Context: 0.63
LH22-56silverGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 216.13 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:215.50-216.13
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 0.63
LH22-56goldGrade: 32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.14 m
- From
- 222.22 m
- To
- 223.36 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:222.22-223.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional high-grade gold intercept, well above the 'exceptional' threshold for underground gold, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization, though over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade gold intercept.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“32.00”
Context: 1.14
LH22-56silverGrade: 3.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.14 m
- From
- 222.22 m
- To
- 223.36 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:222.22-223.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely a minor byproduct, not a primary driver of value.
Negative factors
- True width unknown.
Evidence · table
“3.54”
Context: 1.14
LH86-06goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH86-06
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1986-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept, providing context but not new information. The grade is weak for underground gold, but the width is good.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width unknown.
Evidence · text
“the second grading 1.46 g/t over 13.20 m”
includesgoldGrade: 5.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 41.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:40.5-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.35 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.35”
Context: includes
includessilverGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 41.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:40.5-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: includes
includesgoldGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.09 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 231.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:230.31-231.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.23 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.23”
Context: includes
includessilverGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.09 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 231.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:230.31-231.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: includes
includesgoldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.95 m
- To
- 236 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:234.95-236
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.05 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: includes
includessilverGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.95 m
- To
- 236 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:234.95-236
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: includes
includesgoldGrade: 19.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 11.66 m
- To
- 13.26 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:11.66-13.26
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.31 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19.31 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.31”
Context: includes
includessilverGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 11.66 m
- To
- 13.26 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:11.66-13.26
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: includes
includesgoldGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.31 m
- From
- 20.76 m
- To
- 21.07 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:20.76-21.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.6 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.6 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.60”
Context: includes
includessilverGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.31 m
- From
- 20.76 m
- To
- 21.07 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:20.76-21.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.57 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.57 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.57”
Context: includes
includesgoldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 216.13 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:215.5-216.13
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.87 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.87 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.87”
Context: includes
includessilverGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 216.13 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:215.5-216.13
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: includes
includesgoldGrade: 32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.14 m
- From
- 222.22 m
- To
- 223.36 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:222.22-223.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 36.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 32 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.00”
Context: includes
includessilverGrade: 3.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.14 m
- From
- 222.22 m
- To
- 223.36 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:222.22-223.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.54 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.54 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.54”
Context: includes
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.