M24: Investor Presentation
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Mamba Exploration Limited
- Ticker
- M24
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Murchison Goldfields
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Silver, Lead
- Document categories
- Capital raise, Agreement transaction, Other, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-02 00:16:31 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Mamba Exploration Limited has completed a A$6.0 million placement to strategic investors and existing shareholders, securing funding for its exploration activities. The company has also formed a strategic alliance with New Murchison Gold and entered an earn-in agreement for the Poison Hills project. The presentation highlights drill-ready gold targets at Meeka East, with a 6,000m RC program planned for Q4 CY26, and strong historical copper intersections at Copper Hills, where diamond drilling is scheduled for Q1 CY27.
Reasoning: Mamba Exploration has successfully completed a A$6.0 million placement and secured strategic partnerships, providing capital and support for its exploration pipeline. While the presented drill results are historical, the company has outlined concrete plans for maiden RC drilling at Meeka East (gold) and diamond drilling at Copper Hills (copper) in the near future, leveraging strong historical intercepts and a seasoned team.
Positive factors
- Secured funding through placement
- Strategic investment and proposed technical alliance
- Earn-in agreement on new ground
- Experienced team and advisors
- Drill-ready gold targets with planned RC program
Negative factors
- Drill results presented are historical, not new
- No current drill results to evaluate
- Upcoming drilling is prospective, not guaranteed success
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document for historical results
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 25
Classification and evidence
Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: All drill results presented are explicitly historical, with original reporting dates ranging from 1969 to 2010.
Evidence · text
“Historical exploration results, refer ASX announcement 21 September 2026 and slide 9, reported under the JORC Code (2012) and not verified by drilling undertaken by the Company.”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative · Story-specific tag
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The document does not provide specific QA/QC details for the historical drill results, only referring to a prior ASX announcement for JORC Table 1.
Evidence · text
“Source: ASX announcement 21 September 2026, historical exploration results reported under the JORC Code (2012). ... true widths not known.”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade for historical copper intercepts is clearly stated as 0.2% Cu.
Evidence · text
“Downhole length-weighted intervals at a 0.2% Cu lower cut-off, maximum 5m internal dilution, no top cut”
Compositing Transparentpositive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The maximum internal dilution for compositing historical intercepts is stated as 5m.
Evidence · text
“maximum 5m internal dilution”
Nearology Playneutral · Story-specific tag
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The Poison Hills project is highlighted for its proximity and adjacency to Solstice Minerals' Nanadie Project, a known copper discovery.
Evidence · text
“Earn-in on the Poison Hills project ... adjoining Solstice Minerals' Nanadie Project (ASX: SLS)”
Capital Raisepositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The company has completed a A$6.0 million placement to strategic investors and existing shareholders.
Evidence · text
“$6.0m placement to strategic investors, select institutions and existing shareholders.”
Strategic Investmentpositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: New Murchison Gold has invested A$0.5 million as a cornerstone investor in the placement.
Evidence · text
“New Merchison Gold has agreed to invest A$0.5m as a cornerstone investor in the placement”
Technical Alliancepositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: A non-binding technical services alliance is proposed with New Murchison Gold to support exploration.
Evidence · text
“Proposed technical services alliance (non-binding)”
Earn-in Agreementpositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The company has entered an earn-in agreement for the Poison Hills project, allowing it to acquire up to 80% ownership.
Evidence · text
“Earn-in on the Poison Hills project”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 24. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (24)
CHRC14Copper Hills · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHRC14
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 50 m
- Hole Depth
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHRC14:24-50
Location
- Easting
- 668236
- Northing
- 7015416
- Elevation
- 474.9 m
- Azimuth
- 245 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1990. The grade and width are good for a copper target.
