LML: FY26 Annual Report

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Lincoln Minerals Limited
Ticker
LML
Exchange
ASX
Region
South Australia
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Lead, Zinc, Silver, Graphite, Magnetite, Uranium
Document categories
Resource update, Drill results, Capital raise
Extracted
2026-09-29 18:54:30 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Lincoln Minerals Limited's FY26 Annual Report highlights a strategic shift towards copper exploration, with recent air core drilling at the Minbrie Copper Project validating its geological model. The company secured A$5.351 million through capital raises to fund ongoing operations and planned follow-up drilling. Despite these advancements, the report discloses a net loss of A$2.198 million and a material uncertainty regarding its ability to continue as a going concern, while its graphite and magnetite resource estimates remained unchanged.

Reasoning: Lincoln Minerals Limited's FY26 Annual Report indicates a mixed performance. While the company successfully raised capital and reported positive early-stage drill results validating its copper exploration model, it also recorded a net loss and faces a material uncertainty regarding its going concern status. The resource updates for other commodities showed no material changes, suggesting a focused but financially challenging period.

Positive factors

  • Successful capital raises provide funding for ongoing operations and exploration.
  • Positive, albeit early-stage, drill results at Minbrie validate the geological model for copper.
  • Active exploration program is underway with plans for follow-up diamond drilling.
  • New CEO with extensive mining industry experience appointed to lead the company.

Negative factors

  • The company reported a net loss for the financial year.
  • A material uncertainty regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern was noted by auditors.
  • A cyber fraud incident resulted in a significant financial loss, though a settlement is expected.
  • Mineral resource estimates for graphite and magnetite were re-stated with no material changes, indicating low progress on these assets.
  • Drill results are reported as 'apparent width' only, which may overstate true thickness.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 51

Classification and evidence

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The drill intercept for hole BUDD192 is explicitly stated as a historical result from February 2025, re-released in this annual report.

Evidence · text

“29.5m @ 0.8% Cu, 7.5% Pb, 1.9% Zn and 9g/t Ag in hole BUDD192 (apparent width)1. Importantly, our review demonstrated ~1.7km of strike at Eagle Ridge remains untested, and large portions of the broader corridor have never been drilled for copper.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill intercept for hole BUDD192 is explicitly stated as 'apparent width', with no true width provided.

Evidence · text

“29.5m @ 0.8% Cu, 7.5% Pb, 1.9% Zn and 9g/t Ag in hole BUDD192 (apparent width)”

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: The historical drill intercept for BUDD192 reports significant grades of lead and zinc alongside copper, which can be penalty elements in copper concentrates.

Evidence · text

“29.5m @ 0.8% Cu, 7.5% Pb, 1.9% Zn and 9g/t Ag in hole BUDD192 (apparent width)”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill intercept for hole MBAC022 is explicitly stated as 'apparent width', with no true width provided.

Evidence · text

“6m at 0.26% Pb and 0.22% Zn from 90m (MBAC022, apparent width)”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Statement explicitly states that the information is based upon information compiled by a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code).

Evidence · text

“The information in this document that relates to Mineral Resources is based upon information compiled by Mr Shane O’Connell who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr O’Connell is a consultant to Lincoln Minerals Limited and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation, the type of deposit under consideration and to the activity undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code).”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Statement explicitly states that the information is compiled by Mr Shane O’Connell, who qualifies as a Competent Person under the JORC Code.

Evidence · text

“The information in this document that relates to Mineral Resources is based upon information compiled by Mr Shane O’Connell who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr O’Connell is a consultant to Lincoln Minerals Limited and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation, the type of deposit under consideration and to the activity undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code).”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'In the year ended June 30, 2026, there have been no changes to the Company’s Mineral Resources,' indicating the estimates are not new.

Evidence · text

“In the year ended June 30, 2026, there have been no changes to the Company’s Mineral Resources.”

All Inferrednegative

100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The Bald Hill magnetite resource is entirely classified as Inferred, indicating low geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 289.4

All Inferrednegative

100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The Iron Mount magnetite resource is entirely classified as Inferred, indicating low geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 135

All Inferrednegative

100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The Rifle Range magnetite resource is entirely classified as Inferred, indicating low geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 3.5

Going Concern Uncertaintynegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The auditor's report highlights a material uncertainty related to going concern due to a net loss of $2,198,849 and net cash outflow from operating and investing activities of $1,783,155.

