Lundin Gold Reports 667.78 g/t over 7.50 Metres and 523.01 g/t Au over 8.25 Metres at FDNS

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Lundin Gold Inc.
Ticker
LUG
Exchange
TSX
Region
southeast Ecuador
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-20 23:30:45 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Lundin Gold announced outstanding drill results from its Fruta del Norte gold mine in Ecuador, including two of the highest grade-thickness gold intercepts ever recorded at the property. These results, from conversion and exploration drilling at FDNS, FDN East, and FDN, confirm significant high-grade mineralization and expand the known mineralized footprint. The company plans an extensive 133,000-meter drilling program for 2026 to continue resource conversion and exploration.

Reasoning: Lundin Gold reported exceptional high-grade gold drill results from its Fruta del Norte (FDN) mining property, particularly at FDNS, with two intercepts ranking among the highest grade-thickness ever recorded. The drilling also confirmed continuity and expansion potential at FDN East and identified new opportunities at FDN, supported by a large ongoing exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold intercepts, including two of the highest grade-thickness results ever at Fruta del Norte.
  • Confirmation of mineralization continuity and expansion potential at FDNS and FDN East.
  • Identification of new near-mine expansion opportunities at FDN.
  • Extensive drilling program planned for 2026, indicating strong commitment to growth.

Facts used in scoring: 484

Atlas analysis — Lundin Gold Inc.: Lundin Gold Reports 667.78 g/t over 7.50 Metres and 523.01 g/t Au over 8.25 Metres at FDNS

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 484. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (484)

FDN-C25-354FDNS · goldGrade: 7.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-354
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
0.88 m
From
29.35 m
To
30.6 m
Hole Depth
90 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-354:29.35-30.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778219
Northing
9582536
Elevation
1086 m
Azimuth
79 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.25m at 7.17 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-354FDNS · silverGrade: 8.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-354
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
0.88 m
From
29.35 m
To
30.6 m
Hole Depth
90 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-354:29.35-30.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778219
Northing
9582536
Elevation
1086 m
Azimuth
79 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.25m at 8.8 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-354FDNS · goldGrade: 5.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-354
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.15 m
True Width
1.52 m
From
32.6 m
To
34.75 m
Hole Depth
90 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-354:32.60-34.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778219
Northing
9582536
Elevation
1086 m
Azimuth
79 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 2.15m at 5.68 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-354FDNS · silverGrade: 12.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-354
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.15 m
True Width
1.52 m
From
32.6 m
To
34.75 m
Hole Depth
90 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-354:32.60-34.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778219
Northing
9582536
Elevation
1086 m
Azimuth
79 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 2.15m at 12.31 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-354FDNS · goldGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-354
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
0.46 m
From
32.6 m
To
33.25 m
Hole Depth
90 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-354:32.60-33.25
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778219
Northing
9582536
Elevation
1086 m
Azimuth
79 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.65m at 10.7 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-354FDNS · silverGrade: 20.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-354
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
0.46 m
From
32.6 m
To
33.25 m
Hole Depth
90 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-354:32.60-33.25
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778219
Northing
9582536
Elevation
1086 m
Azimuth
79 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.65m at 20.9 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 6.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.55 m
True Width
2.51 m
From
20.85 m
To
24.4 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:20.85-24.40
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 3.55m at 6.03 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade gold
FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 17.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.55 m
True Width
2.51 m
From
20.85 m
To
24.4 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:20.85-24.40
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 3.55m at 17.42 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 16.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
True Width
0.6 m
From
20.85 m
To
21.7 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:20.85-21.70
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.85m at 16.15 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 16.15 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“16.15”

Context: 0.85

FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 25.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
25.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
True Width
0.6 m
From
20.85 m
To
21.7 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:20.85-21.70
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.85m at 25.7 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
24 m
To
24.4 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:24.00-24.40
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.4m at 15.8 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 15.8 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“15.80”

Context: 0.40

FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 68.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
68.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
24 m
To
24.4 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:24.00-24.40
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.4m at 68.3 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 5.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.55 m
True Width
1.1 m
From
39.85 m
To
41.4 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:39.85-41.40
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.55m at 5.41 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 11.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.55 m
True Width
1.1 m
From
39.85 m
To
41.4 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:39.85-41.40
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.55m at 11.18 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 17.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
40.6 m
To
41 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:40.60-41.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.4m at 17.75 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 17.75 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“17.75”

Context: 0.40

FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 20.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
40.6 m
To
41 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:40.60-41.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.4m at 20.4 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 7.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
True Width
1.17 m
From
71.4 m
To
73.05 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:71.40-73.05
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.65m at 7.43 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 17.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
True Width
1.17 m
From
71.4 m
To
73.05 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:71.40-73.05
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.65m at 17.19 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 3.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
1.56 m
From
82.4 m
To
84.6 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:82.40-84.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 2.2m at 3.98 g/t gold.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade gold for underground mining
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 33.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
33.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
1.56 m
From
82.4 m
To
84.6 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:82.40-84.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 2.2m at 33.84 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 9.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.57 m
From
83.8 m
To
84.6 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:83.80-84.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.8m at 9.15 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 72.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
72.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.57 m
From
83.8 m
To
84.6 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:83.80-84.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.8m at 72.5 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · goldGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
True Width
1.03 m
From
99.2 m
To
100.65 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:99.20-100.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.45m at 6.6 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-355FDNS · silverGrade: 16.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-355
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
True Width
1.03 m
From
99.2 m
To
100.65 m
Hole Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-355:99.20-100.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778217
Northing
9582533
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.45m at 16.94 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-357FDNS · goldGrade: 5.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
64.35 m
To
66.15 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:64.35-66.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.8m at 5.23 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-357FDNS · silverGrade: 15.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
64.35 m
To
66.15 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:64.35-66.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.8m at 15.58 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-357FDNS · goldGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
65 m
To
65.65 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:65.00-65.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.65m at 12.5 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-357FDNS · silverGrade: 29.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
29.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
65 m
To
65.65 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:65.00-65.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.65m at 29.3 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-357FDNS · goldGrade: 10.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.5 m
From
131.2 m
To
132 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:131.20-132.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.8m at 10.97 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-357FDNS · silverGrade: 185Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
185
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.5 m
From
131.2 m
To
132 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:131.20-132.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.8m at 185.0 g/t silver.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade silver

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-357FDNS · goldGrade: 11.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
True Width
2.54 m
From
149.9 m
To
153 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:149.90-153.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 3.1m at 11.84 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold
FDN-C25-357FDNS · silverGrade: 120.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
120.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
True Width
2.54 m
From
149.9 m
To
153 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:149.90-153.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 3.1m at 120.01 g/t silver.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade silver
FDN-C25-357FDNS · goldGrade: 55.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
55.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.37 m
From
152.55 m
To
153 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:152.55-153.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.45m at 55.7 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 55.7 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“55.70”

Context: 0.45

FDN-C25-357FDNS · silverGrade: 145Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-357
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
145
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.37 m
From
152.55 m
To
153 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-357:152.55-153.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778218
Northing
9582534
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.45m at 145.0 g/t silver.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade silver

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-366FDNS · goldGrade: 7.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.95 m
True Width
2.55 m
From
48.1 m
To
51.05 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:48.10-51.05
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 2.95m at 7.66 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold
FDN-C25-366FDNS · silverGrade: 15.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.95 m
True Width
2.55 m
From
48.1 m
To
51.05 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:48.10-51.05
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 2.95m at 15.94 g/t silver.

FDN-C25-366FDNS · goldGrade: 14.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
True Width
0.61 m
From
48.1 m
To
48.8 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:48.10-48.80
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.7m at 14.65 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-366FDNS · silverGrade: 20.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
True Width
0.61 m
From
48.1 m
To
48.8 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:48.10-48.80
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.7m at 20.3 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-366FDNS · goldGrade: 19.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.43 m
From
50.55 m
To
51.05 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:50.55-51.05
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.5m at 19.6 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 19.6 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“19.60”

Context: 0.50

FDN-C25-366FDNS · silverGrade: 27.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.43 m
From
50.55 m
To
51.05 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:50.55-51.05
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.5m at 27.6 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-366FDNS · goldGrade: 12.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.23 m
From
65.6 m
To
67.1 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:65.60-67.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.5m at 12.46 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-366FDNS · silverGrade: 14.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.23 m
From
65.6 m
To
67.1 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:65.60-67.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 1.5m at 14.17 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-366FDNS · goldGrade: 27.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
0.53 m
From
66.45 m
To
67.1 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:66.45-67.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.65m at 27.7 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 27.7 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“27.70”

Context: 0.65

FDN-C25-366FDNS · silverGrade: 15.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-366
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
0.53 m
From
66.45 m
To
67.1 m
Hole Depth
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-366:66.45-67.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778211
Northing
9582662
Elevation
1083 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-32 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.65m at 15.3 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
True Width
1.74 m
From
1.5 m
To
4.2 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:1.50-4.20
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 2.7m at 5.6 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade gold
FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 7.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
True Width
1.74 m
From
1.5 m
To
4.2 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:1.50-4.20
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 2.7m at 7.95 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 16.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.51 m
From
3.4 m
To
4.2 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:3.40-4.20
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.8m at 16.15 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 16.15 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“16.15”

Context: 0.80

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.51 m
From
3.4 m
To
4.2 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:3.40-4.20
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.8m at 16.0 g/t silver.

