MAG Silver Reports New Gold and Additional Zinc Mineralization at Salamandra - Junior Mining Network
Original announcement by jmn on
- Company
- MAG Silver Corp.
- Ticker
- MAG
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Durango, Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Zinc, Silver, Copper, Lead, Tungsten
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-04 11:30:20 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
MAG Silver Corp. announced assay results from its six-hole Phase 3 drill program at the Salamandra Property in Durango, Mexico, revealing new gold and tungsten mineralization, alongside additional zinc. Hole SA15-35 intersected significant gold grades, including 0.88m at 3.59 g/t gold and 2.31m at 2.96 g/t gold, marking the first appreciable gold and tungsten on the property. The program also returned moderate to strong zinc intercepts, such as 0.79m at 7.79% zinc in SA15-31 and 1.00m at 9.87% zinc in SA15-35, expanding the known mineralization footprint within a Carbonate Replacement/Skarn Deposit system.
Reasoning: The announcement reports the discovery of new gold and tungsten mineralization, which is a significant positive development for the project's potential. While many intercepts are low grade, the presence of moderate to strong zinc and gold grades, especially in new areas, indicates a complex and extensive mineral system. The lack of true width information and the absence of favorable host rocks temper the overall enthusiasm.
Positive factors
- Discovery of new gold and tungsten mineralization, expanding the known metal endowment of the system.
- Several moderate to strong grade zinc intercepts, particularly in SA15-31 and SA15-35.
- Drilling extends mineralization into new areas, indicating potential for further expansion.
Negative factors
- True widths of intercepts cannot be determined at this time, limiting geological confidence.
- Many intercepts show weak grades across multiple commodities.
- Lack of favorable limestone host rocks encountered in this phase of drilling.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 298
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 298. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (298)
SA15-30goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.24 m
- From
- 653.25 m
- To
- 656.49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:653.25-656.49
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 3.24
SA15-30silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.24 m
- From
- 653.25 m
- To
- 656.49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:653.25-656.49
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 3.24
SA15-30copperGrade: 385Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 385
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.24 m
- From
- 653.25 m
- To
- 656.49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:653.25-656.49
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“385”
Context: 3.24
SA15-30leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.24 m
- From
- 653.25 m
- To
- 656.49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:653.25-656.49
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 3.24
SA15-30zincGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.24 m
- From
- 653.25 m
- To
- 656.49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:653.25-656.49
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: 3.24
SA15-30tungstenGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.24 m
- From
- 653.25 m
- To
- 656.49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:653.25-656.49
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 3.24
SA15-30goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 2.09
SA15-30silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 2.09
SA15-30copperGrade: 184Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 184
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“184”
Context: 2.09
SA15-30leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 2.09
SA15-30zincGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.55”
Context: 2.09
SA15-30tungstenGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-30
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-30:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 2.09
SA15-31goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.79 m
- From
- 409.4 m
- To
- 410.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:409.40-410.19
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.79
SA15-31silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.79 m
- From
- 409.4 m
- To
- 410.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:409.40-410.19
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak silver grade, just above the 30 g/t threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“39”
Context: 0.79
SA15-31copperGrade: 763Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 763
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.79 m
- From
- 409.4 m
- To
- 410.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:409.40-410.19
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“763”
Context: 0.79
SA15-31leadGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.79 m
- From
- 409.4 m
- To
- 410.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:409.40-410.19
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 0.79
SA15-31zincGrade: 7.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.79 m
- From
- 409.4 m
- To
- 410.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:409.40-410.19
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over a narrow width, which is a positive but limited result.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (7.79% Zn exceeds 5% moderate threshold).
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.79m).
Evidence · table
“7.79”
Context: 0.79
SA15-31tungstenGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.79 m
- From
- 409.4 m
- To
- 410.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:409.40-410.19
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 0.79
SA15-31goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.54
SA15-31silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 0.54
SA15-31copperGrade: 74Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 74
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“74”
Context: 0.54
SA15-31leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.54
SA15-31zincGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 5% moderate threshold.
