Lundin Gold Reports Further High-Grade Results at FDNS including 108.61 g/t Au over 11.75 Metres; Development Begins Toward FDN East Following Record Drill Result of 236.62 g/t Au over 3.95 Metres
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Lundin Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- LUG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- southeast Ecuador
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-08-20 19:45:26 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Lundin Gold announced further high-grade drill results from its Fruta del Norte gold mine in southeast Ecuador, including a record 236.62 g/t gold over 3.95 meters at FDN East and 108.61 g/t gold over 11.75 meters at FDNS. These results are from ongoing conversion and exploration drilling programs, demonstrating continuity and extending mineralization beyond current resource envelopes. The company has commenced underground development towards FDN East to accelerate drilling and support potential future production, reinforcing confidence in the deposit's growth and conversion potential.
Reasoning: Lundin Gold reported exceptional high-grade gold and silver drill results from its FDNS, FDN East, and FDN projects, including a record 236.62 g/t Au over 3.95 m and 108.61 g/t Au over 11.75 m. These results extend mineralization, support resource conversion, and have prompted underground development towards FDN East, indicating strong potential for resource and reserve growth.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercepts
- high_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- step_out_extension
- qaqc_disclosed
- category_upgrade
- development_advancing
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 908
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 908. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (908)
FDN-C26-393FDNS · goldGrade: 7.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-393
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.05 m
- True Width
- 2.32 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-393:0.00-4.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- high_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“7.58”
Context: 4.05
FDN-C26-393FDNS · silverGrade: 41.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-393
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 41.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.05 m
- True Width
- 2.32 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-393:0.00-4.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“41.75”
Context: 4.05
FDN-C26-393FDNS · goldGrade: 16.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-393
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 0.98 m
- From
- 1.55 m
- To
- 3.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-393:0.00-4.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptional gold grades over a narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“16.23”
Context: 1.70
FDN-C26-393FDNS · silverGrade: 84.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-393
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 84.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 0.98 m
- From
- 1.55 m
- To
- 3.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-393:0.00-4.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“84.48”
Context: 1.70
FDN-C26-393FDNS · goldGrade: 6.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-393
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 1.81 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 73.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-393:70.45-73.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“6.86”
Context: 3.15
FDN-C26-393FDNS · silverGrade: 109.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-393
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 109.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 1.81 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 73.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-393:70.45-73.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“109.82”
Context: 3.15
FDN-C26-393FDNS · goldGrade: 10.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-393
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 72.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-393:70.45-73.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“10.38”
Context: 1.65
FDN-C26-393FDNS · silverGrade: 106.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-393
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 106.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 72.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-393:70.45-73.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“106.16”
Context: 1.65
FDN-C26-394FDNS · goldGrade: 9.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-394
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.52 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-394:0.00-3.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -20 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“9.12”
Context: 3.75
FDN-C26-394FDNS · silverGrade: 6.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-394
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.52 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-394:0.00-3.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -20 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“6.17”
Context: 3.75
FDN-C26-394FDNS · goldGrade: 16.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-394
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- True Width
- 1.83 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-394:0.00-3.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -20 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptional gold grades over a narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“16.65”
Context: 1.95
FDN-C26-394FDNS · silverGrade: 8.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-394
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- True Width
- 1.83 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-394:0.00-3.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -20 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“8.28”
Context: 1.95
FDN-C26-394FDNS · goldGrade: 10.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-394
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.52 m
- From
- 119.6 m
- To
- 123.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-394:119.60-123.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -20 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“10.41”
Context: 3.75
FDN-C26-394FDNS · silverGrade: 67.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-394
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.52 m
- From
- 119.6 m
- To
- 123.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-394:119.60-123.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -20 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“67.11”
Context: 3.75
FDN-C26-394FDNS · goldGrade: 33.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-394
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 122.5 m
- To
- 123.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-394:119.60-123.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -20 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptional gold grades over a narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“33.10”
Context: 0.85
FDN-C26-394FDNS · silverGrade: 16.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-394
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 122.5 m
- To
- 123.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-394:119.60-123.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -20 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“16.50”
Context: 0.85
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 7.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.55 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 17.95 m
- To
- 21.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:17.95-21.50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“7.52”
Context: 3.55
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 12.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.55 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 17.95 m
- To
- 21.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:17.95-21.50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.51”
Context: 3.55
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 12.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 20.05 m
- To
- 20.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:17.95-21.50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“12.15”
Context: 0.50
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 20.05 m
- To
- 20.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:17.95-21.50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“10.80”
Context: 0.50
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- True Width
- 2.76 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 40.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:37.70-40.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“4.40”
Context: 3.05
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 12.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- True Width
- 2.76 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 40.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:37.70-40.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.51”
Context: 3.05
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 8.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 38.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:37.70-40.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“8.82”
Context: 0.85
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 22.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 38.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:37.70-40.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“22.52”
Context: 0.85
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 8.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 1.17 m
- From
- 60.3 m
- To
- 61.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:60.30-61.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“8.89”
Context: 1.25
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 7.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 1.17 m
- From
- 60.3 m
- To
- 61.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:60.30-61.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“7.77”
Context: 1.25
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 8.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 2.81 m
- From
- 79.05 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:79.05-82.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“8.81”
Context: 3.25
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 8.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 2.81 m
- From
- 79.05 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:79.05-82.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“8.08”
Context: 3.25
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 16.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 80.75 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:79.05-82.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptional gold grades over a narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“16.28”
Context: 1.55
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 12.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 80.75 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:79.05-82.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.48”
Context: 1.55
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 6.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 2.73 m
- From
- 92.45 m
- To
- 95.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:92.45-95.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“6.35”
Context: 3.15
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 3.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 2.73 m
- From
- 92.45 m
- To
- 95.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:92.45-95.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“3.99”
Context: 3.15
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 10.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 1.08 m
- From
- 92.45 m
- To
- 93.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:92.45-95.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“10.55”
Context: 1.25
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 4.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 1.08 m
- From
- 92.45 m
- To
- 93.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:92.45-95.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.41”
Context: 1.25
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 5.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 104.85 m
- To
- 107.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:104.85-107.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“5.89”
Context: 2.45
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 51.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 104.85 m
- To
- 107.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:104.85-107.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“51.73”
Context: 2.45
FDN-C26-396FDNS · goldGrade: 10.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 104.85 m
- To
- 105.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:104.85-107.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“10.03”
Context: 1.10
FDN-C26-396FDNS · silverGrade: 106.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-396
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 106.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 104.85 m
- To
- 105.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-396:104.85-107.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778147
- Northing
- 9582594
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 157 °
- Dip
- -24 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“106.91”
Context: 1.10
FDN-C26-399FDNS · goldGrade: 8.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-399
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.46 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
- Hole Depth
- 126.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-399:0.00-3.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -34 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“8.82”
Context: 3.00
FDN-C26-399FDNS · silverGrade: 6.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-399
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.46 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
- Hole Depth
- 126.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-399:0.00-3.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -34 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“6.53”
Context: 3.00
FDN-C26-399FDNS · goldGrade: 12.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-399
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.64 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
- Hole Depth
- 126.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-399:0.00-3.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -34 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“12.33”
Context: 2.00
FDN-C26-399FDNS · silverGrade: 7.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-399
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.64 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
- Hole Depth
- 126.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-399:0.00-3.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582333
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -34 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“7.75”
Context: 2.00
FDN-C26-400FDNS · goldGrade: 8.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-400
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- True Width
- 3.11 m
- From
- 41.5 m
- To
- 45.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 105 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-400:41.50-45.90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582334
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“8.68”
Context: 4.40
FDN-C26-400FDNS · silverGrade: 4.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-400
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- True Width
- 3.11 m
- From
- 41.5 m
- To
- 45.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 105 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-400:41.50-45.90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582334
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.91”
Context: 4.40
FDN-C26-400FDNS · goldGrade: 87.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-400
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 87.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 45.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 105 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-400:41.50-45.90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582334
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows bonanza gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercepts
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“87.40”
Context: 0.40
FDN-C26-400FDNS · silverGrade: 36.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-400
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 45.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 105 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-400:41.50-45.90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582334
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“36.20”
Context: 0.40
FDN-C26-400FDNS · goldGrade: 18.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-400
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.75 m
- True Width
- 6.19 m
- From
- 78.8 m
- To
- 87.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 105 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-400:78.80-87.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582334
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows exceptional gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“18.74”
Context: 8.75
FDN-C26-400FDNS · silverGrade: 12.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-400
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.75 m
- True Width
- 6.19 m
- From
- 78.8 m
- To
- 87.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 105 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-400:78.80-87.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582334
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.30”
Context: 8.75
FDN-C26-400FDNS · goldGrade: 375Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-400
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 375
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 81.55 m
- To
- 81.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 105 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-400:78.80-87.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582334
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows bonanza gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercepts
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“375.00”
Context: 0.40
FDN-C26-400FDNS · silverGrade: 178Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-400
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 178
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 81.55 m
- To
- 81.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 105 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-400:78.80-87.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778157
- Northing
- 9582334
- Elevation
- 1090 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“178.00”
Context: 0.40
FDN-C26-402FDNS · goldGrade: 18.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-402
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.25 m
- True Width
- 6.54 m
- From
- 34.55 m
- To
- 43.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 80.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-402:34.55-43.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 292 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows exceptional gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“18.20”
Context: 9.25
FDN-C26-402FDNS · silverGrade: 21.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-402
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.25 m
- True Width
- 6.54 m
- From
- 34.55 m
- To
- 43.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 80.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-402:34.55-43.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 292 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“21.38”
Context: 9.25
FDN-C26-402FDNS · goldGrade: 96.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-402
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 96.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.64 m
- From
- 34.55 m
- To
- 35.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 80.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-402:34.55-43.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 292 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows bonanza gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercepts
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“96.13”
Context: 0.90
FDN-C26-402FDNS · silverGrade: 64.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-402
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 64.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.64 m
- From
- 34.55 m
- To
- 35.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 80.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-402:34.55-43.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 292 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“64.25”
Context: 0.90
FDN-C26-402FDNS · goldGrade: 52.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-402
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 52.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 41.9 m
- To
- 43.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 80.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-402:34.55-43.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 292 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows bonanza gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercepts
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“52.87”
Context: 1.30
FDN-C26-402FDNS · silverGrade: 23.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-402
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 41.9 m
- To
- 43.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 80.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-402:34.55-43.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 292 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“23.64”
Context: 1.30
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 5.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- True Width
- 3.41 m
- From
- 4.5 m
- To
- 9.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:4.50-9.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“5.36”
Context: 5.30
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- True Width
- 3.41 m
- From
- 4.5 m
- To
- 9.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:4.50-9.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“7.50”
Context: 5.30
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 7.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:4.50-9.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“12.00”
Context: 1.35
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 9.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 7.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:4.50-9.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“9.61”
Context: 1.35
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 4.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- True Width
- 4.4 m
- From
- 48.35 m
- To
- 54.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:48.35-54.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“4.07”
Context: 5.75
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 4.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- True Width
- 4.4 m
- From
- 48.35 m
- To
- 54.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:48.35-54.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.56”
Context: 5.75
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 11.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.61 m
- From
- 52.1 m
- To
- 52.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:48.35-54.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“11.36”
Context: 0.80
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.61 m
- From
- 52.1 m
- To
- 52.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:48.35-54.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“9.40”
Context: 0.80
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 3.06 m
- From
- 61.9 m
- To
- 65.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:61.90-65.90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“4.55”
Context: 4.00
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 3.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 3.06 m
- From
- 61.9 m
- To
- 65.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:61.90-65.90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“3.19”
Context: 4.00
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.54 m
- From
- 63.45 m
- To
- 64.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:61.90-65.90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“11.30”
Context: 0.70
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.54 m
- From
- 63.45 m
- To
- 64.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:61.90-65.90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: 0.70
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- True Width
- 2.57 m
- From
- 69.75 m
- To
- 73.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:69.75-73.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: 3.35
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- True Width
- 2.57 m
- From
- 69.75 m
- To
- 73.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:69.75-73.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“5.38”
Context: 3.35
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 33.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.31 m
- From
- 69.75 m
- To
- 70.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:69.75-73.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows bonanza gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercepts
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“33.40”
Context: 0.40
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.31 m
- From
- 69.75 m
- To
- 70.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:69.75-73.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“15.80”
Context: 0.40
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 6.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- True Width
- 1.8 m
- From
- 87.25 m
- To
- 89.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:87.25-89.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“6.92”
Context: 2.55
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- True Width
- 1.8 m
- From
- 87.25 m
- To
- 89.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:87.25-89.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“16.00”
Context: 2.55
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 14.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.81 m
- From
- 88.25 m
- To
- 89.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:87.25-89.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“14.88”
Context: 1.15
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 28.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.81 m
- From
- 88.25 m
- To
- 89.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:87.25-89.80
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“28.51”
Context: 1.15
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 13.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- True Width
- 3.04 m
- From
- 96.9 m
- To
- 101.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:96.90-101.20
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“13.41”
Context: 4.30
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 11.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- True Width
- 3.04 m
- From
- 96.9 m
- To
- 101.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:96.90-101.20
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“11.63”
Context: 4.30
FDN-C26-403FDNS · goldGrade: 39.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 96.9 m
- To
- 98.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:96.90-101.20
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows bonanza gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercepts
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“39.91”
Context: 1.35
FDN-C26-403FDNS · silverGrade: 18.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-403
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 96.9 m
- To
- 98.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-403:96.90-101.20
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778148
- Northing
- 9582595
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“18.09”
Context: 1.35
FDN-C26-405FDNS · goldGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- True Width
- 1.62 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:0.00-3.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“4.55”
Context: 3.45
FDN-C26-405FDNS · silverGrade: 46.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- True Width
- 1.62 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:0.00-3.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“46.99”
Context: 3.45
FDN-C26-405FDNS · goldGrade: 8.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 2.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:0.00-3.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“8.80”
Context: 0.95
FDN-C26-405FDNS · silverGrade: 61.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 61.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 2.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:0.00-3.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“61.90”
Context: 0.95
FDN-C26-405FDNS · goldGrade: 5.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 80.3 m
- To
- 82.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:80.30-82.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“5.11”
Context: 1.80
FDN-C26-405FDNS · silverGrade: 52.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 52.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 80.3 m
- To
- 82.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:80.30-82.10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“52.77”
Context: 1.80
FDN-C26-405FDNS · goldGrade: 4.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.65 m
- True Width
- 1.71 m
- From
- 87.35 m
- To
- 91 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:87.35-91.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“4.84”
Context: 3.65
FDN-C26-405FDNS · silverGrade: 30.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.65 m
- True Width
- 1.71 m
- From
- 87.35 m
- To
- 91 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:87.35-91.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“30.39”
Context: 3.65
FDN-C26-405FDNS · goldGrade: 13.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.42 m
- From
- 87.35 m
- To
- 88.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:87.35-91.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“13.45”
Context: 0.90
FDN-C26-405FDNS · silverGrade: 89.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 89.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.42 m
- From
- 87.35 m
- To
- 88.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:87.35-91.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“89.60”
Context: 0.90
FDN-C26-405FDNS · goldGrade: 13.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.15 m
- True Width
- 1.95 m
- From
- 117.55 m
- To
- 121.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:117.55-121.70
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“13.73”
Context: 4.15
FDN-C26-405FDNS · silverGrade: 141.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 141.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.15 m
- True Width
- 1.95 m
- From
- 117.55 m
- To
- 121.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:117.55-121.70
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“141.26”
Context: 4.15
FDN-C26-405FDNS · goldGrade: 31.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:117.55-121.70
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows bonanza gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercepts
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“31.03”
Context: 1.70
FDN-C26-405FDNS · silverGrade: 274.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-405
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 274.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-405:117.55-121.70
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778218
- Northing
- 9582536
- Elevation
- 1085 m
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong silver grades, contributing significantly to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“274.96”
Context: 1.70
FDN-C26-407FDNS · goldGrade: 3.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 2.5 m
- To
- 4.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:2.50-4.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“3.75”
Context: 2.45
FDN-C26-407FDNS · silverGrade: 9.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 2.5 m
- To
- 4.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:2.50-4.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“9.18”
Context: 2.45
FDN-C26-407FDNS · goldGrade: 4.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.75 m
- True Width
- 4.11 m
- From
- 8.45 m
- To
- 13.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:8.45-13.20
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“4.73”
Context: 4.75
FDN-C26-407FDNS · silverGrade: 6.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.75 m
- True Width
- 4.11 m
- From
- 8.45 m
- To
- 13.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:8.45-13.20
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“6.23”
Context: 4.75
FDN-C26-407FDNS · goldGrade: 7.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 10.45 m
- To
- 11.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:8.45-13.20
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“7.42”
Context: 1.10
FDN-C26-407FDNS · silverGrade: 9.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 10.45 m
- To
- 11.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:8.45-13.20
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“9.94”
Context: 1.10
FDN-C26-407FDNS · goldGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.65 m
- True Width
- 4.89 m
- From
- 16.9 m
- To
- 22.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:16.90-22.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“5.10”
Context: 5.65
FDN-C26-407FDNS · silverGrade: 8.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.65 m
- True Width
- 4.89 m
- From
- 16.9 m
- To
- 22.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:16.90-22.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“8.52”
Context: 5.65
FDN-C26-407FDNS · goldGrade: 15.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.04 m
- From
- 16.9 m
- To
- 18.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:16.90-22.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptional gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“15.75”
Context: 1.20
FDN-C26-407FDNS · silverGrade: 8.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.04 m
- From
- 16.9 m
- To
- 18.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:16.90-22.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“8.87”
Context: 1.20
FDN-C26-407FDNS · goldGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.15 m
- True Width
- 6.19 m
- From
- 30.15 m
- To
- 37.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:30.15-37.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“6.30”
Context: 7.15
FDN-C26-407FDNS · silverGrade: 8.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.15 m
- True Width
- 6.19 m
- From
- 30.15 m
- To
- 37.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:30.15-37.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“8.11”
Context: 7.15
FDN-C26-407FDNS · goldGrade: 19.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.17 m
- From
- 35.95 m
- To
- 37.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:30.15-37.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptional gold grades over a very narrow width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“19.30”
Context: 1.35
FDN-C26-407FDNS · silverGrade: 19.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-407
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.17 m
- From
- 35.95 m
- To
- 37.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-407:30.15-37.30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778174
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 298 °
- Dip
- -16 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“19.25”
Context: 1.35
FDN-C26-408FDNS · goldGrade: 5.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-408
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 1.63 m
- From
- 77.35 m
- To
- 80.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-408:77.35-80.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 281 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“5.52”
Context: 3.25
FDN-C26-408FDNS · silverGrade: 20.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-408
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 1.63 m
- From
- 77.35 m
- To
- 80.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-408:77.35-80.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 281 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“20.40”
Context: 3.25
FDN-C26-408FDNS · goldGrade: 12.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-408
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 77.35 m
- To
- 78.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-408:77.35-80.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 281 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“12.02”
Context: 1.35
FDN-C26-408FDNS · silverGrade: 43.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-408
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 77.35 m
- To
- 78.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-408:77.35-80.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582486
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 281 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate silver grades, contributing to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“43.80”
Context: 1.35
FDN-C26-409FDNS · goldGrade: 5.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-409
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- True Width
- 5.32 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 6.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-409:0.00-6.50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582485
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 268 °
- Dip
- -36 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, supporting resource conversion in an underground epithermal deposit.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“5.22”
Context: 6.50
FDN-C26-409FDNS · silverGrade: 4.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-409
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- True Width
- 5.32 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 6.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-409:0.00-6.50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582485
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 268 °
- Dip
- -36 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the interval.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.94”
Context: 6.50
FDN-C26-409FDNS · goldGrade: 9.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-409
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 0.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-409:0.00-6.50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582485
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 268 °
- Dip
- -36 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong gold grades over a very narrow width, enhancing the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
- true_width_disclosed
- continuity_confirmed
Evidence · table
“9.67”
Context: 0.45
FDN-C26-409FDNS · silverGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-409
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 0.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-409:0.00-6.50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 778169
- Northing
- 9582485
- Elevation
- 1087 m
- Azimuth
- 268 °
- Dip
- -36 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows weak silver grades, contributing marginally to the overall value of the intercept.
