M79: Annual Report to shareholders

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Mammoth Minerals Limited
Ticker
M79
Exchange
ASX
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Lead, Antimony, Zinc, Nickel, Cobalt, Manganese
Document categories
Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other
Extracted
2026-09-29 15:24:10 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Mammoth Minerals Limited's annual report for the year ended June 30, 2026, highlights a significant corporate transformation, including a name change and a strategic shift to focus on gold, silver, and critical minerals projects in the Americas. The company acquired the Excelsior Springs Gold-Silver Project and Bella Gold Project in the USA, while divesting other assets. Exploration activities at Excelsior Springs yielded high-grade rock chip samples and some positive drill intercepts, but the company reported a substantial financial loss and a material uncertainty regarding its ability to continue as a going concern.

Reasoning: The annual report details a significant corporate restructuring and acquisition of new projects, particularly in the US, shifting focus to gold and silver. While some high-grade rock chip and drill results are reported, including one drill intercept exceeding the prior best grade and another exceeding the prior best grade-thickness product, the company also recorded a substantial loss and a material uncertainty regarding its ability to continue as a going concern, indicating financial challenges despite exploration progress.

Positive factors

  • Portfolio transformation and acquisition of new gold/silver projects in the USA
  • High-grade rock chip samples from Blue Dick and Kentucky trends
  • Some positive drill intercepts from Buster, including one exceeding prior best grade and one exceeding prior best GT
  • BHP Xplor accelerator program for Picha project
  • QP/CP signed off on exploration results

Negative factors

  • Significant financial loss for the year
  • Material uncertainty regarding going concern
  • Some drill results are historical or re-releases
  • Rock chip samples are not as reliable as drill results
  • Divestment of projects (Paterson, Mt Slopeaway)
  • Apparent width only for drill intercepts
  • Deleterious elements (antimony) present in some samples

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 116

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The report states that the information is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Glenn Poole, a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.

Evidence · text

“The information in this report is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Glenn Poole, a Competent Person who is the Managing Director and CEO of Mammoth Minerals Limited and a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity which he has undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Poole consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill intercepts are given as downhole lengths without any mention of true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

“13.72m @ 1.15g/t Au from 62.5m – MEXRC2601”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The results for the Charaque Gold-Silver Project are explicitly referred to as 'Significant historical results' and 'data collected during the option period' following a termination of an earn-in agreement.

Evidence · text

“Significant historical results include:”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The drilling program at Buster is described as testing 'only around 1.3km of a total 7km prospective mineralised corridor', implying an extension of known mineralization.

Evidence · text

“By the end of the reporting period has now more than 21,000m of drilling on the Buster Trend, testing only around 1.3km of a total 7km prospective mineralised corridor.”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Several rock chip samples from the Blue Dick and Kentucky Trends report exceptionally high grades, such as 17,582 g/t Ag, 15,336 g/t Ag, 97.3 g/t Au, and 57 g/t Au, which are well above typical thresholds.

Evidence · text

“0.20m @ 17,582g/t Ag, 0.75g/t Au, 2.76% Cu, 1.72% Sb – MREX00625 – Channel Sample”

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: Antimony (Sb) is explicitly mentioned with grade values in several polymetallic rock chip samples from the Blue Dick and Kentucky Trends.

Evidence · text

“39.80g/t Au, 251g/t Ag, 4.65% Cu, 5.73% Pb – MREX00522”

Inferred Carlin-typeneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company states that diamond drilling at Buster 'redefined the Company’s understanding of the potential for a “Carlin-type” mineral system at Excelsior'.