Evidence · table
“4.30”
Context: 0.54
SA15-31tungstenGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 0.54
SA15-31goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.92
SA15-31silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: 0.92
SA15-31copperGrade: 43Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“43”
Context: 0.92
SA15-31leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.92
SA15-31zincGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, just above the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“2.03”
Context: 0.92
SA15-31tungstenGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-31
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-31:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 0.92
SA15-32goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.87 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.87 m
- From
- 17.11 m
- To
- 31.98 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:17.11-31.98
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 14.87
SA15-32silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.87 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.87 m
- From
- 17.11 m
- To
- 31.98 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:17.11-31.98
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 14.87
SA15-32copperGrade: 161Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.87 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 161
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.87 m
- From
- 17.11 m
- To
- 31.98 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:17.11-31.98
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“161”
Context: 14.87
SA15-32leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.87 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.87 m
- From
- 17.11 m
- To
- 31.98 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:17.11-31.98
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 14.87
SA15-32zincGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.87 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.87 m
- From
- 17.11 m
- To
- 31.98 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:17.11-31.98
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“0.99”
Context: 14.87
SA15-32tungstenGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.87 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.87 m
- From
- 17.11 m
- To
- 31.98 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:17.11-31.98
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 14.87
SA15-32goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:122.00-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade, below the 0.3 g/t threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 6.02
SA15-32silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:122.00-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 6.02
SA15-32copperGrade: 320Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 320
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:122.00-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“320”
Context: 6.02
SA15-32leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:122.00-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 6.02
SA15-32zincGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:122.00-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 6.02
SA15-32tungstenGrade: 6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:122.00-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“6”
Context: 6.02
SA15-32goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade, just above the 0.3 g/t threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 0.75
SA15-32silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade, below the 30 g/t threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“11”
Context: 0.75
SA15-32copperGrade: 283Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 283
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“283”
Context: 0.75
SA15-32leadGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 0.75
SA15-32zincGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: 0.75
SA15-32tungstenGrade: 17Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“17”
Context: 0.75
SA15-32goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:380.20-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.53
SA15-32silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:380.20-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 0.53
SA15-32copperGrade: 178Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 178
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:380.20-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“178”
Context: 0.53
SA15-32leadGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:380.20-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 0.53
SA15-32zincGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:380.20-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.25”
Context: 0.53
SA15-32tungstenGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-32
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-32:380.20-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 0.53
SA15-33goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.18 m
- From
- 30.9 m
- To
- 34.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:30.90-34.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade, below the 0.3 g/t threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 3.18
SA15-33silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.18 m
- From
- 30.9 m
- To
- 34.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:30.90-34.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade, below the 30 g/t threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 3.18
SA15-33copperGrade: 138Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 138
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.18 m
- From
- 30.9 m
- To
- 34.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:30.90-34.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“138”
Context: 3.18
SA15-33leadGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.18 m
- From
- 30.9 m
- To
- 34.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:30.90-34.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade, below the 1% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 3.18
SA15-33zincGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.18 m
- From
- 30.9 m
- To
- 34.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:30.90-34.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.22”
Context: 3.18
SA15-33tungstenGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.18 m
- From
- 30.9 m
- To
- 34.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:30.90-34.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 3.18
SA15-33goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.59
SA15-33silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 0.59
SA15-33copperGrade: 3360Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3360
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak copper mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak copper grade (0.336% Cu is below 0.5% moderate threshold).
Evidence · table
“3,360”
Context: 0.59
SA15-33leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.59
SA15-33zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.59
SA15-33tungstenGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 0.59
SA15-33goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.74
SA15-33silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: 0.74
SA15-33copperGrade: 2510Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2510
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak copper mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak copper grade (0.251% Cu is just above 0.25% weak threshold).