Evidence · text

“We draw attention to Note 2 in the financial statements, which indicates that the Group incurred a net loss of $2,198,849 during the year ended 30 June 2026 and a net cash outflow from operating and investing activities of $1,783,155. As stated in Note 2, these events or conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 2, indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.”

Fraud Incidentnegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company identified a loss of $121,772 due to a phishing scam, which is a negative event impacting financial security.

Evidence · text

“During the year the Company identified two bank transactions to incorrect bank details as a result of a phishing scam resulting in a loss of $121,772 net of recoveries.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 51. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (16)

BUDD192Minbrie · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BUDD192
Project
Minbrie
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Eagle Ridge prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is high-grade and indicates significant mineralization, but its novelty is low as it's a re-statement and reported as apparent width only. The presence of other base metals could imply processing challenges.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and re-stated.
  • Reported as apparent width only.
  • Polymetallic nature with lead and zinc may indicate processing complexities or penalty elements.

Evidence · text

“29.5m @ 0.8% Cu, 7.5% Pb, 1.9% Zn and 9g/t Ag in hole BUDD192 (apparent width)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

BUDD192Minbrie · leadGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BUDD192
Project
Minbrie
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Geometry

Grade
7.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Eagle Ridge prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept is high-grade and indicates significant mineralization, but its novelty is low as it's a re-statement and reported as apparent width only. The presence of other base metals could imply processing challenges.

Positive factors

  • High-grade lead intercept.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and re-stated.
  • Reported as apparent width only.
  • Polymetallic nature with other base metals may indicate processing complexities or penalty elements.

Evidence · text

“29.5m @ 0.8% Cu, 7.5% Pb, 1.9% Zn and 9g/t Ag in hole BUDD192 (apparent width)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

BUDD192Minbrie · zincGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BUDD192
Project
Minbrie
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Eagle Ridge prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept is high-grade and indicates significant mineralization, but its novelty is low as it's a re-statement and reported as apparent width only. The presence of other base metals could imply processing challenges.

Positive factors

  • High-grade zinc intercept.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and re-stated.
  • Reported as apparent width only.
  • Polymetallic nature with other base metals may indicate processing complexities or penalty elements.

Evidence · text

“29.5m @ 0.8% Cu, 7.5% Pb, 1.9% Zn and 9g/t Ag in hole BUDD192 (apparent width)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

BUDD192Minbrie · silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BUDD192
Project
Minbrie
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Geometry

Grade
9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Eagle Ridge prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept adds value to the polymetallic mineralization, but its novelty is low as it's a re-statement and reported as apparent width only. The presence of other base metals could imply processing challenges.

Positive factors

  • Silver intercept adds value to the polymetallic mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and re-stated.
  • Reported as apparent width only.
  • Polymetallic nature with other base metals may indicate processing complexities or penalty elements.

Evidence · text

“29.5m @ 0.8% Cu, 7.5% Pb, 1.9% Zn and 9g/t Ag in hole BUDD192 (apparent width)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MBAC022Minbrie · leadGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MBAC022
Project
Minbrie
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
90 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MBAC022:90-96

Location

Location
Eagle Ridge
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new lead intercept confirms the up-dip continuity of mineralization and validates the geological model, which is positive for exploration. However, the grade is relatively low and it's reported as apparent width.

Positive factors

  • New drill result confirms mineralization continues up-dip.
  • Validates the geological model for the project.

Negative factors

  • Grade is relatively low.
  • Reported as apparent width only.

Evidence · text

“6m at 0.26% Pb and 0.22% Zn from 90m (MBAC022, apparent width)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MBAC022Minbrie · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MBAC022
Project
Minbrie
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
90 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MBAC022:90-96

Location

Location
Eagle Ridge
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new zinc intercept confirms the up-dip continuity of mineralization and validates the geological model, which is positive for exploration. However, the grade is relatively low and it's reported as apparent width.

Positive factors

  • New drill result confirms mineralization continues up-dip.
  • Validates the geological model for the project.

Negative factors

  • Grade is relatively low.
  • Reported as apparent width only.

Evidence · text

“6m at 0.26% Pb and 0.22% Zn from 90m (MBAC022, apparent width)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 7Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The successful renounceable Entitlement Issue raised a substantial amount of capital, providing crucial funding for the company's activities.