Evidence · text

“The detail available from the assay results and drill core observations has redefined the Company’s understanding of the potential for a “Carlin-type” mineral system at Excelsior.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 116. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (116)

MEXRC2601Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2601
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.72 m
From
62.5 m
To
76.22 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2601:62.5-76.22

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend, part of the Excelsior Springs project, but the grade is below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“13.72m @ 1.15g/t Au from 62.5m – MEXRC2601”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2605Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2605
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.62 m
From
219.51 m
To
227.13 m
Intercept Depth
219.51 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2605:219.51-227.13

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend, part of the Excelsior Springs project, but the grade is below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“7.62m @ 2.1g/t Au from 219.51m – MEXRC2605”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2617Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.54 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2617
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.54 m
From
0 m
To
33.54 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2617:0-33.54

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend shows good length from surface and its grade-thickness product exceeds the project's prior best, indicating potential for bulk tonnage.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Good intercept length from surface
  • Grade-thickness product exceeds prior best GT
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“33.54m @ 1.25g/t Au from 0m Incl 9.15m @ 3.18g/t Au from 18.29m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2617Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 3.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2617
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
3.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.15 m
From
18.29 m
To
27.44 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2617:18.29-27.44

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a new gold drill sub-intercept from the Buster Trend, part of the Excelsior Springs project, but the grade is below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“9.15m @ 3.18g/t Au from 18.29m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2617Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 1.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.77 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2617
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.77 m
From
44.21 m
To
60.98 m
Intercept Depth
44.21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2617:44.21-60.98

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a new gold drill sub-intercept from the Buster Trend, part of the Excelsior Springs project, but the grade is below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“16.77m @ 1.84g/t Au from 44.21m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2617Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 7.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2617
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
7.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
51.83 m
To
54.88 m
Intercept Depth
51.83 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2617:51.83-54.88

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new gold drill sub-intercept from the Buster Trend is a bonanza intercept, exceeding the project's prior best grade, indicating high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Grade exceeds prior best grade for the project
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“3.05m @ 7.70g/t Au from 51.83m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2613Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2613
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
0 m
To
12.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2613:0-12.2

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend, part of the Excelsior Springs project, showing mineralization from surface, but the grade is below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • From surface
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“12.20m @ 2.56g/t Au from surface – MEXRC2613”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2614Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2614
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
0 m
To
3.05 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2614:0-3.05

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend, part of the Excelsior Springs project, showing mineralization from surface, but the grade is below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • From surface
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“3.05m @ 1.32g/t Au from surface – MEXRC2614”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2614Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.77 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2614
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.77 m
From
7.62 m
To
24.39 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2614:7.62-24.39

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend, part of the Excelsior Springs project, but the grade is below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“16.77m @ 1.06g/t Au from 7.62m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2615Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2615
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.67 m
From
0 m
To
10.67 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2615:0-10.67

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend shows mineralization from surface, but the grade is significantly below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • From surface
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“10.67m @ 0.70g/t Au from surface – MEXRC2615”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXRC2616Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.77 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXRC2616
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.77 m
From
57.93 m
To
74.7 m
Intercept Depth
57.93 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXRC2616:57.93-74.7

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend has a grade significantly below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“16.77m @ 0.74g/t Au from 57.93m – MEXRC2616”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXDD007Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXDD007
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.32 m
From
26 m
To
32.32 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXDD007:26-32.32

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend, part of the Excelsior Springs project, but the grade is below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“6.32m @ 2.10g/t Au from 26m Incl 1.0m @ 6.40g/t Au from 27m – MEXDD007”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXDD007Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 6.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXDD007
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
6.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
27 m
To
28 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXDD007:27-28

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new gold drill sub-intercept from the Buster Trend shows a high-grade zone above the project average, but over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Grade is above project average
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“1.0m @ 6.40g/t Au from 27m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXDD003Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXDD003
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
28.5 m
To
42.5 m
Intercept Depth
28.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXDD003:28.5-42.5

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new gold drill intercept from the Buster Trend has a grade significantly below the project's average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“14.0m at 0.99g/t Au from 28.5m Incl 2.0m @ 4.54g/t Au from 40.5m – MEXDD003”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MEXDD003Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 4.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MEXDD003
Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
4.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
40.5 m
To
42.5 m
Intercept Depth
40.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MEXDD003:40.5-42.5