Positive factors
- true_width_disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.50”
Context: 0.45
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 0.98 m
- From
- 1.55 m
- To
- 3.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:1.55-3.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.23 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 27.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.23 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.23”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 84.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 84.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 0.98 m
- From
- 1.55 m
- To
- 3.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:1.55-3.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 84.48 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 143.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“84.48”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 72.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:70.45-72.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.38 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.38 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.38”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 106.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 106.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 72.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:70.45-72.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 106.16 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 175.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“106.16”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- True Width
- 1.83 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-1.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.65 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 32.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.65 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.65”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- True Width
- 1.83 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-1.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.28 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.28 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.28”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 33.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 122.5 m
- To
- 123.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:122.5-123.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 28.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 33.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“33.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 122.5 m
- To
- 123.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:122.5-123.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 20.05 m
- To
- 20.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:20.05-20.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.15 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.15 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.15”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 20.05 m
- To
- 20.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:20.05-20.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.80”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 38.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:37.7-38.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.82 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.82 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.82”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 22.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 38.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:37.7-38.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.52”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 80.75 m
- To
- 82.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:80.75-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.28 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.28 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.28”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 12.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 80.75 m
- To
- 82.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:80.75-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.48”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 1.08 m
- From
- 92.45 m
- To
- 93.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:92.45-93.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.55 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.55 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.55”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 1.08 m
- From
- 92.45 m
- To
- 93.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:92.45-93.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.41 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.41 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.41”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 104.85 m
- To
- 105.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:104.85-105.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.03 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.03 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.03”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 106.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 106.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 104.85 m
- To
- 105.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:104.85-105.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 106.91 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 117.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“106.91”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.64 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.33 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.33 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.33”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.64 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.75 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.75 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.75”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 87.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 87.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 45.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:45.5-45.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 87.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 35.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 87.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“87.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 36.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 45.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:45.5-45.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“36.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 375Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 375
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 81.55 m
- To
- 81.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:81.55-81.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 375 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 150.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 375 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“375.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 178Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 178
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 81.55 m
- To
- 81.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:81.55-81.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 178 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 71.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“178.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 96.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 96.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.64 m
- From
- 34.55 m
- To
- 35.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:34.55-35.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 96.13 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 86.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 96.13 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“96.13”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 64.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 64.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.64 m
- From
- 34.55 m
- To
- 35.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:34.55-35.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 64.25 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 57.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“64.25”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 52.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 52.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 41.9 m
- To
- 43.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.9-43.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 52.87 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 68.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 52.87 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“52.87”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 23.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 41.9 m
- To
- 43.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.9-43.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 23.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.64”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 7.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:6.5-7.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 9.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 7.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:6.5-7.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.61 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.61 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.61”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.61 m
- From
- 52.1 m
- To
- 52.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:52.1-52.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.36 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.36 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.36”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.61 m
- From
- 52.1 m
- To
- 52.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:52.1-52.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.54 m
- From
- 63.45 m
- To
- 64.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:63.45-64.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.3 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.3 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.30”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.54 m
- From
- 63.45 m
- To
- 64.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:63.45-64.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 33.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.31 m
- From
- 69.75 m
- To
- 70.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:69.75-70.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 33.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“33.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.31 m
- From
- 69.75 m
- To
- 70.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:69.75-70.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.80”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.81 m
- From
- 88.25 m
- To
- 89.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:88.25-89.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.88 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.88 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.88”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 28.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.81 m
- From
- 88.25 m
- To
- 89.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:88.25-89.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 28.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28.51”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 39.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 96.9 m
- To
- 98.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.9-98.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.91 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 53.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 39.91 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“39.91”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 18.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 96.9 m
- To
- 98.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.9-98.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.09 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.09 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.09”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 2.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:1.5-2.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.8 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.8 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.80”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 61.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 61.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 2.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:1.5-2.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 61.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 58.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“61.90”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.42 m
- From
- 87.35 m
- To
- 88.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:87.35-88.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.45 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.45 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.45”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 89.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 89.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.42 m
- From
- 87.35 m
- To
- 88.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:87.35-88.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 89.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 80.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“89.60”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 31.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:120-121.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.03 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 52.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 31.03 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“31.03”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 274.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 274.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:120-121.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 274.96 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 467.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 274.96 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“274.96”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 7.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 10.45 m
- To
- 11.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:10.45-11.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.42 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.42 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.42”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 9.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 10.45 m
- To
- 11.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:10.45-11.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.94”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.04 m
- From
- 16.9 m
- To
- 18.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:16.9-18.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.75 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.75 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.75”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.04 m
- From
- 16.9 m
- To
- 18.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:16.9-18.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.87”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 19.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.17 m
- From
- 35.95 m
- To
- 37.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:35.95-37.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 26.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.30”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 19.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.17 m
- From
- 35.95 m
- To
- 37.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:35.95-37.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.25”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 77.35 m
- To
- 78.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:77.35-78.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.02 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.02 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.02”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 43.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 77.35 m
- To
- 78.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:77.35-78.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 43.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 59.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“43.80”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 0.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-0.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.67 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.67 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.67”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 0.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-0.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 28.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.66 m
- From
- 5.7 m
- To
- 6.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:5.7-6.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 28.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.66 m
- From
- 5.7 m
- To
- 6.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:5.7-6.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-409FDNS · goldGrade: 5.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-409
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.46 m
- From
- 94.3 m
- To
- 97.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-409:94.3-97.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.55 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.55”
Context: FDN-C26-409
FDN-C26-409FDNS · silverGrade: 4.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-409
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.46 m
- From
- 94.3 m
- To
- 97.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-409:94.3-97.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.62”
Context: FDN-C26-409
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.43 m
- From
- 95.15 m
- To
- 96.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:95.15-96.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.09 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.09 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.09”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 5.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.43 m
- From
- 95.15 m
- To
- 96.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:95.15-96.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.29”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-411FDNS · goldGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-411
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.85 m
- True Width
- 4.78 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 113.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-411:109-113.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.02 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.6 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.02”
Context: FDN-C26-411
FDN-C26-411FDNS · silverGrade: 16.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-411
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.85 m
- True Width
- 4.78 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 113.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-411:109-113.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 78.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.18”
Context: FDN-C26-411
FDN-C26-413FDNS · goldGrade: 14.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-413
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- True Width
- 1.23 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 51.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-413:49-51.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.28 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.28 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.28”
Context: FDN-C26-413
FDN-C26-413FDNS · silverGrade: 41.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-413
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 41.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- True Width
- 1.23 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 51.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-413:49-51.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 41.29 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 88.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“41.29”
Context: FDN-C26-413
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 45.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 45.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.29 m
- From
- 49.65 m
- To
- 50.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49.65-50.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 45.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 45.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“45.60”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 105Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 105
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.29 m
- From
- 49.65 m
- To
- 50.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49.65-50.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 105 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“105.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-417FDNS · goldGrade: 51.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-417
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 2.02 m
- From
- 41.85 m
- To
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-417:41.85-45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.56 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 162.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 51.56 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“51.56”
Context: FDN-C26-417
FDN-C26-417FDNS · silverGrade: 25.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-417
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 2.02 m
- From
- 41.85 m
- To
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-417:41.85-45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 79.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 25.11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“25.11”
Context: FDN-C26-417
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 87.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 87.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- True Width
- 1.19 m
- From
- 43.15 m
- To
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:43.15-45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 87.12 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 161.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 87.12 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“87.12”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 40.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- True Width
- 1.19 m
- From
- 43.15 m
- To
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:43.15-45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40.99 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 75.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“40.99”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-420FDNS · goldGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- True Width
- 2.89 m
- From
- 18.45 m
- To
- 26.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:18.45-26.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.1 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 51.5 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.10”
Context: FDN-C26-420
FDN-C26-420FDNS · silverGrade: 15.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- True Width
- 2.89 m
- From
- 18.45 m
- To
- 26.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:18.45-26.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 134.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.90”
Context: FDN-C26-420
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 103Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 103
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.14 m
- From
- 22.75 m
- To
- 23.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:22.75-23.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 103 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 41.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 103 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“103.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 91.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 91.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.14 m
- From
- 22.75 m
- To
- 23.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:22.75-23.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 91.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“91.30”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-420FDNS · goldGrade: 10.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 0.41 m
- From
- 49.5 m
- To
- 50.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:49.5-50.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.81 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.81 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.81”
Context: FDN-C26-420
FDN-C26-420FDNS · silverGrade: 33.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 0.41 m
- From
- 49.5 m
- To
- 50.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:49.5-50.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“33.10”
Context: FDN-C26-420
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.27 m
- From
- 49.5 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49.5-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.68 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.68 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.68”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 47.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.27 m
- From
- 49.5 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49.5-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 47.35 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“47.35”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-420FDNS · goldGrade: 4.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 59.75 m
- To
- 61.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:59.75-61.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.86 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.86”
Context: FDN-C26-420
FDN-C26-420FDNS · silverGrade: 21.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 59.75 m
- To
- 61.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:59.75-61.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.96 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.96”
Context: FDN-C26-420
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.27 m
- From
- 60.95 m
- To
- 61.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:60.95-61.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.05 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.05 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.05”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 26.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.27 m
- From
- 60.95 m
- To
- 61.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:60.95-61.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 26.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.50”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-420FDNS · goldGrade: 26.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 0.72 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 78.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:76.2-78.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.17 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 55.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 26.17 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.17”
Context: FDN-C26-420
FDN-C26-420FDNS · silverGrade: 37.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 0.72 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 78.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:76.2-78.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.66 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 79.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.66”
Context: FDN-C26-420
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 130Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 130
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.14 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 76.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:76.2-76.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 130 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 52.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 130 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“130.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 63.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 63.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.14 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 76.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:76.2-76.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 63.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“63.60”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-420FDNS · goldGrade: 8.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 96.8 m
- To
- 98.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:96.8-98.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.85 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.85 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.85”
Context: FDN-C26-420
FDN-C26-420FDNS · silverGrade: 18.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-420
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 96.8 m
- To
- 98.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-420:96.8-98.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.40”
Context: FDN-C26-420
FDN-C26-421FDNS · goldGrade: 3.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-421
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- True Width
- 0.79 m
- From
- 0.75 m
- To
- 3.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-421:0.75-3.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.74 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.74”
Context: FDN-C26-421
FDN-C26-421FDNS · silverGrade: 16.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-421
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- True Width
- 0.79 m
- From
- 0.75 m
- To
- 3.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-421:0.75-3.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.52”
Context: FDN-C26-421
FDN-C26-421FDNS · goldGrade: 6.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-421
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 125.1 m
- To
- 127.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-421:125.1-127.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.21 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.21”
Context: FDN-C26-421
FDN-C26-421FDNS · silverGrade: 6.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-421
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 125.1 m
- To
- 127.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-421:125.1-127.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.62”
Context: FDN-C26-421
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 29.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.14 m
- From
- 125.65 m
- To
- 126.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:125.65-126.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 29.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.70”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.14 m
- From
- 125.65 m
- To
- 126.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:125.65-126.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.30”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-422FDNS · goldGrade: 5.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-422
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 45.4 m
- To
- 47.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-422:45.4-47.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.27 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.27”
Context: FDN-C26-422
FDN-C26-422FDNS · silverGrade: 51.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-422
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 0.95 m
- From
- 45.4 m
- To
- 47.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-422:45.4-47.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.85 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 98.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“51.85”
Context: FDN-C26-422
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.4 m
- From
- 46.1 m
- To
- 46.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:46.1-46.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.78 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.78 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.78”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 105.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 105.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.4 m
- From
- 46.1 m
- To
- 46.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:46.1-46.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 105.45 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 84.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“105.45”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-422FDNS · goldGrade: 8.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-422
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.5 m
- From
- 98.65 m
- To
- 101.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-422:98.65-101.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.02 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.02 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.02”
Context: FDN-C26-422
FDN-C26-422FDNS · silverGrade: 24.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-422
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.5 m
- From
- 98.65 m
- To
- 101.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-422:98.65-101.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 24.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.40”
Context: FDN-C26-422
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.48 m
- From
- 98.65 m
- To
- 99.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.65-99.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.30”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 35.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.48 m
- From
- 98.65 m
- To
- 99.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.65-99.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 33.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“35.70”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-425FDNS · goldGrade: 6.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-425
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- True Width
- 3.79 m
- From
- 2.85 m
- To
- 6.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-425:2.85-6.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.15 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.15”
Context: FDN-C26-425
FDN-C26-425FDNS · silverGrade: 9.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-425
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- True Width
- 3.79 m
- From
- 2.85 m
- To
- 6.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-425:2.85-6.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.88 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.88 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.88”
Context: FDN-C26-425
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 2.85 m
- To
- 4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:2.85-4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.42 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.42 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.42”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 22.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 2.85 m
- To
- 4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:2.85-4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.62”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-425FDNS · goldGrade: 9.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-425
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- True Width
- 1.94 m
- From
- 9.7 m
- To
- 11.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-425:9.7-11.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.1 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.1 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.10”
Context: FDN-C26-425
FDN-C26-425FDNS · silverGrade: 17.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-425
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- True Width
- 1.94 m
- From
- 9.7 m
- To
- 11.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-425:9.7-11.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.36 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 33.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.36 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.36”
Context: FDN-C26-425
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 10.65 m
- To
- 11.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:10.65-11.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.30”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 10.65 m
- To
- 11.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:10.65-11.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 24 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-425FDNS · goldGrade: 7.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-425
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.59 m
- From
- 56.5 m
- To
- 58.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-425:56.5-58.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.69 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.69 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.69”
Context: FDN-C26-425
FDN-C26-425FDNS · silverGrade: 8.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-425
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.59 m
- From
- 56.5 m
- To
- 58.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-425:56.5-58.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.06 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.06 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.06”
Context: FDN-C26-425
FDN-C26-425FDNS · goldGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-425
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- True Width
- 4.08 m
- From
- 64.8 m
- To
- 68.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-425:64.8-68.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: FDN-C26-425
FDN-C26-425FDNS · silverGrade: 5.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-425
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- True Width
- 4.08 m
- From
- 64.8 m
- To
- 68.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-425:64.8-68.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.94”
Context: FDN-C26-425
FDN-C26-426FDNS · goldGrade: 17.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 1.27 m
- From
- 19 m
- To
- 20.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:19-20.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.83 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 27.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 17.83 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.83”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · silverGrade: 17.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 1.27 m
- From
- 19 m
- To
- 20.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:19-20.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.77”
Context: FDN-C26-426
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 65.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 65.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.33 m
- From
- 19.4 m
- To
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:19.4-19.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 65.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 26.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 65.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“65.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 41.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 41.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.33 m
- From
- 19.4 m
- To
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:19.4-19.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 41.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“41.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-426FDNS · goldGrade: 18.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.65 m
- True Width
- 5.41 m
- From
- 21.9 m
- To
- 29.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:21.9-29.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.06 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 138.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.06 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.06”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · silverGrade: 71.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 71.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.65 m
- True Width
- 5.41 m
- From
- 21.9 m
- To
