LDR: Annual Report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Lode Resources Ltd
- Ticker
- LDR
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Tasmania
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Antimony, Tin, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Gold
- Document categories
- Resource update, Drill results, Capital raise, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 07:52:12 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Lode Resources Ltd reported a transformational year, highlighted by a maiden JORC Mineral Resource Estimate at its Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project in Tasmania, totaling 480kt at 533g/t AgEq for 8.2Moz AgEq, with 65% classified as Indicated. The company also announced new silver-zinc and tin-copper-silver discoveries at Montezuma, along with strong metallurgical recoveries and high-grade exploration results from other projects in Tasmania and New South Wales. A successful $4.5 million capital raise further strengthened the balance sheet to fund ongoing exploration and development studies.
Reasoning: Lode Resources delivered a significant maiden JORC Mineral Resource Estimate for its flagship Montezuma project, made new high-grade discoveries, reported strong metallurgical recoveries, and completed a capital raise, positioning the company for future development and resource expansion.
Positive factors
- Maiden JORC Mineral Resource Estimate for Montezuma project
- High proportion of Indicated resource (65%) in maiden MRE
- Discovery of new silver-zinc and tin-copper-silver mineralisation systems at Montezuma
- Strong metallurgical recoveries for key metals at Montezuma
- Successful capital raise strengthening balance sheet and funding future work
- High-grade surface sample results from new acquisitions (Silver Hills, Blocks East, Fahlore)
- Ongoing exploration success at New England Antimony and Uralla Gold projects
Negative factors
- Individual metal grades for silver, antimony, lead, and copper are not reported for the Montezuma resource estimate, only a silver equivalent grade
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 145
Classification and evidence
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("flotation")
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 145. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (55)
MZS42Montezuma Silver & Antimony · zincGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MZS42
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 2.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole MZS42 discovered a new high-grade silver-zinc mineralisation system at Montezuma, significantly expanding the project's resource growth potential with a good true width estimate.
Positive factors
- Discovery of a new silver-zinc mineralisation system, opening new exploration avenues
- High zinc grade (6.2%) over a significant width (6.4m)
- True width estimate provided (2.8m), increasing confidence in geometry
- Comparable to grades at world-class operations in the region
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony and potential arsenic from mineralisation complexity
Evidence · text
“6.40m @ 6.2% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.8
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MZS42Montezuma Silver & Antimony · leadGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MZS42
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 2.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grades contribute positively to the newly discovered silver-zinc system, enhancing the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Positive factors
- Significant lead grade (1.5%) contributing to the new polymetallic discovery
- True width estimate provided (2.8m)
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony and potential arsenic from mineralisation complexity
Evidence · text
“1.5% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.8
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MZS42Montezuma Silver & Antimony · antimonyGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MZS42
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 2.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The presence of antimony in the new silver-zinc discovery further enhances the polymetallic nature of the Montezuma project.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.1%) in the new silver-zinc discovery adds to polymetallic potential
- True width estimate provided (2.8m)
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony and potential arsenic from mineralisation complexity
Evidence · text
“0.1% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.8
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MZS42Montezuma Silver & Antimony · silverGrade: 43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MZS42
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 2.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades in the new silver-zinc discovery are encouraging and contribute to the overall polymetallic potential of the Montezuma project.
Positive factors
- Silver grade (43 g/t) in the new silver-zinc discovery adds to polymetallic potential
- True width estimate provided (2.8m)
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony and potential arsenic from mineralisation complexity
Evidence · text
“43g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.8
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MZS42Montezuma Silver & Antimony · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MZS42
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 2.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grades in the new silver-zinc discovery add to the polymetallic nature of the Montezuma project.
Positive factors
- Gold presence (0.1 g/t) in the new silver-zinc discovery adds to polymetallic potential
- True width estimate provided (2.8m)
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony and potential arsenic from mineralisation complexity
Evidence · text
“0.1g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.8
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MZS43Montezuma Silver & Antimony · tinGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MZS43
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 133.5 m
- To
- 134 m
- Hole Depth
- 133.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 133.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MZS43:133.5-134
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very high-grade tin intercept from the newly discovered Moores Lode significantly enhances the polymetallic potential of the Montezuma project.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin (7.3%) over a narrow interval, indicating bonanza potential
- Discovery of the new Moores Lode, expanding mineralisation footprint
- Intercept from drilling designed to test hanging wall stratigraphy, confirming new targets
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.5m)
- Presence of antimony and potential arsenic from mineralisation complexity
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MZS43Montezuma Silver & Antimony · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MZS43
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 134.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 133.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 134 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MZS43:134-134.5
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Gold grades in the newly discovered Moores Lode contribute to the polymetallic nature of the Montezuma project.