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new gold drill sub-intercept from the Buster Trend shows a moderate grade over a narrow width, below the project average.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept from an active exploration program
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“2.0m @ 4.54g/t Au from 40.5m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 16Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 39.8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
39.8
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza gold grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“39.80g/t Au, 251g/t Ag, 4.65% Cu, 5.73% Pb – MREX00522”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 17Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 251Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
251
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade silver, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“39.80g/t Au, 251g/t Ag, 4.65% Cu, 5.73% Pb – MREX00522”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 18Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 4.65Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
4.65
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“39.80g/t Au, 251g/t Ag, 4.65% Cu, 5.73% Pb – MREX00522”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 19Excelsior Springs · leadGrade: 5.73Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
5.73
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade lead, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade lead
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“39.80g/t Au, 251g/t Ag, 4.65% Cu, 5.73% Pb – MREX00522”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 20Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 4.56Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
4.56
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade gold, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“4.56g/t Au, 0.32% Cu – MREX00487”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 21Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade copper, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade copper
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“4.56g/t Au, 0.32% Cu – MREX00487”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 22Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 11.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
11.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade gold, indicating potential, though over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“0.4m @ 11.70g/t Au, 5.99g/t Ag, 0.54% Cu – MREX00476 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 23Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 5.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
5.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows low-grade silver over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade silver
  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“0.4m @ 11.70g/t Au, 5.99g/t Ag, 0.54% Cu – MREX00476 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 24Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade copper over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade copper
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“0.4m @ 11.70g/t Au, 5.99g/t Ag, 0.54% Cu – MREX00476 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 25Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 2.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade gold over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“2.1m @ 2.64g/t Au, incl. 0.4m @ 8.72g/t Au – MREX00502-505 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 26Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 8.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
8.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade gold, indicating potential, though over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“0.4m @ 8.72g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 27Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 1556Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1556
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,556g/t Ag, 2.40% Cu, 0.25% Sb – MREX00527”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 28Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,556g/t Ag, 2.40% Cu, 0.25% Sb – MREX00527”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 29Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“1,556g/t Ag, 2.40% Cu, 0.25% Sb – MREX00527”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 30Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 1357Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1357
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,357g/t Ag, 0.70% Cu, 0.20% Sb – MREX00526”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 31Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade copper, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,357g/t Ag, 0.70% Cu, 0.20% Sb – MREX00526”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 32Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“1,357g/t Ag, 0.70% Cu, 0.20% Sb – MREX00526”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 33Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 1269Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1269
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,269g/t Ag, 0.38% Cu, 0.52g/t Au, 0.29% Sb – MREX00517”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 34Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade copper, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,269g/t Ag, 0.38% Cu, 0.52g/t Au, 0.29% Sb – MREX00517”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 35Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows low-grade gold, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade gold
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,269g/t Ag, 0.38% Cu, 0.52g/t Au, 0.29% Sb – MREX00517”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 36Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“1,269g/t Ag, 0.38% Cu, 0.52g/t Au, 0.29% Sb – MREX00517”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 37Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 1196Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1196
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,196g/t Ag, 3.24% Cu, 0.39g/t Au, 0.45% Sb – MREX00513”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 38Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,196g/t Ag, 3.24% Cu, 0.39g/t Au, 0.45% Sb – MREX00513”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 39Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows low-grade gold, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade gold
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,196g/t Ag, 3.24% Cu, 0.39g/t Au, 0.45% Sb – MREX00513”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 40Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“1,196g/t Ag, 3.24% Cu, 0.39g/t Au, 0.45% Sb – MREX00513”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 41Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 17582Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
17582
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades over a narrow width, indicating significant high-grade potential, though antimony is present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“0.20m @ 17,582g/t Ag, 0.75g/t Au, 2.76% Cu, 1.72% Sb – MREX00625 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 42Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows low-grade gold over a narrow width, with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade gold
  • Narrow channel sample length
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“0.20m @ 17,582g/t Ag, 0.75g/t Au, 2.76% Cu, 1.72% Sb – MREX00625 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 43Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 2.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade copper over a narrow width, with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“0.20m @ 17,582g/t Ag, 0.75g/t Au, 2.76% Cu, 1.72% Sb – MREX00625 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 44Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“0.20m @ 17,582g/t Ag, 0.75g/t Au, 2.76% Cu, 1.72% Sb – MREX00625 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 45Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 3407Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
3407
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades over a narrow width, indicating significant high-grade potential, though antimony is present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“0.50m @ 3,407g/t Ag, 0.54% Cu, 0.47% Sb – MREX00621 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 46Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade copper over a narrow width, with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“0.50m @ 3,407g/t Ag, 0.54% Cu, 0.47% Sb – MREX00621 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 47Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“0.50m @ 3,407g/t Ag, 0.54% Cu, 0.47% Sb – MREX00621 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 48Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 15336Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
15336
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“15,336g/t Ag, 7.46g/t Au, 2.53% Cu, 0.31% Sb – MREX00718”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 49Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 7.46Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
7.46
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade gold, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“15,336g/t Ag, 7.46g/t Au, 2.53% Cu, 0.31% Sb – MREX00718”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 50Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.53
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“15,336g/t Ag, 7.46g/t Au, 2.53% Cu, 0.31% Sb – MREX00718”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 51Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“15,336g/t Ag, 7.46g/t Au, 2.53% Cu, 0.31% Sb – MREX00718”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 52Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 3945Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
