LSR: Lodestar Delivers Significant Resource at Ned's Creek Gold

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Lodestar Minerals Limited
Ticker
LSR
Exchange
ASX
Region
Western Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-10-21 23:14:03 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Lodestar Minerals has announced a maiden Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for its Ned’s Creek Gold Project in Western Australia, totaling 5.9 million tonnes at 1.16 g/t Au for 221,000 ounces of gold. The resource is entirely classified as Inferred, indicating early-stage confidence, but remains open along strike and at depth with plans for further drilling. Historical metallurgical testwork on limited samples showed encouraging gold recoveries of over 90% via cyanide leaching.

Reasoning: Lodestar Minerals announced a maiden Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for its Ned’s Creek Gold Project, establishing a resource base in a prime gold-producing region. While the resource is entirely Inferred and relies on assumed bulk densities, it is JORC compliant and QP signed, with encouraging historical metallurgy and significant upside potential along strike and at depth.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed
  • Open at strike and depth
  • Good historical metallurgy
  • Located in established gold-producing region with nearby infrastructure

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities
  • Limited and historical metallurgical testwork
  • No multi-element analysis for resource

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 24

Classification and evidence

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.

Why it applies: The announcement explicitly states 'Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.

Evidence · text

“Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”

All Inferrednegative

100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The resource is classified entirely as Inferred, indicating a low level of geological confidence.

Evidence · text

“classified entirely as Inferred under the JORC Code (2012 Edition).”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate is based on information compiled and assessed by Mr Allan Ignacio, a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM) and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG).

Evidence · text

“The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Ned’s Creek Gold Project is based on information compiled and assessed by Mr Allan Ignacio, a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM, Membership No. 229530) and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG, Membership No. 6431).”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is reported in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition).

Evidence · text

“reported under the JORC Code (2012 Edition).”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The resource is reported at a cut-off grade (COG) of 0.5 g/t Au.

Evidence · text

“reported at a cut-off grade (COG) of 0.5 g/t Au”

Bench Scale Onlynegative

Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: Metallurgical testwork was described as 'Laboratory-scale cyanide leach tests'.

Evidence · text

“Laboratory-scale cyanide leach tests achieved gold extractions of approximately 90.9% and 92.4%, respectively, over 48 hours.”

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: Metallurgical testwork was based on a 'limited number of samples and should not be considered representative of the entire Mineral Resource'.

Evidence · text

“However, the results are based on a limited number of samples and should not be considered representative of the entire Mineral Resource.”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Historical metallurgical testwork showed gold extractions of approximately 90.9% and 92.4%, which is high for gold cyanide leaching.

Evidence · text

“gold extractions of approximately 90.9% and 92.4%”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The document mentions 'conventional cyanide leaching processes'.

Evidence · text

“amenable to conventional cyanide leaching processes”

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: The document mentions 'Additional gravity concentration followed by cyanide leaching'.

Evidence · text

“Additional gravity concentration followed by cyanide leaching”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 24. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (20)

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 5903000Grade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 221000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:b268868d3a05d8225b3a
Deposit or zone
Ned’s Creek Gold Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
mixed
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5903000
Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
221000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is the maiden Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for the entire project, establishing a baseline for future development, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed
  • Open at strike and depth
  • Located in established gold-producing region with nearby infrastructure

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities
  • No multi-element analysis for resource

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 5,903,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 1550000Grade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 58000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:a72deb2b75904accc33a
Deposit or zone
Ned’s Creek Gold Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
Oxides
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1550000
Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
58000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This represents the oxide component of the maiden Inferred MRE, which is typically amenable to open-pit mining, but shares the same early-stage confidence limitations as the overall resource.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed
  • Amenable to open-pit mining

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 1,550,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 1211000Grade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 46000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:5790e3ff777dc64fdc0b
Deposit or zone
Ned’s Creek Gold Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
transitional
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1211000
Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
46000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This represents the transitional component of the maiden Inferred MRE, which is typically amenable to open-pit mining, but shares the same early-stage confidence limitations as the overall resource.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed
  • Amenable to open-pit mining

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.17”

Context: 1,211,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 2761000Grade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 103000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:62843eddff4fcc25422a
Deposit or zone
Ned’s Creek Gold Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2761000
Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
103000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This represents the combined oxide and transitional component of the maiden Inferred MRE, which is typically amenable to open-pit mining, but shares the same early-stage confidence limitations as the overall resource.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed
  • Amenable to open-pit mining

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.17”

Context: 2,761,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 3142000Grade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 117000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:8fa07d5c208655198930
Deposit or zone
Ned’s Creek Gold Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3142000
Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
117000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This represents the fresh material component of the maiden Inferred MRE, which is typically amenable to open-pit mining, but shares the same early-stage confidence limitations as the overall resource.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed
  • Amenable to open-pit mining