Positive factors

  • Successful capital raise provides significant funding for company operations.
  • Issue price of $0.005 per share indicates market confidence.

Evidence · text

“In September 2025 Lincoln completed a renounceable Entitlement Issue, raising $1,501,000 (before costs).”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 8Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Follow-On placement successfully raised additional capital, contributing to the company's funding needs.

Positive factors

  • Successful capital raise provides additional funding for company operations.
  • Follow-On placement on the same terms as the Entitlement Issue indicates consistent market interest.

Evidence · text

“A further $750,000 was raised in a Follow‑On placement on the same terms as the Entitlement Issue.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 9Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The first tranche of the strategic placement secured significant funding from a strategic investor at an improved share price, demonstrating increased investor confidence.

Positive factors

  • Binding commitment from a strategic investor provides strong financial backing.
  • Placement at A$0.012 per share indicates a higher valuation compared to previous raises.

Evidence · text

“Tranche 1 83.3 million New Shares were issued to raise A$1 million (before costs) using Lincoln’s placement capacity under ASX Listing Rule 7.1.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 10Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The approval and completion of the second tranche of the strategic placement secured significant additional funding, crucial for advancing the Minbrie Copper Project.

Positive factors

  • Shareholder approval for the second tranche of the strategic placement ensures substantial funding.
  • The placement includes free attaching options, providing additional incentive for investors.

Evidence · text

“Tranche 2 At an extraordinary general meeting held on 10 July 2026, shareholders approved the issue of 175 million New Shares and 129.2 million Attaching Options to raise A$2.1 million (before costs).”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 11Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The company's cash and cash equivalents increased significantly, providing a stronger financial position for future operations.

Positive factors

  • Increased cash balance compared to the previous year, indicating improved liquidity.

Evidence · table

“1,648,132”

Context: Cash and cash equivalents

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 12Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The company reported a substantial net loss, which is a negative financial indicator and contributes to the overall going concern uncertainty.

Negative factors

  • Significant net loss for the financial year, impacting profitability.
  • Contributes to the material uncertainty regarding going concern.

Evidence · table

“(2,198,849)”

Context: Loss after income tax expense for the year

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 13Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The company experienced a significant net cash outflow from operating activities, highlighting ongoing operational costs not covered by revenue.

Negative factors

  • Continued negative cash flow from operating activities, indicating reliance on financing for day-to-day operations.

Evidence · table

“(1,084,273)”

Context: Net cash used in operating activities

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 14Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The company had a net cash outflow from investing activities, mainly driven by exploration and evaluation expenditures, which is typical for an exploration company but contributes to overall cash burn.

Negative factors

  • Negative cash flow from investing activities, primarily due to exploration and evaluation payments.

Evidence · table

“(698,882)”

Context: Net cash used in investing activities

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 15Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The company generated substantial positive cash flow from financing activities, demonstrating its ability to raise capital to fund its operations and exploration programs.

Positive factors

  • Significant positive cash flow from financing activities, primarily from share issues, indicating successful capital raises.

Evidence · table

“2,810,095”

Context: Net cash from financing activities

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 16Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
australia_sa
Ticker
LML

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A cyber fraud incident resulted in a financial loss, highlighting a security breach, although a settlement is expected to recover the funds.

Positive factors

  • Company has executed a Deed of Settlement and Release to recover the funds.

Negative factors

  • Loss incurred due to a cyber fraud incident, indicating a security vulnerability.

Evidence · text

“During the year the Company identified two bank transactions to incorrect bank details as a result of a phishing scam resulting in a loss of $121,772 net of recoveries.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (35)

measuredKookaburra Graphite Project · graphiteTonnes: 1000000Grade: 11.77Grade Unit: %TGCContained Metal: 118Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kookaburra Graphite Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:e08d5688c2fab05b087f
Deposit or zone
Kookaburra Gully

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
1000000
Grade
11.77
Grade Unit
%TGC
Contained Metal
118
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
%TGC

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a high-confidence Measured resource for graphite, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence Measured resource category.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.

Evidence · table

“11.77”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedKookaburra Graphite Project · graphiteTonnes: 1440000Grade: 11.73Grade Unit: %TGCContained Metal: 169Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kookaburra Graphite Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:36f9b229d7b71fc7f39e
Deposit or zone
Kookaburra Gully

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1440000
Grade
11.73
Grade Unit
%TGC
Contained Metal
169
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
%TGC

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for graphite provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.