Evidence · table
“2,510”
Context: 0.74
SA15-33leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.74
SA15-33zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.74
SA15-33tungstenGrade: 14Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-33
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-33:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“14”
Context: 0.74
SA15-34goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.32 m
- From
- 29.23 m
- To
- 40.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:29.23-40.55
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 11.32
SA15-34silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.32 m
- From
- 29.23 m
- To
- 40.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:29.23-40.55
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 11.32
SA15-34copperGrade: 173Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11.32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 173
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11.32 m
- From
- 29.23 m
- To
- 40.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:29.23-40.55
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“173”
Context: 11.32
SA15-34leadGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.32 m
- From
- 29.23 m
- To
- 40.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:29.23-40.55
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 11.32
SA15-34zincGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.32 m
- From
- 29.23 m
- To
- 40.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:29.23-40.55
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 11.32
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11.32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11.32 m
- From
- 29.23 m
- To
- 40.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:29.23-40.55
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 11.32
SA15-34goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.83
SA15-34silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 3.83
SA15-34copperGrade: 230Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 230
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“230”
Context: 3.83
SA15-34leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.83
SA15-34zincGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.58”
Context: 3.83
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 3.83
SA15-34goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:141.97-145.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.03
SA15-34silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:141.97-145.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 3.03
SA15-34copperGrade: 187Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 187
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:141.97-145.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“187”
Context: 3.03
SA15-34leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:141.97-145.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.03
SA15-34zincGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:141.97-145.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, just above the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“2.25”
Context: 3.03
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 46Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:141.97-145.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“46”
Context: 3.03
SA15-34goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.54
SA15-34silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 3.54
SA15-34copperGrade: 166Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 166
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“166”
Context: 3.54
SA15-34leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.54
SA15-34zincGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.70”
Context: 3.54
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 3.54
SA15-34goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:184.28-187.90
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 3.62
SA15-34silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:184.28-187.90
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 3.62
SA15-34copperGrade: 201Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 201
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:184.28-187.90
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“201”
Context: 3.62
SA15-34leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:184.28-187.90
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.62
SA15-34zincGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.69
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:184.28-187.90
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.69”
Context: 3.62
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:184.28-187.90
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“12”
Context: 3.62
SA15-34goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade, below the 1 g/t moderate threshold.
Evidence · table
“0.79”
Context: 1.10
SA15-34silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 1.10
SA15-34copperGrade: 277Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 277
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“277”
Context: 1.10
SA15-34leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 1.10
SA15-34zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.10
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 1.10
SA15-34goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:304.60-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 22.76
SA15-34silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:304.60-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 22.76
SA15-34copperGrade: 147Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 147
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:304.60-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“147”
Context: 22.76
SA15-34leadGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:304.60-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 22.76
SA15-34zincGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:304.60-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: 22.76
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:304.60-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: 22.76
SA15-34goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 16.36
SA15-34silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 16.36
SA15-34copperGrade: 268Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 268
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“268”
Context: 16.36
SA15-34leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 16.36
SA15-34zincGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.47”
Context: 16.36
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 16.36
SA15-34goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 28.09
SA15-34silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: 28.09
SA15-34copperGrade: 219Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 219
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“219”
Context: 28.09
SA15-34leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 28.09
SA15-34zincGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, which is noted in the text but not high-grade.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length (28.09m).
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.43”
Context: 28.09
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: 28.09
SA15-34goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:500.25-515.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 15.05
SA15-34silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:500.25-515.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 15.05
SA15-34copperGrade: 281Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 281
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:500.25-515.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“281”
Context: 15.05
SA15-34leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:500.25-515.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 15.05
SA15-34zincGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:500.25-515.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 2% threshold for weak.
Evidence · table
“1.61”
Context: 15.05
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:500.25-515.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 15.05
SA15-34goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:505.65-509.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 3.35
SA15-34silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:505.65-509.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 3.35
SA15-34copperGrade: 525Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 525
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:505.65-509.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak copper mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak copper grade (0.0525% Cu is below 0.25% weak threshold).
Evidence · table
“525”
Context: 3.35
SA15-34leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:505.65-509.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 3.35
SA15-34zincGrade: 3.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:505.65-509.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 5% moderate threshold.
Evidence · table
“3.35”
Context: 3.35
SA15-34tungstenGrade: 6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-34
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-34:505.65-509.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“6”
Context: 3.35
SA15-35goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.88 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 465.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-465.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 5.88
SA15-35silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.88 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 465.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-465.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 5.88
SA15-35copperGrade: 205Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 205
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.88 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 465.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-465.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low copper mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade.
Evidence · table
“205”
Context: 5.88
SA15-35leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.88 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 465.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-465.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 5.88
SA15-35zincGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.88 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 465.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-465.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak zinc mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak zinc grade, below the 5% moderate threshold.
Evidence · table
“2.61”
Context: 5.88
SA15-35tungstenGrade: 26Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 26
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.88 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 465.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-465.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low tungsten mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low tungsten grade.
Evidence · table
“26”
Context: 5.88
SA15-35goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows no significant gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 0.46
SA15-35silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 0.46
SA15-35copperGrade: 673Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 673
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak copper mineralization, contributing marginally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Weak copper grade (0.0673% Cu is below 0.25% weak threshold).