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 3,142,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 1921000Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 69000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:073c19a3d138187fb9d8
Deposit or zone
Contessa
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
mixed
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1921000
Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
69000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Contessa deposit contributes significantly to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 1,921,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 506000Grade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 19000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:b5bc413d7b3f4836d0a3
Deposit or zone
Contessa
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
Oxides
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
506000
Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
19000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The oxide component of the Contessa deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 506,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 456000Grade: 1.56Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 23000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:c003341b7f207252fefb
Deposit or zone
Contessa
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
transitional
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
456000
Grade
1.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
23000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The transitional component of the Contessa deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 456,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 962000Grade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 42000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:1039d839ccecf26d3ed1
Deposit or zone
Contessa
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
962000
Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
42000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined oxide and transitional component of the Contessa deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: 962,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 960000Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 28000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:dc9b12ab08f25787d2dc
Deposit or zone
Contessa
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
960000
Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
28000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The fresh material component of the Contessa deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 960,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 711000Grade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 26000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:d19631107c716539ed63
Deposit or zone
Central Park
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
mixed
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
711000
Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
26000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Central Park deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 711,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 629000Grade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 24000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:2551e15edd54d50fb74a
Deposit or zone
Central Park
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
Oxides
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
629000
Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
24000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The oxide component of the Central Park deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 629,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 43000Grade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:082351d85d41c6847baf
Deposit or zone
Central Park
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
transitional
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
43000
Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The transitional component of the Central Park deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 43,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 672000Grade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 25000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:1fc84be234b0bbc32e51
Deposit or zone
Central Park
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
672000
Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
25000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined oxide and transitional component of the Central Park deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.17”

Context: 672,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 38000Grade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:6c01c4716c05f2db601b
Deposit or zone
Central Park
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
38000
Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The fresh material component of the Central Park deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 38,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 3270000Grade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 125000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:18a37c0994516d03fa64
Deposit or zone
Gidgee Flat
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
mixed
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3270000
Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
125000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Gidgee Flat deposit is the largest contributor to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 3,270,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 415000Grade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 15000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:cb83d2b1168fa5e7b06f
Deposit or zone
Gidgee Flat
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
Oxides
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
415000
Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
15000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The oxide component of the Gidgee Flat deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 415,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 712000Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 21000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:21ab679fa013bdd72064
Deposit or zone
Gidgee Flat
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
transitional
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
712000
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
21000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The transitional component of the Gidgee Flat deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 712,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 1127000Grade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 36000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:62ae6a21b7628f766b52
Deposit or zone
Gidgee Flat
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1127000
Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
36000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined oxide and transitional component of the Gidgee Flat deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 1,127,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredNed's Creek Gold Project · goldTonnes: 2144000Grade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 89000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Allan Ignacio
Resource group id
resource:7e65bb0ab11153d64d27
Deposit or zone
Gidgee Flat
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2144000
Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
89000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-20

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Laboratories and Intertek Laboratories

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The fresh material component of the Gidgee Flat deposit contributes to the maiden Inferred MRE, but its early-stage nature and reliance on assumed parameters limit confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden MRE
  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Entirely Inferred resource
  • Assumed bulk densities

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: 2,144,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

Metallurgical Results (4)

cyanide leachNed's Creek Gold Project · goldRecovery: 90.9 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
cyanide leach
Processing Route
cyanide leaching
Sample
two samples from the Gidgee Flat prospect (LNRC033 and LNRC039)
Leach Time
48 hours

Recovery

Recovery
90.9 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical laboratory-scale cyanide leach tests on Gidgee Flat samples showed high gold recovery, suggesting amenability to conventional processing, but the limited scope and historical nature reduce its current relevance and confidence.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery
  • Mill Route

Negative factors

  • Bench Scale Only
  • Single Domain Only
  • Limited and historical metallurgical testwork

Evidence · text

“Laboratory-scale cyanide leach tests achieved gold extractions of approximately 90.9% and 92.4%, respectively, over 48 hours.”
cyanide leachNed's Creek Gold Project · goldRecovery: 92.4 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
cyanide leach
Processing Route
cyanide leaching
Sample
two samples from the Gidgee Flat prospect (LNRC033 and LNRC039)
Leach Time
48 hours

Recovery

Recovery
92.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical laboratory-scale cyanide leach tests on Gidgee Flat samples showed high gold recovery, suggesting amenability to conventional processing, but the limited scope and historical nature reduce its current relevance and confidence.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery
  • Mill Route

Negative factors

  • Bench Scale Only
  • Single Domain Only
  • Limited and historical metallurgical testwork

Evidence · text

“Laboratory-scale cyanide leach tests achieved gold extractions of approximately 90.9% and 92.4%, respectively, over 48 hours.”
gravityNed's Creek Gold Project · goldRecovery: 90.9 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
gravity
Processing Route
gravity concentration followed by cyanide leaching
Sample
two samples from the Gidgee Flat prospect (LNRC033 and LNRC039)

Recovery

Recovery
90.9 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical metallurgical testwork combining gravity concentration and cyanide leaching on Gidgee Flat samples showed high overall gold recovery, but the limited scope and historical nature reduce its current relevance and confidence.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery
  • Gravity Route
  • Mill Route

Negative factors

  • Bench Scale Only
  • Single Domain Only
  • Limited and historical metallurgical testwork

Evidence · text

“Additional gravity concentration followed by cyanide leaching achieved overall gold extractions of approximately 90.9% and 91.8%, respectively.”

Tags used in scoring

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

gravityNed's Creek Gold Project · goldRecovery: 91.8 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ned's Creek Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
LSR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
gravity
Processing Route
gravity concentration followed by cyanide leaching
Sample
two samples from the Gidgee Flat prospect (LNRC033 and LNRC039)

Recovery

Recovery
91.8 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical metallurgical testwork combining gravity concentration and cyanide leaching on Gidgee Flat samples showed high overall gold recovery, but the limited scope and historical nature reduce its current relevance and confidence.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery
  • Gravity Route
  • Mill Route

Negative factors

  • Bench Scale Only
  • Single Domain Only
  • Limited and historical metallurgical testwork

Evidence · text

“Additional gravity concentration followed by cyanide leaching achieved overall gold extractions of approximately 90.9% and 91.8%, respectively.”

Tags used in scoring

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.