Evidence · table

“11.73”

Context: 1.44

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredKookaburra Graphite Project · graphiteTonnes: 1070000Grade: 11.66Grade Unit: %TGCContained Metal: 125Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kookaburra Graphite Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:d37d3a479b0585989c8d
Deposit or zone
Kookaburra Gully

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1070000
Grade
11.66
Grade Unit
%TGC
Contained Metal
125
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
%TGC

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for graphite is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.

Evidence · table

“11.66”

Context: 1.07

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedKookaburra Graphite Project · graphiteTonnes: 2840000Grade: 7.53Grade Unit: %TGCContained Metal: 214Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kookaburra Graphite Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:587d55c30473d9f52015
Deposit or zone
Koppio

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2840000
Grade
7.53
Grade Unit
%TGC
Contained Metal
214
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
%TGC

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for graphite provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.

Evidence · table

“7.53”

Context: 2.84

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredKookaburra Graphite Project · graphiteTonnes: 790000Grade: 6.72Grade Unit: %TGCContained Metal: 53Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kookaburra Graphite Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:6b081998ce398da4588a
Deposit or zone
Koppio

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
790000
Grade
6.72
Grade Unit
%TGC
Contained Metal
53
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
%TGC

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for graphite is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.

Evidence · table

“6.72”

Context: 0.79

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedKookaburra Graphite Project · graphiteTonnes: 580000Grade: 7.73Grade Unit: %TGCContained Metal: 45Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kookaburra Graphite Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:711e53d9deae47f0011a
Deposit or zone
Kookaburra Gully Extended

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
580000
Grade
7.73
Grade Unit
%TGC
Contained Metal
45
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
%TGC

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for graphite provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.

Evidence · table

“7.73”

Context: 0.58

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredKookaburra Graphite Project · graphiteTonnes: 5120000Grade: 4.86Grade Unit: %TGCContained Metal: 249Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kookaburra Graphite Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:991b7c8e082beaa536db
Deposit or zone
Kookaburra Gully Extended

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5120000
Grade
4.86
Grade Unit
%TGC
Contained Metal
249
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
%TGC

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for graphite is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.

Evidence · table

“4.86”

Context: 5.12

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

measuredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 10800000Grade: 22.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:cccc8dbb72b0f80462e2
Deposit or zone
Koppio

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
10800000
Grade
22.7
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a high-confidence Measured resource for iron, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence Measured resource category.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“22.7”

Context: 10.8

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

measuredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 10800000Grade: 52.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:cccc8dbb72b0f80462e2
Deposit or zone
Koppio

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
10800000
Grade
52.3
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a high-confidence Measured resource for silicon dioxide, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence Measured resource category.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“52.3”

Context: 10.8

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 106600000Grade: 24.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:874f525474559e12daf9
Deposit or zone
Koppio

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
106600000
Grade
24.3
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for iron provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“24.3”

Context: 106.6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 106600000Grade: 52Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:874f525474559e12daf9
Deposit or zone
Koppio

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
106600000
Grade
52
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for silicon dioxide provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“52”

Context: 106.6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 99600000Grade: 24.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:cbfb8601cff0b6c428b4
Deposit or zone
Koppio

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
99600000
Grade
24.5
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for iron is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“24.5”

Context: 99.6

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 99600000Grade: 52.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:cbfb8601cff0b6c428b4
Deposit or zone
Koppio

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
99600000
Grade
52.3
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for silicon dioxide is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“52.3”

Context: 99.6

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 155800000Grade: 24.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:5040aa810eb52305ffe5
Deposit or zone
Brennand

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
155800000
Grade
24.2
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for iron provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“24.2”

Context: 155.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 155800000Grade: 50.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:5040aa810eb52305ffe5
Deposit or zone
Brennand

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
155800000
Grade
50.8
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for silicon dioxide provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“50.8”

Context: 155.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 110400000Grade: 24.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:397150ada4cdcffd040f
Deposit or zone
Brennand

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
110400000
Grade
24.4
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for iron is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“24.4”

Context: 110.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 110400000Grade: 50.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:397150ada4cdcffd040f
Deposit or zone
Brennand

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
110400000
Grade
50.6
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for silicon dioxide is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“50.6”

Context: 110.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 289400000Grade: 26.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:4a53c1d1ea3aa5898ccc
Deposit or zone
Bald Hill