Positive factors
- Gold presence (0.70 ppm) in the new Moores Lode adds to polymetallic potential
- Discovery of the new Moores Lode, expanding mineralisation footprint
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.5m)
- Presence of antimony and potential arsenic from mineralisation complexity
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MZS43Montezuma Silver & Antimony · tinGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MZS43
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 133.5 m
- To
- 134.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 133.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 133.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MZS43:133.5-134.5
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade tin intercept from the new Moores Lode confirms significant polymetallic potential at Montezuma.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin (3.7%) over a 1.0m interval from the new Moores Lode
- Discovery of the new Moores Lode, expanding mineralisation footprint
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony and potential arsenic from mineralisation complexity
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MAG010Magwood Antimony · antimonyGrade: 9.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAG010
- Project
- Magwood Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The first drilling program at Magwood returned very high-grade antimony intercepts, indicating significant unmined potential at this historic producer.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (9.92%) over a significant width (4.8m)
- First drilling program at historic Magwood mine, indicating high novelty
- Potential for significant unmined in situ antimony vein style mineralisation
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“9.92% Sb over 4.8m in drill hole MAG010”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MAG010Magwood Antimony · antimonyGrade: 19.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAG010
- Project
- Magwood Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional high-grade antimony sub-interval from the first drilling at Magwood highlights bonanza potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade antimony (19.61%) over a good width (2.4m)
- First drilling program at historic Magwood mine, indicating high novelty
- Potential for significant unmined in situ antimony vein style mineralisation
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“incl. 19.61% Sb over 2.4m in drill hole MAG010”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MAG010Magwood Antimony · antimonyGrade: 28.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAG010
- Project
- Magwood Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional high-grade antimony sub-interval from the first drilling at Magwood highlights bonanza potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade antimony (28.57%) over a good width (1.3m)
- First drilling program at historic Magwood mine, indicating high novelty
- Potential for significant unmined in situ antimony vein style mineralisation
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“incl. 28.57% Sb over 1.3m in drill hole MAG010”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MAG010Magwood Antimony · antimonyGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAG010
- Project
- Magwood Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade antimony intercepts from the first drilling at Magwood indicate significant potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (1.96%) over a good width (3.0m)
- First drilling program at historic Magwood mine, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“1.96% Sb over 3.0m in drill hole MAG010”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MAG010Magwood Antimony · antimonyGrade: 16.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAG010
- Project
- Magwood Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional high-grade antimony sub-interval from the first drilling at Magwood highlights bonanza potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade antimony (16.60%) over a narrow interval
- First drilling program at historic Magwood mine, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.3m)
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“incl. 16.60% Sb over 0.3m in drill hole MAG010”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MAG010Magwood Antimony · antimonyGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAG010
- Project
- Magwood Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade antimony intercepts from the first drilling at Magwood indicate significant potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (2.20%) over a narrow interval
- First drilling program at historic Magwood mine, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“2.20% Sb over 1.9m in drill hole MAG010”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MAG008Magwood Antimony · antimonyGrade: 19.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAG008
- Project
- Magwood Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional high-grade antimony intercept from the first drilling at Magwood highlights bonanza potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade antimony (19.20%) over a very narrow interval
- First drilling program at historic Magwood mine, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.2m)
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“19.20% Sb over 0.2m in drill hole MAG008”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
MAG007Magwood Antimony · antimonyGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAG007
- Project
- Magwood Antimony
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade antimony intercepts from the first drilling at Magwood indicate significant potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (1.28%) over a narrow interval
- First drilling program at historic Magwood mine, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“1.28% Sb over 0.9m in drill hole MAG007”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA003Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA003
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 34 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA003:32-34
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: First pass drilling at Rock Abbey returned high-grade antimony, indicating significant exploration potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (1.31%) over a good width (2.0m)
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“1.31”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA003Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA003
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA003:32-33
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade antimony sub-interval from first pass drilling at Rock Abbey highlights good potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (2.22%) over a narrow interval
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“2.22”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA005Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA005
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 41 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA005:39-41
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: First pass drilling at Rock Abbey returned lower-grade antimony, but confirms mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.30%) over a good width (2.0m)
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Lower grade antimony
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA005Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA005
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA005:39-40
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A lower-grade antimony sub-interval from first pass drilling at Rock Abbey confirms mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.42%) over a narrow interval
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Lower grade antimony
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA014Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA014
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA014:49-51
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: First pass drilling at Rock Abbey returned antimony grades, confirming mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.96%) over a good width (2.0m)
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.96”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA014Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA014
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA014:49-50
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade antimony sub-interval from first pass drilling at Rock Abbey highlights good potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (1.72%) over a narrow interval
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“1.72”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA015Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA015
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 59 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA015:59-61
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: First pass drilling at Rock Abbey returned high-grade antimony, indicating significant exploration potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (3.15%) over a good width (2.0m)
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“3.15”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA015Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 6.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA015
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 59 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA015:59-60
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very high-grade antimony sub-interval from first pass drilling at Rock Abbey highlights strong potential.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (6.18%) over a narrow interval
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“6.18”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
RKA016Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect · antimonyGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RKA016
- Project
- Rock Abbey Antimony Prospect
