M2M: High-Grade Gold Results Expands Footprint at Golden Crown

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Mt Malcolm Mines NL
Ticker
M2M
Exchange
ASX
Region
Western Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-10-21 00:16:23 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Mt Malcolm Mines NL reported high-grade gold assay results from its recent RC drilling campaign at the Golden Crown Prospect in Western Australia, significantly expanding the mineralisation footprint. The campaign included extensional drilling that intersected gold approximately 350m west of the previously known core, with notable intercepts such as 6m at 9.28 g/t Au and 9m at 3.64 g/t Au. These results demonstrate strong potential for resource growth and continuity, although true widths are not yet known and some assays are pending final 1m splits.

Reasoning: The drilling campaign delivered high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, and significantly expanded the mineralisation footprint at the Golden Crown Prospect by 350m to the west. This step-out drilling identified new mineralisation and compelling targets for follow-up, demonstrating strong potential for resource growth. QA/QC was disclosed, but true widths are not yet known and some assays are pending 1m splits.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent
  • Multiple stacked structures identified
  • Continuity supported by drilling
  • High hit rate

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits
  • Drill spacing not sufficient for MRE

Facts used in scoring: 40

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab (Intertek Perth), QP sign-off (Mr. Vivek Sharma), and stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Laboratory and company QA/QC results were reviewed and found satisfactory.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and maximum 1m internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a lower cut-off of 0.5g/t Au, with a maximum of 1m of consecutive internal dilution.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Extensional drilling intersected gold approximately 350m west of the 2024–2025 core, significantly expanding the mineralisation footprint.

Evidence · text

“extensional drilling intersected gold approximately 350m west of the 2024–2025 core”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The campaign included infill holes to extend already interpreted lodes, indicating a mix of exploration and resource definition.

Evidence · text

“The campaign had four aims: infill holes to extend already interpreted lodes, step out along the NW trend, drill deeper than earlier programs, and test western parts of the prospect.”

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 40. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (37)

26GCRC014Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 9.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC014
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
9.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
31 m
To
37 m
Hole Depth
180 m
Intercept Depth
31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC014:31-37
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348979
Northing
6803006
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“6m @ 9.28 g/t Au from 31m in 26GCRC014”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 9.28 g/t Au over 6m is well above the orogenic gold threshold for open pit mining.

Evidence · text

“6m @ 9.28 g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC014Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 23.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC014
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
23.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
31 m
To
32 m
Hole Depth
180 m
Intercept Depth
31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC014:31-32
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348979
Northing
6803006
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“1m @ 23.5 g/t Au from 31m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 23.5 g/t Au over 1m is well above the orogenic gold threshold for open pit mining.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 23.5 g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC024Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 3.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC024
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
3.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
12 m
To
21 m
Hole Depth
72 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC024:12-21
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348918
Northing
6802902
Elevation
399 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“9m @ 3.64 g/t Au from 12m in 26GCRC024”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC024Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC024
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
6.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
12 m
To
16 m
Hole Depth
72 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC024:12-16
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348918
Northing
6802902
Elevation
399 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“4m @ 6.50 g/t Au from 12m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 6.50 g/t Au over 4m is above the orogenic gold threshold for open pit mining.

Evidence · text

“4m @ 6.50 g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC022Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 5.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC022
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
5.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
13 m
To
16 m
Hole Depth
96 m
Intercept Depth
13 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC022:13-16
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348951
Northing
6802878
Elevation
400 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“3m @ 5.78 g/t Au from 13 m in 26GCRC022”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 5.78 g/t Au over 3m is above the orogenic gold threshold for open pit mining.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 5.78 g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC022Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 13.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC022
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
13.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
13 m
To
14 m
Hole Depth
96 m
Intercept Depth
13 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC022:13-14
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348951
Northing
6802878
Elevation
400 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“1m @ 13.77 g/t Au from 13m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 13.77 g/t Au over 1m is well above the orogenic gold threshold for open pit mining.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 13.77 g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC027Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 2.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC027
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
2.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
21 m
To
26 m
Hole Depth
78 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC027:21-26
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348916
Northing
6802947
Elevation
400 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“5m @ 2.88 g/t Au from 21m in 26GCRC027”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC027Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC027
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
5.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
22 m
To
23 m
Hole Depth
78 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC027:22-23
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348916
Northing
6802947
Elevation
400 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“1m @ 5.38 g/t Au from 22m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 5.38 g/t Au over 1m is above the orogenic gold threshold for open pit mining.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 5.38 g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC030Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 3.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC030
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
3.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
22 m
To
23 m
Hole Depth
66 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC030:22-23
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348673
Northing
6802880
Elevation
392 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold intercept from extensional drilling, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · text