- 29.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:21.9-29.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 71.19 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 544.6 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“71.19”
Context: FDN-C26-426
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 40.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- True Width
- 1.31 m
- From
- 26.25 m
- To
- 28.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:26.25-28.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40.96 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 75.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 40.96 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“40.96”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 190.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 190.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- True Width
- 1.31 m
- From
- 26.25 m
- To
- 28.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:26.25-28.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 190.81 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 353.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“190.81”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-426FDNS · goldGrade: 28.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 1.35 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 35.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:32.3-35.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.92 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 92.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 28.92 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28.92”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · silverGrade: 17.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 1.35 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 35.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:32.3-35.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.58 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 56.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.58 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.58”
Context: FDN-C26-426
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 57.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 57.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 33.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:32.3-33.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 57.52 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 92.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 57.52 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“57.52”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 29.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 33.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:32.3-33.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.85 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 29.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.85”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-426FDNS · goldGrade: 5.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.3 m
- From
- 77.5 m
- To
- 80.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:77.5-80.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.88 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.88”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · silverGrade: 8.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.3 m
- From
- 77.5 m
- To
- 80.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:77.5-80.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.10”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · goldGrade: 23.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- True Width
- 2.96 m
- From
- 84.4 m
- To
- 89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:84.4-89
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 108.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 23.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.50”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- True Width
- 2.96 m
- From
- 84.4 m
- To
- 89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:84.4-89
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.30”
Context: FDN-C26-426
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 38.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- True Width
- 1.67 m
- From
- 84.4 m
- To
- 87 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:84.4-87
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.19 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 99.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 38.19 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“38.19”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- True Width
- 1.67 m
- From
- 84.4 m
- To
- 87 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:84.4-87
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.03 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.03 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.03”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-426FDNS · goldGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- True Width
- 3.68 m
- From
- 91.1 m
- To
- 95.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:91.1-95.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.6 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.60”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · silverGrade: 6.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- True Width
- 3.68 m
- From
- 91.1 m
- To
- 95.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:91.1-95.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.05”
Context: FDN-C26-426
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 94.9 m
- To
- 95.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94.9-95.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.79 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.79 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.79”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 94.9 m
- To
- 95.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94.9-95.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-426FDNS · goldGrade: 6.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.15 m
- True Width
- 5.48 m
- From
- 97.2 m
- To
- 104.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:97.2-104.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.72 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 48.0 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.72”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · silverGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.15 m
- True Width
- 5.48 m
- From
- 97.2 m
- To
- 104.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:97.2-104.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.52”
Context: FDN-C26-426
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 101.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:100-101.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.04 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.04 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.04”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 101.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:100-101.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.73”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-426FDNS · goldGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 2.42 m
- From
- 109.2 m
- To
- 112.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:109.2-112.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: FDN-C26-426
FDN-C26-426FDNS · silverGrade: 2.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-426
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 2.42 m
- From
- 109.2 m
- To
- 112.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-426:109.2-112.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.58 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.58 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.58”
Context: FDN-C26-426
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.82 m
- From
- 109.2 m
- To
- 110.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:109.2-110.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.85 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.85 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.85”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.82 m
- From
- 109.2 m
- To
- 110.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:109.2-110.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.60”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-427FDNS · goldGrade: 5.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.13 m
- From
- 13.6 m
- To
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:13.6-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.96 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.96”
Context: FDN-C26-427
FDN-C26-427FDNS · silverGrade: 11.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.13 m
- From
- 13.6 m
- To
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:13.6-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.10”
Context: FDN-C26-427
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.57 m
- From
- 13.6 m
- To
- 14.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:13.6-14.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.5 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.5 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.57 m
- From
- 13.6 m
- To
- 14.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:13.6-14.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.10”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-427FDNS · goldGrade: 6.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.95 m
- True Width
- 3.82 m
- From
- 21.05 m
- To
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:21.05-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.59 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 39.2 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.59”
Context: FDN-C26-427
FDN-C26-427FDNS · silverGrade: 23.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.95 m
- True Width
- 3.82 m
- From
- 21.05 m
- To
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:21.05-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 140.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 23.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.64”
Context: FDN-C26-427
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.12 m
- From
- 23.55 m
- To
- 25.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:23.55-25.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.87 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 26.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.87 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.87”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 43.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.12 m
- From
- 23.55 m
- To
- 25.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:23.55-25.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 43.33 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 75.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“43.33”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-427FDNS · goldGrade: 18.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.7 m
- True Width
- 5.9 m
- From
- 62.8 m
- To
- 70.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:62.8-70.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.83 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 145.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.83 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.83”
Context: FDN-C26-427
FDN-C26-427FDNS · silverGrade: 21.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.7 m
- True Width
- 5.9 m
- From
- 62.8 m
- To
- 70.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:62.8-70.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.92 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 168.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.92 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.92”
Context: FDN-C26-427
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 37.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- True Width
- 2.22 m
- From
- 63.5 m
- To
- 66.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:63.5-66.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.84 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 109.7 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 37.84 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.84”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 29.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- True Width
- 2.22 m
- From
- 63.5 m
- To
- 66.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:63.5-66.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 84.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 29.12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.12”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-427FDNS · goldGrade: 6.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- True Width
- 4.44 m
- From
- 80.2 m
- To
- 85.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:80.2-85.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.31 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.9 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.31”
Context: FDN-C26-427
FDN-C26-427FDNS · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- True Width
- 4.44 m
- From
- 80.2 m
- To
- 85.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:80.2-85.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.20”
Context: FDN-C26-427
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.54 m
- From
- 82 m
- To
- 82.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:82-82.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.85 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.85 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.85”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.54 m
- From
- 82 m
- To
- 82.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:82-82.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.10”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-427FDNS · goldGrade: 5.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- True Width
- 1.77 m
- From
- 90.3 m
- To
- 92.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:90.3-92.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.78 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.78”
Context: FDN-C26-427
FDN-C26-427FDNS · silverGrade: 2.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-427
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- True Width
- 1.77 m
- From
- 90.3 m
- To
- 92.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-427:90.3-92.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.54 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.54 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.54”
Context: FDN-C26-427
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.36 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:91-91.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.36 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:91-91.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-428FDNS · goldGrade: 5.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-428
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- True Width
- 6.5 m
- From
- 61.8 m
- To
- 68.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-428:61.8-68.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.33 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 35.2 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.33”
Context: FDN-C26-428
FDN-C26-428FDNS · silverGrade: 13.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-428
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- True Width
- 6.5 m
- From
- 61.8 m
- To
- 68.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-428:61.8-68.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.65 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 90.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.65 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.65”
Context: FDN-C26-428
FDN-C26-429FDNS · goldGrade: 6.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-429
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.65 m
- From
- 41.8 m
- To
- 43.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-429:41.8-43.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.15 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.15”
Context: FDN-C26-429
FDN-C26-429FDNS · silverGrade: 21.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-429
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.65 m
- From
- 41.8 m
- To
- 43.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-429:41.8-43.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.36 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.36 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.36”
Context: FDN-C26-429
FDN-C26-430FDNS · goldGrade: 7.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-430
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- True Width
- 3.49 m
- From
- 21.5 m
- To
- 26.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-430:21.5-26.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.56 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 34.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.56 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.56”
Context: FDN-C26-430
FDN-C26-430FDNS · silverGrade: 33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-430
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- True Width
- 3.49 m
- From
- 21.5 m
- To
- 26.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-430:21.5-26.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 150.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“33.00”
Context: FDN-C26-430
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- True Width
- 1.65 m
- From
- 23.9 m
- To
- 26.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:23.9-26.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.3 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.3 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.30”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 50.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- True Width
- 1.65 m
- From
- 23.9 m
- To
- 26.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:23.9-26.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50.91 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 109.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“50.91”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-433FDNS · goldGrade: 5.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-433
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- True Width
- 2.46 m
- From
- 4.65 m
- To
- 7.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-433:4.65-7.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.81 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.81”
Context: FDN-C26-433
FDN-C26-433FDNS · silverGrade: 37.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-433
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- True Width
- 2.46 m
- From
- 4.65 m
- To
- 7.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-433:4.65-7.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.56 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 95.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.56”
Context: FDN-C26-433
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.72 m
- From
- 6.45 m
- To
- 7.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:6.45-7.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.85 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.85 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.85”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.72 m
- From
- 6.45 m
- To
- 7.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:6.45-7.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 97 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 72.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“97.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-433FDNS · goldGrade: 5.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-433
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.9 m
- From
- 17.6 m
- To
- 20.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-433:17.6-20.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.42 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.42”
Context: FDN-C26-433
FDN-C26-433FDNS · silverGrade: 27.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-433
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.9 m
- From
- 17.6 m
- To
- 20.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-433:17.6-20.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.46 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 82.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 27.46 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27.46”
Context: FDN-C26-433
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.72 m
- From
- 17.6 m
- To
- 18.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:17.6-18.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 83.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 83.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.72 m
- From
- 17.6 m
- To
- 18.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:17.6-18.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 83.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 62.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“83.60”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-434FDNS · goldGrade: 4.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-434
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- True Width
- 2.73 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-434:0-2.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.28 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.28”
Context: FDN-C26-434
FDN-C26-434FDNS · silverGrade: 50.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-434
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- True Width
- 2.73 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-434:0-2.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50.69 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 147.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“50.69”
Context: FDN-C26-434
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 5.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 1.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-1.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.42 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.42”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 67.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 1.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-1.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 67.69 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 115.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“67.69”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-435FDNS · goldGrade: 12.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-435
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- True Width
- 2.37 m
- From
- 15.5 m
- To
- 18.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-435:15.5-18.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.02 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 37.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.02 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.02”
Context: FDN-C26-435
FDN-C26-435FDNS · silverGrade: 21.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-435
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- True Width
- 2.37 m
- From
- 15.5 m
- To
- 18.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-435:15.5-18.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 66.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.50”
Context: FDN-C26-435
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.96 m
- From
- 16.4 m
- To
- 17.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:16.4-17.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 29.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.96 m
- From
- 16.4 m
- To
- 17.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:16.4-17.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 29.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.10”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-435FDNS · goldGrade: 14.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-435
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 63.95 m
- To
- 65.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-435:63.95-65.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.01 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.01 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.01”
Context: FDN-C26-435
FDN-C26-435FDNS · silverGrade: 11.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-435
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 63.95 m
- To
- 65.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-435:63.95-65.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.10”
Context: FDN-C26-435
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 24.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.46 m
- From
- 64.55 m
- To
- 65.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:64.55-65.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 24.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.90”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 18.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.46 m
- From
- 64.55 m
- To
- 65.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:64.55-65.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.40”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-437FDNS · goldGrade: 5.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-437
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- True Width
- 2.79 m
- From
- 32.45 m
- To
- 35.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-437:32.45-35.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.14 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.14”
Context: FDN-C26-437
FDN-C26-437FDNS · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-437
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- True Width
- 2.79 m
- From
- 32.45 m
- To
- 35.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-437:32.45-35.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.40”
Context: FDN-C26-437
FDN-C26-437FDNS · goldGrade: 7.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-437
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.75 m
- True Width
- 16.69 m
- From
- 43.65 m
- To
- 60.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-437:43.65-60.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.78 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 130.3 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 7.78 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.78”
Context: FDN-C26-437
FDN-C26-437FDNS · silverGrade: 8.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-437
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.75 m
- True Width
- 16.69 m
- From
- 43.65 m
- To
- 60.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-437:43.65-60.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 135.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.07”
Context: FDN-C26-437
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 31.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 1.69 m
- From
- 51.2 m
- To
- 52.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51.2-52.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 52.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 31.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“31.01”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 1.69 m
- From
- 51.2 m
- To
- 52.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51.2-52.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.02 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.02 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.02”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 23.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.4 m
- From
- 56.6 m
- To
- 57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:56.6-57
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 23.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.70”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 17.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.4 m
- From
- 56.6 m
- To
- 57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:56.6-57
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.90”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-438FDNS · goldGrade: 3.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-438
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- True Width
- 6.28 m
- From
- 46.8 m
- To
- 54.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-438:46.8-54.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.71 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 26.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.71”
Context: FDN-C26-438
FDN-C26-438FDNS · silverGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-438
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- True Width
- 6.28 m
- From
- 46.8 m
- To
- 54.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-438:46.8-54.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.98 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.98 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.98”
Context: FDN-C26-438
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.74 m
- From
- 46.8 m
- To
- 47.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:46.8-47.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.32 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.32 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.32”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.74 m
- From
- 46.8 m
- To
- 47.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:46.8-47.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 7.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 49.3 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49.3-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.33 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.33 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.33”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 49.3 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49.3-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.90”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-438FDNS · goldGrade: 8.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-438
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.21 m
- From
- 58.9 m
- To
- 60.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-438:58.9-60.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.09 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.09 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.09”
Context: FDN-C26-438
FDN-C26-438FDNS · silverGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-438
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.21 m
- From
- 58.9 m
- To
- 60.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-438:58.9-60.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.16 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: FDN-C26-438
FDN-C26-438FDNS · goldGrade: 5.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-438
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- True Width
- 1.95 m
- From
- 70.15 m
- To
- 72.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-438:70.15-72.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.29 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.29”
Context: FDN-C26-438
FDN-C26-438FDNS · silverGrade: 6.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-438
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- True Width
- 1.95 m
- From
- 70.15 m
- To
- 72.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-438:70.15-72.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.94”
Context: FDN-C26-438
FDN-C26-438FDNS · goldGrade: 9.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-438
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 75.7 m
- To
- 76.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-438:75.7-76.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.49 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.49 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.49”
Context: FDN-C26-438
FDN-C26-438FDNS · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-438
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 75.7 m
- To
- 76.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-438:75.7-76.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.50”
Context: FDN-C26-438
FDN-C26-439FDNS · goldGrade: 12.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-439
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.57 m
- From
- 46.75 m
- To
- 47.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-439:46.75-47.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.75 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.75 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.75”
Context: FDN-C26-439
FDN-C26-439FDNS · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-439
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.57 m
- From
- 46.75 m
- To
- 47.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-439:46.75-47.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.50”
Context: FDN-C26-439
FDN-C26-439FDNS · goldGrade: 15.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-439
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- True Width
- 1.95 m
- From
- 125.15 m
- To
- 127.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-439:125.15-127.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 38.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.01”
Context: FDN-C26-439
FDN-C26-439FDNS · silverGrade: 5.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-439
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- True Width
- 1.95 m
- From
- 125.15 m
- To
- 127.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-439:125.15-127.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.84 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.84 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.84”
Context: FDN-C26-439
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 34.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.54 m
- From
- 127 m
- To
- 127.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:127-127.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 34.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“34.90”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.54 m
- From
- 127 m
- To
- 127.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:127-127.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.40”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-439FDNS · goldGrade: 8.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-439
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- True Width
- 2.4 m
- From
- 158.2 m
- To
- 161.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-439:158.2-161.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.42 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 28.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.42 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.42”
Context: FDN-C26-439
FDN-C26-439FDNS · silverGrade: 5.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-439
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- True Width
- 2.4 m
- From
- 158.2 m
- To
- 161.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-439:158.2-161.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.36 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.36 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.36”
Context: FDN-C26-439
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 0.99 m
- From
- 158.2 m
- To
- 159.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:158.2-159.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.5 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.5 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 0.99 m
- From
- 158.2 m
- To
- 159.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:158.2-159.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.94”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-439FDNS · goldGrade: 22.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-439
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 165.45 m
- To
- 170 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-439:165.45-170
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 103.7 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 22.8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.80”
Context: FDN-C26-439
FDN-C26-439FDNS · silverGrade: 6.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-439
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 165.45 m
- To
- 170 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-439:165.45-170
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.48”
Context: FDN-C26-439
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 37.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.41 m
- From
- 166.95 m
- To
- 168.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:166.95-168.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.78 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 75.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 37.78 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.78”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.41 m
- From
- 166.95 m
- To
- 168.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:166.95-168.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.80”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-440FDNS · goldGrade: 14.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-440
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 2.83 m
- From
- 101.5 m
- To
- 105.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-440:101.5-105.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.56 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 58.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.56 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.56”
Context: FDN-C26-440
FDN-C26-440FDNS · silverGrade: 12.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-440
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 2.83 m
- From
- 101.5 m
- To
- 105.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-440:101.5-105.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 48.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.14”
Context: FDN-C26-440
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 26.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 1.48 m
- From
- 103.4 m
- To
- 105.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:103.4-105.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.25 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 55.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 26.25 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.25”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 1.48 m
- From
- 103.4 m
- To
- 105.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:103.4-105.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.87”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-440FDNS · goldGrade: 9.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-440
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 141 m
- To
- 142.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-440:141-142.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.24 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.24 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.24”
Context: FDN-C26-440
FDN-C26-440FDNS · silverGrade: 10.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-440
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 141 m
- To
- 142.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-440:141-142.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.86”
Context: FDN-C26-440
FDN-C26-442FDNS · goldGrade: 7.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-442
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.69 m
- From
- 57.6 m
- To
- 59.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-442:57.6-59.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.72 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.72 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.72”
Context: FDN-C26-442
FDN-C26-442FDNS · silverGrade: 48.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-442
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 48.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.69 m
- From
- 57.6 m
- To
- 59.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-442:57.6-59.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 48.42 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 84.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“48.42”
Context: FDN-C26-442
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 17.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.48 m
- From
- 57.6 m
- To
- 58.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:57.6-58.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 17.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.48 m
- From
- 57.6 m
- To
- 58.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:57.6-58.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-442FDNS · goldGrade: 5.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-442
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- True Width
- 3.38 m
- From
- 81 m
- To
- 84.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-442:81-84.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.17 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.17”
Context: FDN-C26-442
FDN-C26-442FDNS · silverGrade: 8.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-442
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- True Width
- 3.38 m
- From
- 81 m
- To
- 84.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-442:81-84.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.90”