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 71 m
- To
- 72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 71 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RKA016:71-72
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: First pass drilling at Rock Abbey returned lower-grade antimony, but confirms mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.19%) over a narrow interval
- First pass drilling program, indicating high novelty
Negative factors
- Lower grade antimony
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
KTN018Uralla West · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN018
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN018:24-33
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN018 returned moderate gold grades over a significant width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.0 g/t) over a significant width (9.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN018Uralla West · goldGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN018
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN018:31-33
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold sub-interval from KTN018 further supports the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (1.92 g/t) over a narrow interval
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“1.92”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN023Uralla West · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN023
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN023:26-32
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN023 returned moderate gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.22 g/t) over a good width (6.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“1.22”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN023Uralla West · goldGrade: 2.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN023
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 28 m
- To
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 28 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN023:28-31
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold sub-interval from KTN023 further supports the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.11 g/t) over a good width (3.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“2.11”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN027AUralla West · goldGrade: 3.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN027A
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN027A:30-32
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN027A returned strong gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.35 g/t) over a good width (2.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“3.35”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN025Uralla West · goldGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN025
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 20 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN025:16-20
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN025 returned moderate gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.51 g/t) over a good width (4.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“1.51”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN025Uralla West · goldGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN025
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 17 m
- To
- 19 m
- Intercept Depth
- 17 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN025:17-19
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold sub-interval from KTN025 further supports the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.53 g/t) over a good width (2.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN021Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN021
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 27 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN021:27-37
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN021 returned weak gold grades over a significant width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.57 g/t) over a significant width (10.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN021Uralla West · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN021
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN021:32-37
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold sub-interval from KTN021 further supports the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.0 g/t) over a good width (5.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: 5.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN031AUralla West · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN031A
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN031A:20-25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN031A returned moderate gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.02 g/t) over a good width (5.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 5.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN026AUralla West · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN026A
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 58 m
- To
- 64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 58 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN026A:58-64
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN026A returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.72 g/t) over a good width (6.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN026AUralla West · goldGrade: 3.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN026A
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 63 m
- To
- 64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN026A:63-64
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold sub-interval from KTN026A further supports the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.19 g/t) over a narrow interval
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“3.19”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN017BUralla West · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN017B
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN017B:46-50
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN017B returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.90 g/t) over a good width (4.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN017BUralla West · goldGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN017B
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 48 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN017B:46-48
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold sub-interval from KTN017B further supports the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.55 g/t) over a good width (2.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“1.55”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN036Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN036
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 18 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN036:7-18
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN036 returned weak gold grades over a significant width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.31 g/t) over a significant width (11.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 11.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN036Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN036
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 17 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN036:13-17
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold sub-interval from KTN036 further supports the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.57 g/t) over a good width (4.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN027BUralla West · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN027B
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 69 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN027B:64-69
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN027B returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.50 g/t) over a good width (5.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 5.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN030Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN030
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 74 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN030:74-80
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN030 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.41 g/t) over a good width (6.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN031BUralla West · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN031B
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 47 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN031B:47-51
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN031B returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.42 g/t) over a good width (4.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN028Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN028
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 43 m
- To
- 46 m
- Intercept Depth
- 43 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN028:43-46
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN028 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.53 g/t) over a good width (3.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN033Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN033
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 26 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN033:22-26
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN033 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.36 g/t) over a good width (4.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN017AUralla West · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN017A
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN017A:38-40
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN017A returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.71 g/t) over a good width (2.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN044Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN044
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 43 m
- To
- 46 m
- Intercept Depth
- 43 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN044:43-46