Positive factors
- Strong historical copper grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 26.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CHRC14Copper Hills · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHRC14
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 50 m
- Hole Depth
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHRC14:24-50
Location
- Easting
- 668236
- Northing
- 7015416
- Elevation
- 474.9 m
- Azimuth
- 245 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold grade is low and not particularly material, especially given it's a historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Low gold grade
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 26.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD7Copper Hills · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 23.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD7
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 23.1 m
- From
- 39.9 m
- To
- 63 m
- Hole Depth
- 63.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD7:39.9-63
Location
- Easting
- 668207
- Northing
- 7015424
- Elevation
- 472.7 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1969. The grade and width are good for a copper target.
Positive factors
- Strong historical copper grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 23.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD6Copper Hills · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD6
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.9 m
- From
- 61.8 m
- To
- 80.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 307.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD6:61.8-80.7
Location
- Easting
- 668257
- Northing
- 7015444
- Elevation
- 473.3 m
- Azimuth
- 242 °
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a good historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1969.
Positive factors
- Good historical copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 18.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD6Copper Hills · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD6
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.9 m
- From
- 61.8 m
- To
- 80.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 307.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD6:61.8-80.7
Location
- Easting
- 668257
- Northing
- 7015444
- Elevation
- 473.3 m
- Azimuth
- 242 °
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold grade is low and not particularly material, especially given it's a historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Low gold grade
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 18.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD6Copper Hills · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD6
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.8 m
- From
- 145.7 m
- To
- 163.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 307.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD6:145.7-163.5
Location
- Easting
- 668257
- Northing
- 7015444
- Elevation
- 473.3 m
- Azimuth
- 242 °
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a good historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1969.
Positive factors
- Good historical copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 17.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD6Copper Hills · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD6
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.8 m
- From
- 145.7 m
- To
- 163.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 307.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD6:145.7-163.5
Location
- Easting
- 668257
- Northing
- 7015444
- Elevation
- 473.3 m
- Azimuth
- 242 °
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold grade is low and not particularly material, especially given it's a historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Low gold grade
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 17.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CHRC12Copper Hills · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHRC12
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 2 m
- To
- 12 m
- Hole Depth
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHRC12:2-12
Location
- Easting
- 668197
- Northing
- 7015308
- Elevation
- 474.6 m
- Azimuth
- 238 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1990.
Positive factors
- Strong historical copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
10CHRC004Copper Hills · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 10CHRC004
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 78 m
- Hole Depth
- 178 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 10CHRC004:60-78
Location
- Easting
- 668208
- Northing
- 7015534
- Elevation
- 462.4 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a good historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 2010.
Positive factors
- Good historical copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: 18.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
10CHRC004Copper Hills · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 10CHRC004
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 78 m
- Hole Depth
- 178 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 10CHRC004:60-78
Location
- Easting
- 668208
- Northing
- 7015534
- Elevation
- 462.4 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold grade is low and not particularly material, especially given it's a historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Low gold grade
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 18.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
08CHD001Copper Hills · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 08CHD001
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 145 m
- Hole Depth
- 168.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 08CHD001:120-145
Location
- Easting
- 668256
- Northing
- 7015511
- Elevation
- 464 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 2008.
Positive factors
- Moderate historical copper grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 25.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
08CHD001Copper Hills · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 08CHD001
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 145 m
- Hole Depth
- 168.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 08CHD001:120-145
Location
- Easting
- 668256
- Northing
- 7015511
- Elevation
- 464 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold grade is low and not particularly material, especially given it's a historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Low gold grade
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 25.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD18Copper Hills · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD18
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 78.9 m
- To
- 84.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 228.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD18:78.9-84.4
Location
- Easting
- 668292
- Northing
- 7015328
- Elevation
- 466.1 m
- Azimuth
- 248 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1969. The intercept length is narrow.
Positive factors
- Strong historical copper grade
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Narrow intercept length
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD6Copper Hills · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD6
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.1 m
- From
- 115.1 m
- To
- 128.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 307.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD6:115.1-128.2
Location
- Easting
- 668257
- Northing
- 7015444
- Elevation
- 473.3 m
- Azimuth
- 242 °
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1969.