Context: FDN-C26-442
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.39 m
- From
- 81 m
- To
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:81-81.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.74 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.74 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.74”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 14.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.39 m
- From
- 81 m
- To
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:81-81.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.60”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 28.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.39 m
- From
- 84.1 m
- To
- 84.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:84.1-84.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 28.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28.30”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 20.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.39 m
- From
- 84.1 m
- To
- 84.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:84.1-84.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 20.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.10”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-443FDNS · goldGrade: 199.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-443
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 199.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.9 m
- True Width
- 5.98 m
- From
- 66.6 m
- To
- 73.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-443:66.6-73.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 199.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1379.3 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 199.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“199.90”
Context: FDN-C26-443
FDN-C26-443FDNS · silverGrade: 79.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-443
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 79.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.9 m
- True Width
- 5.98 m
- From
- 66.6 m
- To
- 73.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-443:66.6-73.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 79.26 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 546.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“79.26”
Context: FDN-C26-443
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 762.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 762.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.56 m
- From
- 66.6 m
- To
- 68.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:66.6-68.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 762.84 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1373.1 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 762.84 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“762.84”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 278.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 278.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.56 m
- From
- 66.6 m
- To
- 68.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:66.6-68.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 278.14 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 500.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 278.14 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“278.14”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-443FDNS · goldGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-443
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- True Width
- 2.38 m
- From
- 94.4 m
- To
- 97.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-443:94.4-97.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.6 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.6 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.60”
Context: FDN-C26-443
FDN-C26-443FDNS · silverGrade: 117Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-443
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 117
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- True Width
- 2.38 m
- From
- 94.4 m
- To
- 97.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-443:94.4-97.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 117 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 321.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“117.00”
Context: FDN-C26-443
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 1.08 m
- From
- 95.9 m
- To
- 97.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:95.9-97.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.03 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.03 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.03”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 251.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 251.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 1.08 m
- From
- 95.9 m
- To
- 97.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:95.9-97.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 251.7 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 314.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 251.7 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“251.70”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-444FDNS · goldGrade: 16.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-444
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- True Width
- 3.26 m
- From
- 24.8 m
- To
- 28.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-444:24.8-28.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.74 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 60.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.74 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.74”
Context: FDN-C26-444
FDN-C26-444FDNS · silverGrade: 4.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-444
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- True Width
- 3.26 m
- From
- 24.8 m
- To
- 28.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-444:24.8-28.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.18”
Context: FDN-C26-444
FDN-C26-444FDNS · goldGrade: 5.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-444
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- True Width
- 3.81 m
- From
- 50 m
- To
- 54.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-444:50-54.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.11 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.11”
Context: FDN-C26-444
FDN-C26-444FDNS · silverGrade: 4.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-444
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- True Width
- 3.81 m
- From
- 50 m
- To
- 54.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-444:50-54.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.15”
Context: FDN-C26-444
FDN-C26-444FDNS · goldGrade: 12.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-444
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- True Width
- 5.37 m
- From
- 63.3 m
- To
- 70.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-444:63.3-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.72 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 96.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.72 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.72”
Context: FDN-C26-444
FDN-C26-444FDNS · silverGrade: 9.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-444
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- True Width
- 5.37 m
- From
- 63.3 m
- To
- 70.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-444:63.3-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.54 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 72.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.54 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.54”
Context: FDN-C26-444
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 24.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- True Width
- 1.94 m
- From
- 68.15 m
- To
- 70.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68.15-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.12 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 66.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 24.12 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.12”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 12.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- True Width
- 1.94 m
- From
- 68.15 m
- To
- 70.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68.15-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.54 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.54 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.54”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-445FDNS · goldGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-445
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- True Width
- 2.53 m
- From
- 31.2 m
- To
- 34.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-445:31.2-34.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.1 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.10”
Context: FDN-C26-445
FDN-C26-445FDNS · silverGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-445
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- True Width
- 2.53 m
- From
- 31.2 m
- To
- 34.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-445:31.2-34.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.62”
Context: FDN-C26-445
FDN-C26-445FDNS · goldGrade: 4.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-445
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.81 m
- From
- 53.7 m
- To
- 55.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-445:53.7-55.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.46 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.46”
Context: FDN-C26-445
FDN-C26-445FDNS · silverGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-445
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.81 m
- From
- 53.7 m
- To
- 55.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-445:53.7-55.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.65 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.65 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: FDN-C26-445
FDN-C26-445FDNS · goldGrade: 5.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-445
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- True Width
- 3.12 m
- From
- 66.4 m
- To
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-445:66.4-70
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.78 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.78”
Context: FDN-C26-445
FDN-C26-445FDNS · silverGrade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-445
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- True Width
- 3.12 m
- From
- 66.4 m
- To
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-445:66.4-70
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.51”
Context: FDN-C26-445
FDN-C26-446FDNS · goldGrade: 5.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-446
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 33.9 m
- To
- 36.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-446:33.9-36.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.19 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.19”
Context: FDN-C26-446
FDN-C26-446FDNS · silverGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-446
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 33.9 m
- To
- 36.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-446:33.9-36.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.22”
Context: FDN-C26-446
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 0.99 m
- From
- 33.9 m
- To
- 35.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:33.9-35.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.58 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.58 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.58”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 0.99 m
- From
- 33.9 m
- To
- 35.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:33.9-35.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.39 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.39”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-446FDNS · goldGrade: 5.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-446
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- True Width
- 2.92 m
- From
- 47.85 m
- To
- 52.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-446:47.85-52.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.52 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.52”
Context: FDN-C26-446
FDN-C26-446FDNS · silverGrade: 8.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-446
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- True Width
- 2.92 m
- From
- 47.85 m
- To
- 52.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-446:47.85-52.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.86”
Context: FDN-C26-446
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.06 m
- From
- 50.75 m
- To
- 52.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:50.75-52.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.77 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.77 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.77”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 18.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.06 m
- From
- 50.75 m
- To
- 52.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:50.75-52.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.23 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.23 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.23”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-446FDNS · goldGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-446
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- True Width
- 2.61 m
- From
- 89.8 m
- To
- 94.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-446:89.8-94.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.1 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 32.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.1 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.10”
Context: FDN-C26-446
FDN-C26-446FDNS · silverGrade: 3.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-446
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- True Width
- 2.61 m
- From
- 89.8 m
- To
- 94.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-446:89.8-94.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.35 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.35 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.35”
Context: FDN-C26-446
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 89.8 m
- To
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:89.8-91.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.41 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.41 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.41”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 0.92 m
- From
- 89.8 m
- To
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:89.8-91.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.50”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-447FDNS · goldGrade: 12.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-447
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 47.85 m
- To
- 50.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-447:47.85-50.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.59 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 29.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.59 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.59”
Context: FDN-C26-447
FDN-C26-447FDNS · silverGrade: 18.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-447
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 47.85 m
- To
- 50.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-447:47.85-50.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.08 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 41.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.08 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.08”
Context: FDN-C26-447
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 32.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.43 m
- From
- 47.85 m
- To
- 48.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:47.85-48.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 27.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 32.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.43 m
- From
- 47.85 m
- To
- 48.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:47.85-48.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.70”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-447FDNS · goldGrade: 5.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-447
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 82.65 m
- To
- 84.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-447:82.65-84.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.83 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.83”
Context: FDN-C26-447
FDN-C26-447FDNS · silverGrade: 24.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-447
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 82.65 m
- To
- 84.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-447:82.65-84.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.63 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 49.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 24.63 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.63”
Context: FDN-C26-447
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 84.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:83.55-84.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.8 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.8 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.80”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 29.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 83.55 m
- To
- 84.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:83.55-84.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 29.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-448FDNS · goldGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 2.18 m
- From
- 0.45 m
- To
- 3.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:0.45-3.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.23 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.23”
Context: FDN-C26-448
FDN-C26-448FDNS · silverGrade: 29.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 2.18 m
- From
- 0.45 m
- To
- 3.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:0.45-3.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 83.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 29.18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.18”
Context: FDN-C26-448
FDN-C26-448FDNS · goldGrade: 6.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.95 m
- True Width
- 3.03 m
- From
- 16.2 m
- To
- 20.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:16.2-20.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.82 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 26.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.82”
Context: FDN-C26-448
FDN-C26-448FDNS · silverGrade: 21.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.95 m
- True Width
- 3.03 m
- From
- 16.2 m
- To
- 20.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:16.2-20.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 85.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.55”
Context: FDN-C26-448
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.88 m
- From
- 17.95 m
- To
- 19.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:17.95-19.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.65 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.65 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.65”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 49.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 49.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.88 m
- From
- 17.95 m
- To
- 19.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:17.95-19.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 49.91 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 57.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“49.91”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-448FDNS · goldGrade: 3.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.93 m
- From
- 39.55 m
- To
- 42.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:39.55-42.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.59 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.8 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.59”
Context: FDN-C26-448
FDN-C26-448FDNS · silverGrade: 6.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.93 m
- From
- 39.55 m
- To
- 42.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:39.55-42.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.22”
Context: FDN-C26-448
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 23.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.26 m
- From
- 40.4 m
- To
- 40.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:40.4-40.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 23.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.26 m
- From
- 40.4 m
- To
- 40.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:40.4-40.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.70”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-448FDNS · goldGrade: 4.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- True Width
- 1.6 m
- From
- 59.75 m
- To
- 61.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:59.75-61.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.75 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.75”
Context: FDN-C26-448
FDN-C26-448FDNS · silverGrade: 8.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- True Width
- 1.6 m
- From
- 59.75 m
- To
- 61.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:59.75-61.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.31”
Context: FDN-C26-448
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.69 m
- From
- 59.75 m
- To
- 60.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:59.75-60.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.43 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.43 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.43”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.69 m
- From
- 59.75 m
- To
- 60.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:59.75-60.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.35 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.35 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.35”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-448FDNS · goldGrade: 5.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 2.81 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 94.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:91.4-94.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.99 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.99”
Context: FDN-C26-448
FDN-C26-448FDNS · silverGrade: 14.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-448
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 2.81 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 94.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-448:91.4-94.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.83 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 48.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.83 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.83”
Context: FDN-C26-448
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 93.1 m
- To
- 94.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:93.1-94.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.15 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.15 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.15”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 22.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 93.1 m
- To
- 94.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:93.1-94.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-450FDNS · goldGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-450
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 1.9 m
- From
- 50.2 m
- To
- 53.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-450:50.2-53.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.85 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.4 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.85”
Context: FDN-C26-450
FDN-C26-450FDNS · silverGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-450
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 1.9 m
- From
- 50.2 m
- To
- 53.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-450:50.2-53.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.48”
Context: FDN-C26-450
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.74 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 53.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:52-53.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.26 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.26 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.26”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 5.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.74 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 53.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:52-53.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.09 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.09 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.09”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-452FDNS · goldGrade: 6.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-452
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.3 m
- True Width
- 20.18 m
- From
- 38.7 m
- To
- 62 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-452:38.7-62
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.29 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 146.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.29 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.29”
Context: FDN-C26-452
FDN-C26-452FDNS · silverGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-452
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.3 m
- True Width
- 20.18 m
- From
- 38.7 m
- To
- 62 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-452:38.7-62
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 83.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.60”
Context: FDN-C26-452
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 2.47 m
- From
- 38.7 m
- To
- 41.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:38.7-41.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.97 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 34.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.97 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.97”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 2.47 m
- From
- 38.7 m
- To
- 41.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:38.7-41.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.28 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.28 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.28”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.43 m
- From
- 55.75 m
- To
- 57.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:55.75-57.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.25 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.25 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.25”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.43 m
- From
- 55.75 m
- To
- 57.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:55.75-57.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.39 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.39”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-453FDNS · goldGrade: 53.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-453
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- True Width
- 8.27 m
- From
- 31.3 m
- To
- 39.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-453:31.3-39.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 53.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 445.3 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 53.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“53.01”
Context: FDN-C26-453
FDN-C26-453FDNS · silverGrade: 8.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-453
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- True Width
- 8.27 m
- From
- 31.3 m
- To
- 39.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-453:31.3-39.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 69.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.25”
Context: FDN-C26-453
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 220.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 220.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- True Width
- 1.82 m
- From
- 37.85 m
- To
- 39.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:37.85-39.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 220.08 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 407.1 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 220.08 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“220.08”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 29.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- True Width
- 1.82 m
- From
- 37.85 m
- To
- 39.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:37.85-39.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.34 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 29.34 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.34”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-453FDNS · goldGrade: 7.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-453
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.15 m
- True Width
- 7.04 m
- From
- 46.55 m
- To
- 53.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-453:46.55-53.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.82 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 55.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.82 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.82”
Context: FDN-C26-453
FDN-C26-453FDNS · silverGrade: 4.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-453
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.15 m
- True Width
- 7.04 m
- From
- 46.55 m
- To
- 53.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-453:46.55-53.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.39 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.39”
Context: FDN-C26-453
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.48 m
- From
- 47 m
- To
- 48.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:47-48.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.26 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.26 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.26”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.48 m
- From
- 47 m
- To
- 48.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:47-48.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.52”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-453FDNS · goldGrade: 3.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-453
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.65 m
- True Width
- 4.58 m
- From
- 68.45 m
- To
- 73.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-453:68.45-73.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.69 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.69”
Context: FDN-C26-453
FDN-C26-453FDNS · silverGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-453
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.65 m
- True Width
- 4.58 m
- From
- 68.45 m
- To
- 73.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-453:68.45-73.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.19”
Context: FDN-C26-453
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.69 m
- From
- 68.45 m
- To
- 69.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68.45-69.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.69 m
- From
- 68.45 m
- To
- 69.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68.45-69.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.90”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-453FDNS · goldGrade: 3.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-453
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 117 m
- To
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-453:117-120.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.42 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.42”
Context: FDN-C26-453
FDN-C26-453FDNS · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-453
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 117 m
- To
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-453:117-120.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.80”
Context: FDN-C26-453
FDN-C26-454FDNS · goldGrade: 5.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-454
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 32.1 m
- To
- 33.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-454:32.1-33.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.28 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.28”
Context: FDN-C26-454
FDN-C26-454FDNS · silverGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-454
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 32.1 m
- To
- 33.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-454:32.1-33.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.69 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.69 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.69”
Context: FDN-C26-454
FDN-C26-454FDNS · goldGrade: 6.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-454
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.75 m
- True Width
- 8.45 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 46.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-454:37.7-46.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.64 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 58.1 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.64”
Context: FDN-C26-454
FDN-C26-454FDNS · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-454
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.75 m
- True Width
- 8.45 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 46.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-454:37.7-46.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.40”
Context: FDN-C26-454
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 41.8 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.8-42.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.65 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.65 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.65”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 41.8 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.8-42.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 44.85 m
- To
- 46.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:44.85-46.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.26 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.26 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.26”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 44.85 m
- To
- 46.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:44.85-46.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.70”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-454FDNS · goldGrade: 4.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-454
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- True Width
- 5.22 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 77 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-454:71.6-77
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.34 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.34”
Context: FDN-C26-454
FDN-C26-454FDNS · silverGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-454
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- True Width
- 5.22 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 77 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-454:71.6-77
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.84 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.84 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: FDN-C26-454
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 74.25 m
- To
- 74.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:74.25-74.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.55 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.55 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.55”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.68 m
- From
- 74.25 m
- To
- 74.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:74.25-74.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.50”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-455FDNS · goldGrade: 4.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-455
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.84 m
- From
- 78.75 m
- To
- 80.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-455:78.75-80.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.81 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.81”
Context: FDN-C26-455
FDN-C26-455FDNS · silverGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-455
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.84 m
- From
- 78.75 m
- To
- 80.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-455:78.75-80.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.50”
Context: FDN-C26-455
FDN-C26-455FDNS · goldGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-455
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- True Width
- 4.54 m
- From
- 101.25 m
- To
- 105.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-455:101.25-105.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.2 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 38.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.2 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.20”
Context: FDN-C26-455
FDN-C26-455FDNS · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-455
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- True Width
- 4.54 m
- From
- 101.25 m
- To
- 105.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-455:101.25-105.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: FDN-C26-455
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 78.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 78.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.39 m
- From
- 101.25 m
- To
- 101.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:101.25-101.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 78.8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 31.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 78.8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“78.80”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 31.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.39 m
- From
- 101.25 m
- To
- 101.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:101.25-101.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“31.80”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-457FDNS · goldGrade: 3.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-457
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- True Width
- 1.9 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-457:0-3.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.69 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.69”
Context: FDN-C26-457
FDN-C26-457FDNS · silverGrade: 5.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-457
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- True Width
- 1.9 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-457:0-3.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.36 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.36 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.36”
Context: FDN-C26-457
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 7.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.93 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.93 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.93”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-457FDNS · goldGrade: 6.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-457
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.83 m
- From
- 30.4 m
- To
- 32.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-457:30.4-32.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.97 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.97”
Context: FDN-C26-457
FDN-C26-457FDNS · silverGrade: 3.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-457
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.83 m
- From
- 30.4 m
- To
- 32.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-457:30.4-32.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.94”
Context: FDN-C26-457
FDN-C26-458FDNS · goldGrade: 3.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-458
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.93 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-458:0-3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.96 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.96”
Context: FDN-C26-458
FDN-C26-458FDNS · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-458
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.93 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-458:0-3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.20”
Context: FDN-C26-458
FDN-C26-458FDNS · goldGrade: 11.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-458
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 2.06 m
- From
- 41.2 m
- To
- 44.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-458:41.2-44.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.28 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 36.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.28 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.28”
Context: FDN-C26-458
FDN-C26-458FDNS · silverGrade: 10.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-458
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 2.06 m
- From
- 41.2 m
- To