Evidence · table
“673”
Context: 0.46
SA15-35leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SA15-35
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SA15-35:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS-Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows no significant lead mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.46
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 184Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 184
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 184 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“184”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.09 m
- From
- 686.48 m
- To
- 688.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:686.48-688.57
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.55 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.55 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.55”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 74Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 74
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 74 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“74”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.54 m
- From
- 550.15 m
- To
- 550.69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:550.15-550.69
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.30”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 43Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 43 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“43”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
- From
- 559.99 m
- To
- 560.91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:559.99-560.91
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.03 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.03”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:122-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.18 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:122-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 320Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 320
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:122-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 320 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“320”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:122-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 128.02 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:122-128.02
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.41 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.39 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 283Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 283
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 283 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“283”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 146.49 m
- To
- 147.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:146.49-147.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.77 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.77 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:380.2-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:380.2-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 178Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 178
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:380.2-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 178 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“178”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:380.2-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
- From
- 380.2 m
- To
- 380.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:380.2-380.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.25 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.25 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.25”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 3360Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3360
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3360 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“3,360”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 399.62 m
- To
- 400.21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:399.62-400.21
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 2510Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2510
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2510 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“2,510”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.74 m
- From
- 420.77 m
- To
- 421.51 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:420.77-421.51
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 230Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 230
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 230 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“230”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 96.75 m
- To
- 100.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:96.75-100.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.58 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.58 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.58”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:141.97-145
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:141.97-145
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 187Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 187
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:141.97-145
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 187 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“187”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:141.97-145
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.03 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 141.97 m
- To
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:141.97-145
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.25 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.25”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 166Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 166
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 166 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“166”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.54 m
- From
- 153.84 m
- To
- 157.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:153.84-157.38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.7 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.70”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:184.28-187.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:184.28-187.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 201Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 201
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:184.28-187.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 201 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“201”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:184.28-187.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.69
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.62 m
- From
- 184.28 m
- To
- 187.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:184.28-187.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.69 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.69 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.69”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.79 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.79 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.79”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 277Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 277
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 277 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“277”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 217.15 m
- To
- 218.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:217.15-218.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:304.6-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:304.6-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 147Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 147
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:304.6-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 147 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“147”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:304.6-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.76 m
- From
- 304.6 m
- To
- 327.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:304.6-327.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.01 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 23.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 268Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 268
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 268 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“268”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.36 m
- From
- 415.22 m
- To
- 431.58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:415.22-431.58
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.47 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 24.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.47”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 219Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 219
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 219 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“219”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28.09 m
- From
- 454.15 m
- To
- 482.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:454.15-482.24
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.43 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 40.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.43”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.25-515.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.25-515.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 281Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 281
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.25-515.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 281 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“281”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.25-515.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.05 m
- From
- 500.25 m
- To
- 515.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.25-515.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.61 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 24.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.61”
Context: and
includinggoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:505.65-509
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: including
includingsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:505.65-509
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: including
includingcopperGrade: 525Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 525
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:505.65-509
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 525 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“525”
Context: including
includingleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:505.65-509
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: including
includingzincGrade: 3.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 505.65 m
- To
- 509 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:505.65-509
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.35 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.35”
Context: including
includinggoldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: including
includingsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: including
includingcopperGrade: 673Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 673
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 673 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“673”
Context: including
includingleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: including
includingzincGrade: 9.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 459.62 m
- To
- 460.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:459.62-460.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.81 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.81”
Context: including
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.04 m
- From
- 489.82 m
- To
- 503.86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:489.82-503.86
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.04 m
- From
- 489.82 m
- To
- 503.86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:489.82-503.86
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 154Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 154
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.04 m
- From
- 489.82 m
- To
- 503.86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:489.82-503.86