Negative factors

  • Low grade silver
  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 667.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
667.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
True Width
4.82 m
From
19.15 m
To
26.65 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:19.15-26.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 7.5m at 667.78 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold
  • Strong grade-thickness product
  • Moderate width intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 667.78 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“667.78”

Context: 7.50

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 268.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
268.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
True Width
4.82 m
From
19.15 m
To
26.65 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:19.15-26.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 7.5m at 268.88 g/t silver.

Positive factors

  • Strong high-grade silver
  • Moderate silver grade-thickness product
  • Moderate width intercept
FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 4710Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4710
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
20.5 m
To
21.1 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:20.50-21.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.6m at 4710.0 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold
  • Exceptional grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 4710.0 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“4710.00”

Context: 0.60

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 1500Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
1500
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
20.5 m
To
21.1 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:20.50-21.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.6m at 1500.0 g/t silver.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade silver
  • Moderate silver grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 1880Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
1880
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.32 m
From
25.6 m
To
26.1 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:25.60-26.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.5m at 1880.0 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold
  • Exceptional grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 1880.0 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“1880.00”

Context: 0.50

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 695Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
695
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.32 m
From
25.6 m
To
26.1 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:25.60-26.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.5m at 695.0 g/t silver.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade silver
  • Moderate silver grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 60.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
60.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.95 m
True Width
8.97 m
From
36.05 m
To
50 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:36.05-50.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 13.95m at 60.19 g/t gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold
  • Exceptional grade-thickness product
  • Moderate width intercept

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 60.19 g/t exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground epithermal deposits.

Evidence · table

“60.19”

Context: 13.95

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 81.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
81.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.95 m
True Width
8.97 m
From
36.05 m
To
50 m
Hole Depth
247.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:36.05-50.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
778192
Northing
9582548
Elevation
1085 m
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 13.95m at 81.58 g/t silver.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade silver
  • Moderate silver grade-thickness product
  • Moderate width intercept
IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
0.46 m
From
32.6 m
To
33.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:32.6-33.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.7 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.7 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.70”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 20.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
0.46 m
From
32.6 m
To
33.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:32.6-33.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 20.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
True Width
0.6 m
From
20.85 m
To
21.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:20.85-21.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.15 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.15 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.15”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 25.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
25.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
True Width
0.6 m
From
20.85 m
To
21.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:20.85-21.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 25.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.70”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
24 m
To
24.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:24-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 15.8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.80”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 68.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
68.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
24 m
To
24.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:24-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 68.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“68.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 17.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
40.6 m
To
41 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:40.6-41
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.75 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 17.75 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.75”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 20.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
40.6 m
To
41 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:40.6-41
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 20.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.40”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.57 m
From
83.8 m
To
84.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:83.8-84.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.15 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.15 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.15”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 72.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
72.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.57 m
From
83.8 m
To
84.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:83.8-84.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 72.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 58.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“72.50”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
65 m
To
65.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:65-65.65
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.5 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.5 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.50”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 29.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
29.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
65 m
To
65.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:65-65.65
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 29.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“29.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 55.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
55.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.37 m
From
152.55 m
To
153 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:152.55-153
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 55.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 55.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“55.70”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 145Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
145
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.37 m
From
152.55 m
To
153 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:152.55-153
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 145 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 65.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“145.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
True Width
0.61 m
From
48.1 m
To
48.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:48.1-48.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.65 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 14.65 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.65”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 20.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
True Width
0.61 m
From
48.1 m
To
48.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:48.1-48.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 20.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 19.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.43 m
From
50.55 m
To
51.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:50.55-51.05
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 19.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.60”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 27.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.43 m
From
50.55 m
To
51.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:50.55-51.05
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 27.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.60”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 27.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
0.53 m
From
66.45 m
To
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:66.45-67.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 27.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.70”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
True Width
0.53 m
From
66.45 m
To
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:66.45-67.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 15.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.51 m
From
3.4 m
To
4.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:3.4-4.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.15 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.15 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.15”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.51 m
From
3.4 m
To
4.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:3.4-4.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 4710Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4710
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
20.5 m
To
21.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:20.5-21.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4710 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2826.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 4710 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4710.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 1500Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
1500
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
20.5 m
To
21.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:20.5-21.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1500 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 900.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1500 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1500.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 1880Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
1880
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.32 m
From
25.6 m
To
26.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:25.6-26.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1880 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 940.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 1880 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1880.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 695Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
695
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.32 m
From
25.6 m
To
26.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:25.6-26.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 695 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 347.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 695 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“695.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 104.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
104.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.65 m
True Width
4.92 m
From
41.9 m
To
49.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:41.9-49.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 104.32 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 798.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 104.32 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“104.32”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 128.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
128.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.65 m
True Width
4.92 m
From
41.9 m
To
49.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:41.9-49.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 128.73 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 984.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“128.73”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 16.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.65 m
True Width
1.7 m
From
56.55 m
To
59.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:56.55-59.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.61 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 44.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.61 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.61”

Context: FDN-C25-374

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 25.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
25.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.65 m
True Width
1.7 m
From
56.55 m
To
59.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:56.55-59.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.89 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 68.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 25.89 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.89”

Context: FDN-C25-374

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 103Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
103
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
58.1 m
To
58.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:58.1-58.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 103 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 41.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 103 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“103.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 91.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
91.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
58.1 m
To
58.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:58.1-58.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 91.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“91.40”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 44.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
44.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
74.7 m
To
78.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:74.7-78.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44.98 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 152.9 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 44.98 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“44.98”

Context: FDN-C25-374

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 47.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
47.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
74.7 m
To
78.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:74.7-78.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 47.47 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 161.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“47.47”

Context: FDN-C25-374

FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 8.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
True Width
1.24 m
From
90.5 m
To
92.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:90.5-92.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.41 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.41 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.41”

Context: FDN-C25-374

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 11.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
True Width
1.24 m
From
90.5 m
To
92.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:90.5-92.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.31”

Context: FDN-C25-374

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 33.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
33.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
90.9 m
To
91.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:90.9-91.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 33.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“33.50”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 27.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
90.9 m
To
91.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:90.9-91.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 27.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.10”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
True Width
1.35 m
From
174.8 m
To
176.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:174.8-176.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.6 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.6 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.60”

Context: FDN-C25-374

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 42.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
42.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
True Width
1.35 m
From
174.8 m
To
176.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:174.8-176.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42.82 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 89.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“42.82”

Context: FDN-C25-374

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.64 m
From
174.8 m
To
175.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:174.8-175.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.65 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 18.65 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.65”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 54.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
54.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.64 m
From
174.8 m
To
175.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:174.8-175.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 54.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“54.40”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 11.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
True Width
1.24 m
From
213.4 m
To
215.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:213.4-215.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.25 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11.25 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.25”

Context: FDN-C25-374

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 363.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
363.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
True Width
1.24 m
From
213.4 m
To
215.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:213.4-215.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 363.23 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 635.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 363.23 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“363.23”

Context: FDN-C25-374

FDN-C25-374FDNS · goldGrade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.34 m
From
244.1 m
To
246 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:244.1-246
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.51 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.51”

Context: FDN-C25-374

FDN-C25-374FDNS · silverGrade: 76.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-374
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
76.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.34 m
From
244.1 m
To
246 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-374:244.1-246
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 76.52 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 145.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“76.52”

Context: FDN-C25-374

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.32 m
From
244.8 m
To
245.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:244.8-245.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.95 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.95 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.95”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 264Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
264
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.32 m
From
244.8 m
To
245.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:244.8-245.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 264 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 118.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 264 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“264.00”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-375FDNS · goldGrade: 6.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-375
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.85 m
True Width
1.84 m
From
18.4 m
To
20.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-375:18.4-20.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.41 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.41”

Context: FDN-C25-375

FDN-C25-375FDNS · silverGrade: 122.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-375
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
122.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.85 m
True Width
1.84 m
From
18.4 m
To
20.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-375:18.4-20.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 122.03 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 225.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“122.03”

Context: FDN-C25-375

FDN-C25-376FDNS · goldGrade: 8.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-376
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.05 m
True Width
1.78 m
From
15.25 m
To
17.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-376:15.25-17.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.29 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.29 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.29”

Context: FDN-C25-376

FDN-C25-376FDNS · silverGrade: 43.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-376
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
43.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.05 m
True Width
1.78 m
From
15.25 m
To
17.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-376:15.25-17.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 43.63 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 89.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“43.63”

Context: FDN-C25-376

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
15.25 m
To
15.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:15.25-15.65
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.23 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.23 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.23”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 53.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
53.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
15.25 m
To
15.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:15.25-15.65
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 53.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“53.80”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 21.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
21.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
True Width
0.48 m
From
16.75 m
To
17.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:16.75-17.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 21.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 51.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
51.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
True Width
0.48 m
From
16.75 m
To
17.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:16.75-17.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“51.10”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-376FDNS · goldGrade: 13.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-376
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
True Width
3.64 m
From
35.1 m
To
39.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-376:35.1-39.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.74 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 57.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.74 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.74”

Context: FDN-C25-376

FDN-C25-376FDNS · silverGrade: 13.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-376
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
True Width
3.64 m
From
35.1 m
To
39.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-376:35.1-39.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 57.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.56”