- 44.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-458:41.2-44.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.47 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 33.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.47 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.47”
Context: FDN-C26-458
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 27.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 41.2 m
- To
- 42.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.2-42.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.93 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 34.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 27.93 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27.93”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 19.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.8 m
- From
- 41.2 m
- To
- 42.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.2-42.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.72 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.72 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.72”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-458FDNS · goldGrade: 30.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-458
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.64 m
- From
- 136.25 m
- To
- 137.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-458:136.25-137.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.28 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 30.28 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“30.28”
Context: FDN-C26-458
FDN-C26-458FDNS · silverGrade: 46.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-458
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.64 m
- From
- 136.25 m
- To
- 137.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-458:136.25-137.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 46.16 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“46.16”
Context: FDN-C26-458
FDN-C26-459FDNS · goldGrade: 18.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.15 m
- True Width
- 10.07 m
- From
- 33.85 m
- To
- 47 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:33.85-47
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.68 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 245.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.68 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.68”
Context: FDN-C26-459
FDN-C26-459FDNS · silverGrade: 11.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.15 m
- True Width
- 10.07 m
- From
- 33.85 m
- To
- 47 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:33.85-47
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.47 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 150.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.47 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.47”
Context: FDN-C26-459
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 44.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 44.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.25 m
- True Width
- 4.02 m
- From
- 36.4 m
- To
- 41.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:36.4-41.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 231.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 44.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“44.01”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 21.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.25 m
- True Width
- 4.02 m
- From
- 36.4 m
- To
- 41.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:36.4-41.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 113.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.64”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-459FDNS · goldGrade: 12.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- True Width
- 2.57 m
- From
- 61.85 m
- To
- 65.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:61.85-65.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.02 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 40.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.02 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.02”
Context: FDN-C26-459
FDN-C26-459FDNS · silverGrade: 14.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- True Width
- 2.57 m
- From
- 61.85 m
- To
- 65.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:61.85-65.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.19”
Context: FDN-C26-459
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 38.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 61.85 m
- To
- 62.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:61.85-62.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 38.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 38.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“38.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 61.85 m
- To
- 62.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:61.85-62.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.80”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-459FDNS · goldGrade: 12.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- True Width
- 2.14 m
- From
- 90 m
- To
- 92.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:90-92.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.34 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 34.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.34 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.34”
Context: FDN-C26-459
FDN-C26-459FDNS · silverGrade: 44.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 44.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- True Width
- 2.14 m
- From
- 90 m
- To
- 92.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:90-92.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44.61 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 124.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“44.61”
Context: FDN-C26-459
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 53.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.46 m
- From
- 90.7 m
- To
- 91.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:90.7-91.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 53.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 32.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 53.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“53.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 134Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 134
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.46 m
- From
- 90.7 m
- To
- 91.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:90.7-91.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 134 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 80.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“134.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-459FDNS · goldGrade: 71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.88 m
- From
- 109.4 m
- To
- 110.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:109.4-110.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 71 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 81.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 71 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“71.00”
Context: FDN-C26-459
FDN-C26-459FDNS · silverGrade: 51.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.88 m
- From
- 109.4 m
- To
- 110.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:109.4-110.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.76 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 59.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“51.76”
Context: FDN-C26-459
FDN-C26-459FDNS · goldGrade: 90.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 90.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.8 m
- True Width
- 5.21 m
- From
- 137.4 m
- To
- 145.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:137.4-145.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 90.91 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 618.2 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 90.91 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“90.91”
Context: FDN-C26-459
FDN-C26-459FDNS · silverGrade: 216.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-459
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 216.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.8 m
- True Width
- 5.21 m
- From
- 137.4 m
- To
- 145.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-459:137.4-145.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 216.67 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1473.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 216.67 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“216.67”
Context: FDN-C26-459
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 214.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 214.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 141.2 m
- To
- 143.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:141.2-143.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 214.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 525.3 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 214.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“214.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 411.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 411.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 141.2 m
- To
- 143.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:141.2-143.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 411.47 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1008.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 411.47 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“411.47”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-460FDNS · goldGrade: 13.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 3.19 m
- From
- 9.4 m
- To
- 12.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:9.4-12.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.77 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 44.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.77 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.77”
Context: FDN-C26-460
FDN-C26-460FDNS · silverGrade: 3.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 3.19 m
- From
- 9.4 m
- To
- 12.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:9.4-12.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.53 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.53 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.53”
Context: FDN-C26-460
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 22.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 10.2 m
- To
- 11.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:10.2-11.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.03 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 22.03 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.03”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 10.2 m
- To
- 11.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:10.2-11.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-460FDNS · goldGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- True Width
- 2.39 m
- From
- 28.1 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:28.1-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.10”
Context: FDN-C26-460
FDN-C26-460FDNS · silverGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- True Width
- 2.39 m
- From
- 28.1 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:28.1-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.15”
Context: FDN-C26-460
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.4 m
- From
- 30.1 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:30.1-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.05 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.05 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.05”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.4 m
- From
- 30.1 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:30.1-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.90”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-460FDNS · goldGrade: 4.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.55 m
- True Width
- 10.51 m
- From
- 32.35 m
- To
- 42.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:32.35-42.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.15 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 43.8 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.15”
Context: FDN-C26-460
FDN-C26-460FDNS · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.55 m
- True Width
- 10.51 m
- From
- 32.35 m
- To
- 42.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:32.35-42.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.50”
Context: FDN-C26-460
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 5.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.65 m
- True Width
- 3.64 m
- From
- 36.85 m
- To
- 40.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:36.85-40.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.65 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.65”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.65 m
- True Width
- 3.64 m
- From
- 36.85 m
- To
- 40.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:36.85-40.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.27”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-460FDNS · goldGrade: 8.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 109.75 m
- To
- 110.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:109.75-110.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.46 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.46 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.46”
Context: FDN-C26-460
FDN-C26-460FDNS · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 109.75 m
- To
- 110.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:109.75-110.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.50”
Context: FDN-C26-460
FDN-C26-460FDNS · goldGrade: 7.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 126.85 m
- To
- 128.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:126.85-128.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.37 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.37 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.37”
Context: FDN-C26-460
FDN-C26-460FDNS · silverGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-460
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 126.85 m
- To
- 128.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-460:126.85-128.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: FDN-C26-460
FDN-C26-461FDNS · goldGrade: 19.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-461
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- True Width
- 4.08 m
- From
- 9.5 m
- To
- 13.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-461:9.5-13.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.83 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 81.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19.83 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.83”
Context: FDN-C26-461
FDN-C26-461FDNS · silverGrade: 3.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-461
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- True Width
- 4.08 m
- From
- 9.5 m
- To
- 13.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-461:9.5-13.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.29”
Context: FDN-C26-461
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 48.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 48.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 12.2 m
- To
- 13.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:12.2-13.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 48.92 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 68.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 48.92 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“48.92”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 12.2 m
- To
- 13.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:12.2-13.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.41 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.41 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.41”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-461FDNS · goldGrade: 4.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-461
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.2 m
- True Width
- 20.12 m
- From
- 29.3 m
- To
- 49.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-461:29.3-49.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.91 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 99.2 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.91”
Context: FDN-C26-461
FDN-C26-461FDNS · silverGrade: 4.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-461
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.2 m
- True Width
- 20.12 m
- From
- 29.3 m
- To
- 49.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-461:29.3-49.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.65 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 93.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.65 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.65”
Context: FDN-C26-461
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.99 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 39.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:37.7-39.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.67 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.67 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.67”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 12.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.99 m
- From
- 37.7 m
- To
- 39.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:37.7-39.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.11”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-461FDNS · goldGrade: 9.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-461
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- True Width
- 2.04 m
- From
- 70.5 m
- To
- 72.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-461:70.5-72.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.14 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.14 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.14”
Context: FDN-C26-461
FDN-C26-461FDNS · silverGrade: 4.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-461
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- True Width
- 2.04 m
- From
- 70.5 m
- To
- 72.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-461:70.5-72.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.38”
Context: FDN-C26-461
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 23.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 71.2 m
- To
- 71.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:71.2-71.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 23.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 71.2 m
- To
- 71.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:71.2-71.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-461FDNS · goldGrade: 10.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-461
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- True Width
- 6.18 m
- From
- 93.8 m
- To
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-461:93.8-100
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.08 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 62.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.08 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.08”
Context: FDN-C26-461
FDN-C26-461FDNS · silverGrade: 2.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-461
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- True Width
- 6.18 m
- From
- 93.8 m
- To
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-461:93.8-100
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.46 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.46 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.46”
Context: FDN-C26-461
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 23.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 1.69 m
- From
- 98.3 m
- To
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.3-100
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.44 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 39.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 23.44 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.44”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 1.69 m
- From
- 98.3 m
- To
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.3-100
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.05”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-462FDNS · goldGrade: 10.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-462
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.07 m
- From
- 32.35 m
- To
- 33.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-462:32.35-33.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.41 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.41 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.41”
Context: FDN-C26-462
FDN-C26-462FDNS · silverGrade: 12.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-462
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 1.07 m
- From
- 32.35 m
- To
- 33.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-462:32.35-33.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.35 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.35 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.35”
Context: FDN-C26-462
FDN-C26-462FDNS · goldGrade: 9.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-462
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.45 m
- True Width
- 4.94 m
- From
- 35.7 m
- To
- 42.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-462:35.7-42.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.58 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 61.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.58 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.58”
Context: FDN-C26-462
FDN-C26-462FDNS · silverGrade: 48.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-462
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 48.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.45 m
- True Width
- 4.94 m
- From
- 35.7 m
- To
- 42.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-462:35.7-42.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 48.04 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 309.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“48.04”
Context: FDN-C26-462
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 51.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.46 m
- From
- 35.7 m
- To
- 36.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:35.7-36.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 31.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 51.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“51.90”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 48.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 48.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.46 m
- From
- 35.7 m
- To
- 36.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:35.7-36.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 48.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“48.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 21.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.31 m
- From
- 37.75 m
- To
- 38.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:37.75-38.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 21.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 57.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 57.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.31 m
- From
- 37.75 m
- To
- 38.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:37.75-38.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 57.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“57.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 35.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.31 m
- From
- 41.75 m
- To
- 42.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.75-42.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 35.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“35.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 489Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 489
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.31 m
- From
- 41.75 m
- To
- 42.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.75-42.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 489 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 195.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 489 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“489.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-463FDNS · goldGrade: 3.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-463
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.45 m
- True Width
- 3.41 m
- From
- 9.7 m
- To
- 14.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-463:9.7-14.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.58 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.58”
Context: FDN-C26-463
FDN-C26-463FDNS · silverGrade: 36.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-463
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.45 m
- True Width
- 3.41 m
- From
- 9.7 m
- To
- 14.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-463:9.7-14.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.41 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 162.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“36.41”
Context: FDN-C26-463
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.38 m
- From
- 11.05 m
- To
- 11.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:11.05-11.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.05 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.05 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.05”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 174Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 174
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.38 m
- From
- 11.05 m
- To
- 11.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:11.05-11.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 174 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 87.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“174.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-463FDNS · goldGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-463
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.07 m
- From
- 16.35 m
- To
- 20.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-463:16.35-20.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.43 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.43”
Context: FDN-C26-463
FDN-C26-463FDNS · silverGrade: 27.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-463
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.07 m
- From
- 16.35 m
- To
- 20.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-463:16.35-20.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 102.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 27.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27.29”
Context: FDN-C26-463
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.66 m
- From
- 17.8 m
- To
- 18.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:17.8-18.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.5 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.5 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.66 m
- From
- 17.8 m
- To
- 18.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:17.8-18.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.60”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-463FDNS · goldGrade: 5.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-463
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- True Width
- 3.79 m
- From
- 49.35 m
- To
- 55.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-463:49.35-55.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.21 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.7 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.21”
Context: FDN-C26-463
FDN-C26-463FDNS · silverGrade: 37.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-463
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- True Width
- 3.79 m
- From
- 49.35 m
- To
- 55.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-463:49.35-55.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.69 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 222.4 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.69”
Context: FDN-C26-463
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.06 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 53.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51.8-53.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.91 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.91 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.91”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 94.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 94.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.06 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 53.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51.8-53.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 94.92 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 156.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“94.92”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-463FDNS · goldGrade: 6.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-463
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 2.45 m
- From
- 147.5 m
- To
- 150.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-463:147.5-150.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.06 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.06”
Context: FDN-C26-463
FDN-C26-463FDNS · silverGrade: 89.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-463
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 89.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 2.45 m
- From
- 147.5 m
- To
- 150.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-463:147.5-150.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 89.98 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 287.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“89.98”
Context: FDN-C26-463
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 148.5 m
- To
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:148.5-150
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.96 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.96 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.96”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 177.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 177.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 148.5 m
- To
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:148.5-150
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 177.66 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 266.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“177.66”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-464FDNS · goldGrade: 5.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-464
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.64 m
- From
- 29.1 m
- To
- 30.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-464:29.1-30.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.19 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.19”
Context: FDN-C26-464
FDN-C26-464FDNS · silverGrade: 6.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-464
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.64 m
- From
- 29.1 m
- To
- 30.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-464:29.1-30.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.14”
Context: FDN-C26-464
FDN-C26-464FDNS · goldGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-464
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.05 m
- True Width
- 3.81 m
- From
- 37.55 m
- To
- 41.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-464:37.55-41.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.5 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 26.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.50”
Context: FDN-C26-464
FDN-C26-464FDNS · silverGrade: 9.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-464
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.05 m
- True Width
- 3.81 m
- From
- 37.55 m
- To
- 41.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-464:37.55-41.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.96 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.96”
Context: FDN-C26-464
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 28.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.75 m
- From
- 40 m
- To
- 40.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:40-40.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 28.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28.30”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 25.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.75 m
- From
- 40 m
- To
- 40.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:40-40.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 25.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“25.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-464FDNS · goldGrade: 5.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-464
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 84.1 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-464:84.1-86
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.04 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.04”
Context: FDN-C26-464
FDN-C26-464FDNS · silverGrade: 7.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-464
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 84.1 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-464:84.1-86
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.55”
Context: FDN-C26-464
FDN-C26-465FDNS · goldGrade: 16.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-465
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.45 m
- True Width
- 2.3 m
- From
- 28.85 m
- To
- 34.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-465:28.85-34.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.84 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 91.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.84 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.84”
Context: FDN-C26-465
FDN-C26-465FDNS · silverGrade: 15.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-465
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.45 m
- True Width
- 2.3 m
- From
- 28.85 m
- To
- 34.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-465:28.85-34.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 83.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.31”
Context: FDN-C26-465
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 35.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 28.85 m
- To
- 30.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:28.85-30.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35.38 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 72.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 35.38 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“35.38”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 22.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 28.85 m
- To
- 30.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:28.85-30.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.23 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 45.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.23 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.23”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-465FDNS · goldGrade: 5.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-465
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.75 m
- True Width
- 2.38 m
- From
- 38.2 m
- To
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-465:38.2-42.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.11 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.11”
Context: FDN-C26-465
FDN-C26-465FDNS · silverGrade: 17.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-465
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.75 m
- True Width
- 2.38 m
- From
- 38.2 m
- To
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-465:38.2-42.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.61 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 83.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.61 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.61”
Context: FDN-C26-465
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 38.2 m
- To
- 39.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:38.2-39.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.7 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.7 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.70”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 47.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 38.2 m
- To
- 39.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:38.2-39.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 47.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“47.30”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-465FDNS · goldGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-465
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.25 m
- True Width
- 5.3 m
- From
- 57.05 m
- To
- 65.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-465:57.05-65.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.4 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 69.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.4 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.40”
Context: FDN-C26-465
FDN-C26-465FDNS · silverGrade: 27.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-465
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.25 m
- True Width
- 5.3 m
- From
- 57.05 m
- To
- 65.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-465:57.05-65.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.85 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 229.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27.85”
Context: FDN-C26-465
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 19.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- True Width
- 1.48 m
- From
- 62.05 m
- To
- 64.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:62.05-64.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 43.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.01”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 34.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- True Width
- 1.48 m
- From
- 62.05 m
- To
- 64.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:62.05-64.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34.38 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 79.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“34.38”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-466FDNS · goldGrade: 8.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-466
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 2.41 m
- From
- 101.95 m
- To
- 105.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-466:101.95-105.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.46 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 26.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.46 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.46”
Context: FDN-C26-466
FDN-C26-466FDNS · silverGrade: 38.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-466
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 2.41 m
- From
- 101.95 m
- To
- 105.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-466:101.95-105.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.44 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 121.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“38.44”
Context: FDN-C26-466
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.46 m
- From
- 102.35 m
- To
- 104.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:102.35-104.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.01 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.01 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.01”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 51.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.46 m
- From
- 102.35 m
- To
- 104.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:102.35-104.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.55 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 97.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“51.55”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-467FDNS · goldGrade: 7.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-467
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 11.85 m
- To
- 14.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-467:11.85-14.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.62 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.62 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.62”
Context: FDN-C26-467
FDN-C26-467FDNS · silverGrade: 14.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-467
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 11.85 m
- To
- 14.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-467:11.85-14.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 42.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.31”
Context: FDN-C26-467
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 26.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 12.85 m
- To
- 13.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:12.85-13.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 26.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.70”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 43.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 12.85 m
- To
- 13.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:12.85-13.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 43.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“43.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 17.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 14.35 m
- To
