Magna Terra Partner Lunex Metals Advances Exploration and Launches Drill Program at the Luna Roja Project in Santa Cruz, Argentina

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Magna Terra Minerals Inc.
Ticker
MTT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Mercury
Document categories
Drill results, Agreement transaction
Extracted
2026-08-25 22:55:43 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Magna Terra Minerals has announced that its partner, Lunex Metals, has commenced a 3,000-metre drill program at the Luna Roja Project in Argentina. The program follows high-grade surface gold and silver sampling and aims to test priority targets identified through recent geophysical and geochemical work.

Reasoning: The announcement marks the start of a significant drill program following strong surface geochemistry and historical drill results at a prospective epithermal project.

Positive factors

  • Commencement of 3,000m drill program
  • High-grade surface sampling (13.26 g/t Au, 1,155 g/t Ag)
  • Presence of mercury pathfinder
  • Historical drill success (LR_DDH002)

Negative factors

  • Mercury presence noted (though described as pathfinder)

Facts used in scoring: 5

Atlas analysis — Magna Terra Minerals Inc.: Magna Terra Partner Lunex Metals Advances Exploration and Launches Drill Program at the Luna Roja Project in Santa Cruz, Argentina. 13.26 g/t over 1 m

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release mentions 10% QA/QC controls including blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Channel and rock-chip samples included 10% QA/QC controls through the insertion of blank samples”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Surface silver assay of 1,155 g/t is exceptionally high.

Evidence · text

“1,155 g/t silver”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (5)

Fact 1goldGrade: 13.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTT

Geometry

Grade
13.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
surface:estrelladelnorte
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart International
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade from surface channel sampling.

Positive factors

  • High grade intercept
Fact 2silverGrade: 1155Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
silver
Ticker
MTT

Geometry

Grade
1155
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
surface:estrelladelnorte
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart International
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional silver grade from surface channel sampling.

Positive factors

  • High grade intercept
LR_DDH002goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LR_DDH002
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTT

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
75 m
From
37 m
To
112 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LR_DDH002:37.0-112.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Chemex Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2019-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept with significant width but low grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant width
LR_DDH002silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LR_DDH002
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MTT

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
75 m
From
37 m
To
112 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LR_DDH002:37.0-112.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Chemex Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2019-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept with low silver grade.

LR_DDH002goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LR_DDH002
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTT

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
42 m
From
68 m
To
110 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LR_DDH002:68.0-110.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Chemex Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2019-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical sub-interval showing grade improvement at depth.

Positive factors

  • Increased grade with depth

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.