# Magma Silver Ni&amp;\#xF1;obamba Phase 1 Work Program Returns Significant Results Including 14.56g/mt Au and 10.59 oz/mt Ag

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/magma-silver-ni-xf1-obamba-phase-1-work-program-returns-significant-results-incl--fc5f6350-6d62-4e99-91fa-bac70a76f693

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/MGMA/news/8231756740380920/magma-silver-ni-xf1-obamba-phase-1-work-program-returns-significant-results-incl

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-09-18T11:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Magma Silver Corp.

- Ticker: MGMA

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Peru

- Primary commodity: Silver

- Secondary commodities: Gold

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-08-23 22:43:10 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Magma Silver reported Phase 1 results from its Niñobamba project in Peru, where geochemical sampling confirmed high-grade gold and silver anomalies. The results, including a 14.56 g/t Au and 10.59 oz/mt Ag sample, align with or exceed historical Newmont data.

Reasoning: Phase 1 geochemical sampling confirmed high-grade silver and gold anomalies, including a 10.59 oz/mt Ag sample, supporting the project's potential for upcoming drilling.

- Positive factor: High-grade surface samples

- Positive factor: Confirmation of historical Newmont results

- Positive factor: QA/QC protocols mentioned

- Negative factor: Results are primarily surface/geochemical sampling rather than drilling

- Negative factor: Historical Newmont data is non-compliant

Facts used in scoring: 4

## Classification and evidence

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: Release mentions every tenth sample will be re-assayed at another independent lab for quality control.

Evidence · text

> every tenth sample will be re-assayed at another independent assay lab in Lima, Peru for quality control

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The current work program is designed to confirm historical Newmont results.

Evidence · text

> Phase 1 assays have confirmed or exceeded the historical Newmont Mining Corp. \(" Newmont "\) results.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (4)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/magma-silver-ni-xf1-obamba-phase-1-work-program-returns-significant-results-incl--fc5f6350-6d62-4e99-91fa-bac70a76f693#fact-drill-facts-0)

Niñobamba · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Niñobamba
- Commodity: gold
- Region: peru
- Reported Region: Peru
- Ticker: MGMA

#### Geometry

- Grade: 14.56
- Grade Unit: g/mt

#### Classification

- Sample Type: surface

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-09-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold sample reported in surface sampling.

- Positive factor: High grade

Evidence · text

> Results ranged from 0.50 g/mt to 14.56 g/mt Au

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/magma-silver-ni-xf1-obamba-phase-1-work-program-returns-significant-results-incl--fc5f6350-6d62-4e99-91fa-bac70a76f693#fact-drill-facts-1)

Niñobamba · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Niñobamba
- Commodity: silver
- Region: peru
- Reported Region: Peru
- Ticker: MGMA

#### Geometry

- Grade: 10.594
- Grade Unit: oz/mt

#### Classification

- Sample Type: surface

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-09-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade silver sample reported in surface sampling.

- Positive factor: High grade

Evidence · text

> 0.604 oz/mt Ag to 10.594 oz/mt Ag

### JM1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/magma-silver-ni-xf1-obamba-phase-1-work-program-returns-significant-results-incl--fc5f6350-6d62-4e99-91fa-bac70a76f693#fact-drill-facts-2)

Jorimina · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: JM1
- Project: Jorimina
- Commodity: gold
- Region: peru
- Reported Region: Peru
- Ticker: MGMA

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.19
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 72.3 m
- From: 53.1 m
- To: 125.4 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-09-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of historical Newmont drilling results.

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · text

> Hole JM1: from 53.1 to 125.4 \(72.3m\) 1.19 g/t gold

### JM1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/magma-silver-ni-xf1-obamba-phase-1-work-program-returns-significant-results-incl--fc5f6350-6d62-4e99-91fa-bac70a76f693#fact-drill-facts-3)

Jorimina · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: JM1
- Project: Jorimina
- Commodity: gold
- Region: peru
- Reported Region: Peru
- Ticker: MGMA

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.07
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 24.6 m
- From: 184.75 m
- To: 209.35 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-09-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of historical Newmont drilling results.

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · text

> from 184.75 to 209.35 \(24.6 m\) 1.07 g/t of gold

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