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN044 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.45 g/t) over a good width (3.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN022Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN022
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN022:33-35
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN022 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.57 g/t) over a good width (2.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN043Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN043
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN043:22-25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN043 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.35 g/t) over a good width (3.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN032Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN032
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 1 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN032:1-3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN032 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.52 g/t) over a good width (2.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN026BUralla West · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN026B
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 75 m
- To
- 77 m
- Intercept Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN026B:75-77
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN026B returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.49 g/t) over a good width (2.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN034Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN034
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN034:34-37
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN034 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.32 g/t) over a good width (3.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN041Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN041
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 34 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN041:32-34
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Drill hole KTN041 returned weak gold grades over a good width, supporting the IRGS model at Uralla.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.38 g/t) over a good width (2.0m)
- Consistent with IRGS deposit model, suggesting potential for larger system
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
KTN001Uralla West · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KTN001
- Project
- Uralla West
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- LDR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 12 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KTN001:5-12
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.65 g/t) over a significant width (7.0m)
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Resource Estimates (86)
indicatedMontezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverTonnes: 480000Contained Metal: 8.2Contained Unit: moz ageqView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Tim Callaghan
- Resource group id
- resource:773a362c73c47382d986
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 480000
- Contained Metal
- 8.2
- Contained Unit
- moz ageq
- Cutoff Grade
- 200
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-04-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 533
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS Metallurgy (Burnie)
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden JORC MRE for Montezuma establishes a significant high-grade polymetallic resource with a high proportion of Indicated material, supporting future development, despite the lack of individual metal grades in the summary table.
Positive factors
- Maiden JORC Mineral Resource Estimate establishes a baseline for the project
- High-grade silver equivalent (533 g/t AgEq) indicates strong economic potential
- Significant contained metal (8.2 Moz AgEq) for a maiden resource
- High proportion of Indicated resource (65%) provides good geological confidence
- Robust underground mining potential highlighted by the cut-off grade
- Metal equivalent assumptions (prices, recoveries) are disclosed, enhancing transparency
Negative factors
- Individual metal grades for silver, antimony, lead, and copper are not reported for the resource estimate, only a silver equivalent grade
Evidence · table
“533”
Context: 480
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Fact 2Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverGrade: 1630Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1630
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade system similar to Montezuma.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade silver (1,630 g/t) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“1,630”
Context: MR0015
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 3Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · antimonyGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 3.07
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade system similar to Montezuma.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (3.07%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“3.07”
Context: MR0015
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 4Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · copperGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 2.14
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade system similar to Montezuma.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper (2.14%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“2.14”
Context: MR0015
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 5Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverGrade: 306Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 306
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (306 g/t) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“306”
Context: MR0016
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 6Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · antimonyGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Antimony presence in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.72%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: MR0016
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 7Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper presence in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Copper presence (0.26%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: MR0016
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 8Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverGrade: 5650Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 5650
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (5,650 g/t) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“5,650”
Context: F003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 9Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · antimonyGrade: 8.04Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 8.04
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (8.04%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“8.04”
Context: F003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 10Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · copperGrade: 8.42Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 8.42
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade copper in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade copper (8.42%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“8.42”
Context: F003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 11Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverGrade: 4070Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 4070
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (4,070 g/t) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“4,070”
Context: F004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 12Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · antimonyGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (4.40%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“4.40”
Context: F004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 13Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · copperGrade: 3.95Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 3.95
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade copper in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade copper (3.95%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“3.95”
Context: F004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 14Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverGrade: 615Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 615
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (615 g/t) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“615”
Context: F005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 15Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · antimonyGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Antimony presence in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.64%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: F005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 16Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · copperGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper presence in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Copper presence (0.73%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: F005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 17Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverGrade: 5120Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 5120
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (5,120 g/t) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“5,120”
Context: F006
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 18Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · antimonyGrade: 7.73Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 7.73
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (7.73%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“7.73”
Context: F006
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 19Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · copperGrade: 7.73Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 7.73
