# LM8: Thick, High-Grade Gold Results De-Risk Lady Herial 2

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03150330

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-10-08T21:13:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-08T22:23:18.131Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-08T22:23:18.131Z

- Company: LUNNON METALS LIMITED

- Ticker: LM8

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: Western Australia

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results, Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-10-08 22:23:18 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Lunnon Metals Limited announced thick, high-grade gold results from infill drilling at its Lady Herial project, including 16m @ 9.14 g/t Au and 10m @ 4.45 g/t Au. These results confirm consistent mineralization, de-risking a potential open pit cut-back and aiming to upgrade resource categories. The company also provided an update on its current JORC-compliant gold mineral resource estimates for Lady Herial and Hustler, with Lady Herial's resource depleted by recent mining.

Reasoning: New high-grade and thick gold intercepts from infill drilling at Lady Herial confirm and extend mineralization, supporting a resource upgrade and de-risking a potential open pit cut-back. The results include bonanza grades and are supported by comprehensive QA/QC.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercepts

- Positive factor: Thick intercepts

- Positive factor: Infill drilling for resource upgrade

- Positive factor: De-risking potential open pit cut-back

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: True width approximated

Facts used in scoring: 48

## Classification and evidence

No classification tags are available.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 48. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (48)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-0)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.42
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4 m
- True Width: 4 m
- From: 62 m
- To: 66 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 62 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_459:62.0-66.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382773.7
- Northing: 6529984.7
- Elevation: 309.9 m
- Azimuth: 353.8 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.42

Context: 4.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-1)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.85
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 62 m
- To: 63 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 62 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_459:62.0-63.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382773.7
- Northing: 6529984.7
- Elevation: 309.9 m
- Azimuth: 353.8 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 3.85

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 3

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-2)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.11
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 64 m
- To: 65 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 62 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_459:64.0-65.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382773.7
- Northing: 6529984.7
- Elevation: 309.9 m
- Azimuth: 353.8 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.11

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 4

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-3)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.96
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 22 m
- To: 23 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 22 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_460:22.0-23.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382783.1
- Northing: 6529984.6
- Elevation: 310.3 m
- Azimuth: 301.9 °
- Dip: -89.1 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.96

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 5

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-4)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.45
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10 m
- True Width: 10 m
- From: 55 m
- To: 65 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 55 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_460:55.0-65.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382783.1
- Northing: 6529984.6
- Elevation: 310.3 m
- Azimuth: 301.9 °
- Dip: -89.1 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade and thick gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, confirming consistent mineralization and supporting resource upgrade.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: Thick intercept

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 4.45

Context: 10.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 6

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-5)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 35.93
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 55 m
- To: 56 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 55 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_460:55.0-56.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382783.1
- Northing: 6529984.6
- Elevation: 310.3 m
- Azimuth: 301.9 °
- Dip: -89.1 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Bonanza grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, significantly contributing to the overall high-grade intercept.

- Positive factor: Bonanza grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 35.93

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 35.93 g/t Au over 1.0m is well above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

> 35.93

Context: 1.0

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 7

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-6)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.59
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4 m
- True Width: 4 m
- From: 61 m
- To: 65 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 55 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_460:61.0-65.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382783.1
- Northing: 6529984.6
- Elevation: 310.3 m
- Azimuth: 301.9 °
- Dip: -89.1 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.59

Context: 4.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 8

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-7)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.17
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 5 m
- True Width: 5 m
- From: 55 m
- To: 60 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 55 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_461:55.0-60.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382793.3
- Northing: 6529984.1
- Elevation: 310.6 m
- Azimuth: 69.1 °
- Dip: -88.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.17

Context: 5.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 9

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-8)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.93
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2 m
- True Width: 2 m
- From: 55 m
- To: 57 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 55 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_461:55.0-57.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382793.3
- Northing: 6529984.1
- Elevation: 310.6 m
- Azimuth: 69.1 °
- Dip: -88.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.93

Context: 2.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-9)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.98
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 68 m
- To: 69 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 55 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_461:68.0-69.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382793.3
- Northing: 6529984.1
- Elevation: 310.6 m
- Azimuth: 69.1 °
- Dip: -88.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.98

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 11

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-10)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.51
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 52 m
- To: 53 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 52 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_462:52.0-53.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382803
- Northing: 6529983.5
- Elevation: 310.6 m
- Azimuth: 28.7 °
- Dip: -89.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.51