Context: FDN-C25-376

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 123.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
123.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
38.9 m
To
39.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:38.9-39.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 123.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 49.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 123.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“123.50”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 60.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
60.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
38.9 m
To
39.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:38.9-39.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 60.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“60.30”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-376FDNS · goldGrade: 32.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-376
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
32.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.3 m
From
98.4 m
To
99.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-376:98.4-99.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.79 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 49.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 32.79 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“32.79”

Context: FDN-C25-376

FDN-C25-376FDNS · silverGrade: 77.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-376
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
77.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.3 m
From
98.4 m
To
99.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-376:98.4-99.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 77.79 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 116.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“77.79”

Context: FDN-C25-376

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 91.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
91.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.43 m
From
98.4 m
To
98.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:98.4-98.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 91.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 45.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 91.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“91.60”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 181Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
181
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.43 m
From
98.4 m
To
98.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:98.4-98.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 181 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 90.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“181.00”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-376FDNS · goldGrade: 5.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-376
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
True Width
1.43 m
From
121.65 m
To
123.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-376:121.65-123.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.54 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.54”

Context: FDN-C25-376

FDN-C25-376FDNS · silverGrade: 6.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-376
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
True Width
1.43 m
From
121.65 m
To
123.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-376:121.65-123.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.66 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.66 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.66”

Context: FDN-C25-376

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
True Width
0.48 m
From
122.05 m
To
122.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:122.05-122.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.65 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.65 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.65”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 8.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
True Width
0.48 m
From
122.05 m
To
122.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:122.05-122.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.10”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-377FDNS · goldGrade: 85.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
85.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.2 m
True Width
3.68 m
From
8.7 m
To
13.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:8.7-13.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 85.45 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 444.3 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 85.45 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“85.45”

Context: FDN-C25-377

FDN-C25-377FDNS · silverGrade: 80.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
80.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.2 m
True Width
3.68 m
From
8.7 m
To
13.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:8.7-13.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 80.98 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 421.1 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“80.98”

Context: FDN-C25-377

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 204.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
204.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.06 m
From
12.4 m
To
13.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:12.4-13.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 204.82 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 307.2 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 204.82 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“204.82”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 211.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
211.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.06 m
From
12.4 m
To
13.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:12.4-13.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 211.03 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 316.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 211.03 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“211.03”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-377FDNS · goldGrade: 8.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.41 m
From
28.3 m
To
30.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:28.3-30.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.53 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.53 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.53”

Context: FDN-C25-377

FDN-C25-377FDNS · silverGrade: 12.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.41 m
From
28.3 m
To
30.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:28.3-30.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 12.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.07”

Context: FDN-C25-377

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 19.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.42 m
From
28.3 m
To
28.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:28.3-28.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.75 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 19.75 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.75”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 18.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.42 m
From
28.3 m
To
28.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:28.3-28.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.80”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-377FDNS · goldGrade: 34.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
34.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
True Width
3.75 m
From
44.1 m
To
49.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:44.1-49.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34.41 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 182.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 34.41 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“34.41”

Context: FDN-C25-377

FDN-C25-377FDNS · silverGrade: 25.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
25.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
True Width
3.75 m
From
44.1 m
To
49.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:44.1-49.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 134.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 25.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.30”

Context: FDN-C25-377

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 80.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
80.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
1.56 m
From
44.1 m
To
46.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:44.1-46.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 80.55 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 177.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 80.55 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“80.55”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 45.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
45.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
1.56 m
From
44.1 m
To
46.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:44.1-46.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 45.05 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 99.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“45.05”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-377FDNS · goldGrade: 84.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
84.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.1 m
True Width
7.14 m
From
61.3 m
To
71.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:61.3-71.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 84.48 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 853.2 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 84.48 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“84.48”

Context: FDN-C25-377

FDN-C25-377FDNS · silverGrade: 56.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
56.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.1 m
True Width
7.14 m
From
61.3 m
To
71.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:61.3-71.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.86 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 574.3 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“56.86”

Context: FDN-C25-377

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 217.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
217.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
True Width
2.47 m
From
64.1 m
To
71.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:64.1-71.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 217.95 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 762.8 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 217.95 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“217.95”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 45.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
45.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
True Width
2.47 m
From
64.1 m
To
71.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:64.1-71.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 45.21 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 158.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“45.21”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-377FDNS · goldGrade: 13.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.75 m
True Width
4.07 m
From
79.15 m
To
84.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:79.15-84.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.32 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 76.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.32 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.32”

Context: FDN-C25-377

FDN-C25-377FDNS · silverGrade: 33.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
33.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.75 m
True Width
4.07 m
From
79.15 m
To
84.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:79.15-84.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.79 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 194.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“33.79”

Context: FDN-C25-377

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 31.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
31.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
80.55 m
To
82.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:80.55-82.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.77 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 62.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 31.77 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.77”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 38.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
38.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
80.55 m
To
82.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:80.55-82.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.08 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 74.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“38.08”

Context: Including

FDN-C25-377FDNS · goldGrade: 15.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
True Width
1.17 m
From
105.05 m
To
106.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:105.05-106.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.68 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 15.68 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.68”

Context: FDN-C25-377

FDN-C25-377FDNS · silverGrade: 30.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C25-377
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
30.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
True Width
1.17 m
From
105.05 m
To
106.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C25-377:105.05-106.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.48 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 50.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“30.48”

Context: FDN-C25-377

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 28.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
28.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
True Width
0.6 m
From
105.45 m
To
106.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:105.45-106.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.69 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 28.69 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“28.69”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 31.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
31.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
True Width
0.6 m
From
105.45 m
To
106.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:105.45-106.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.92 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.92”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-378FDNS · goldGrade: 9.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-378
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.84 m
From
52.9 m
To
54.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-378:52.9-54.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.06 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.06 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.06”

Context: FDN-C26-378

FDN-C26-378FDNS · silverGrade: 9.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-378
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.84 m
From
52.9 m
To
54.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-378:52.9-54.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.72 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.72 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.72”

Context: FDN-C26-378

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 22.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
22.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.58 m
From
54.2 m
To
54.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:54.2-54.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 22.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.40”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 14.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.58 m
From
54.2 m
To
54.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:54.2-54.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.40”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-378FDNS · goldGrade: 9.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-378
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
True Width
5.12 m
From
65.15 m
To
70.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-378:65.15-70.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.63 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 51.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.63 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.63”

Context: FDN-C26-378

FDN-C26-378FDNS · silverGrade: 16.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-378
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
True Width
5.12 m
From
65.15 m
To
70.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-378:65.15-70.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.25”

Context: FDN-C26-378

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 27.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
True Width
1.4 m
From
65.15 m
To
66.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:65.15-66.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.54 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 39.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 27.54 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.54”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
True Width
1.4 m
From
65.15 m
To
66.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:65.15-66.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.94”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-378FDNS · goldGrade: 5.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-378
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
True Width
4.06 m
From
105.8 m
To
110 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-378:105.8-110
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.13 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.13”

Context: FDN-C26-378

FDN-C26-378FDNS · silverGrade: 42.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-378
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
42.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
True Width
4.06 m
From
105.8 m
To
110 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-378:105.8-110
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42.88 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 180.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“42.88”

Context: FDN-C26-378

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
True Width
1.55 m
From
107.2 m
To
108.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:107.2-108.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.27 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.27 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.27”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 79.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
79.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
True Width
1.55 m
From
107.2 m
To
108.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:107.2-108.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 79.08 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 126.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“79.08”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-379FDNS · goldGrade: 7.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
True Width
2.47 m
From
16.7 m
To
20.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:16.7-20.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.38 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.38 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.38”

Context: FDN-C26-379

FDN-C26-379FDNS · silverGrade: 9.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
True Width
2.47 m
From
16.7 m
To
20.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:16.7-20.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.30”

Context: FDN-C26-379

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
True Width
0.78 m
From
16.7 m
To
17.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:16.7-17.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.17 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 14.17 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.17”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
True Width
0.78 m
From
16.7 m
To
17.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:16.7-17.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.62”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-379FDNS · goldGrade: 9.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
True Width
1.66 m
From
21.4 m
To
23.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:21.4-23.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.38 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.38 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.38”

Context: FDN-C26-379

FDN-C26-379FDNS · silverGrade: 28.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
28.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
True Width
1.66 m
From
21.4 m
To
23.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:21.4-23.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.32 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 66.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 28.32 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“28.32”

Context: FDN-C26-379

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 37.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
37.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
23.25 m
To
23.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:23.25-23.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 37.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“37.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 75.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
75.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
23.25 m
To
23.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:23.25-23.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 75.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“75.60”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-379FDNS · goldGrade: 16.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
True Width
3.5 m
From
54.45 m
To
61.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:54.45-61.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.13 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 112.9 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.13 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.13”

Context: FDN-C26-379

FDN-C26-379FDNS · silverGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
True Width
3.5 m
From
54.45 m
To
61.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:54.45-61.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 80.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.50”

Context: FDN-C26-379

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 31.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
31.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.25 m
True Width
1.63 m
From
58.2 m
To
61.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:58.2-61.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.42 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 102.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 31.42 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.42”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.25 m
True Width
1.63 m
From
58.2 m
To
61.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:58.2-61.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.72 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.72 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.72”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-379FDNS · goldGrade: 3.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
True Width
1.78 m
From
96.1 m
To
99.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:96.1-99.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.17 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.17”

Context: FDN-C26-379

FDN-C26-379FDNS · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
True Width
1.78 m
From
96.1 m
To
99.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:96.1-99.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.60”