3945
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“3,945g/t Ag, 14.4g/t Au, 0.73% Cu, 0.17% Sb – MREX00721”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 53Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 14.4Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
14.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza gold grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“3,945g/t Ag, 14.4g/t Au, 0.73% Cu, 0.17% Sb – MREX00721”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 54Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade copper, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“3,945g/t Ag, 14.4g/t Au, 0.73% Cu, 0.17% Sb – MREX00721”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 55Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“3,945g/t Ag, 14.4g/t Au, 0.73% Cu, 0.17% Sb – MREX00721”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 56Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 1760Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1760
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,760g/t Ag, 1.98% Cu, 0.32% Sb – MREX00626”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 57Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,760g/t Ag, 1.98% Cu, 0.32% Sb – MREX00626”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 58Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“1,760g/t Ag, 1.98% Cu, 0.32% Sb – MREX00626”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 59Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 1450Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1450
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,450g/t Ag, 1.87g/t Au, 0.22% Sb – MREX00745”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 60Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade gold, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade gold
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“1,450g/t Ag, 1.87g/t Au, 0.22% Sb – MREX00745”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 61Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“1,450g/t Ag, 1.87g/t Au, 0.22% Sb – MREX00745”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 62Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
12.2
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza gold grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“12.2g/t Au, 48.9g/t Ag – MREX00698”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 63Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 48.9Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
48.9
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows moderate-grade silver, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade silver
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“12.2g/t Au, 48.9g/t Ag – MREX00698”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 64Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 2.64Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.64
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows high-grade gold, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“2.64g/t Au, 5.07g/t Ag – MREX00696”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 65Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 5.07Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
5.07
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows low-grade silver, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade silver
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“2.64g/t Au, 5.07g/t Ag – MREX00696”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 66Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
10.1
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows bonanza copper grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“10.1% Cu, 0.82g/t Au, 25.76g/t Ag – MREX00638”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 67Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows low-grade gold, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade gold
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“10.1% Cu, 0.82g/t Au, 25.76g/t Ag – MREX00638”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 68Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 25.76Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
25.76
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Blue Dick Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Blue Dick Trend shows low-grade silver, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade silver
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“10.1% Cu, 0.82g/t Au, 25.76g/t Ag – MREX00638”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 69Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 9.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
9.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Imperial Gold Mine
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Imperial Gold Mine shows bonanza copper grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade copper
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“1.20m @ 9.35% Cu – MREX00780 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 70Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Imperial Gold Mine
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Imperial Gold Mine shows high-grade copper, indicating significant potential, though over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“1.35m @ 4.20% Cu – MREX00779 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 71Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Imperial Gold Mine
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Imperial Gold Mine shows high-grade copper, indicating potential, though over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“0.8m @ 1.39% Cu – MREX00781 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 72Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Imperial Gold Mine
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Imperial Gold Mine shows high-grade copper, indicating potential, though over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“0.3m @ 1.72% Cu – MREX00782 – Channel Sample”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 73Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 5580Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
5580
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“MREX00310: 5,580g/t Ag, >1.0% Sb, 2.46g/t Au and 1.95% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 74Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 1Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“MREX00310: 5,580g/t Ag, >1.0% Sb, 2.46g/t Au and 1.95% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 75Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 2.46Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.46
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows high-grade gold, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“MREX00310: 5,580g/t Ag, >1.0% Sb, 2.46g/t Au and 1.95% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 76Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.95
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“MREX00310: 5,580g/t Ag, >1.0% Sb, 2.46g/t Au and 1.95% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 77Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 97.3Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
97.3
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows bonanza gold grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00183: 97.3g/t Au, 321g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 78Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 321Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
321
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00183: 97.3g/t Au, 321g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 79Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 57Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
57
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows bonanza gold grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00152: 57g/t Au, 99g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 80Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 99Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
99
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows high-grade silver, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00152: 57g/t Au, 99g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 81Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 46.8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
46.8
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows bonanza gold grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00319: 46.8g/t Au, 187g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 82Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 187Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
187
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows high-grade silver, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00319: 46.8g/t Au, 187g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 83Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 903Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
903
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00321: 903g/t Ag, 4.51g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 84Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
4.51
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows high-grade gold, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00321: 903g/t Ag, 4.51g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 85Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 869Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
869
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“MREX00317: 869g/t Ag, 0.65g/t Au, 0.19% Sb”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 86Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows low-grade gold, though it's a surface sample with antimony present.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade gold
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Presence of antimony

