Magna Mining Reports Results of Levack Mine Preliminary Economic Assessment and Approves Restart of Production

Original announcement by globenewswire on

Company
Magna Mining Inc.
Ticker
NICU
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Primary commodity
Nickel
Secondary commodities
Copper, Platinum, Palladium, Gold, Silver, Cobalt
Document categories
Other, Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-08 13:11:24 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Magna Mining announced robust results from a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the restart of its fully-permitted Levack Mine in the Sudbury Basin, Ontario. The PEA outlines a 7.3-year mine life with an after-tax NPV7% of C$227.0 million and an impressive after-tax IRR of 92.4%, with a rapid payback period of 0.6 years. Based on these strong economics and low initial capital requirements, the company's Board of Directors has formally approved the restart of production.

Reasoning: The Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Levack Mine restart demonstrates robust economics with a high after-tax IRR and rapid payback, supported by existing infrastructure and low initial capital. This has led to the formal approval for production restart, indicating strong company confidence despite the preliminary nature of the study and the absence of declared mineral reserves.

Positive factors

  • High IRR (92.4% after-tax)
  • Rapid payback (0.6 years)
  • Low initial capital (net funding of C$8.6 million)
  • Existing infrastructure
  • Formal approval for mine restart
  • Potential for further optimization and inclusion of R2 Footwall Zone

Negative factors

  • PEA is preliminary in nature
  • No mineral reserves declared
  • Reliance on Inferred resources (2.1 million short tons in PEA inventory)
  • Risks associated with historic mined-out stopes and voids

Facts used in scoring: 49

Classification and evidence

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The document reports the results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).

Evidence · text

“Magna Mining Reports Results of Levack Mine Preliminary Economic Assessment”

Low Initial Capexpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Initial capital costs are estimated to be $70.1 million, with a calculated net initial funding requirement of $8.6 million.

Evidence · text

“Initial capital costs from January 1, 2027 to the start of commercial production are estimated to be $70.1 million, after incorporating equipment financing timing effects. This initial capital is estimated to be offset by refundable tax credits 3 of approximately $5.6 million and expected pre-commercial production operating cash flow of approximately $55.9 million using base case price assumptions 1 , leaving a calculated net initial funding requirement of $8.6 million.”

Rapid Paybackpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The Levack PEA estimates payback in 0.6 years.

Evidence · text

“the Levack PEA estimates payback in 0.6 years”

High IRRpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The after-tax Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) is 92.4%.

Evidence · text

“an after-tax Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) of 92.4%”

No Reservesnegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company's Board of Directors approved the restart while acknowledging that there are no supporting mineral reserves with demonstrated economic viability.

Evidence · text

“while acknowledging that there are no supporting mineral reserves with demonstrated economic viability”

Preliminary Studynegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The PEA is explicitly stated as preliminary in nature.

Evidence · text

“The PEA is preliminary in nature”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document includes an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Levack Mine.

Evidence · text

“updated Levack Mine Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource summary includes an Indicated category.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Indicated

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource summary includes an Inferred category, and 2.1 million short tons of the PEA inventory are classified as Inferred.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Inferred

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo, is named as an independent Qualified Person responsible for the MRE.

Evidence · text

“Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo, Senior Geologist of Orix Geoscience Inc. is an independent Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and is responsible for the current Levack Mine MRE”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The PEA and MRE were prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

“prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 48. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (48)

indicatedLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 6763000.575Grade: 0.83Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:deb41162cf21fabf23a4
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6763000.575
Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Contact zone with stated copper grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: 7,455,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · nickelTonnes: 6763000.575Grade: 1.46Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:deb41162cf21fabf23a4
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6763000.575
Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Contact zone with stated nickel grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.46”

Context: 7,455,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · cobaltTonnes: 6763000.575Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:deb41162cf21fabf23a4
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6763000.575
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Contact zone with stated cobalt grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 7,455,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · platinumTonnes: 6763000.575Grade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:deb41162cf21fabf23a4
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6763000.575
Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Contact zone with stated platinum grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 7,455,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · palladiumTonnes: 6763000.575Grade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:deb41162cf21fabf23a4
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6763000.575
Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Contact zone with stated palladium grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 7,455,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · goldTonnes: 6763000.575Grade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:deb41162cf21fabf23a4
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6763000.575
Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Contact zone with stated gold grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 7,455,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · silverTonnes: 6763000.575Grade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:deb41162cf21fabf23a4
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6763000.575
Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Contact zone with stated silver grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: 7,455,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 6763000.575View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:deb41162cf21fabf23a4
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6763000.575
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Contact zone with stated copper equivalent grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“3.09”