Context: FDN-C26-379

FDN-C26-379FDNS · goldGrade: 4.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
1.72 m
From
107 m
To
110 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:107-110
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.46 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.46”

Context: FDN-C26-379

FDN-C26-379FDNS · silverGrade: 4.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-379
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
1.72 m
From
107 m
To
110 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-379:107-110
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.61 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.61 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.61”

Context: FDN-C26-379

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
108.9 m
To
109.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:108.9-109.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.2 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11.2 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.20”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 6.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
108.9 m
To
109.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:108.9-109.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.40”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-380FDNS · goldGrade: 523.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-380
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
523.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.25 m
True Width
6.32 m
From
22.55 m
To
30.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-380:22.55-30.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 523.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4314.8 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 523.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“523.01”

Context: FDN-C26-380

FDN-C26-380FDNS · silverGrade: 134.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-380
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
134.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.25 m
True Width
6.32 m
From
22.55 m
To
30.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-380:22.55-30.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 134.92 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1113.1 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“134.92”

Context: FDN-C26-380

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 2389.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
2389.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
23.8 m
To
25.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:23.8-25.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2389.51 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4301.1 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 2389.51 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2389.51”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 592.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
592.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
23.8 m
To
25.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:23.8-25.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 592.06 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1065.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 592.06 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“592.06”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-380FDNS · goldGrade: 32.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-380
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
32.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.55 m
True Width
3.49 m
From
39.45 m
To
44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-380:39.45-44
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.94 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 149.9 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 32.94 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“32.94”

Context: FDN-C26-380

FDN-C26-380FDNS · silverGrade: 27.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-380
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.55 m
True Width
3.49 m
From
39.45 m
To
44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-380:39.45-44
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.59 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 125.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 27.59 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.59”

Context: FDN-C26-380

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 75.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
75.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.46 m
From
41.1 m
To
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:41.1-43
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 75.79 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 144.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 75.79 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“75.79”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 53.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
53.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.46 m
From
41.1 m
To
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:41.1-43
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 53.36 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 101.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“53.36”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-380FDNS · goldGrade: 6.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-380
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
1.69 m
From
62.2 m
To
64.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-380:62.2-64.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.39 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.39”

Context: FDN-C26-380

FDN-C26-380FDNS · silverGrade: 10.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-380
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
1.69 m
From
62.2 m
To
64.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-380:62.2-64.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.01 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.01 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.01”

Context: FDN-C26-380

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.46 m
From
62.2 m
To
62.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:62.2-62.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 15.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.10”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 12.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.46 m
From
62.2 m
To
62.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:62.2-62.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 12.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.70”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-380FDNS · goldGrade: 9.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-380
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
True Width
2.14 m
From
92 m
To
94.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-380:92-94.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.02 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.02 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.02”

Context: FDN-C26-380

FDN-C26-380FDNS · silverGrade: 10.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-380
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
True Width
2.14 m
From
92 m
To
94.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-380:92-94.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.32 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.32 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.32”

Context: FDN-C26-380

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 23.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
23.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.05 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
93.1 m
To
94.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:93.1-94.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 23.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.20”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.05 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
93.1 m
To
94.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:93.1-94.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 17.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.60”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-381FDNS · goldGrade: 6.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-381
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
True Width
1.35 m
From
9.2 m
To
10.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-381:9.2-10.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.23 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.23”

Context: FDN-C26-381

FDN-C26-381FDNS · silverGrade: 6.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-381
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
True Width
1.35 m
From
9.2 m
To
10.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-381:9.2-10.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.83 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.83 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.83”

Context: FDN-C26-381

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 20.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
9.2 m
To
9.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:9.2-9.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 20.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
9.2 m
To
9.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:9.2-9.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.40”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-381FDNS · goldGrade: 4.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-381
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.3 m
True Width
3.19 m
From
30 m
To
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-381:30-33.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.63 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.63”

Context: FDN-C26-381

FDN-C26-381FDNS · silverGrade: 20.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-381
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.3 m
True Width
3.19 m
From
30 m
To
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-381:30-33.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.63 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 68.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 20.63 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.63”

Context: FDN-C26-381

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
32 m
To
32.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:32-32.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.3 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.3 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
32 m
To
32.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:32-32.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.90”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-381FDNS · goldGrade: 7.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-381
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
1.21 m
From
41.2 m
To
42.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-381:41.2-42.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.26 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.26 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.26”

Context: FDN-C26-381

FDN-C26-381FDNS · silverGrade: 8.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-381
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
1.21 m
From
41.2 m
To
42.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-381:41.2-42.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.32 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.32 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.32”

Context: FDN-C26-381

FDN-C26-381FDNS · goldGrade: 23.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-381
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
23.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.2 m
True Width
5.02 m
From
49.05 m
To
54.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-381:49.05-54.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.19 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 120.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 23.19 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.19”

Context: FDN-C26-381

FDN-C26-381FDNS · silverGrade: 18.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-381
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.2 m
True Width
5.02 m
From
49.05 m
To
54.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-381:49.05-54.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.82 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 97.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.82 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.82”

Context: FDN-C26-381

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 86.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
86.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
1.21 m
From
53 m
To
54.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:53-54.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 86.14 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 107.7 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 86.14 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“86.14”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 30.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
30.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
1.21 m
From
53 m
To
54.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:53-54.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.78 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“30.78”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-382FDNS · goldGrade: 17.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-382
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.3 m
True Width
2.53 m
From
33.4 m
To
36.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-382:33.4-36.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.23 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 56.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 17.23 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.23”

Context: FDN-C26-382

FDN-C26-382FDNS · silverGrade: 22.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-382
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
22.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.3 m
True Width
2.53 m
From
33.4 m
To
36.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-382:33.4-36.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 22.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.25”

Context: FDN-C26-382

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 28.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
28.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.46 m
From
33.4 m
To
35.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:33.4-35.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.03 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 53.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 28.03 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“28.03”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 32.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
32.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.46 m
From
33.4 m
To
35.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:33.4-35.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.69 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 62.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“32.69”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-382FDNS · goldGrade: 11.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-382
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.45 m
True Width
5.71 m
From
40.75 m
To
48.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-382:40.75-48.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.32 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 84.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11.32 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.32”

Context: FDN-C26-382

FDN-C26-382FDNS · silverGrade: 19.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-382
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.45 m
True Width
5.71 m
From
40.75 m
To
48.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-382:40.75-48.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.88 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 148.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 19.88 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.88”

Context: FDN-C26-382

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 26.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
26.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
True Width
1.76 m
From
45.9 m
To
48.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:45.9-48.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.12 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 60.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 26.12 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.12”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 27.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
True Width
1.76 m
From
45.9 m
To
48.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:45.9-48.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 63.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 27.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.70”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-384FDNS · goldGrade: 5.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-384
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.65 m
True Width
6.27 m
From
29.55 m
To
37.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-384:29.55-37.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.06 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 38.7 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.06”

Context: FDN-C26-384

FDN-C26-384FDNS · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-384
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.65 m
True Width
6.27 m
From
29.55 m
To
37.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-384:29.55-37.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 66.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.70”

Context: FDN-C26-384

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
True Width
1.88 m
From
34.9 m
To
37.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:34.9-37.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.28 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 28.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.28 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.28”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
True Width
1.88 m
From
34.9 m
To
37.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:34.9-37.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.51”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-384FDNS · goldGrade: 44.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-384
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
44.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
True Width
12.53 m
From
86.45 m
To
101.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-384:86.45-101.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44.09 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 674.6 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 44.09 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“44.09”

Context: FDN-C26-384

FDN-C26-384FDNS · silverGrade: 16.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-384
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
True Width
12.53 m
From
86.45 m
To
101.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-384:86.45-101.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.98 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 259.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.98”

Context: FDN-C26-384

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
True Width
1.31 m
From
88.85 m
To
90.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:88.85-90.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.85 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 18.85 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.85”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 6.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
True Width
1.31 m
From
88.85 m
To
90.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:88.85-90.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.42 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.42 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.42”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 111.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
111.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.6 m
True Width
4.59 m
From
93 m
To
98.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:93-98.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 111.33 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 623.4 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 111.33 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“111.33”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 36.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
36.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.6 m
True Width
4.59 m
From
93 m
To
98.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:93-98.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.72 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 205.6 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“36.72”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-385FDNS · goldGrade: 4.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-385
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.75 m
True Width
2.71 m
From
5.7 m
To
8.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-385:5.7-8.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.71 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.71”

Context: FDN-C26-385

FDN-C26-385FDNS · silverGrade: 10.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-385
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.75 m
True Width
2.71 m
From
5.7 m
To
8.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-385:5.7-8.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.93 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.93 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.93”

Context: FDN-C26-385

FDN-C26-385FDNS · goldGrade: 8.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-385
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
16.6 m
To
18 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-385:16.6-18
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.3 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.3 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.30”

Context: FDN-C26-385

FDN-C26-385FDNS · silverGrade: 12.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-385
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
16.6 m
To
18 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-385:16.6-18
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.79 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 12.79 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.79”

Context: FDN-C26-385

FDN-C26-386FDNS · goldGrade: 5.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-386
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
True Width
1.97 m
From
1.3 m
To
3.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-386:1.3-3.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.19 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.19”

Context: FDN-C26-386

FDN-C26-386FDNS · silverGrade: 7.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-386
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
True Width
1.97 m
From
1.3 m
To
3.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-386:1.3-3.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.47 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.47 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.47”