Evidence · text

“MREX00317: 869g/t Ag, 0.65g/t Au, 0.19% Sb”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 87Excelsior Springs · antimonyGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
antimony
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Kentucky Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
antimony

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Kentucky Trend shows the presence of antimony, which is a deleterious element, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results
  • Antimony is a deleterious element

Evidence · text

“MREX00317: 869g/t Ag, 0.65g/t Au, 0.19% Sb”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 88Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 839Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
839
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00233: 839g/t Ag, 0.48g/t Au, 11.1% Pb and 1.25% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 89Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows low-grade gold, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade gold
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00233: 839g/t Ag, 0.48g/t Au, 11.1% Pb and 1.25% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 90Excelsior Springs · leadGrade: 11.1Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
11.1
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows bonanza lead grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade lead
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00233: 839g/t Ag, 0.48g/t Au, 11.1% Pb and 1.25% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 91Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00233: 839g/t Ag, 0.48g/t Au, 11.1% Pb and 1.25% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 92Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 754Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
754
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00242: 754g/t Ag, 10.2% Pb and 1.65% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 93Excelsior Springs · leadGrade: 10.2Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
10.2
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows bonanza lead grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade lead
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00242: 754g/t Ag, 10.2% Pb and 1.65% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 94Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.65
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00242: 754g/t Ag, 10.2% Pb and 1.65% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 95Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 337Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
337
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows bonanza silver grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00240: 337g/t Ag, 1.63g/t Au, 8.95% Pb and 1.28% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 96Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows moderate-grade gold, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade gold
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00240: 337g/t Ag, 1.63g/t Au, 8.95% Pb and 1.28% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 97Excelsior Springs · leadGrade: 8.95Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
8.95
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows bonanza lead grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade lead
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00240: 337g/t Ag, 1.63g/t Au, 8.95% Pb and 1.28% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 98Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00240: 337g/t Ag, 1.63g/t Au, 8.95% Pb and 1.28% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 99Excelsior Springs · silverGrade: 190Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
190
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows high-grade silver, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00232: 190g/t Ag, 0.71g/t Au, 22.5% Pb and 2.36% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 100Excelsior Springs · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows low-grade gold, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade gold
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00232: 190g/t Ag, 0.71g/t Au, 22.5% Pb and 2.36% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 101Excelsior Springs · leadGrade: 22.5Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
22.5
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows bonanza lead grades, indicating significant high-grade potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade lead
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00232: 190g/t Ag, 0.71g/t Au, 22.5% Pb and 2.36% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 102Excelsior Springs · copperGrade: 2.36Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Excelsior Springs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
2.36
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Stantz Trend
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This rock chip sample from the Stantz Trend shows high-grade copper, indicating significant potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Polymetallic nature indicates potential for multiple revenue streams
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“MREX00232: 190g/t Ag, 0.71g/t Au, 22.5% Pb and 2.36% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 103Picha · copperGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Picha
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Ichucollo target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Ichucollo target shows high-grade copper over a good length, indicating significant potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper over good length
  • Competent Person sign-off

