# Lode Gold Evaluates Underground Mining Potential at Dingman Gold Project \(Ontario\) & Initiates New Geological Model \(MRE: 376,000 Oz Au M&I + 47,000 Oz Au Inferred\) Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lode-gold-evaluates-underground-mining-potential-at-dingman-gold-project-ontario--062b8cad-ac6e-49b1-954a-4f5d23ab7c4c Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lode-gold-evaluates-underground-mining-180300402.html Publisher: yahoo\_press Original announcement: 2026-02-02T18:03:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-19T06:12:21.167Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-19T06:12:21.167Z - Company: Lode Gold Resources Inc - Ticker: LOD - Exchange: TSXV - Region: Ontario - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Resource update, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-19 06:12:21 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.00 · Neutral ## Minestarters Atlas summary Lode Gold has initiated a new geological model for its Dingman Gold Project in Ontario to improve lithological and structural interpretations. The company noted its current NI 43-101 resource stands at 376,000 oz Au \(M&I\) and 47,000 oz Au \(Inferred\) using a 0.94 g/t Au cut-off. Reasoning: The announcement primarily restates existing NI 43-101 resource figures while announcing the start of a new geological modeling process. - Positive factor: Initiation of new geological model to improve resource understanding Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: The document discusses the current resource status in the context of initiating a new geological model. Evidence · text > announcement of the initiation of a new geological model... for its wholly owned Dingman Gold Project **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The resource is explicitly stated to be a NI 43-101 resource. Evidence · text > currently with a NI 43-101 resource ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (2) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lode-gold-evaluates-underground-mining-potential-at-dingman-gold-project-ontario--062b8cad-ac6e-49b1-954a-4f5d23ab7c4c#fact-resource-facts-0) Dingman Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Dingman Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: Ontario - Ticker: LOD #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:d5088c28e56bf7734d29 #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 376000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 0.94 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of existing NI 43-101 resource figures. Evidence · text > currently with a NI 43-101 resource of 376,000 Oz Au using 0.94 g/t Au cutoff in measured and indicated categories #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **No QP/CP Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience. Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lode-gold-evaluates-underground-mining-potential-at-dingman-gold-project-ontario--062b8cad-ac6e-49b1-954a-4f5d23ab7c4c#fact-resource-facts-1) Dingman Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Dingman Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: Ontario - Ticker: LOD #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:0bb68957e5085339d063 #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 47000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 0.94 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of existing NI 43-101 resource figures. Evidence · text > and 47,000 Oz Au in inferred category #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **No QP/CP Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience. Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.