Context: FDN-C26-386

FDN-C26-386FDNS · goldGrade: 13.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-386
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.2 m
True Width
3.01 m
From
58.5 m
To
61.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-386:58.5-61.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.53 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 43.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.53 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.53”

Context: FDN-C26-386

FDN-C26-386FDNS · silverGrade: 13.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-386
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.2 m
True Width
3.01 m
From
58.5 m
To
61.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-386:58.5-61.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.24 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 42.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.24 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.24”

Context: FDN-C26-386

FDN-C26-387FDNS · goldGrade: 3.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-387
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
True Width
5.11 m
From
0.4 m
To
6.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-387:0.4-6.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.95 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.3 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.95”

Context: FDN-C26-387

FDN-C26-387FDNS · silverGrade: 4.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-387
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
True Width
5.11 m
From
0.4 m
To
6.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-387:0.4-6.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.77”

Context: FDN-C26-387

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
0.4 m
To
0.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:0.4-0.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.05 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 18.05 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.05”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
0.4 m
To
0.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:0.4-0.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 20.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
5.9 m
To
6.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:5.9-6.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 20.8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.80”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
5.9 m
To
6.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:5.9-6.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.70”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-387FDNS · goldGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-387
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
True Width
3.81 m
From
21.8 m
To
26.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-387:21.8-26.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.2 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 36.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.2 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.20”

Context: FDN-C26-387

FDN-C26-387FDNS · silverGrade: 9.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-387
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
True Width
3.81 m
From
21.8 m
To
26.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-387:21.8-26.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.17 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.17 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.17”

Context: FDN-C26-387

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 83.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
83.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
23.25 m
To
23.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:23.25-23.65
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 83.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 33.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 83.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“83.60”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 48.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
48.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
23.25 m
To
23.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:23.25-23.65
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 48.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“48.40”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-387FDNS · goldGrade: 15.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-387
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.25 m
True Width
4.55 m
From
33.65 m
To
38.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-387:33.65-38.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.06 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 79.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 15.06 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.06”

Context: FDN-C26-387

FDN-C26-387FDNS · silverGrade: 15.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-387
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.25 m
True Width
4.55 m
From
33.65 m
To
38.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-387:33.65-38.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 80.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 15.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.27”

Context: FDN-C26-387

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 182.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
182.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
35.75 m
To
36.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:35.75-36.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 182.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 73.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 182.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“182.50”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 75.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
75.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
35.75 m
To
36.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:35.75-36.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 75.1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“75.10”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-387FDNS · goldGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-387
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
True Width
1.82 m
From
74.8 m
To
76.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-387:74.8-76.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.70”

Context: FDN-C26-387

FDN-C26-387FDNS · silverGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-387
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
True Width
1.82 m
From
74.8 m
To
76.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-387:74.8-76.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.70”

Context: FDN-C26-387

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.52 m
From
76.3 m
To
76.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:76.3-76.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.3 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11.3 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.52 m
From
76.3 m
To
76.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:76.3-76.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.70”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-388FDNS · goldGrade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-388
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.75 m
True Width
3.05 m
From
13 m
To
17.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-388:13-17.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.51 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.51”

Context: FDN-C26-388

FDN-C26-388FDNS · silverGrade: 6.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-388
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.75 m
True Width
3.05 m
From
13 m
To
17.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-388:13-17.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.59 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.59 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.59”

Context: FDN-C26-388

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
True Width
0.93 m
From
14.3 m
To
15.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:14.3-15.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.96 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11.96 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.96”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
True Width
0.93 m
From
14.3 m
To
15.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:14.3-15.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.77”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-388FDNS · goldGrade: 4.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-388
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.4 m
True Width
4.76 m
From
41.5 m
To
48.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-388:41.5-48.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.16 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.8 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.16”

Context: FDN-C26-388

FDN-C26-388FDNS · silverGrade: 8.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-388
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.4 m
True Width
4.76 m
From
41.5 m
To
48.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-388:41.5-48.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 63.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.52”

Context: FDN-C26-388

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 38.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
38.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
47.4 m
To
47.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:47.4-47.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 38.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“38.10”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
47.4 m
To
47.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:47.4-47.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 20 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.00”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-389FDNS · goldGrade: 17.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-389
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.85 m
True Width
8.72 m
From
16.7 m
To
25.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-389:16.7-25.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.47 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 154.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 17.47 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.47”

Context: FDN-C26-389

FDN-C26-389FDNS · silverGrade: 22.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-389
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
22.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.85 m
True Width
8.72 m
From
16.7 m
To
25.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-389:16.7-25.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.13 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 195.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 22.13 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.13”

Context: FDN-C26-389

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 110.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
110.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
1.18 m
From
18.2 m
To
19.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:18.2-19.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 110.06 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 132.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 110.06 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“110.06”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 100.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
100.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
1.18 m
From
18.2 m
To
19.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:18.2-19.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 100.7 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 120.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“100.70”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-390FDNS · goldGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-390
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
True Width
2.79 m
From
9.3 m
To
12.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-390:9.3-12.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.20”

Context: FDN-C26-390

FDN-C26-390FDNS · silverGrade: 10.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-390
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
True Width
2.79 m
From
9.3 m
To
12.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-390:9.3-12.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.04 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.04 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.04”

Context: FDN-C26-390

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.37 m
From
10.1 m
To
10.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:10.1-10.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 36 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“36.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 30.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
30.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.37 m
From
10.1 m
To
10.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:10.1-10.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“30.20”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-391FDNS · goldGrade: 4.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-391
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.15 m
True Width
1.95 m
From
23.8 m
To
25.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-391:23.8-25.95
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.71 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.71”

Context: FDN-C26-391

FDN-C26-391FDNS · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-391
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.15 m
True Width
1.95 m
From
23.8 m
To
25.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-391:23.8-25.95
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.30”

Context: FDN-C26-391

FDN-C26-391FDNS · goldGrade: 5.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-391
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
True Width
3.81 m
From
66.2 m
To
70.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-391:66.2-70.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.08 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.08”

Context: FDN-C26-391

FDN-C26-391FDNS · silverGrade: 4.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-391
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
True Width
3.81 m
From
66.2 m
To
70.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-391:66.2-70.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.22”

Context: FDN-C26-391

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
1.56 m
From
66.2 m
To
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:66.2-68
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.04 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.04 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.04”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
1.56 m
From
66.2 m
To
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:66.2-68
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.65 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.65 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.65”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-391FDNS · goldGrade: 16.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-391
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.05 m
True Width
1.86 m
From
77.95 m
To
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-391:77.95-80
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.43 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 33.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.43 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.43”

Context: FDN-C26-391

FDN-C26-391FDNS · silverGrade: 18.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-391
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.05 m
True Width
1.86 m
From
77.95 m
To
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-391:77.95-80
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.53 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.53 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.53”

Context: FDN-C26-391

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 31.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
31.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.91 m
From
79 m
To
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:79-80
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 31.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 31.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 18.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.91 m
From
79 m
To
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:79-80
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.60”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-392FDNS · goldGrade: 4.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-392
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
0 m
To
4.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-392:0-4.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.74 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.74”

Context: FDN-C26-392

FDN-C26-392FDNS · silverGrade: 25.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-392
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
25.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
0 m
To
4.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-392:0-4.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 114.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 25.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.94”

Context: FDN-C26-392

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 13.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.05 m
From
0 m
To
1.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:0-1.05
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.52 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.52 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.52”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 48.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
48.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.05 m
From
0 m
To
1.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:0-1.05
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 48.59 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 51.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“48.59”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-397FDNS · goldGrade: 4.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-397
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
True Width
2.31 m
From
19.25 m
To
21.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-397:19.25-21.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.49 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.49”

Context: FDN-C26-397

FDN-C26-397FDNS · silverGrade: 16.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-397
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
True Width
2.31 m
From
19.25 m
To
21.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-397:19.25-21.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.77”

Context: FDN-C26-397

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
True Width
0.54 m
From
19.25 m
To
19.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:19.25-19.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.35 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 15.35 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.35”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 45.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
45.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
True Width
0.54 m
From
19.25 m
To
19.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:19.25-19.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 45.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“45.40”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-397FDNS · goldGrade: 6.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-397
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
28.95 m
To
30.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-397:28.95-30.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.59 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.59”

Context: FDN-C26-397

FDN-C26-397FDNS · silverGrade: 11.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-397
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
True Width
1.38 m
From
28.95 m
To
30.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-397:28.95-30.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.41 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.41 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.41”

Context: FDN-C26-397

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 19.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
28.95 m
To
29.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:28.95-29.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.95 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 19.95 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.95”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
28.95 m
To
29.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:28.95-29.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.70”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-398FDNS · goldGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-398
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
True Width
3.19 m
From
3.9 m
To
7.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-398:3.9-7.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.6 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.60”

Context: FDN-C26-398

FDN-C26-398FDNS · silverGrade: 4.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-398
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
True Width
3.19 m
From
3.9 m
To
7.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-398:3.9-7.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.15”

Context: FDN-C26-398

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 26.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
26.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.75 m
From
5.7 m
To
6.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:5.7-6.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 26.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.75 m
From
5.7 m
To
6.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:5.7-6.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.30”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-401FDNS · goldGrade: 13.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-401
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.45 m
True Width
1.88 m
From
12.8 m
To
15.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-401:12.8-15.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.45 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 33.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.45 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.45”