“1m @ 3.55 g/t Au from 22m in 26GCRC030”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: This intercept is approximately 245m west of 26GCRC027, significantly expanding the mineralisation footprint.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 3.55 g/t Au from 22m in 26GCRC030, about 245m west of 26GCRC027.”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC009Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC009
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
31 m
To
32 m
Hole Depth
72 m
Intercept Depth
31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC009:31-32
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348861
Northing
6802960
Elevation
397 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 31

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC009Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC009
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
49 m
To
50 m
Hole Depth
72 m
Intercept Depth
31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC009:49-50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348861
Northing
6802960
Elevation
397 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 49

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC010Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC010
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
37 m
To
38 m
Hole Depth
90 m
Intercept Depth
37 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC010:37-38
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348873
Northing
6802974
Elevation
398 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 37

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC010Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC010
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
53 m
To
54 m
Hole Depth
90 m
Intercept Depth
37 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC010:53-54
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348873
Northing
6802974
Elevation
398 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: 53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC010Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC010
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
66 m
To
67 m
Hole Depth
90 m
Intercept Depth
37 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC010:66-67
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348873
Northing
6802974
Elevation
398 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: 66

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC011Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC011
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
49 m
To
52 m
Hole Depth
108 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC011:49-52
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348891
Northing
6803008
Elevation
399 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 49

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC011Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC011
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
49 m
To
50 m
Hole Depth
108 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC011:49-50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348891
Northing
6803008
Elevation
399 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1m @ 1.35 g/t Au from 49m”

Context: 0.82

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC011Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC011
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
55 m
To
56 m
Hole Depth
108 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC011:55-56
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348891
Northing
6803008
Elevation
399 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: 55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC012Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC012
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
7 m
To
12 m
Hole Depth
138 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC012:7-12
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348902
Northing
6803026
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1.46”

Context: 7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC012Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC012
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
3.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
8 m
To
9 m
Hole Depth
138 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC012:8-9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348902
Northing
6803026
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1m @ 3.02g/t Au from 8m”

Context: 1.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC012Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 3.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC012
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
3.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
56 m
To
57 m
Hole Depth
138 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC012:56-57
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348902
Northing
6803026
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“3.87”

Context: 56

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC013Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC013
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
34 m
To
35 m
Hole Depth
108 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC013:34-35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348962
Northing
6803030
Elevation
408 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: 34

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC015Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC015
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
44 m
To
47 m
Hole Depth
174 m
Intercept Depth
44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC015:44-47
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348997
Northing
6802993
Elevation
410 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: 44

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC016Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC016
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
44 m
To
45 m
Hole Depth
174 m
Intercept Depth
44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC016:44-45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
349011
Northing
6802971
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 44

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC019Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC019
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
12 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
108 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC019:12-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348969
Northing
6802939
Elevation
405 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 12

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC020Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC020
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
18 m
To
21 m
Hole Depth
138 m
Intercept Depth
18 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC020:18-21
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348957
Northing
6802897
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 18

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC024Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC024
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
26 m
To
27 m
Hole Depth
72 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC024:26-27
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348918
Northing
6802902
Elevation
399 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC025Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC025
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
1.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
28 m
To
30 m
Hole Depth
84 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC025:28-30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348918
Northing
6802954
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1.97”

Context: 28

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC025Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 2.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC025
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
2.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
29 m
To
30 m
Hole Depth
84 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC025:29-30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348918
Northing
6802954
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1m @ 2.65 g/t Au from 29m”