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade copper in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade copper (7.73%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“7.73”
Context: F006
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 20Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverGrade: 666Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 666
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates strong exploration potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (666 g/t) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“666”
Context: F007
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 21Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · antimonyGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Antimony presence in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.84%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: F007
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 22Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project · copperGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:220ec607b7e72c9af849
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper presence in surface grab samples from Fahlore indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Copper presence (1.01%) from Fahlore mine dump samples, indicating potential
- Fahlore deposit mineralisation is similar to Montezuma, suggesting continuity of style
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: F007
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 23Greater Montezuma Project · silverGrade: 1630Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1630
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade silver (1,630 g/t) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“1,630”
Context: MR0015
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 24Greater Montezuma Project · antimonyGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 3.07
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (3.07%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“3.07”
Context: MR0015
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 25Greater Montezuma Project · leadGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 3.39
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade lead in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- High-grade lead (3.39%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“3.39”
Context: MR0015
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 26Greater Montezuma Project · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence (0.07%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: MR0015
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 27Greater Montezuma Project · copperGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 2.14
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper (2.14%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“2.14”
Context: MR0015
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 28Greater Montezuma Project · silverGrade: 306Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 306
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (306 g/t) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“306”
Context: MR0016
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 29Greater Montezuma Project · antimonyGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Antimony presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.72%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: MR0016
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 30Greater Montezuma Project · leadGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Lead presence (1.03%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: MR0016
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 31Greater Montezuma Project · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence (0.01%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: MR0016
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 32Greater Montezuma Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Copper presence (0.26%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: MR0016
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 33Greater Montezuma Project · silverGrade: 5650Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 5650
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (5,650 g/t) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“5,650”
Context: BE001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 34Greater Montezuma Project · antimonyGrade: 8.04Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 8.04
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (8.04%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“8.04”
Context: BE001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 35Greater Montezuma Project · leadGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1.82
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade lead in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- High-grade lead (1.82%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“1.82”
Context: BE001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 36Greater Montezuma Project · zincGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence (0.47%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: BE001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 37Greater Montezuma Project · copperGrade: 8.42Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 8.42
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade copper in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade copper (8.42%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“8.42”
Context: BE001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 38Greater Montezuma Project · silverGrade: 4070Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 4070
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (4,070 g/t) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“4,070”
Context: BE002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 39Greater Montezuma Project · antimonyGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (4.4%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: BE002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 40Greater Montezuma Project · leadGrade: 4.52Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 4.52
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade lead (4.52%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“4.52”
Context: BE002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 41Greater Montezuma Project · zincGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence (0.13%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: BE002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 42Greater Montezuma Project · copperGrade: 3.95Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 3.95
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade copper in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade copper (3.95%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“3.95”
Context: BE002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 43Greater Montezuma Project · silverGrade: 615Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 615
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (615 g/t) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“615”
Context: BE003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 44Greater Montezuma Project · antimonyGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Antimony presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.64%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: BE003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 45Greater Montezuma Project · leadGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Lead presence (0.16%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: BE003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 46Greater Montezuma Project · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence (0.05%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: BE003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 47Greater Montezuma Project · copperGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Copper presence (0.73%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: BE003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 48Greater Montezuma Project · silverGrade: 5120Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 5120
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (5,120 g/t) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“5,120”
Context: BE004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 49Greater Montezuma Project · antimonyGrade: 7.73Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 7.73
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration upside.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (7.73%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“7.73”
Context: BE004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 50Greater Montezuma Project · leadGrade: 11.75Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 11.75
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade lead (11.75%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“11.75”
Context: BE004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 51Greater Montezuma Project · zincGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence (0.17%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: BE004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 52Greater Montezuma Project · copperGrade: 7.73Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 7.73
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade copper in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade copper (7.73%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“7.73”
Context: BE004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 53Greater Montezuma Project · silverGrade: 666Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 666
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade mineralised system.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (666 g/t) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“666”