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 154 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“154”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.04 m
- From
- 489.82 m
- To
- 503.86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:489.82-503.86
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.04 m
- From
- 489.82 m
- To
- 503.86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:489.82-503.86
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.19 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 30.7 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.19”
Context: and
includinggoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 497.08 m
- To
- 498.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:497.08-498.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: including
includingsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 497.08 m
- To
- 498.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:497.08-498.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: including
includingcopperGrade: 395Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 395
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 497.08 m
- To
- 498.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:497.08-498.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 395 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“395”
Context: including
includingleadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 497.08 m
- To
- 498.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:497.08-498.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: including
includingzincGrade: 9.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 497.08 m
- To
- 498.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:497.08-498.08
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.87 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.87”
Context: including
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.35 m
- From
- 515.11 m
- To
- 536.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:515.11-536.46
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.35 m
- From
- 515.11 m
- To
- 536.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:515.11-536.46
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 143Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 143
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 21.35 m
- From
- 515.11 m
- To
- 536.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:515.11-536.46
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 143 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“143”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21.35 m
- From
- 515.11 m
- To
- 536.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:515.11-536.46
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21.35 m
- From
- 515.11 m
- To
- 536.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:515.11-536.46
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.06 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 22.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.19 m
- From
- 724.11 m
- To
- 734.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:724.11-734.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.19 m
- From
- 724.11 m
- To
- 734.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:724.11-734.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 406Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 406
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10.19 m
- From
- 724.11 m
- To
- 734.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:724.11-734.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 406 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“406”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.19 m
- From
- 724.11 m
- To
- 734.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:724.11-734.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.19 m
- From
- 724.11 m
- To
- 734.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:724.11-734.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: and
includinggoldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 730.74 m
- To
- 731.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:730.74-731.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: including
includingsilverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 730.74 m
- To
- 731.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:730.74-731.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: including
includingcopperGrade: 587Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 587
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 730.74 m
- To
- 731.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:730.74-731.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 587 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“587”
Context: including
includingleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 730.74 m
- To
- 731.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:730.74-731.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: including
includingzincGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 730.74 m
- To
- 731.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:730.74-731.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: including
andgoldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29.9 m
- From
- 786.38 m
- To
- 816.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:786.38-816.28
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29.9 m
- From
- 786.38 m
- To
- 816.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:786.38-816.28
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 146Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 29.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 146
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 29.9 m
- From
- 786.38 m
- To
- 816.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:786.38-816.28
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 146 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“146”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 29.9 m
- From
- 786.38 m
- To
- 816.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:786.38-816.28
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 29.9 m
- From
- 786.38 m
- To
- 816.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:786.38-816.28
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 14.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 871.25 m
- To
- 871.61 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:871.25-871.61
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.76 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.76 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.76”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 871.25 m
- To
- 871.61 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:871.25-871.61
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 2190Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2190
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 871.25 m
- To
- 871.61 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:871.25-871.61
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2190 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“2,190”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 871.25 m
- To
- 871.61 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:871.25-871.61
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 871.25 m
- To
- 871.61 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:871.25-871.61
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.33 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.33 m
- From
- 895.38 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:895.38-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.33 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.33 m
- From
- 895.38 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:895.38-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 761Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.33 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 761
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.33 m
- From
- 895.38 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:895.38-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 761 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“761”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.33 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.33 m
- From
- 895.38 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:895.38-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.33 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.33 m
- From
- 895.38 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:895.38-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
includinggoldGrade: 3.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.88 m
- From
- 903.83 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:903.83-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.59 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.59”
Context: including
includingsilverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.88 m
- From
- 903.83 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:903.83-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: including
includingcopperGrade: 389Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 389
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.88 m
- From
- 903.83 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:903.83-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 389 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“389”
Context: including
includingleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.88 m
- From
- 903.83 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:903.83-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: including
includingzincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.88 m
- From
- 903.83 m
- To
- 904.71 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:903.83-904.71
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: including
andgoldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.07 m
- From
- 926.34 m
- To
- 934.41 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:926.34-934.41
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.37 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.07 m
- From
- 926.34 m
- To
- 934.41 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:926.34-934.41
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 1386Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1386
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.07 m
- From
- 926.34 m
- To
- 934.41 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:926.34-934.41
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1386 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1,386”
Context: and
andleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.07 m
- From
- 926.34 m
- To
- 934.41 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:926.34-934.41
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.07 m
- From
- 926.34 m
- To
- 934.41 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:926.34-934.41
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
includinggoldGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.31 m
- From
- 928.7 m
- To
- 931.01 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:928.7-931.01
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.96 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.96”
Context: including
includingsilverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.31 m
- From
- 928.7 m
- To
- 931.01 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:928.7-931.01
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: including
includingcopperGrade: 1575Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1575
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.31 m
- From
- 928.7 m
- To
- 931.01 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:928.7-931.01
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1575 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1,575”
Context: including
includingleadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.31 m
- From
- 928.7 m
- To
- 931.01 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:928.7-931.01
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: including
includingzincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.31 m
- From
- 928.7 m
- To
- 931.01 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:928.7-931.01
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2015-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: including
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.