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 12

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-11)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.65
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 55 m
- To: 56 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 52 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_462:55.0-56.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382803
- Northing: 6529983.5
- Elevation: 310.6 m
- Azimuth: 28.7 °
- Dip: -89.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.65

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 13

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-12)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.73
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10 m
- True Width: 10 m
- From: 49 m
- To: 59 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 49 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_482:49.0-59.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382813
- Northing: 6529982.8
- Elevation: 310.8 m
- Azimuth: 13.1 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 5 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.73

Context: 10.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 14

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-13)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.12
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 50 m
- To: 51 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 49 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_482:50.0-51.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382813
- Northing: 6529982.8
- Elevation: 310.8 m
- Azimuth: 13.1 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 5 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, significantly contributing to the overall intercept.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 7.12

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 15

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-14)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.55
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 17 m
- To: 18 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 17 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_483:17.0-18.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382772.8
- Northing: 6529962.5
- Elevation: 310 m
- Azimuth: 270.4 °
- Dip: -89.2 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.55

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 16

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-15)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.53
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 53 m
- To: 54 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 17 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_483:53.0-54.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382772.8
- Northing: 6529962.5
- Elevation: 310 m
- Azimuth: 270.4 °
- Dip: -89.2 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.53

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 17

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-16)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.98
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 61 m
- To: 62 m
- Hole Depth: 72 m
- Intercept Depth: 17 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_483:61.0-62.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382772.8
- Northing: 6529962.5
- Elevation: 310 m
- Azimuth: 270.4 °
- Dip: -89.2 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.98

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 18

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-17)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.52
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 21 m
- To: 22 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 21 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_484:21.0-22.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382782.8
- Northing: 6529963
- Elevation: 310.2 m
- Azimuth: 48.3 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 3 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.52

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 19

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-18)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.15
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6 m
- True Width: 6 m
- From: 52 m
- To: 58 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 21 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_484:52.0-58.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382782.8
- Northing: 6529963
- Elevation: 310.2 m
- Azimuth: 48.3 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 3 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.15

Context: 6.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 20

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-19)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.53
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 52 m
- To: 53 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 21 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_484:52.0-53.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382782.8
- Northing: 6529963
- Elevation: 310.2 m
- Azimuth: 48.3 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 3 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 2.53

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 21

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-20)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.23
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 57 m
- To: 58 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 21 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_484:57.0-58.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382782.8
- Northing: 6529963
- Elevation: 310.2 m
- Azimuth: 48.3 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 3 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 3.23

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 22

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-21)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.28
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2 m
- True Width: 2 m
- From: 24 m
- To: 26 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 24 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_485:24.0-26.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382793
- Northing: 6529963.2
- Elevation: 310.4 m
- Azimuth: 81.2 °
- Dip: -89.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 5 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 3.28

Context: 2.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 23

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-22)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 9.14
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 16 m
- True Width: 16 m
- From: 44 m
- To: 60 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 44 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_485:44.0-60.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382793
- Northing: 6529963.2
- Elevation: 310.4 m
- Azimuth: 81.2 °
- Dip: -89.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 5 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade and thick gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, confirming consistent mineralization and supporting resource upgrade.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: Thick intercept

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 9.14

Context: 16.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 9.14 g/t Au over 16.0m is well above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

> 9.14

Context: 16.0

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 24

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-23)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.06
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 48 m
- To: 49 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 44 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_485:48.0-49.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382793
- Northing: 6529963.2
- Elevation: 310.4 m
- Azimuth: 81.2 °
- Dip: -89.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 5 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.06

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 25

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-24)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 122.78
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 51 m
- To: 52 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 44 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_485:51.0-52.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382793
- Northing: 6529963.2
- Elevation: 310.4 m
- Azimuth: 81.2 °
- Dip: -89.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 5 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional bonanza grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, significantly boosting the overall intercept grade.