Context: 7,455,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 311170.655Grade: 7.4Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:990d4dd3f658aa99d165
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
311170.655
Grade
7.4
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Footwall zone with high copper grade and stated cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High copper grade

Evidence · table

“7.40”

Context: 343,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · nickelTonnes: 311170.655Grade: 1.86Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:990d4dd3f658aa99d165
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
311170.655
Grade
1.86
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Footwall zone with high nickel grade and stated cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High nickel grade

Evidence · table

“1.86”

Context: 343,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · cobaltTonnes: 311170.655Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:990d4dd3f658aa99d165
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
311170.655
Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Footwall zone with stated cobalt grade and cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 343,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · platinumTonnes: 311170.655Grade: 2.88Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:990d4dd3f658aa99d165
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
311170.655
Grade
2.88
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Footwall zone with high platinum grade and stated cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High platinum grade

Evidence · table

“2.88”

Context: 343,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · palladiumTonnes: 311170.655Grade: 5.25Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:990d4dd3f658aa99d165
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
311170.655
Grade
5.25
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Footwall zone with high palladium grade and stated cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High palladium grade

Evidence · table

“5.25”

Context: 343,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · goldTonnes: 311170.655Grade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:990d4dd3f658aa99d165
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
311170.655
Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Footwall zone with high gold grade and stated cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High gold grade

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: 343,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · silverTonnes: 311170.655Grade: 29.15Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:990d4dd3f658aa99d165
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
311170.655
Grade
29.15
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Footwall zone with high silver grade and stated cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High silver grade

Evidence · table

“29.15”

Context: 343,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 311170.655View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:990d4dd3f658aa99d165
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
311170.655
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Footwall zone with high copper equivalent grade and stated cut-off, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High copper equivalent grade

Evidence · table

“12.40”

Context: 343,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 7075000.03Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:fcda0d7bbaa3a75e6e2c
Deposit or zone
Total Indicated
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7075000.03
Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with stated copper grade, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 7,798,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · nickelTonnes: 7075000.03Grade: 1.48Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:fcda0d7bbaa3a75e6e2c
Deposit or zone
Total Indicated
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7075000.03
Grade
1.48
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with stated nickel grade, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.48”

Context: 7,798,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · cobaltTonnes: 7075000.03Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:fcda0d7bbaa3a75e6e2c
Deposit or zone
Total Indicated
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7075000.03
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with stated cobalt grade, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 7,798,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · platinumTonnes: 7075000.03Grade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:fcda0d7bbaa3a75e6e2c
Deposit or zone
Total Indicated
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7075000.03
Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with stated platinum grade, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 7,798,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · palladiumTonnes: 7075000.03Grade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:fcda0d7bbaa3a75e6e2c
Deposit or zone
Total Indicated
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7075000.03
Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with stated palladium grade, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: 7,798,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · goldTonnes: 7075000.03Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:fcda0d7bbaa3a75e6e2c
Deposit or zone
Total Indicated
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7075000.03
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with stated gold grade, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 7,798,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · silverTonnes: 7075000.03Grade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:fcda0d7bbaa3a75e6e2c
Deposit or zone
Total Indicated
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7075000.03
Grade
2.16
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with stated silver grade, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.16”

Context: 7,798,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 7075000.03View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:fcda0d7bbaa3a75e6e2c
Deposit or zone
Total Indicated
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7075000.03
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with stated copper equivalent grade, supporting the overall project economics.