Context: 1.97

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC026Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC026
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
29 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
84 m
Intercept Depth
29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC026:29-33
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348921
Northing
6802952
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC026Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC026
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
31 m
To
32 m
Hole Depth
84 m
Intercept Depth
29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC026:31-32
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348921
Northing
6802952
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1m @1.11 g/t Au from 31 m”

Context: 0.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC026Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC026
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
38 m
To
39 m
Hole Depth
84 m
Intercept Depth
29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC026:38-39
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348921
Northing
6802952
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1”

Context: 38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC026Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC026
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
45 m
To
46 m
Hole Depth
84 m
Intercept Depth
29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC026:45-46
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348921
Northing
6802952
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 45

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC027Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC027
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
35 m
To
39 m
Hole Depth
78 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC027:35-39
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348916
Northing
6802947
Elevation
400 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC027Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 165Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC027
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
165
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
60 m
To
62 m
Hole Depth
78 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC027:60-62
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348916
Northing
6802947
Elevation
400 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported grade of 165 g/t Au over 2m is highly inconsistent with its sub-interval of 1m at 2.77 g/t Au, suggesting a likely typo and making the result unreliable.

Negative factors

  • Inconsistent grade reporting
  • Likely typo in grade value
  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“165”

Context: 60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Inconsistent Grade ReportingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The reported grade of 165 g/t Au over 2m is highly inconsistent with its sub-interval of 1m at 2.77 g/t Au, suggesting a likely typo.

Evidence · table

“165”

Context: 60

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC027Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 2.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC027
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
2.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
60 m
To
61 m
Hole Depth
78 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC027:60-61
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348916
Northing
6802947
Elevation
400 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate-grade gold sub-interval, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“1m @ 2.77 g/t Au from 60m”

Context: 165

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC027Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC027
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
71 m
To
72 m
Hole Depth
78 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC027:71-72
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348916
Northing
6802947
Elevation
400 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 71

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”
26GCRC029Golden Crown Prospect · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26GCRC029
Project
Golden Crown Prospect
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
M2M

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
7 m
To
8 m
Hole Depth
66 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26GCRC029:7-8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
348767
Northing
6802885
Elevation
394 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Perth
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from extensional drilling, but true width is unknown and 1m splits are pending.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Assays pending for 1m splits

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: This intercept is from the western traverse, expanding the mineralisation footprint.

Evidence · text

“Holes 26GCRC028–032 form a west-trending traverse of about 320m. Gold was intersected in 26GCRC029”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts are reported as downhole widths; true widths are not yet known.”

Resource Estimates (2)

indicatedGolden Crown · goldTonnes: 80800Grade: 1.47Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3800Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
M2M

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Dr. Spero Carras
Resource group id
resource:78beed8bbe25dce904c1
Deposit or zone
Golden Crown

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
80800
Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3800
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-03-12

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical Indicated Resource estimate for Golden Crown, compliant with JORC, but the effective date is from March 2026, making it stale.

Positive factors

  • JORC Compliant

Negative factors

  • Stale Estimate

Evidence · table

“80,800”

Context: Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

inferredGolden Crown · goldTonnes: 14900Grade: 1.68Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 800Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
M2M

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Dr. Spero Carras
Resource group id
resource:16f08ee796556b4db525
Deposit or zone
Golden Crown

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14900
Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
800
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-03-12

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource estimate for Golden Crown, compliant with JORC, but the effective date is from March 2026, making it stale and representing a speculative category.

Positive factors

  • JORC Compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource
  • Stale Estimate

Evidence · table

“14,900”

Context: Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

Metallurgical Results (1)

cyanide leachGolden Crown · goldRecovery: 94.32 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
M2M

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
cyanide leach
Processing Route
cyanide leach
Sample
five transition-zone composites

Recovery

Recovery
94.32 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-05-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical preliminary cyanide leach testwork showed high gold recovery, but it was bench-scale and may not be representative of all mineralisation.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery

Negative factors

  • Bench Scale Only
  • Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

“94.3% average (ASX gold recovery in preliminary cyanide leach testwork: 6th May 2024)”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.