Context: FDN-C26-401

FDN-C26-401FDNS · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-401
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.45 m
True Width
1.88 m
From
12.8 m
To
15.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-401:12.8-15.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.60”

Context: FDN-C26-401

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 31.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
31.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
True Width
0.69 m
From
12.8 m
To
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:12.8-13.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.85 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 28.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 31.85 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.85”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
True Width
0.69 m
From
12.8 m
To
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:12.8-13.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.40”

Context: Including

FDN-C26-401FDNS · goldGrade: 9.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-401
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.25 m
True Width
1.45 m
From
114.85 m
To
119.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-401:114.85-119.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.95 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 42.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.95 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.95”

Context: FDN-C26-401

FDN-C26-401FDNS · silverGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
FDN-C26-401
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.25 m
True Width
1.45 m
From
114.85 m
To
119.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
FDN-C26-401:114.85-119.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.70”

Context: FDN-C26-401

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 18.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.85 m
True Width
0.63 m
From
115.25 m
To
117.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:115.25-117.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.97 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 35.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 18.97 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.97”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.85 m
True Width
0.63 m
From
115.25 m
To
117.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:115.25-117.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.49 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.49”

Context: Including

UGE-S-26-472FDNS · goldGrade: 3.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-S-26-472
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.45 m
True Width
1.73 m
From
9.15 m
To
11.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-S-26-472:9.15-11.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.83 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.83”

Context: UGE-S-26-472

UGE-S-26-472FDNS · silverGrade: 9.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-S-26-472
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.45 m
True Width
1.73 m
From
9.15 m
To
11.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-S-26-472:9.15-11.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.82 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.82 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.82”

Context: UGE-S-26-472

UGE-S-26-472FDNS · goldGrade: 22.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-S-26-472
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
22.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
True Width
3.21 m
From
46.9 m
To
51.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-S-26-472:46.9-51.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.97 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 114.8 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 22.97 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.97”

Context: UGE-S-26-472

UGE-S-26-472FDNS · silverGrade: 18.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-S-26-472
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
True Width
3.21 m
From
46.9 m
To
51.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-S-26-472:46.9-51.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.39 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.39”

Context: UGE-S-26-472

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 56.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
56.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.35 m
True Width
0.87 m
From
50.55 m
To
51.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:50.55-51.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.15 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 75.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 56.15 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“56.15”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 37.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
37.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.35 m
True Width
0.87 m
From
50.55 m
To
51.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:50.55-51.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.23 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 50.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“37.23”

Context: Including

UGE-S-26-472FDNS · goldGrade: 7.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-S-26-472
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
139.9 m
To
141.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-S-26-472:139.9-141.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.95 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.95 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.95”

Context: UGE-S-26-472

UGE-S-26-472FDNS · silverGrade: 156.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-S-26-472
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
156.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
139.9 m
To
141.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-S-26-472:139.9-141.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 156.83 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 196.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“156.83”

Context: UGE-S-26-472

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 21.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
21.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
140.75 m
To
141.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:140.75-141.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 21.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.50”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 373Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
373
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
140.75 m
To
141.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:140.75-141.15
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 373 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 149.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 373 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“373.00”

Context: Including

UGE-S-26-472FDNS · goldGrade: 13.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-S-26-472
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
True Width
1 m
From
173.65 m
To
175.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-S-26-472:173.65-175.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.77 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.77 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.77”

Context: UGE-S-26-472

UGE-S-26-472FDNS · silverGrade: 135.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-S-26-472
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
135.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
True Width
1 m
From
173.65 m
To
175.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-S-26-472:173.65-175.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 135.84 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 237.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“135.84”

Context: UGE-S-26-472

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 29.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
29.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.46 m
From
173.65 m
To
174.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:173.65-174.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 29.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“29.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 290.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
290.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.46 m
From
173.65 m
To
174.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:173.65-174.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 290.15 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 232.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 290.15 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“290.15”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-422FDNS · goldGrade: 3.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-422
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
36.8 m
To
39.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-422:36.8-39.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.92 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.92”

Context: UGE-E-25-422

UGE-E-25-422FDNS · silverGrade: 28.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-422
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
28.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
36.8 m
To
39.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-422:36.8-39.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 78.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 28.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“28.10”

Context: UGE-E-25-422

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
37.85 m
To
38.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:37.85-38.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.9 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 14.9 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 104Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
104
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
37.85 m
To
38.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:37.85-38.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 104 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 72.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“104.00”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-422FDNS · goldGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-422
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
136.7 m
To
139.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-422:136.7-139.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.24 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.24”

Context: UGE-E-25-422

UGE-E-25-422FDNS · silverGrade: 3.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-422
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
136.7 m
To
139.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-422:136.7-139.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.67 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.67 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.67”

Context: UGE-E-25-422

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
137.8 m
To
138.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:137.8-138.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.96 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.96 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.96”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
137.8 m
To
138.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:137.8-138.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.70”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-422FDNS · goldGrade: 4.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-422
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.65 m
From
551.4 m
To
555.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-422:551.4-555.05
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.68 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.68”

Context: UGE-E-25-422

UGE-E-25-422FDNS · silverGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-422
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.65 m
From
551.4 m
To
555.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-422:551.4-555.05
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.24 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.24 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.24”

Context: UGE-E-25-422

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 25.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
25.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
551.4 m
To
552.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:551.4-552.05
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 25.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
551.4 m
To
552.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:551.4-552.05
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.60”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · goldGrade: 13.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.98 m
From
190.4 m
To
191.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:190.4-191.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.4 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.4 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.40”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · silverGrade: 249Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
249
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.98 m
From
190.4 m
To
191.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:190.4-191.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 249 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 249.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 249 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“249.00”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · goldGrade: 9.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
True Width
1.71 m
From
239.05 m
To
240.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:239.05-240.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.06 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.06 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.06”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · silverGrade: 7.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
True Width
1.71 m
From
239.05 m
To
240.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:239.05-240.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.21 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.21 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.21”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 17.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.78 m
From
240 m
To
240.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:240-240.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.53 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 17.53 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.53”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.78 m
From
240 m
To
240.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:240-240.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.60”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · goldGrade: 13.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
True Width
3.72 m
From
266.85 m
To
270.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:266.85-270.65
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.25 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 50.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.25 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.25”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · silverGrade: 5.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
True Width
3.72 m
From
266.85 m
To
270.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:266.85-270.65
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.78 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.78 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.78”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 39.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
39.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
1.22 m
From
266.85 m
To
268.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:266.85-268.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 49.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 39.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“39.60”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 14.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
1.22 m
From
266.85 m
To
268.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:266.85-268.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.02 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14.02 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.02”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · goldGrade: 12.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
True Width
5.38 m
From
278.9 m
To
284.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:278.9-284.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.22 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 67.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.22 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.22”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · silverGrade: 11.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
True Width
5.38 m
From
278.9 m
To
284.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:278.9-284.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 64.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.77”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 30.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
30.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.86 m
From
282.5 m
To
284.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:282.5-284.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.23 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 57.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 30.23 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“30.23”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 19.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
True Width
1.86 m
From
282.5 m
To
284.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:282.5-284.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 19.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.29”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · goldGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
True Width
2.35 m
From
286.6 m
To
289 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:286.6-289
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.8 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.8 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.80”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · silverGrade: 8.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
True Width
2.35 m
From
286.6 m
To
289 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:286.6-289
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.38”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 20.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.98 m
From
288 m
To
289 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:288-289
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.68 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 20.68 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.68”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.98 m
From
288 m
To
289 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:288-289
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.76 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.76 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.76”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · goldGrade: 20.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
20.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
True Width
5.77 m
From
299 m
To
304.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:299-304.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.34 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 120.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 20.34 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.34”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · silverGrade: 15.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
True Width
5.77 m
From
299 m
To
304.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:299-304.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 90.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 15.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.31”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 61.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
61.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
1.76 m
From
299 m
To
300.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:299-300.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 61.21 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 110.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 61.21 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“61.21”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 37.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
37.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
1.76 m
From
299 m
To
300.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:299-300.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.56 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 67.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“37.56”

Context: Including

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · goldGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
True Width
2.74 m
From
333.95 m
To
336.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:333.95-336.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.20”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

UGE-E-25-425FDNS · silverGrade: 3.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-25-425
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
True Width
2.74 m
From
333.95 m
To
336.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-25-425:333.95-336.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.84 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.84 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.84”

Context: UGE-E-25-425

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 7.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
True Width
0.83 m
From
335.9 m
To
336.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:335.9-336.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.61 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.61 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.61”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 4.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
True Width
0.83 m
From
335.9 m
To
336.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:335.9-336.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.64”

Context: Including

UGE-E-26-429FDNS · goldGrade: 6.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-429
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
90.3 m
To
97.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-429:90.3-97.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.69 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 48.8 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.69”

Context: UGE-E-26-429

UGE-E-26-429FDNS · silverGrade: 6.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-429
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
90.3 m
To
97.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-429:90.3-97.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.37 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.37 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.37”

Context: UGE-E-26-429

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
94.5 m
To
96.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:94.5-96.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.13 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 38.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.13 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.13”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 9.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
94.5 m
To
96.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:94.5-96.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.17 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.17 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.17”

Context: Including

UGE-E-26-429FDNS · goldGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-429
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.95 m
From
375.35 m
To
378.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-429:375.35-378.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.00”

Context: UGE-E-26-429

UGE-E-26-429FDNS · silverGrade: 7.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-429
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.95 m
From
375.35 m
To
378.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-429:375.35-378.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.15”