Positive factors

  • Indicated Resource category
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Evidence · table

“3.50”

Context: 7,798,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 4802600.49Grade: 0.86Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f9025d853444349f1dc5
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4802600.49
Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Contact zone with stated copper grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 5,294,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · nickelTonnes: 4802600.49Grade: 1.47Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f9025d853444349f1dc5
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4802600.49
Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Contact zone with stated nickel grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: 5,294,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · cobaltTonnes: 4802600.49Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f9025d853444349f1dc5
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4802600.49
Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Contact zone with stated cobalt grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 5,294,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · platinumTonnes: 4802600.49Grade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f9025d853444349f1dc5
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4802600.49
Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Contact zone with stated platinum grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 5,294,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · palladiumTonnes: 4802600.49Grade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f9025d853444349f1dc5
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4802600.49
Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Contact zone with stated palladium grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 5,294,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · goldTonnes: 4802600.49Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f9025d853444349f1dc5
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4802600.49
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Contact zone with stated gold grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 5,294,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · silverTonnes: 4802600.49Grade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f9025d853444349f1dc5
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4802600.49
Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Contact zone with stated silver grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 5,294,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 4802600.49View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f9025d853444349f1dc5
Deposit or zone
Contact
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4802600.49
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.08
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Contact zone with stated copper equivalent grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“3.08”

Context: 5,294,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 488000.73Grade: 5.28Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:8bcb909ff52d19e64bed
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
488000.73
Grade
5.28
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Footwall zone with high copper grade and stated cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High copper grade

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“5.28”

Context: 538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · nickelTonnes: 488000.73Grade: 0.78Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:8bcb909ff52d19e64bed
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
488000.73
Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Footwall zone with stated nickel grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · cobaltTonnes: 488000.73Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:8bcb909ff52d19e64bed
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
488000.73
Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Footwall zone with stated cobalt grade and cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · platinumTonnes: 488000.73Grade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:8bcb909ff52d19e64bed
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
488000.73
Grade
2.53
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Footwall zone with high platinum grade and stated cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High platinum grade

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“2.53”

Context: 538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · palladiumTonnes: 488000.73Grade: 4.78Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:8bcb909ff52d19e64bed
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
488000.73
Grade
4.78
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Footwall zone with high palladium grade and stated cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High palladium grade

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“4.78”

Context: 538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · goldTonnes: 488000.73Grade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:8bcb909ff52d19e64bed
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
488000.73
Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Footwall zone with high gold grade and stated cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High gold grade

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · silverTonnes: 488000.73Grade: 20.56Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:8bcb909ff52d19e64bed
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
488000.73
Grade
20.56
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Footwall zone with high silver grade and stated cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High silver grade

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“20.56”

Context: 538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 488000.73View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:8bcb909ff52d19e64bed
Deposit or zone
Footwall
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
488000.73
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Footwall zone with high copper equivalent grade and stated cut-off, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed
  • High copper equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“8.78”

Context: 538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 5290601.28Grade: 1.27Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:3c4833ae60d30f0a0468
Deposit or zone
Total Inferred
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5290601.28
Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with stated copper grade, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 5,832,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · nickelTonnes: 5290601.28Grade: 1.41Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:3c4833ae60d30f0a0468
Deposit or zone
Total Inferred
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5290601.28
Grade
1.41
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with stated nickel grade, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“1.41”

Context: 5,832,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · cobaltTonnes: 5290601.28Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:3c4833ae60d30f0a0468
Deposit or zone
Total Inferred
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5290601.28
Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with stated cobalt grade, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 5,832,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · platinumTonnes: 5290601.28Grade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:3c4833ae60d30f0a0468
Deposit or zone
Total Inferred
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5290601.28
Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with stated platinum grade, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 5,832,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · palladiumTonnes: 5290601.28Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:3c4833ae60d30f0a0468
Deposit or zone
Total Inferred
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5290601.28
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with stated palladium grade, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 5,832,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · goldTonnes: 5290601.28Grade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:3c4833ae60d30f0a0468
Deposit or zone
Total Inferred
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5290601.28
Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with stated gold grade, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 5,832,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · silverTonnes: 5290601.28Grade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tonneView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:3c4833ae60d30f0a0468
Deposit or zone
Total Inferred
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5290601.28
Grade
2.51
Grade Unit
g/tonne
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with stated silver grade, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“2.51”

Context: 5,832,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLevack Mine · copperTonnes: 5290601.28View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Levack Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
northeastern Ontario, Canada
Ticker
NICU

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, other
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo.
Resource group id
resource:3c4833ae60d30f0a0468
Deposit or zone
Total Inferred
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5290601.28
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-08-31

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.61
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with stated copper equivalent grade, contributing to the overall project economics but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource category

Evidence · table

“3.61”

Context: 5,832,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.