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
289400000
Grade
26.8
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource is entirely Inferred, indicating low confidence, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2012.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Resource is entirely in the Inferred category, indicating low geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2012, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“26.8”

Context: 289.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 289400000Grade: 51Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:4a53c1d1ea3aa5898ccc
Deposit or zone
Bald Hill

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
289400000
Grade
51
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource is entirely Inferred, indicating low confidence, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2012.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Resource is entirely in the Inferred category, indicating low geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2012, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“51”

Context: 289.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 38500000Grade: 29.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:7e64519398ca17951395
Deposit or zone
Kapperna

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
38500000
Grade
29.7
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for iron provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“29.7”

Context: 38.5

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 38500000Grade: 43.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:7e64519398ca17951395
Deposit or zone
Kapperna

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
38500000
Grade
43.1
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for silicon dioxide provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“43.1”

Context: 38.5

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 23300000Grade: 29.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:2a1883c20723c0c0311b
Deposit or zone
Kapperna

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23300000
Grade
29.7
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for iron is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“29.7”

Context: 23.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 23300000Grade: 43.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:2a1883c20723c0c0311b
Deposit or zone
Kapperna

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23300000
Grade
43.8
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for silicon dioxide is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“43.8”

Context: 23.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 135000000Grade: 25.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:5d2f1541e6bbcece2628
Deposit or zone
Iron Mount

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
135000000
Grade
25.5
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource is entirely Inferred, indicating low confidence, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Resource is entirely in the Inferred category, indicating low geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“25.5”

Context: 135

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 135000000Grade: 36.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:5d2f1541e6bbcece2628
Deposit or zone
Iron Mount

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
135000000
Grade
36.7
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource is entirely Inferred, indicating low confidence, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Resource is entirely in the Inferred category, indicating low geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“36.7”

Context: 135

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 72400000Grade: 27.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:d1990bb18a66119b51ba
Deposit or zone
Carrow

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
72400000
Grade
27.3
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for iron provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“27.3”

Context: 72.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 72400000Grade: 40.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:d1990bb18a66119b51ba
Deposit or zone
Carrow

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
72400000
Grade
40.1
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for silicon dioxide provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“40.1”

Context: 72.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 86800000Grade: 27.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:653cfa9511d7383800e9
Deposit or zone
Carrow

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
86800000
Grade
27.2
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for iron is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“27.2”

Context: 86.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 86800000Grade: 41.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:653cfa9511d7383800e9
Deposit or zone
Carrow

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
86800000
Grade
41.6
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for silicon dioxide is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“41.6”

Context: 86.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 12300000Grade: 26.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:b23dca99db7a5d6439b0
Deposit or zone
Barnes

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12300000
Grade
26.6
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for iron provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“26.6”

Context: 12.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 12300000Grade: 41.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:b23dca99db7a5d6439b0
Deposit or zone
Barnes

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12300000
Grade
41.1
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for silicon dioxide provides reasonable confidence, but its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“41.1”

Context: 12.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 88900000Grade: 23.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:09e1151490cac96bcae1
Deposit or zone
Barnes

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
88900000
Grade
23.5
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for iron is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“23.5”

Context: 88.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 88900000Grade: 44.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:09e1151490cac96bcae1
Deposit or zone
Barnes

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
88900000
Grade
44.1
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for silicon dioxide is speculative, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative with limited geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“44.1”

Context: 88.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · iron_oreTonnes: 3500000Grade: 27.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:b802c4cd7c8f4ca8c85a
Deposit or zone
Rifle Range

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
27.1
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource is entirely Inferred, indicating low confidence, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Resource is entirely in the Inferred category, indicating low geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“27.1”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredEyre Magnetite Project · silicon_dioxideTonnes: 3500000Grade: 38.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eyre Magnetite Project
Commodity
silicon_dioxide
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
LML

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Shane O’Connell
Resource group id
resource:b802c4cd7c8f4ca8c85a
Deposit or zone
Rifle Range

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
38.7
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-06-30

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource is entirely Inferred, indicating low confidence, and its novelty is low as no changes were reported for the current financial year, and the estimate is stale from 2004.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Resource is entirely in the Inferred category, indicating low geological confidence.
  • No material changes to the resource estimate in the current reporting period, indicating low novelty.
  • Estimate is from 2004, indicating it is stale.

Evidence · table

“38.7”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.