- Positive factor: Bonanza grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 122.78

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 122.78 g/t Au over 1.0m is well above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

> 122.78

Context: 1.0

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 26

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-25)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.94
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- True Width: 3 m
- From: 57 m
- To: 60 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 44 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_485:57.0-60.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382793
- Northing: 6529963.2
- Elevation: 310.4 m
- Azimuth: 81.2 °
- Dip: -89.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 5 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, significantly contributing to the overall intercept.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 6.94

Context: 3.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 6.94 g/t Au over 3.0m is well above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

> 6.94

Context: 3.0

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 27

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-26)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 18 m
- True Width: 18 m
- From: 40 m
- To: 58 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 40 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_486:40.0-58.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382802.5
- Northing: 6529962.9
- Elevation: 310.6 m
- Azimuth: 338.8 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 7 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.50

Context: 18.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 28

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-27)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.8
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 56 m
- To: 57 m
- Hole Depth: 66 m
- Intercept Depth: 40 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_486:56.0-57.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382802.5
- Northing: 6529962.9
- Elevation: 310.6 m
- Azimuth: 338.8 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 7 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 3.80

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 29

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-28)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.87
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 14 m
- True Width: 14 m
- From: 39 m
- To: 53 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 39 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_487:39.0-53.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382812.4
- Northing: 6529963.1
- Elevation: 311.2 m
- Azimuth: 293.1 °
- Dip: -89.5 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade and thick gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, confirming consistent mineralization and supporting resource upgrade.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: Thick intercept

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 2.87

Context: 14.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 30

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-29)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.25
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 39 m
- To: 40 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 39 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_487:39.0-40.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382812.4
- Northing: 6529963.1
- Elevation: 311.2 m
- Azimuth: 293.1 °
- Dip: -89.5 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.25

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 31

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-30)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 8.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2 m
- True Width: 2 m
- From: 42 m
- To: 44 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 39 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_487:42.0-44.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382812.4
- Northing: 6529963.1
- Elevation: 311.2 m
- Azimuth: 293.1 °
- Dip: -89.5 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, significantly contributing to the overall intercept.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 8.40

Context: 2.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 8.40 g/t Au over 2.0m is well above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

> 8.40

Context: 2.0

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 32

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-31)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.22
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 47 m
- To: 48 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 39 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_487:47.0-48.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382812.4
- Northing: 6529963.1
- Elevation: 311.2 m
- Azimuth: 293.1 °
- Dip: -89.5 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, significantly contributing to the overall intercept.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 6.22

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 6.22 g/t Au over 1.0m is well above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

> 6.22

Context: 1.0

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 33

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-32)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 5.39
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2 m
- True Width: 2 m
- From: 51 m
- To: 53 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 39 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_487:51.0-53.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382812.4
- Northing: 6529963.1
- Elevation: 311.2 m
- Azimuth: 293.1 °
- Dip: -89.5 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, significantly contributing to the overall intercept.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 5.39

Context: 2.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 5.39 g/t Au over 2.0m is above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

> 5.39

Context: 2.0

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 34

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-33)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.14
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 14 m
- True Width: 14 m
- From: 37 m
- To: 51 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 37 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_488:37.0-51.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382822.3
- Northing: 6529962.6
- Elevation: 311.4 m
- Azimuth: 252.4 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade and thick gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, confirming consistent mineralization and supporting resource upgrade.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: Thick intercept

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 2.14

Context: 14.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 35

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-34)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.12
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 37 m
- To: 38 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 37 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_488:37.0-38.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382822.3
- Northing: 6529962.6
- Elevation: 311.4 m
- Azimuth: 252.4 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.12

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 36

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-35)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.89
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2 m
- True Width: 2 m
- From: 40 m
- To: 42 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 37 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_488:40.0-42.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382822.3
- Northing: 6529962.6
- Elevation: 311.4 m
- Azimuth: 252.4 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 2.89

Context: 2.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 37

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-36)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.91
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 5 m
- True Width: 5 m
- From: 46 m
- To: 51 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 37 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_488:46.0-51.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382822.3
- Northing: 6529962.6
- Elevation: 311.4 m
- Azimuth: 252.4 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 3.91

Context: 5.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 38

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-37)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.67
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 36 m
- To: 37 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 36 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_489:36.0-37.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382832.6
- Northing: 6529962.6
- Elevation: 311.6 m
- Azimuth: 97.1 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 0.67

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 39

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-38)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.18
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6 m
- True Width: 6 m
- From: 44 m
- To: 50 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 36 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_489:44.0-50.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382832.6
- Northing: 6529962.6
- Elevation: 311.6 m
- Azimuth: 97.1 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.18

Context: 6.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 40

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-39)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.32
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2 m
- True Width: 2 m
- From: 44 m
- To: 46 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 36 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_489:44.0-46.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382832.6
- Northing: 6529962.6
- Elevation: 311.6 m
- Azimuth: 97.1 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 2.32