Context: UGE-E-26-429

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
375.35 m
To
376.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:375.35-376.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.08 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.08 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.08”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
375.35 m
To
376.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:375.35-376.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.70”

Context: Including

UGE-E-26-429FDNS · goldGrade: 169.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-429
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
169.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
427.5 m
To
431.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-429:427.5-431.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 169.93 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 713.7 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 169.93 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“169.93”

Context: UGE-E-26-429

UGE-E-26-429FDNS · silverGrade: 102.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-429
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
102.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
427.5 m
To
431.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-429:427.5-431.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 102.36 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 429.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“102.36”

Context: UGE-E-26-429

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 712Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
712
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
430.7 m
To
431.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:430.7-431.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 712 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 712.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 712 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“712.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 429Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
429
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
430.7 m
To
431.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:430.7-431.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 429 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 429.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 429 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“429.00”

Context: Including

UGE-E-26-456FDNS · goldGrade: 5.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-456
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
96.7 m
To
101.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-456:96.7-101.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.42 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 27.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.42”

Context: UGE-E-26-456

UGE-E-26-456FDNS · silverGrade: 8.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-456
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
96.7 m
To
101.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-456:96.7-101.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.44 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 42.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.44 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.44”

Context: UGE-E-26-456

UGE-E-26-458FDNS · goldGrade: 9.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-458
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
318.3 m
To
319.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-458:318.3-319.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.52 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.52 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.52”

Context: UGE-E-26-458

UGE-E-26-458FDNS · silverGrade: 10.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-458
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
318.3 m
To
319.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-458:318.3-319.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.30”

Context: UGE-E-26-458

UGE-E-26-465FDNS · goldGrade: 5.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-465
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
102.7 m
To
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-465:102.7-107.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.27 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.27”

Context: UGE-E-26-465

UGE-E-26-465FDNS · silverGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-E-26-465
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
102.7 m
To
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-E-26-465:102.7-107.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.20”

Context: UGE-E-26-465

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
From
104.7 m
To
106.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:104.7-106.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.73 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.73 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.73”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 7.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
From
104.7 m
To
106.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:104.7-106.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.99 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.99 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.99”

Context: Including

UGE-26-441FDNS · goldGrade: 10.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-441
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
71.5 m
To
75.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-441:71.5-75.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.09 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 40.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.09 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.09”

Context: UGE-26-441

UGE-26-441FDNS · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-441
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
71.5 m
To
75.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-441:71.5-75.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 41.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.40”

Context: UGE-26-441

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 21.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
21.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
74 m
To
75.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:74-75.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.47 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 32.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 21.47 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.47”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
74 m
To
75.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:74-75.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.25”

Context: Including

UGE-26-441FDNS · goldGrade: 4.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-441
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
84.8 m
To
87.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-441:84.8-87.85
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.25 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.25”

Context: UGE-26-441

UGE-26-441FDNS · silverGrade: 6.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-441
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
84.8 m
To
87.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-441:84.8-87.85
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.44 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.44 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.44”

Context: UGE-26-441

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 23.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
23.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
87.4 m
To
87.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:87.4-87.85
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.7 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 23.7 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.70”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 21.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
21.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
87.4 m
To
87.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:87.4-87.85
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 21.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.50”

Context: Including

UGE-26-443FDNS · goldGrade: 9.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-443
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
True Width
2.25 m
From
76 m
To
78.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-443:76-78.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.59 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.59 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.59”

Context: UGE-26-443

UGE-26-443FDNS · silverGrade: 36.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-443
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
36.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
True Width
2.25 m
From
76 m
To
78.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-443:76-78.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 94.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“36.50”

Context: UGE-26-443

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 22.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
22.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
True Width
0.65 m
From
76.65 m
To
77.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:76.65-77.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 22.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
True Width
0.65 m
From
76.65 m
To
77.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:76.65-77.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 92 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 69.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“92.00”

Context: Including

UGE-26-443FDNS · goldGrade: 13.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-443
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
True Width
3.12 m
From
96.4 m
To
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-443:96.4-100
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.86 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 49.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.86 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.86”

Context: UGE-26-443

UGE-26-443FDNS · silverGrade: 10.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-443
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
True Width
3.12 m
From
96.4 m
To
100 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-443:96.4-100
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.57 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.57 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.57”

Context: UGE-26-443

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 120Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
120
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
96.4 m
To
96.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:96.4-96.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 120 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 48.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 120 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“120.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 79.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
79.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.35 m
From
96.4 m
To
96.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:96.4-96.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 79.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“79.40”

Context: Including

UGE-26-444FDNS · goldGrade: 4.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-444
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
True Width
1.84 m
From
21.5 m
To
24.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-444:21.5-24.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.23 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.23”

Context: UGE-26-444

UGE-26-444FDNS · silverGrade: 8.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-444
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
True Width
1.84 m
From
21.5 m
To
24.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-444:21.5-24.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.85 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.85”

Context: UGE-26-444

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 16.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.32 m
From
21.5 m
To
21.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:21.5-21.95
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.95 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.95 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.95”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 21.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
21.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
True Width
0.32 m
From
21.5 m
To
21.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:21.5-21.95
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 21.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.50”

Context: Including

UGE-26-444FDNS · goldGrade: 22.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-444
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
22.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.65 m
True Width
1.87 m
From
49.2 m
To
51.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-444:49.2-51.85
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.56 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 59.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 22.56 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.56”

Context: UGE-26-444

UGE-26-444FDNS · silverGrade: 50.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-444
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
50.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.65 m
True Width
1.87 m
From
49.2 m
To
51.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-444:49.2-51.85
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50.24 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 133.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“50.24”

Context: UGE-26-444

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 101.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
101.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
50.4 m
To
50.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:50.4-50.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 101.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 40.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 101.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“101.50”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 105Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
105
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.28 m
From
50.4 m
To
50.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:50.4-50.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 105 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 42.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“105.00”

Context: Including

UGE-26-451FDNS · goldGrade: 5.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-451
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
15.3 m
To
17.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-451:15.3-17.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.71 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.71”

Context: UGE-26-451

UGE-26-451FDNS · silverGrade: 7.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-451
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
15.3 m
To
17.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-451:15.3-17.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.87”

Context: UGE-26-451

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 11.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
16.6 m
To
17.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:16.6-17.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.17 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11.17 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.17”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 11.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
16.6 m
To
17.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:16.6-17.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.35 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.35 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.35”

Context: Including

UGE-26-451FDNS · goldGrade: 3.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-451
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
From
37.45 m
To
40.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-451:37.45-40.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.87 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.87”

Context: UGE-26-451

UGE-26-451FDNS · silverGrade: 14.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-451
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
From
37.45 m
To
40.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-451:37.45-40.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.79 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14.79 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.79”

Context: UGE-26-451

UGE-26-451FDNS · goldGrade: 8.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-451
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
True Width
1.03 m
From
62.85 m
To
64.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-451:62.85-64.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.72 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.72 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.72”

Context: UGE-26-451

UGE-26-451FDNS · silverGrade: 21.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-451
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
21.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
True Width
1.03 m
From
62.85 m
To
64.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-451:62.85-64.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.83 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 21.83 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.83”

Context: UGE-26-451

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 28.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
28.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
64.05 m
To
64.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:64.05-64.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 28.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“28.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 44.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
44.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.26 m
From
64.05 m
To
64.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:64.05-64.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“44.60”

Context: Including

UGE-26-451FDNS · goldGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-451
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.45 m
From
86.55 m
To
94 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-451:86.55-94
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 35.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.70”

Context: UGE-26-451

UGE-26-451FDNS · silverGrade: 7.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-451
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.45 m
From
86.55 m
To
94 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-451:86.55-94
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 53.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.22”

Context: UGE-26-451

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
From
86.55 m
To
88.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:86.55-88.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.76 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.76 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.76”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 9.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
From
86.55 m
To
88.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:86.55-88.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.56”

Context: Including

UGE-26-452FDNS · goldGrade: 12.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-452
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
True Width
1.28 m
From
58.2 m
To
59.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-452:58.2-59.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.7 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.7 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.70”

Context: UGE-26-452

UGE-26-452FDNS · silverGrade: 13.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-452
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
True Width
1.28 m
From
58.2 m
To
59.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-452:58.2-59.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.76 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.76 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.76”

Context: UGE-26-452

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 38.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
38.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
58.2 m
To
58.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:58.2-58.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 38.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“38.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 36.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
36.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
58.2 m
To
58.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:58.2-58.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“36.50”

Context: Including

UGE-26-452FDNS · goldGrade: 9.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-452
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
True Width
1.28 m
From
62.3 m
To
63.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-452:62.3-63.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.07 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.07 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.07”

Context: UGE-26-452

UGE-26-452FDNS · silverGrade: 7.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-452
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
True Width
1.28 m
From
62.3 m
To
63.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-452:62.3-63.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.72 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.72 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.72”

Context: UGE-26-452

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 27.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
62.7 m
To
63.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:62.7-63.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 27.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 19.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
62.7 m
To
63.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:62.7-63.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 19.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.50”

Context: Including

UGE-26-453FDNS · goldGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-453
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.15 m
True Width
2.67 m
From
33.55 m
To
37.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-453:33.55-37.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.50”

Context: UGE-26-453

UGE-26-453FDNS · silverGrade: 13.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-453
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.15 m
True Width
2.67 m
From
33.55 m
To
37.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-453:33.55-37.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 57.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.87”