- 14.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:14.35-14.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.35 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 17.35 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.35”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 14.35 m
- To
- 14.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:14.35-14.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-467FDNS · goldGrade: 5.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-467
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- True Width
- 9.55 m
- From
- 99.5 m
- To
- 113 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-467:99.5-113
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.32 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 71.8 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.32”
Context: FDN-C26-467
FDN-C26-467FDNS · silverGrade: 32.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-467
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- True Width
- 9.55 m
- From
- 99.5 m
- To
- 113 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-467:99.5-113
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 440.1 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.60”
Context: FDN-C26-467
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 102.1 m
- To
- 102.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:102.1-102.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 37.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 102.1 m
- To
- 102.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:102.1-102.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 104.55 m
- To
- 105.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:104.55-105.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.15 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.15 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.15”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 104.55 m
- To
- 105.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:104.55-105.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 55.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 55.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 108.5 m
- To
- 109 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:108.5-109
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 55.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 27.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 55.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“55.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 253Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 253
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 108.5 m
- To
- 109 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:108.5-109
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 253 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 126.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 253 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“253.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-468FDNS · goldGrade: 4.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-468
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- True Width
- 2.44 m
- From
- 9.2 m
- To
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-468:9.2-13
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.02 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.02”
Context: FDN-C26-468
FDN-C26-468FDNS · silverGrade: 8.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-468
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- True Width
- 2.44 m
- From
- 9.2 m
- To
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-468:9.2-13
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.04 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.04 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.04”
Context: FDN-C26-468
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.61 m
- From
- 12.05 m
- To
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:12.05-13
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.56 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.56 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.56”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.61 m
- From
- 12.05 m
- To
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:12.05-13
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.24 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.24 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.24”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-468FDNS · goldGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-468
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- True Width
- 4.18 m
- From
- 27.5 m
- To
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-468:27.5-34
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 33.8 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.20”
Context: FDN-C26-468
FDN-C26-468FDNS · silverGrade: 17.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-468
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- True Width
- 4.18 m
- From
- 27.5 m
- To
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-468:27.5-34
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.58 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 114.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.58 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.58”
Context: FDN-C26-468
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 27.5 m
- To
- 28.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:27.5-28.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.57 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.57 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.57”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 66.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 66.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 0.77 m
- From
- 27.5 m
- To
- 28.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:27.5-28.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 66.13 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 79.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“66.13”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-468FDNS · goldGrade: 3.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-468
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.93 m
- From
- 67.4 m
- To
- 70.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-468:67.4-70.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.33 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.33”
Context: FDN-C26-468
FDN-C26-468FDNS · silverGrade: 31.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-468
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.93 m
- From
- 67.4 m
- To
- 70.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-468:67.4-70.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 95.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“31.70”
Context: FDN-C26-468
FDN-C26-468FDNS · goldGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-468
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- True Width
- 3.34 m
- From
- 81.7 m
- To
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-468:81.7-86.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.9 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 41.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.9 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.90”
Context: FDN-C26-468
FDN-C26-468FDNS · silverGrade: 5.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-468
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- True Width
- 3.34 m
- From
- 81.7 m
- To
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-468:81.7-86.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.99 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.99 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.99”
Context: FDN-C26-468
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 27.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.45 m
- True Width
- 0.93 m
- From
- 84.2 m
- To
- 85.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:84.2-85.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.47 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 39.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 27.47 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27.47”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.45 m
- True Width
- 0.93 m
- From
- 84.2 m
- To
- 85.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:84.2-85.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.20”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-469FDNS · goldGrade: 5.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-469
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- True Width
- 2.17 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-469:0-2.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.79 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.79”
Context: FDN-C26-469
FDN-C26-469FDNS · silverGrade: 4.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-469
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- True Width
- 2.17 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-469:0-2.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.83 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.83 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.83”
Context: FDN-C26-469
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 28.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-0.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 28.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-0.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.80”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-469FDNS · goldGrade: 7.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-469
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- True Width
- 8.57 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-469:15.2-25.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.63 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 75.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.63 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.63”
Context: FDN-C26-469
FDN-C26-469FDNS · silverGrade: 17.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-469
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- True Width
- 8.57 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-469:15.2-25.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.35 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 171.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.35 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.35”
Context: FDN-C26-469
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 23.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.56 m
- From
- 19.5 m
- To
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:19.5-21.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.58 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 42.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 23.58 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.58”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 37.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.56 m
- From
- 19.5 m
- To
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:19.5-21.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.39 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 67.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.39”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-469FDNS · goldGrade: 4.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-469
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.6 m
- From
- 48.9 m
- To
- 51.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-469:48.9-51.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.96 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.96”
Context: FDN-C26-469
FDN-C26-469FDNS · silverGrade: 13.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-469
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.6 m
- From
- 48.9 m
- To
- 51.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-469:48.9-51.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.38”
Context: FDN-C26-469
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 48.9 m
- To
- 49.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:48.9-49.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.75 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.75 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.75”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 21.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.35 m
- From
- 48.9 m
- To
- 49.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:48.9-49.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- True Width
- 0.39 m
- From
- 50.35 m
- To
- 50.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:50.35-50.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.05 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.05 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.05”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- True Width
- 0.39 m
- From
- 50.35 m
- To
- 50.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:50.35-50.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.60”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-470FDNS · goldGrade: 5.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-470
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 2.95 m
- From
- 5.1 m
- To
- 8.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-470:5.1-8.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.84 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.84”
Context: FDN-C26-470
FDN-C26-470FDNS · silverGrade: 16.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-470
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 2.95 m
- From
- 5.1 m
- To
- 8.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-470:5.1-8.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.63 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 49.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.63 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.63”
Context: FDN-C26-470
FDN-C26-470FDNS · goldGrade: 52.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-470
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 52.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- True Width
- 7.5 m
- From
- 11.4 m
- To
- 18.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-470:11.4-18.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 52.78 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 395.9 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 52.78 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“52.78”
Context: FDN-C26-470
FDN-C26-470FDNS · silverGrade: 44.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-470
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 44.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- True Width
- 7.5 m
- From
- 11.4 m
- To
- 18.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-470:11.4-18.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44.98 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 337.3 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“44.98”
Context: FDN-C26-470
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 118.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 118.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 11.8 m
- To
- 12.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:11.8-12.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 118.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 136.3 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 118.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“118.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 159.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 159.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 11.8 m
- To
- 12.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:11.8-12.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 159.48 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 183.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“159.48”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 579Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 579
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.4 m
- From
- 18.5 m
- To
- 18.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:18.5-18.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 579 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 231.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 579 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“579.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 260Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 260
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.4 m
- From
- 18.5 m
- To
- 18.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:18.5-18.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 260 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 104.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 260 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“260.00”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-471FDNS · goldGrade: 3.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-471
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.55 m
- True Width
- 3.57 m
- From
- 34.2 m
- To
- 39.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-471:34.2-39.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.13 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.13”
Context: FDN-C26-471
FDN-C26-471FDNS · silverGrade: 2.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-471
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.55 m
- True Width
- 3.57 m
- From
- 34.2 m
- To
- 39.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-471:34.2-39.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.91 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.91 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.91”
Context: FDN-C26-471
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 6.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 34.2 m
- To
- 35.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:34.2-35.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.46 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.46”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 34.2 m
- To
- 35.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:34.2-35.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.56”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-471FDNS · goldGrade: 5.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-471
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 2.95 m
- From
- 126.05 m
- To
- 129.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-471:126.05-129.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.88 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.88”
Context: FDN-C26-471
FDN-C26-471FDNS · silverGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-471
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 2.95 m
- From
- 126.05 m
- To
- 129.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-471:126.05-129.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.03 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.03 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.03”
Context: FDN-C26-471
FDN-C26-472FDNS · goldGrade: 3.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-472
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.46 m
- From
- 38.4 m
- To
- 41.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-472:38.4-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.34 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.34”
Context: FDN-C26-472
FDN-C26-472FDNS · silverGrade: 5.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-472
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.46 m
- From
- 38.4 m
- To
- 41.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-472:38.4-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.07”
Context: FDN-C26-472
FDN-C26-472FDNS · goldGrade: 3.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-472
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- True Width
- 3.12 m
- From
- 99.8 m
- To
- 103.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-472:99.8-103.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.19 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.19”
Context: FDN-C26-472
FDN-C26-472FDNS · silverGrade: 3.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-472
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- True Width
- 3.12 m
- From
- 99.8 m
- To
- 103.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-472:99.8-103.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.86”
Context: FDN-C26-472
FDN-C26-472FDNS · goldGrade: 4.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-472
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 3.46 m
- From
- 107.7 m
- To
- 111.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-472:107.7-111.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.92 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.92”
Context: FDN-C26-472
FDN-C26-472FDNS · silverGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-472
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 3.46 m
- From
- 107.7 m
- To
- 111.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-472:107.7-111.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.25”
Context: FDN-C26-472
FDN-C26-472FDNS · goldGrade: 10.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-472
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- True Width
- 4.22 m
- From
- 114.85 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-472:114.85-120
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.81 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 55.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.81 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.81”
Context: FDN-C26-472
FDN-C26-472FDNS · silverGrade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-472
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- True Width
- 4.22 m
- From
- 114.85 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-472:114.85-120
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.49 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.49”
Context: FDN-C26-472
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 17.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 118.3 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:118.3-120
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.76 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 17.76 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.76”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 118.3 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:118.3-120
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.40”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-474FDNS · goldGrade: 12.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- True Width
- 6.2 m
- From
- 36.1 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-474:36.1-42.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.47 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 82.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.47 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.47”
Context: FDN-C26-474
FDN-C26-474FDNS · silverGrade: 10.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- True Width
- 6.2 m
- From
- 36.1 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-474:36.1-42.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 71.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.87”
Context: FDN-C26-474
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 33.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- True Width
- 2.21 m
- From
- 40.35 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:40.35-42.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.26 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 78.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 33.26 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“33.26”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- True Width
- 2.21 m
- From
- 40.35 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:40.35-42.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.90”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-474FDNS · goldGrade: 32.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- True Width
- 5.73 m
- From
- 73 m
- To
- 79.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-474:73-79.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.82 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 200.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 32.82 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.82”
Context: FDN-C26-474
FDN-C26-474FDNS · silverGrade: 36.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- True Width
- 5.73 m
- From
- 73 m
- To
- 79.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-474:73-79.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.84 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 224.7 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“36.84”
Context: FDN-C26-474
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 91.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 91.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 1.97 m
- From
- 73.8 m
- To
- 75.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:73.8-75.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 91.91 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 193.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 91.91 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“91.91”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 86.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 86.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 1.97 m
- From
- 73.8 m
- To
- 75.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:73.8-75.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 86.19 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 181.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“86.19”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-474FDNS · goldGrade: 9.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- True Width
- 3.1 m
- From
- 84.7 m
- To
- 88 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-474:84.7-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.41 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 31.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.41 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.41”
Context: FDN-C26-474
FDN-C26-474FDNS · silverGrade: 12.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- True Width
- 3.1 m
- From
- 84.7 m
- To
- 88 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-474:84.7-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.76 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 42.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.76 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.76”
Context: FDN-C26-474
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.69 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 87.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:85.3-87.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.29 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 29.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.29 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.29”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.69 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 87.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:85.3-87.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.24 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.24 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.24”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-475FDNS · goldGrade: 3.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-475
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- True Width
- 1.96 m
- From
- 11.25 m
- To
- 14.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-475:11.25-14.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.99 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.99”
Context: FDN-C26-475
FDN-C26-475FDNS · silverGrade: 7.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-475
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- True Width
- 1.96 m
- From
- 11.25 m
- To
- 14.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-475:11.25-14.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.51”
Context: FDN-C26-475
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.42 m
- From
- 11.8 m
- To
- 12.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:11.8-12.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.60”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.42 m
- From
- 11.8 m
- To
- 12.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:11.8-12.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.60”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-475FDNS · goldGrade: 6.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-475
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- True Width
- 4.4 m
- From
- 26.15 m
- To
- 31.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-475:26.15-31.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.48 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 37.3 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.48”
Context: FDN-C26-475
FDN-C26-475FDNS · silverGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-475
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- True Width
- 4.4 m
- From
- 26.15 m
- To
- 31.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-475:26.15-31.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 42.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.40”
Context: FDN-C26-475
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 26.15 m
- To
- 27.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:26.15-27.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.55 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.55 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.55”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 26.15 m
- To
- 27.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:26.15-27.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.83 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.83 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.83”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-475FDNS · goldGrade: 7.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-475
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- True Width
- 3.12 m
- From
- 50.8 m
- To
- 54.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-475:50.8-54.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.63 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 27.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.63 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.63”
Context: FDN-C26-475
FDN-C26-475FDNS · silverGrade: 7.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-475
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- True Width
- 3.12 m
- From
- 50.8 m
- To
- 54.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-475:50.8-54.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.27”
Context: FDN-C26-475
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 0.91 m
- From
- 52.5 m
- To
- 53.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:52.5-53.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.80”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 0.91 m
- From
- 52.5 m
- To
- 53.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:52.5-53.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.40”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-476FDNS · goldGrade: 3.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- True Width
- 1.2 m
- From
- 8.75 m
- To
- 11.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:8.75-11.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.64 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.64”
Context: FDN-C26-476
FDN-C26-476FDNS · silverGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- True Width
- 1.2 m
- From
- 8.75 m
- To
- 11.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:8.75-11.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.70”
Context: FDN-C26-476
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.2 m
- From
- 10.2 m
- To
- 10.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:10.2-10.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.70”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 9.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.2 m
- From
- 10.2 m
- To
- 10.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:10.2-10.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.30”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-476FDNS · goldGrade: 8.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 23.2 m
- To
- 25.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:23.2-25.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.73 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.73 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.73”
Context: FDN-C26-476
FDN-C26-476FDNS · silverGrade: 13.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1 m
- From
- 23.2 m
- To
- 25.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:23.2-25.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.38”
Context: FDN-C26-476
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 23.2 m
- To
- 24.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:23.2-24.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.35 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.35 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.35”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 23.2 m
- To
- 24.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:23.2-24.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.96 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.96”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-476FDNS · goldGrade: 5.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.75 m
- True Width
- 3.88 m
- From
- 131.1 m
- To
- 138.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:131.1-138.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.91 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 45.8 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.91”
Context: FDN-C26-476
FDN-C26-476FDNS · silverGrade: 107.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 107.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.75 m
- True Width
- 3.88 m
- From
- 131.1 m
- To
- 138.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:131.1-138.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 107.33 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 831.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“107.33”
Context: FDN-C26-476
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 0.78 m
- From
- 132.3 m
- To
- 133.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:132.3-133.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.32 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.32 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.32”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 156.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 156.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- True Width
- 0.78 m
- From
- 132.3 m
- To
- 133.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:132.3-133.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 156.4 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 242.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“156.40”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-476FDNS · goldGrade: 3.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- True Width
- 1.95 m
- From
- 168.3 m
- To
- 172.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:168.3-172.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.94 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.4 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.94”
Context: FDN-C26-476
FDN-C26-476FDNS · silverGrade: 98.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 98.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- True Width
- 1.95 m
- From
- 168.3 m
- To
- 172.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:168.3-172.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 98.59 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 384.5 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“98.59”
Context: FDN-C26-476
FDN-C26-476FDNS · goldGrade: 11.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.15 m
- True Width
- 2.08 m
- From
- 182.8 m
- To
- 186.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:182.8-186.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.13 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 46.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.13 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.13”
Context: FDN-C26-476
FDN-C26-476FDNS · silverGrade: 11.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.15 m
- True Width
- 2.08 m
- From
- 182.8 m
- To
- 186.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:182.8-186.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 48.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.64”
Context: FDN-C26-476
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 76.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 76.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 186.4 m
- To
- 186.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:186.4-186.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 76.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 42.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 76.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“76.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 41.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 41.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 186.4 m
- To
- 186.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:186.4-186.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 41.1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“41.10”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-476FDNS · goldGrade: 3.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- True Width
- 2.15 m
- From
- 209.55 m
- To
- 213.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:209.55-213.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.26 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.26”
Context: FDN-C26-476
FDN-C26-476FDNS · silverGrade: 286.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-476
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 286.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- True Width
- 2.15 m
- From
- 209.55 m
- To
- 213.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-476:209.55-213.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 286.6 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1232.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 286.6 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“286.60”
Context: FDN-C26-476
FDN-C26-481FDNS · goldGrade: 7.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-481
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 12.25 m
- To
- 13.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-481:12.25-13.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.26 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.26 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.26”
Context: FDN-C26-481
FDN-C26-481FDNS · silverGrade: 17.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-481
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 12.25 m
- To
- 13.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-481:12.25-13.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.03 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.03 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.03”
Context: FDN-C26-481
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 12.65 m
- To
- 13.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:12.65-13.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.65 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.65 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.65”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 31.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 12.65 m
- To
- 13.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:12.65-13.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“31.60”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-481FDNS · goldGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-481
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- True Width
- 2.16 m
- From
- 89.75 m
- To
- 92.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-481:89.75-92.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.4 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.4 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.40”
Context: FDN-C26-481
FDN-C26-481FDNS · silverGrade: 6.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-481
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- True Width
- 2.16 m
- From
- 89.75 m
- To
- 92.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-481:89.75-92.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.12”
Context: FDN-C26-481
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.13 m
- From
- 90.2 m
- To
- 91.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:90.2-91.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.6 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.6 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.60”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.13 m
- From
- 90.2 m
- To
- 91.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:90.2-91.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.72 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.72 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.72”
Context: Including
FDN-C26-481FDNS · goldGrade: 196.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-481
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 196.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 2.89 m
- From
- 161.35 m