Context: 2.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 41

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-40)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.35
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 48 m
- To: 49 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 36 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_489:48.0-49.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382832.6
- Northing: 6529962.6
- Elevation: 311.6 m
- Azimuth: 97.1 °
- Dip: -89.8 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold sub-interval from infill drilling at Lady Herial, contributing to resource definition.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.35

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 42

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-41)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.27
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 21 m
- To: 22 m
- Hole Depth: 60 m
- Intercept Depth: 21 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_491:21.0-22.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382842.3
- Northing: 6529962.7
- Elevation: 311.6 m
- Azimuth: 24.6 °
- Dip: -89.4 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.27

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 43

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-42)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.48
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2 m
- True Width: 2 m
- From: 16 m
- To: 18 m
- Hole Depth: 54 m
- Intercept Depth: 16 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_492:16.0-18.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382779.9
- Northing: 6529942.9
- Elevation: 310.2 m
- Azimuth: 237.2 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.48

Context: 2.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 44

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-43)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.71
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 28 m
- To: 29 m
- Hole Depth: 54 m
- Intercept Depth: 16 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_492:28.0-29.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382779.9
- Northing: 6529942.9
- Elevation: 310.2 m
- Azimuth: 237.2 °
- Dip: -89.3 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.71

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 45

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-44)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.58
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- True Width: 3 m
- From: 20 m
- To: 23 m
- Hole Depth: 54 m
- Intercept Depth: 20 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_493:20.0-23.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382790
- Northing: 6529942.9
- Elevation: 310.5 m
- Azimuth: 51.2 °
- Dip: -88.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 2.58

Context: 3.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 46

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-45)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 47 m
- To: 48 m
- Hole Depth: 54 m
- Intercept Depth: 20 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_493:47.0-48.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382790
- Northing: 6529942.9
- Elevation: 310.5 m
- Azimuth: 51.2 °
- Dip: -88.7 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: Good grade gold

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 2.40

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au is clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 47

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-46)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.48
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- True Width: 1 m
- From: 23 m
- To: 24 m
- Hole Depth: 54 m
- Intercept Depth: 23 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_494:23.0-24.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: Other
- Easting: 382810.3
- Northing: 6529942.3
- Elevation: 311.2 m
- Azimuth: 106 °
- Dip: -89.6 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 4 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Lady Herial.

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

- Positive factor: Compositing transparent

Evidence · table

> 1.48

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program's objective was to reduce drill spacing to improve geological and grade estimation confidence and increase resource categories.

Evidence · text

> The program’s objective was to reduce the drill spacing on the known gold mineralisation \(i.e. inside the existing Mineral Resource\), to better than an approximate 20m x 10m spacing, thereby improving geological and grade estimation confidence, and if successful, increasing the category of the mineralisation from Inferred to Indicated and potentially Indicated to Measured.

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

#### Rejected tags

**True Width Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document states 'drill widths approximate true widths'.

Evidence · text

> drill widths approximate true widths

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The document includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, detailing laboratory procedures, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The following Table 1 provides the requisite details relevant to today’s reported results.

**Compositing Transparent** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

> &gt;0.5 g/t Au cut-off, drill widths approximate true widths; see Annexure 2 for full results and Figures 3 &amp; 4 for cross sectional views\).

### Fact 48

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/lm8-thick-high-grade-gold-results-de-risk-lady-herial-2--682a2cf8-ed6c-4301-8b04-247f55c30b17#fact-drill-facts-47)

Lady Herial · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lady Herial
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: australia\_wa
- Ticker: LM8

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.02
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 18 m
- True Width: 18 m
- From: 29 m
- To: 47 m
- Hole Depth: 54 m
- Intercept Depth: 29 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: LDH26RC\_494:29.0-47.0
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Location: NWP
- Easting: 382810.3
- Northing: 6529942.3
- Elevation: 311.2 m
- Azimuth: 106 °
- Dip: -89.6 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: Intertek Genalysis
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 4 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

- Positive factor: High-grade gold

- Positive factor: Thick intercept

- Positive factor: True width approximated

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed

Evidence · table

> 2.02

Context: 18.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**True Width Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true\_width\_m is 18

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Gold has been produced in the area since the discovery of the Red Hill gold mine in 1896 \(adjacent to the Company’s hist"

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