Positive factors
- Moderate historical copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 13.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD6Copper Hills · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD6
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.1 m
- From
- 115.1 m
- To
- 128.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 307.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD6:115.1-128.2
Location
- Easting
- 668257
- Northing
- 7015444
- Elevation
- 473.3 m
- Azimuth
- 242 °
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold grade is low and not particularly material, especially given it's a historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Low gold grade
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 13.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CHRC11Copper Hills · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHRC11
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 32 m
- Hole Depth
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHRC11:22-32
Location
- Easting
- 668145
- Northing
- 7015397
- Elevation
- 467.7 m
- Azimuth
- 257 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a good historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1990.
Positive factors
- Good historical copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CHRC11Copper Hills · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHRC11
- Project
- Copper Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 32 m
- Hole Depth
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHRC11:22-32
Location
- Easting
- 668145
- Northing
- 7015397
- Elevation
- 467.7 m
- Azimuth
- 257 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical gold grade is low and not particularly material, especially given it's a historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Low gold grade
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD5Lady Alma · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD5
- Project
- Lady Alma
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.4 m
- From
- 151.7 m
- To
- 165.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 322.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 151.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD5:151.7-165.1
Location
- Easting
- 667290
- Northing
- 7016816
- Elevation
- 476.5 m
- Azimuth
- 57 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1969.
Positive factors
- Strong historical copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 13.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CD3Lady Alma · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CD3
- Project
- Lady Alma
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.4 m
- From
- 93.5 m
- To
- 109.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 184.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CD3:93.5-109.9
Location
- Easting
- 666828
- Northing
- 7016481
- Elevation
- 476.9 m
- Azimuth
- 9 °
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1969.
Positive factors
- Strong historical copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 16.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CHRC7Lady Alma · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHRC7
- Project
- Lady Alma
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 28 m
- Hole Depth
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHRC7:6-28
Location
- Easting
- 666855
- Northing
- 7016553
- Elevation
- 475.5 m
- Azimuth
- 235 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1990.
Positive factors
- Moderate historical copper grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CHRC7Lady Alma · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHRC7
- Project
- Lady Alma
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 28 m
- Hole Depth
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHRC7:6-28
Location
- Easting
- 666855
- Northing
- 7016553
- Elevation
- 475.5 m
- Azimuth
- 235 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate historical gold intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1990.
Positive factors
- Moderate historical gold grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
YGHR1Lady Alma · copperGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- YGHR1
- Project
- Lady Alma
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 24 m
- Hole Depth
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- YGHR1:22-24
Location
- Easting
- 666539
- Northing
- 7017513
- Elevation
- 482.2 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1996-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1996. The intercept length is narrow.
Positive factors
- High historical copper grade
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Narrow intercept length
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
YGHR1Lady Alma · copperGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- YGHR1
- Project
- Lady Alma
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 37 m
- To
- 39 m
- Hole Depth
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 37 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- YGHR1:37-39
Location
- Easting
- 666539
- Northing
- 7017513
- Elevation
- 482.2 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1996-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high historical copper intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1996. The intercept length is narrow.
Positive factors
- High historical copper grade
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Narrow intercept length
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
YGHR1Lady Alma · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- YGHR1
- Project
- Lady Alma
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- murchison goldfields
- Reported Region
- murchison goldfields
- Ticker
- M24
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 37 m
- To
- 39 m
- Hole Depth
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 37 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- YGHR1:37-39
Location
- Easting
- 666539
- Northing
- 7017513
- Elevation
- 482.2 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1996-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate historical gold intercept, but its novelty is low as it was reported in 1996. The intercept length is narrow.
Positive factors
- Moderate historical gold grade
Negative factors
- Result is historical
- Narrow intercept length
- True width not known
- No QA/QC disclosure in this document
Evidence · table
“1.31”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.