- To
- 165.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-481:161.35-165.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 196.79 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 885.6 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 196.79 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“196.79”
Context: FDN-C26-481
FDN-C26-481FDNS · silverGrade: 394.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDN-C26-481
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 394.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 2.89 m
- From
- 161.35 m
- To
- 165.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDN-C26-481:161.35-165.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 394.5 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1775.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 394.5 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“394.50”
Context: FDN-C26-481
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 929Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 929
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.58 m
- From
- 164.95 m
- To
- 165.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:164.95-165.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 929 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 836.1 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 929 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“929.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 727Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 727
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.58 m
- From
- 164.95 m
- To
- 165.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:164.95-165.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 727 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 654.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 727 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“727.00”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-477FDNS · goldGrade: 5.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-477
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.13 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-477:73.6-75.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.52 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.52”
Context: UGE-S-26-477
UGE-S-26-477FDNS · silverGrade: 16.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-477
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.13 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-477:73.6-75.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.55”
Context: UGE-S-26-477
UGE-S-26-477FDNS · goldGrade: 15.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-477
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- True Width
- 1.66 m
- From
- 106.7 m
- To
- 109.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-477:106.7-109.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.72 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 36.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.72 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.72”
Context: UGE-S-26-477
UGE-S-26-477FDNS · silverGrade: 35.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-477
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- True Width
- 1.66 m
- From
- 106.7 m
- To
- 109.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-477:106.7-109.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35.23 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 82.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“35.23”
Context: UGE-S-26-477
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · goldGrade: 12.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- True Width
- 1.94 m
- From
- 39.6 m
- To
- 42.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:39.6-42.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.42 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 34.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.42 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.42”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · silverGrade: 43.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- True Width
- 1.94 m
- From
- 39.6 m
- To
- 42.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:39.6-42.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 43.78 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 120.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“43.78”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 17.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 41.5 m
- To
- 42.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.5-42.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.07 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 17.07 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.07”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 74.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 74.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 41.5 m
- To
- 42.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:41.5-42.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 74.74 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 63.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“74.74”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · goldGrade: 10.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.41 m
- From
- 59.55 m
- To
- 61.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:59.55-61.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.01 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.01 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.01”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · silverGrade: 13.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.41 m
- From
- 59.55 m
- To
- 61.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:59.55-61.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.98 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.98 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.98”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 17.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.42 m
- From
- 60.35 m
- To
- 60.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:60.35-60.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.15 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 17.15 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.15”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 21.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.42 m
- From
- 60.35 m
- To
- 60.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:60.35-60.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.80”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · goldGrade: 4.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- True Width
- 2.34 m
- From
- 71.35 m
- To
- 74.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:71.35-74.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.25 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.25”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · silverGrade: 14.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- True Width
- 2.34 m
- From
- 71.35 m
- To
- 74.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:71.35-74.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.36 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.36 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.36”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.61 m
- From
- 71.35 m
- To
- 72.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:71.35-72.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.9 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.9 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.90”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 20.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.61 m
- From
- 71.35 m
- To
- 72.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:71.35-72.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 20.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.05”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · goldGrade: 9.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- True Width
- 3.11 m
- From
- 102.2 m
- To
- 106.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:102.2-106.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.05 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 39.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.05 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.05”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · silverGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- True Width
- 3.11 m
- From
- 102.2 m
- To
- 106.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:102.2-106.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 58.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.30”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- True Width
- 1.7 m
- From
- 102.65 m
- To
- 105.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:102.65-105.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.26 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 36.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.26 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.26”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 19.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- True Width
- 1.7 m
- From
- 102.65 m
- To
- 105.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:102.65-105.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.77”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · goldGrade: 8.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- True Width
- 3.64 m
- From
- 112.25 m
- To
- 117.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:112.25-117.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.42 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 43.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.42 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.42”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · silverGrade: 15.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- True Width
- 3.64 m
- From
- 112.25 m
- To
- 117.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:112.25-117.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.53 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 80.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.53 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.53”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- True Width
- 1.56 m
- From
- 115.2 m
- To
- 117.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:115.2-117.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.99 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 33.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.99 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.99”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 31.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- True Width
- 1.56 m
- From
- 115.2 m
- To
- 117.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:115.2-117.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.63 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 69.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“31.63”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · goldGrade: 7.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- True Width
- 2.07 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 136.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:134-136.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.22 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.22 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.22”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · silverGrade: 20.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- True Width
- 2.07 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 136.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:134-136.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.97 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 56.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 20.97 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.97”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · goldGrade: 6.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 2.3 m
- From
- 170.05 m
- To
- 173.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:170.05-173.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.68 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.68”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · silverGrade: 7.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 2.3 m
- From
- 170.05 m
- To
- 173.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:170.05-173.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.77”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 0.99 m
- From
- 170.05 m
- To
- 171.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:170.05-171.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.77 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.77 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.77”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- True Width
- 0.99 m
- From
- 170.05 m
- To
- 171.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:170.05-171.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.03 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.03 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.03”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · goldGrade: 108.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 108.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.75 m
- True Width
- 8.31 m
- From
- 177.8 m
- To
- 189.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:177.8-189.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 108.61 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1276.2 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 108.61 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“108.61”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
UGE-S-26-478FDNS · silverGrade: 30.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-478
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.75 m
- True Width
- 8.31 m
- From
- 177.8 m
- To
- 189.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-478:177.8-189.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.79 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 361.8 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“30.79”
Context: UGE-S-26-478
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 2030Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2030
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 184.85 m
- To
- 185.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:184.85-185.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2030 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 812.0 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 2030 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2030.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 510Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 510
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 184.85 m
- To
- 185.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:184.85-185.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 510 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 204.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 510 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“510.00”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-489FDNS · goldGrade: 12.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-489
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.4 m
- True Width
- 7.29 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 7.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-489:0-7.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.62 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 93.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.62 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.62”
Context: UGE-S-26-489
UGE-S-26-489FDNS · silverGrade: 7.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-489
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.4 m
- True Width
- 7.29 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 7.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-489:0-7.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.58 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 56.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.58 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.58”
Context: UGE-S-26-489
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 23.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 2.91 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-2.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.93 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 70.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 23.93 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.93”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 2.91 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:0-2.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.47 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.47 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.47”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-489FDNS · goldGrade: 5.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-489
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.38 m
- From
- 25.8 m
- To
- 27.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-489:25.8-27.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.03 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.03”
Context: UGE-S-26-489
UGE-S-26-489FDNS · silverGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-489
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.38 m
- From
- 25.8 m
- To
- 27.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-489:25.8-27.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.61 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.61 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.61”
Context: UGE-S-26-489
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25.8 m
- To
- 26.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:25.8-26.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.65 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.65 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.65”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25.8 m
- To
- 26.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:25.8-26.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-489FDNS · goldGrade: 12.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-489
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- True Width
- 2.41 m
- From
- 32.9 m
- To
- 35.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-489:32.9-35.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.61 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 31.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.61 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.61”
Context: UGE-S-26-489
UGE-S-26-489FDNS · silverGrade: 3.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-489
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- True Width
- 2.41 m
- From
- 32.9 m
- To
- 35.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-489:32.9-35.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.47 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.47 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.47”
Context: UGE-S-26-489
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 25.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.16 m
- From
- 32.9 m
- To
- 34.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:32.9-34.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 25.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“25.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.16 m
- From
- 32.9 m
- To
- 34.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:32.9-34.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.20”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-489FDNS · goldGrade: 16.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-489
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 42 m
- To
- 43 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-489:42-43
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.73 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.73 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.73”
Context: UGE-S-26-489
UGE-S-26-489FDNS · silverGrade: 10.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-489
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 42 m
- To
- 43 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-489:42-43
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.06 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.06 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.06”
Context: UGE-S-26-489
UGE-S-26-490FDNS · goldGrade: 8.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-490
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- True Width
- 5.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 5.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-490:0-5.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.81 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 51.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.81 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.81”
Context: UGE-S-26-490
UGE-S-26-490FDNS · silverGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-490
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- True Width
- 5.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 5.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-490:0-5.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.39 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.39”
Context: UGE-S-26-490
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 19.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.45 m
- True Width
- 1.36 m
- From
- 2.45 m
- To
- 3.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:2.45-3.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.78 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 28.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19.78 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.78”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.45 m
- True Width
- 1.36 m
- From
- 2.45 m
- To
- 3.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:2.45-3.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.08 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.08 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.08”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-491FDNS · goldGrade: 6.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-491
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.05 m
- True Width
- 4.97 m
- From
- 177.55 m
- To
- 182.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-491:177.55-182.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.08 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.7 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.08”
Context: UGE-S-26-491
UGE-S-26-491FDNS · silverGrade: 11.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-491
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.05 m
- True Width
- 4.97 m
- From
- 177.55 m
- To
- 182.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-491:177.55-182.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.89 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 60.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.89 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.89”
Context: UGE-S-26-491
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.72 m
- From
- 179.1 m
- To
- 180.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.1-180.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.61 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.61 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.61”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.72 m
- From
- 179.1 m
- To
- 180.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.1-180.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.29”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-491FDNS · goldGrade: 4.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-491
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 3.2 m
- From
- 194.1 m
- To
- 197.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-491:194.1-197.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.58 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.58”
Context: UGE-S-26-491
UGE-S-26-491FDNS · silverGrade: 9.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-491
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- True Width
- 3.2 m
- From
- 194.1 m
- To
- 197.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-491:194.1-197.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.56”
Context: UGE-S-26-491
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.64 m
- From
- 196.7 m
- To
- 197.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:196.7-197.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.95 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.95 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.95”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.64 m
- From
- 196.7 m
- To
- 197.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:196.7-197.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.00”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-491FDNS · goldGrade: 4.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-491
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 199.7 m
- To
- 201.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-491:199.7-201.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.17 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.17”
Context: UGE-S-26-491
UGE-S-26-491FDNS · silverGrade: 15.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-491
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 199.7 m
- To
- 201.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-491:199.7-201.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.86”
Context: UGE-S-26-491
UGE-S-26-493FDNS · goldGrade: 5.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-493
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- True Width
- 1.38 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-493:0-2.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.84 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.84”
Context: UGE-S-26-493
UGE-S-26-493FDNS · silverGrade: 7.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-493
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- True Width
- 1.38 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-493:0-2.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.06 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.06 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.06”
Context: UGE-S-26-493
UGE-S-26-493FDNS · goldGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-493
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 72.15 m
- To
- 73.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-493:72.15-73.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.8 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.8 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.80”
Context: UGE-S-26-493
UGE-S-26-493FDNS · silverGrade: 12.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-493
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.45 m
- From
- 72.15 m
- To
- 73.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-493:72.15-73.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.79 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.79 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.79”
Context: UGE-S-26-493
UGE-S-26-494FDNS · goldGrade: 5.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-494
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- True Width
- 1.31 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-494:0-3.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.41 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.41”
Context: UGE-S-26-494
UGE-S-26-494FDNS · silverGrade: 5.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-494
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- True Width
- 1.31 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-494:0-3.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.92 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.92 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.92”
Context: UGE-S-26-494
UGE-S-26-494FDNS · goldGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-494
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 0.74 m
- From
- 29.65 m
- To
- 31.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-494:29.65-31.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.55 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.55”
Context: UGE-S-26-494
UGE-S-26-494FDNS · silverGrade: 3.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-494
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 0.74 m
- From
- 29.65 m
- To
- 31.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-494:29.65-31.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.41 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.41 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.41”
Context: UGE-S-26-494
UGE-S-26-494FDNS · goldGrade: 5.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-494
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 1.25 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 66.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-494:63.2-66.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.94 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.94”
Context: UGE-S-26-494
UGE-S-26-494FDNS · silverGrade: 8.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-494
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 1.25 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 66.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-494:63.2-66.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.19”
Context: UGE-S-26-494
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 20.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.27 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 63.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:63.2-63.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 20.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.90”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 17.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.27 m
- From
- 63.2 m
- To
- 63.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:63.2-63.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.90”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-496FDNS · goldGrade: 3.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-496
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- True Width
- 1.68 m
- From
- 8.6 m
- To
- 11.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-496:8.6-11.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.42 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.42”
Context: UGE-S-26-496
UGE-S-26-496FDNS · silverGrade: 3.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-496
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- True Width
- 1.68 m
- From
- 8.6 m
- To
- 11.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-496:8.6-11.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.84 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.84 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.84”
Context: UGE-S-26-496
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 6.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.43 m
- From
- 8.6 m
- To
- 9.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:8.6-9.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.01 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.01”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.43 m
- From
- 8.6 m
- To
- 9.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:8.6-9.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.00”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-496FDNS · goldGrade: 6.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-496
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.83 m
- From
- 38.3 m
- To
- 39.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-496:38.3-39.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.87 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.87”
Context: UGE-S-26-496
UGE-S-26-496FDNS · silverGrade: 34.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-496
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.83 m
- From
- 38.3 m
- To
- 39.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-496:38.3-39.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34.91 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 57.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“34.91”
Context: UGE-S-26-496
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.2 m
- From
- 38.3 m
- To
- 38.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:38.3-38.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 21 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.2 m
- From
- 38.3 m
- To
- 38.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:38.3-38.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.40”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-497FDNS · goldGrade: 17.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-497
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- True Width
- 3.11 m
- From
- 14.05 m
- To
- 18.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-497:14.05-18.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.14 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 75.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 17.14 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.14”
Context: UGE-S-26-497
UGE-S-26-497FDNS · silverGrade: 90.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-497
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 90.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- True Width
- 3.11 m
- From
- 14.05 m
- To
- 18.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-497:14.05-18.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 90.43 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 397.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“90.43”
Context: UGE-S-26-497
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 38.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.24 m
- From
- 16.25 m
- To
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:16.25-18
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.54 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 67.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 38.54 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“38.54”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 209.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 209.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.24 m
- From
- 16.25 m
- To
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:16.25-18
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 209.14 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 366.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 209.14 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“209.14”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-497FDNS · goldGrade: 67.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-497
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- True Width
- 4.1 m
- From
- 37.5 m
- To
- 43.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-497:37.5-43.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 67.19 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 389.7 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 67.19 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“67.19”
Context: UGE-S-26-497
UGE-S-26-497FDNS · silverGrade: 46.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-497
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- True Width
- 4.1 m
- From
- 37.5 m
- To
- 43.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-497:37.5-43.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 46.93 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 272.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“46.93”
Context: UGE-S-26-497
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 552Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 552
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 40.05 m
- To
- 40.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:40.05-40.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 552 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 220.8 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 552 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“552.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 170Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 170
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 40.05 m
- To
- 40.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:40.05-40.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 170 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 68.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“170.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 148.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 148.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 0.74 m
- From
- 42.25 m
- To
- 43.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:42.25-43.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 148.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 155.9 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 148.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“148.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 156Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 156
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 0.74 m
- From
- 42.25 m
- To
- 43.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:42.25-43.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 156 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 163.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“156.00”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-497FDNS · goldGrade: 9.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-497
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 2.26 m
- From
- 53.2 m
- To
- 56.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-497:53.2-56.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.56 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.56 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.56”
Context: UGE-S-26-497
UGE-S-26-497FDNS · silverGrade: 42.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-497
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 42.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 2.26 m
- From
- 53.2 m
- To
- 56.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-497:53.2-56.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42.1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 134.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“42.10”
Context: UGE-S-26-497
UGE-S-26-497FDNS · goldGrade: 47.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-497
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- True Width
- 2.9 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 66.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-497:62.5-66.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 47.73 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 195.7 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 47.73 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“47.73”
Context: UGE-S-26-497
UGE-S-26-497FDNS · silverGrade: 26.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-497
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- True Width
- 2.9 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 66.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-497:62.5-66.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.39 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 108.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 26.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.39”
Context: UGE-S-26-497
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 474Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 474
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 63.65 m
- To
- 64.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:63.65-64.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 474 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 189.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 474 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“474.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 182Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 182
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.28 m
- From
- 63.65 m
- To
- 64.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:63.65-64.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 182 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 72.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“182.00”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · goldGrade: 7.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- True Width
- 3.56 m
- From
- 14.5 m
- To
- 20.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:14.5-20.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.02 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 43.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.02 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.02”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · silverGrade: 7.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- True Width
- 3.56 m
- From
- 14.5 m
- To
- 20.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:14.5-20.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.53 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.53 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.53”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- True Width
- 1.52 m
- From
- 18.05 m
- To