Context: UGE-26-453

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 9.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.51 m
From
33.95 m
To
34.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:33.95-34.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.48 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.48 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.48”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 22.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
22.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.51 m
From
33.95 m
To
34.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:33.95-34.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 22.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.55”

Context: Including

UGE-26-453FDNS · goldGrade: 4.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-453
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
True Width
3.47 m
From
39 m
To
44.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-453:39-44.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.68 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 25.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.68”

Context: UGE-26-453

UGE-26-453FDNS · silverGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-453
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
True Width
3.47 m
From
39 m
To
44.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-453:39-44.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.10”

Context: UGE-26-453

UGE-26-454FDNS · goldGrade: 3.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-454
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.65 m
From
0.45 m
To
11.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-454:0.45-11.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.28 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 34.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.28”

Context: UGE-26-454

UGE-26-454FDNS · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-454
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.65 m
From
0.45 m
To
11.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-454:0.45-11.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 67.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.30”

Context: UGE-26-454

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
0.45 m
To
1.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:0.45-1.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.69 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.69 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.69”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 21.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
21.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
0.45 m
To
1.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:0.45-1.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 21.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.07”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
From
8.8 m
To
10.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:8.8-10.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.27 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.27 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.27”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
From
8.8 m
To
10.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:8.8-10.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.27”

Context: Including

UGE-26-454FDNS · goldGrade: 9.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-454
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
9.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.25 m
True Width
5.83 m
From
25.45 m
To
33.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-454:25.45-33.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.54 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 78.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.54 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.54”

Context: UGE-26-454

UGE-26-454FDNS · silverGrade: 19.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-454
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.25 m
True Width
5.83 m
From
25.45 m
To
33.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-454:25.45-33.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 163.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 19.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.86”

Context: UGE-26-454

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 19.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.05 m
True Width
1.45 m
From
25.45 m
To
27.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:25.45-27.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.83 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 40.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 19.83 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.83”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 26.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
26.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.05 m
True Width
1.45 m
From
25.45 m
To
27.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:25.45-27.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 53.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 26.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.25”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 26.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
26.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
0.88 m
From
32.45 m
To
33.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:32.45-33.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.34 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 32.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 26.34 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.34”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 49.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
49.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
True Width
0.88 m
From
32.45 m
To
33.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:32.45-33.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 49.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 61.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“49.50”

Context: Including

UGE-26-455FDNS · goldGrade: 5.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-455
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
5.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
42 m
To
52.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-455:42-52.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.88 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 62.3 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.88”

Context: UGE-26-455

UGE-26-455FDNS · silverGrade: 7.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-455
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
42 m
To
52.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-455:42-52.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.43 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 78.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.43 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.43”

Context: UGE-26-455

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 22.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
22.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
42.8 m
To
45.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:42.8-45.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.12 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 50.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 22.12 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.12”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 16.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
42.8 m
To
45.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:42.8-45.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.87”

Context: Including

UGE-26-455FDNS · goldGrade: 4.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-455
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
60.5 m
To
69.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-455:60.5-69.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.91 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 45.2 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.91”

Context: UGE-26-455

UGE-26-455FDNS · silverGrade: 12.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-455
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
60.5 m
To
69.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-455:60.5-69.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.71 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 116.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 12.71 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.71”

Context: UGE-26-455

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 14.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
14.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
60.5 m
To
62.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:60.5-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.72 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 29.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 14.72 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.72”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
60.5 m
To
62.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:60.5-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.25”

Context: Including

UGE-26-457FDNS · goldGrade: 39.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-457
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
39.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
True Width
3.1 m
From
71.85 m
To
75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-457:71.85-75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.16 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 123.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 39.16 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“39.16”

Context: UGE-26-457

UGE-26-457FDNS · silverGrade: 17.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-457
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.15 m
True Width
3.1 m
From
71.85 m
To
75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-457:71.85-75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 55.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 17.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.55”

Context: UGE-26-457

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 305Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
305
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
74.15 m
To
74.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:74.15-74.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 305 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 122.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 305 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“305.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 127Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
127
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.39 m
From
74.15 m
To
74.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:74.15-74.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 127 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 50.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“127.00”

Context: Including

UGE-26-461FDNS · goldGrade: 4.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-461
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
From
66.35 m
To
68.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-461:66.35-68.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.47 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.47”

Context: UGE-26-461

UGE-26-461FDNS · silverGrade: 16.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-461
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
16.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
From
66.35 m
To
68.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-461:66.35-68.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.88 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.88 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.88”

Context: UGE-26-461

UGE-26-461FDNS · goldGrade: 4.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-461
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
4.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.75 m
From
70 m
To
73.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-461:70-73.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.17 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.17”

Context: UGE-26-461

UGE-26-461FDNS · silverGrade: 13.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-461
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.75 m
From
70 m
To
73.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-461:70-73.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.69 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 51.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.69 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.69”

Context: UGE-26-461

UGE-26-461FDNS · goldGrade: 8.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-461
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.85 m
From
74.85 m
To
82.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-461:74.85-82.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.32 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 65.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.32 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.32”

Context: UGE-26-461

UGE-26-461FDNS · silverGrade: 23.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-461
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
23.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.85 m
From
74.85 m
To
82.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-461:74.85-82.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 181.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 23.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.15”

Context: UGE-26-461

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 15.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
From
78.9 m
To
82.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:78.9-82.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.71 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 53.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 15.71 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.71”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 33.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
33.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
From
78.9 m
To
82.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:78.9-82.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.62 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 114.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“33.62”

Context: Including

UGE-26-461FDNS · goldGrade: 3.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-461
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.7 m
From
85.05 m
To
88.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-461:85.05-88.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.47 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.47”

Context: UGE-26-461

UGE-26-461FDNS · silverGrade: 23.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-461
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
23.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.7 m
From
85.05 m
To
88.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-461:85.05-88.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.13 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 85.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 23.13 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.13”

Context: UGE-26-461

UGE-26-463FDNS · goldGrade: 8.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-463
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
96.8 m
To
101 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-463:96.8-101
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.33 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 35.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.33 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.33”

Context: UGE-26-463

UGE-26-463FDNS · silverGrade: 7.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-463
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
7.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
96.8 m
To
101 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-463:96.8-101
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.06 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.06 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.06”

Context: UGE-26-463

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 41.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
41.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
96.8 m
To
97.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:96.8-97.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 41.8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 41.8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“41.80”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
96.8 m
To
97.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:96.8-97.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.10”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 24.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
24.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
98.55 m
To
99 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:98.55-99
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 24.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“24.30”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
15.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
98.55 m
To
99 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:98.55-99
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 15.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.60”

Context: Including

UGE-26-463FDNS · goldGrade: 6.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-463
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m
From
135.6 m
To
140.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-463:135.6-140.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.05 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.9 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.05”

Context: UGE-26-463

UGE-26-463FDNS · silverGrade: 10.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-463
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m
From
135.6 m
To
140.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-463:135.6-140.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.95 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 55.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.95 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.95”

Context: UGE-26-463

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
135.6 m
To
136.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:135.6-136.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 24 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“24.00”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 17.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
17.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
135.6 m
To
136.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:135.6-136.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 17.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.90”

Context: Including

UGE-26-464FDNS · goldGrade: 6.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-464
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
42.45 m
To
48.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-464:42.45-48.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.16 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 37.6 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.16”

Context: UGE-26-464

UGE-26-464FDNS · silverGrade: 11.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-464
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
11.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
42.45 m
To
48.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-464:42.45-48.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.33 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 69.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.33 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.33”

Context: UGE-26-464

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 12.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
42.45 m
To
43.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:42.45-43.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.55 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.55 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.55”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 19.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
19.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
42.45 m
To
43.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:42.45-43.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 19.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.10”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 8.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
8.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
45.45 m
To
47.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:45.45-47.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.45 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.45 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.45”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 13.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
13.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
45.45 m
To
47.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:45.45-47.45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.15”

Context: Including

UGE-26-479FDNS · goldGrade: 10.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-479
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.55 m
From
58.15 m
To
81.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-479:58.15-81.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.55 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 248.5 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 10.55 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.55”

Context: UGE-26-479

UGE-26-479FDNS · silverGrade: 27.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-479
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
27.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.55 m
From
58.15 m
To
81.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-479:58.15-81.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.07 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 637.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.07”

Context: UGE-26-479

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 24.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
24.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
78.6 m
To
80.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:78.6-80.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 57.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 24.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“24.90”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 12.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
12.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
78.6 m
To
80.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:78.6-80.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.32 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 12.32 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.32”

Context: Including

UGE-26-479FDNS · goldGrade: 6.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-479
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
6.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
131.5 m
To
135.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-479:131.5-135.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.37 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.37”

Context: UGE-26-479

UGE-26-479FDNS · silverGrade: 3.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UGE-26-479
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
3.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
131.5 m
To
135.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
UGE-26-479:131.5-135.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.11”

Context: UGE-26-479

IncludingFDNS · goldGrade: 10.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
gold
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
10.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
From
133.3 m
To
135.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:133.3-135.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.84 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 19.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.84 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.84”

Context: Including

IncludingFDNS · silverGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
FDNS
Commodity
silver
Region
ecuador
Reported Region
southeast Ecuador
Ticker
LUG

Geometry

Grade
2.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
From
133.3 m
To
135.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:133.3-135.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.86”

Context: Including

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.