Evidence · text

“13.1m @ 1.38% Cu & 10.21 g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 104Picha · silverGrade: 10.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Picha
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
10.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Ichucollo target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Ichucollo target shows low-grade silver over a good length.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade silver

Evidence · text

“13.1m @ 1.38% Cu & 10.21 g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 105Picha · copperGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Picha
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Ichucollo target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Ichucollo target shows high-grade copper over a good length, indicating significant potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper over good length
  • Competent Person sign-off

Evidence · text

“24.0m @ 1.08% Cu & 3.99g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 106Picha · silverGrade: 3.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Picha
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
3.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Ichucollo target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Ichucollo target shows low-grade silver over a good length.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade silver

Evidence · text

“24.0m @ 1.08% Cu & 3.99g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 107Picha · copperGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Picha
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
30 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Ichucollo target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Ichucollo target shows moderate-grade copper over a good length, indicating potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade copper over good length
  • Competent Person sign-off

Evidence · text

“30.0m @ 0.79% Cu & 7.56g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 108Picha · silverGrade: 7.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Picha
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
7.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Ichucollo target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Ichucollo target shows low-grade silver over a good length.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade silver

Evidence · text

“30.0m @ 0.79% Cu & 7.56g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 109Picha · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Picha
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Ichucollo target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Ichucollo target shows moderate-grade copper over a good length, indicating potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade copper over good length
  • Competent Person sign-off

Evidence · text

“16.0m @ 0.60% Cu & 9.1g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 110Picha · silverGrade: 9.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Picha
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
9.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Ichucollo target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample from the Ichucollo target shows low-grade silver over a good length.

Positive factors

  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low-grade silver

Evidence · text

“16.0m @ 0.60% Cu & 9.1g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 111Charaque · silverGrade: 538Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Charaque
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
538
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Huallatani Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical channel sample from the Huallatani Target shows bonanza silver grades over a narrow width, indicating past high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new data
  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“channel sample (0.3m x 0.2m) of 538g/t Ag and 19.5% Pb”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 112Charaque · leadGrade: 19.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Charaque
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
19.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Huallatani Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical channel sample from the Huallatani Target shows bonanza lead grades over a narrow width, indicating past high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade lead
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new data
  • Narrow channel sample length

Evidence · text

“channel sample (0.3m x 0.2m) of 538g/t Ag and 19.5% Pb”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 113Charaque · silverGrade: 43.2Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Charaque
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
43.2
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Huallatani Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical dump sample from the Huallatani Target shows moderate-grade silver, indicating past potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade silver
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new data
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“dump samples from historical artisanal mining of up to 43.2g/t Ag and 7.74% Pb”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 114Charaque · leadGrade: 7.74Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Charaque
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
7.74
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Huallatani Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical dump sample from the Huallatani Target shows high-grade lead, indicating past potential, though it's a surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade lead
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new data
  • Surface sample, less reliable than drill results

Evidence · text

“dump samples from historical artisanal mining of up to 43.2g/t Ag and 7.74% Pb”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 115Charaque · silverGrade: 929Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Charaque
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
929
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Arco Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical channel sample from the Arco Target shows bonanza silver grades, indicating past high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade silver
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new data

Evidence · text

“channel samples (2.0m x 0.2m) up to 929g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 116Charaque · copperGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Charaque
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
M79

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Location

Location
Arco Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical channel sample from the Arco Target shows high-grade copper, indicating past potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper
  • Competent Person sign-off

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new data

Evidence · text

“another of up to 0.98% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.