- 20.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:18.05-20.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.25 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 35.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.25 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.25”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- True Width
- 1.52 m
- From
- 18.05 m
- To
- 20.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:18.05-20.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.94”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · goldGrade: 5.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- True Width
- 1.92 m
- From
- 26.15 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:26.15-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.12 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.12”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · silverGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- True Width
- 1.92 m
- From
- 26.15 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:26.15-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.56”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 21.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.23 m
- From
- 29.7 m
- To
- 30.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:29.7-30.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 21.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- True Width
- 0.23 m
- From
- 29.7 m
- To
- 30.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:29.7-30.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.10”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · goldGrade: 19.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.35 m
- True Width
- 3.07 m
- From
- 56.95 m
- To
- 62.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:56.95-62.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.33 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 103.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19.33 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.33”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · silverGrade: 47.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.35 m
- True Width
- 3.07 m
- From
- 56.95 m
- To
- 62.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:56.95-62.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 47.16 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 252.3 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“47.16”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 49.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 49.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 60.3 m
- To
- 62.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:60.3-62.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 49.44 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 98.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 49.44 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“49.44”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 97.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 97.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.15 m
- From
- 60.3 m
- To
- 62.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:60.3-62.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 97.28 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 194.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“97.28”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · goldGrade: 8.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 1.6 m
- From
- 112.3 m
- To
- 115.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:112.3-115.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.08 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.08 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.08”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · silverGrade: 35.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- True Width
- 1.6 m
- From
- 112.3 m
- To
- 115.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:112.3-115.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35.41 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 113.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“35.41”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 17.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 113 m
- To
- 114.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:113-114.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.91 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 17.91 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.91”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 58.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 113 m
- To
- 114.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:113-114.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.96 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 76.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“58.96”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · goldGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- True Width
- 1.65 m
- From
- 308.3 m
- To
- 311.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:308.3-311.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.48 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.48”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · silverGrade: 150.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 150.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- True Width
- 1.65 m
- From
- 308.3 m
- To
- 311.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:308.3-311.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 150.28 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 495.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“150.28”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 309 m
- To
- 310.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:309-310.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.1 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.1 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 305.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 305.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 309 m
- To
- 310.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:309-310.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 305.16 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 396.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 305.16 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“305.16”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · goldGrade: 3.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 1.58 m
- From
- 319.3 m
- To
- 322.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:319.3-322.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.06 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.06”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
UGE-S-26-505FDNS · silverGrade: 105.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-505
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 105.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 1.58 m
- From
- 319.3 m
- To
- 322.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-505:319.3-322.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 105.15 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 331.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“105.15”
Context: UGE-S-26-505
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.3 m
- From
- 320.1 m
- To
- 320.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:320.1-320.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.14 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.14 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.14”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 213Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 213
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.3 m
- From
- 320.1 m
- To
- 320.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:320.1-320.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 213 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 127.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 213 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“213.00”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-506FDNS · goldGrade: 5.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-506
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.56 m
- From
- 18.45 m
- To
- 20.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-506:18.45-20.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.09 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.09”
Context: UGE-S-26-506
UGE-S-26-506FDNS · silverGrade: 6.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-506
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 0.56 m
- From
- 18.45 m
- To
- 20.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-506:18.45-20.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.64”
Context: UGE-S-26-506
UGE-S-26-506FDNS · goldGrade: 9.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-506
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.32 m
- From
- 92.95 m
- To
- 93.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-506:92.95-93.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.74 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.74 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.74”
Context: UGE-S-26-506
UGE-S-26-506FDNS · silverGrade: 62.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-506
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 62.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.32 m
- From
- 92.95 m
- To
- 93.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-506:92.95-93.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 62.16 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 59.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“62.16”
Context: UGE-S-26-506
UGE-S-26-509FDNS · goldGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-509
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- True Width
- 2.55 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 5.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-509:0-5.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.4 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 27.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.40”
Context: UGE-S-26-509
UGE-S-26-509FDNS · silverGrade: 4.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-509
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- True Width
- 2.55 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 5.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-509:0-5.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.64”
Context: UGE-S-26-509
UGE-S-26-509FDNS · goldGrade: 3.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-509
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 34.25 m
- To
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-509:34.25-38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.65 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.7 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.65”
Context: UGE-S-26-509
UGE-S-26-509FDNS · silverGrade: 6.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-509
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 34.25 m
- To
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-509:34.25-38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.02 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.02 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.02”
Context: UGE-S-26-509
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 6.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 0.88 m
- From
- 34.25 m
- To
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:34.25-36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.99 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.99”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 6.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 0.88 m
- From
- 34.25 m
- To
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:34.25-36
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.19”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-512FDNS · goldGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-512
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 2.02 m
- From
- 70.4 m
- To
- 73.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-512:70.4-73.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.5 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 32.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.5 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.50”
Context: UGE-S-26-512
UGE-S-26-512FDNS · silverGrade: 36.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-512
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 2.02 m
- From
- 70.4 m
- To
- 73.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-512:70.4-73.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.64 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 104.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“36.64”
Context: UGE-S-26-512
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 22.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.78 m
- From
- 72.15 m
- To
- 73.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:72.15-73.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.05 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 22.05 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.05”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 60.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 60.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.78 m
- From
- 72.15 m
- To
- 73.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:72.15-73.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 60.48 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 66.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“60.48”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-518FDNS · goldGrade: 3.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-518
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.72 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-518:54.9-57.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.61 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.8 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.61”
Context: UGE-S-26-518
UGE-S-26-518FDNS · silverGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-518
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 1.72 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-518:54.9-57.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.33 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: UGE-S-26-518
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.29 m
- From
- 57.4 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:57.4-57.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.60”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.29 m
- From
- 57.4 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:57.4-57.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.70”
Context: Including
UGE-S-26-518FDNS · goldGrade: 5.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-518
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 67.2 m
- To
- 70.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-518:67.2-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.03 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.03”
Context: UGE-S-26-518
UGE-S-26-518FDNS · silverGrade: 3.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-518
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- True Width
- 2.12 m
- From
- 67.2 m
- To
- 70.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-518:67.2-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.42 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.42 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.42”
Context: UGE-S-26-518
UGE-S-26-518FDNS · goldGrade: 4.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-518
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.09 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 91.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-518:89.9-91.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.41 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.41”
Context: UGE-S-26-518
UGE-S-26-518FDNS · silverGrade: 5.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-S-26-518
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.09 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 91.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-S-26-518:89.9-91.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.19”
Context: UGE-S-26-518
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 90.45 m
- To
- 91.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:90.45-91.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.85 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.85 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.85”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 90.45 m
- To
- 91.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:90.45-91.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.20”
Context: Including
FDNE-2026-466-D1FDNS · goldGrade: 7.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D1
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 420.4 m
- To
- 423.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D1:420.4-423.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.23 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.23 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.23”
Context: FDNE-2026-466-D1
FDNE-2026-466-D1FDNS · silverGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D1
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 420.4 m
- To
- 423.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D1:420.4-423.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.40”
Context: FDNE-2026-466-D1
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 420.4 m
- To
- 421.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:420.4-421.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.4 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.4 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 420.4 m
- To
- 421.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:420.4-421.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.96 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.96”
Context: Including
FDNE-2026-466-D2FDNS · goldGrade: 4.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D2
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.65 m
- True Width
- 4.37 m
- From
- 300.05 m
- To
- 304.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D2:300.05-304.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.38 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.38”
Context: FDNE-2026-466-D2
FDNE-2026-466-D2FDNS · silverGrade: 61.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D2
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 61.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.65 m
- True Width
- 4.37 m
- From
- 300.05 m
- To
- 304.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D2:300.05-304.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 61.06 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 283.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“61.06”
Context: FDNE-2026-466-D2
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.75 m
- From
- 303.9 m
- To
- 304.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:303.9-304.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.67 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.67 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.67”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 278Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 278
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- True Width
- 0.75 m
- From
- 303.9 m
- To
- 304.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:303.9-304.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 278 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 222.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 278 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“278.00”
Context: Including
FDNE-2026-466-D2FDNS · goldGrade: 23.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D2
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.25 m
- True Width
- 5.66 m
- From
- 429.05 m
- To
- 435.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D2:429.05-435.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.16 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 144.8 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 23.16 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.16”
Context: FDNE-2026-466-D2
FDNE-2026-466-D2FDNS · silverGrade: 13.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D2
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.25 m
- True Width
- 5.66 m
- From
- 429.05 m
- To
- 435.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- FDNE-2026-466-D2:429.05-435.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.89 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.89 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.89”
Context: FDNE-2026-466-D2
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 39.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.72 m
- From
- 432.3 m
- To
- 435.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:432.3-435.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 117.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 39.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“39.01”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 23.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.72 m
- From
- 432.3 m
- To
- 435.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:432.3-435.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.74 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 71.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 23.74 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.74”
Context: Including
UGE-E-26-470FDNS · goldGrade: 9.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-470
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.4 m
- From
- 97.8 m
- To
- 110.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-470:97.8-110.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.11 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 113.0 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 9.11 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.11”
Context: UGE-E-26-470
UGE-E-26-470FDNS · silverGrade: 10.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-470
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.4 m
- From
- 97.8 m
- To
- 110.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-470:97.8-110.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.59 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 131.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.59 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.59”
Context: UGE-E-26-470
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.75 m
- From
- 98.4 m
- To
- 107.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.4-107.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.1 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 105.9 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 12.1 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.75 m
- From
- 98.4 m
- To
- 107.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.4-107.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 115.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.20”
Context: Including
UGE-E-26-470FDNS · goldGrade: 12.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-470
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 372.1 m
- To
- 373.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-470:372.1-373.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.6 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.6 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.60”
Context: UGE-E-26-470
UGE-E-26-470FDNS · silverGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-470
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 372.1 m
- To
- 373.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-470:372.1-373.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.20”
Context: UGE-E-26-470
UGE-E-26-487FDNS · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-487
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.25 m
- True Width
- 4.11 m
- From
- 263.65 m
- To
- 267.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-487:263.65-267.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.00”
Context: UGE-E-26-487
UGE-E-26-487FDNS · silverGrade: 5.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-487
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.25 m
- True Width
- 4.11 m
- From
- 263.65 m
- To
- 267.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-487:263.65-267.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.92 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.92 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.92”
Context: UGE-E-26-487
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 29.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.58 m
- From
- 263.65 m
- To
- 264.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:263.65-264.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 29.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.10”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 26.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.58 m
- From
- 263.65 m
- To
- 264.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:263.65-264.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 26.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.50”
Context: Including
UGE-E-26-487FDNS · goldGrade: 236.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-487
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 236.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.95 m
- True Width
- 3.82 m
- From
- 280.75 m
- To
- 284.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-487:280.75-284.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 236.62 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 934.6 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 236.62 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“236.62”
Context: UGE-E-26-487
UGE-E-26-487FDNS · silverGrade: 144.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-487
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 144.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.95 m
- True Width
- 3.82 m
- From
- 280.75 m
- To
- 284.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-487:280.75-284.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 144.57 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 571.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“144.57”
Context: UGE-E-26-487
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 933Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 933
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.97 m
- From
- 282 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:282-283
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 933 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 933.0 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 933 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“933.00”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 566.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 566.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.97 m
- From
- 282 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:282-283
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 566.25 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 566.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 566.25 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“566.25”
Context: Including
UGE-E-26-511FDNS · goldGrade: 4.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-511
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- True Width
- 2.44 m
- From
- 161.6 m
- To
- 164.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-511:161.6-164.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.07 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.07”
Context: UGE-E-26-511
UGE-E-26-511FDNS · silverGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-511
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- True Width
- 2.44 m
- From
- 161.6 m
- To
- 164.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-511:161.6-164.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.72 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.72 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.72”
Context: UGE-E-26-511
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.13 m
- From
- 161.6 m
- To
- 162.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:161.6-162.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.67 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.67 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.67”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 3.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.13 m
- From
- 161.6 m
- To
- 162.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:161.6-162.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.73”
Context: Including
UGE-E-26-515FDNS · goldGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-515
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- True Width
- 2.89 m
- From
- 279 m
- To
- 281.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-515:279-281.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.24 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.24”
Context: UGE-E-26-515
UGE-E-26-515FDNS · silverGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-515
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- True Width
- 2.89 m
- From
- 279 m
- To
- 281.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-515:279-281.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.38”
Context: UGE-E-26-515
UGE-E-26-519FDNS · goldGrade: 6.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-519
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- True Width
- 5.31 m
- From
- 29.25 m
- To
- 34.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-519:29.25-34.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.08 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 33.4 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.08”
Context: UGE-E-26-519
UGE-E-26-519FDNS · silverGrade: 73.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-E-26-519
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 73.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- True Width
- 5.31 m
- From
- 29.25 m
- To
- 34.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-E-26-519:29.25-34.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 73.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 402.6 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“73.20”
Context: UGE-E-26-519
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 20.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 1.01 m
- From
- 29.25 m
- To
- 30.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:29.25-30.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 20.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.60”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 287Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 287
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 1.01 m
- From
- 29.25 m
- To
- 30.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:29.25-30.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 287 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 301.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 287 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“287.00”
Context: Including
UGE-26-471FDNS · goldGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-471
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 57 m
- To
- 62.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-471:57-62.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.3 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 32.8 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.30”
Context: UGE-26-471
UGE-26-471FDNS · silverGrade: 6.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-471
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 57 m
- To
- 62.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-471:57-62.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.56”
Context: UGE-26-471
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 58.8 m
- To
- 61.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:58.8-61.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.95 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.95 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.95”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 58.8 m
- To
- 61.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:58.8-61.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.04 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.04 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.04”
Context: Including
UGE-26-471FDNS · goldGrade: 4.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-471
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 126.35 m
- To
- 132.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-471:126.35-132.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.73 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 27.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.73”
Context: UGE-26-471
UGE-26-471FDNS · silverGrade: 3.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-471
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 126.35 m
- To
- 132.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-471:126.35-132.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.51”
Context: UGE-26-471
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 131.15 m
- To
- 132.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.15-132.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.4 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.4 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.40”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 131.15 m
- To
- 132.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.15-132.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.50”
Context: Including
UGE-26-474FDNS · goldGrade: 7.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.45 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 45.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-474:40.5-45.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.44 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 40.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.44 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.44”
Context: UGE-26-474
UGE-26-474FDNS · silverGrade: 13.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.45 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 45.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-474:40.5-45.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.76 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 75.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.76 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.76”
Context: UGE-26-474
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 42.75 m
- To
- 45.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:42.75-45.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.46 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.46 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.46”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 42.75 m
- To
- 45.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:42.75-45.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.71 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.71 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.71”
Context: Including
UGE-26-474FDNS · goldGrade: 6.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 66.7 m
- To
- 74.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-474:66.7-74.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.26 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 46.9 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.26”
Context: UGE-26-474
UGE-26-474FDNS · silverGrade: 21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-474
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 66.7 m
- To
- 74.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-474:66.7-74.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 157.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.00”
Context: UGE-26-474
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- From
- 68.65 m
- To
- 70.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68.65-70.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.14 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.14 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.14”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 22.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- From
- 68.65 m
- To
- 70.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68.65-70.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.48”
Context: Including
UGE-26-520FDNS · goldGrade: 9.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-520
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 50.9 m
- To
- 71.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-520:50.9-71.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.32 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 194.8 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 9.32 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.32”
Context: UGE-26-520
UGE-26-520FDNS · silverGrade: 10.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-520
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 50.9 m
- To
- 71.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-520:50.9-71.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.01 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 209.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.01”
Context: UGE-26-520
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 62.1 m
- To
- 68.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:62.1-68.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.85 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 122.5 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 18.85 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.85”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 62.1 m
- To
- 68.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:62.1-68.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 68.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.48”
Context: Including
UGE-26-523FDNS · goldGrade: 15.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-523
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.05 m
- From
- 45.6 m
- To
- 53.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-523:45.6-53.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.05 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 121.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.05 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.05”
Context: UGE-26-523
UGE-26-523FDNS · silverGrade: 20.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-523
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.05 m
- From
- 45.6 m
- To
- 53.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-523:45.6-53.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 162.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 20.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.20”
Context: UGE-26-523
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 61.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 61.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 45.6 m
- To
- 46.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:45.6-46.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 61.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 49.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 61.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“61.50”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 56.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 56.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 45.6 m
- To
- 46.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:45.6-46.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 45.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“56.20”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 25.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- From
- 51.2 m
- To
- 53.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51.2-53.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.35 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 62.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 25.35 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“25.35”
Context: Including
IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 24.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- From
- 51.2 m
- To
- 53.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51.2-53.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 59.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 24.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.25”
Context: Including
UGE-26-523FDNS · goldGrade: 8.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-523
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.55 m
- From
- 59.55 m
- To
- 65.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-523:59.55-65.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.02 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 44.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.02 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.02”
Context: UGE-26-523
UGE-26-523FDNS · silverGrade: 5.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGE-26-523
- Project
- FDNS
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- LUG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.55 m
- From
- 59.55 m
- To
- 65.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGE-26-523:59.55-65.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.83 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.83 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.83”
Context: UGE-26-523
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.