Context: BE005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 54Greater Montezuma Project · antimonyGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Antimony presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.84%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: BE005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 55Greater Montezuma Project · leadGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Lead presence (0.86%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: BE005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 56Greater Montezuma Project · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence (0.03%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: BE005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 57Greater Montezuma Project · copperGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Greater Montezuma Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:22df8f383770babe557b
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper presence in surface grab samples from Blocks East indicates polymetallic exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Copper presence (1.01%) from Blocks East dump samples, indicating polymetallic potential
- Historical workings and anomalous soils extend over 400m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: BE005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 58Silver Hills Project · silverGrade: 9370Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 9370
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (9,370 g/t) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“9,370 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 59Silver Hills Project · antimonyGrade: 8.48Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 8.48
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (8.48%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“8.48% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 60Silver Hills Project · leadGrade: 16.05Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 16.05
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade lead (16.05%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“16.05% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 61Silver Hills Project · silverGrade: 4110Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 4110
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (4,110 g/t) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“4,110 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 62Silver Hills Project · antimonyGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony (2.27%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“2.27% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 63Silver Hills Project · leadGrade: 81Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 81
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade lead (81.00%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“81.00% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 64Silver Hills Project · silverGrade: 726Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 726
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates strong exploration potential in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (726 g/t) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“726 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 65Silver Hills Project · antimonyGrade: 18.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 18.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade antimony (18.60%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“18.60% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 66Silver Hills Project · leadGrade: 43.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 43.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade lead (43.40%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“43.40% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 67Silver Hills Project · silverGrade: 2400Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 2400
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade silver in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade silver (2,400 g/t) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“2,400 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 68Silver Hills Project · antimonyGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 10.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade antimony (10.60%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“10.60% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 69Silver Hills Project · leadGrade: 23.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 23.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade lead (23.60%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“23.60% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 70Silver Hills Project · silverGrade: 1485Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1485
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates strong exploration potential in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade silver (1,485 g/t) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“1,485 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 71Silver Hills Project · antimonyGrade: 6.81Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 6.81
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade antimony (6.81%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“6.81% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 72Silver Hills Project · leadGrade: 37.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 37.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade lead (37.70%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“37.70% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 73Silver Hills Project · silverGrade: 668Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 668
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates strong exploration potential in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (668 g/t) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“668 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 74Silver Hills Project · antimonyGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Antimony presence in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.41%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“0.41% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 75Silver Hills Project · leadGrade: 21.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 21.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade lead (21.6%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“21.6% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 76Silver Hills Project · silverGrade: 624Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 624
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates strong exploration potential in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver (624 g/t) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“624 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 77Silver Hills Project · antimonyGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Antimony presence in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates exploration potential.
Positive factors
- Antimony presence (0.58%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“0.58% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 78Silver Hills Project · leadGrade: 33.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 33.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade lead in surface grab samples from Silver Cliffs indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a highly prospective region.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade lead (33.10%) from Silver Cliffs dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Project located within a proven high-grade mineralised system (Mt Bischoff Mine area)
- Historical workings extend over 300m of strike, suggesting scale
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
- Presence of antimony, which can be a penalty element
Evidence · text
“33.10% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 79Silver Hills Project · tinGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1.43
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade tin in surface grab samples from North Valley Lodes indicates strong exploration potential for a high-grade tin system in a proven mining district.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin (1.43%) from North Valley Lodes dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Workings extend over 500m of strike, suggesting significant scale
- Project located within an established and well-endowed mining province (Mt Bischoff tin mine)
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Evidence · table
“1.43”
Context: NV001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 80Silver Hills Project · tinGrade: 3.64Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 3.64
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade tin in surface grab samples from North Valley Lodes indicates bonanza potential and strong exploration upside in a proven mining district.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade tin (3.64%) from North Valley Lodes dump samples, indicating bonanza potential
- Workings extend over 500m of strike, suggesting significant scale
- Project located within an established and well-endowed mining province (Mt Bischoff tin mine)
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Evidence · table
“3.64”
Context: NV002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 81Silver Hills Project · tinGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Tin presence in surface grab samples from North Valley Lodes indicates exploration potential in a proven mining district.
Positive factors
- Tin presence (0.42%) from North Valley Lodes dump samples, indicating potential
- Workings extend over 500m of strike, suggesting significant scale
- Project located within an established and well-endowed mining province (Mt Bischoff tin mine)
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: NV003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 82Silver Hills Project · tinGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Tin presence in surface grab samples from North Valley Lodes indicates exploration potential in a proven mining district.
Positive factors
- Tin presence (0.44%) from North Valley Lodes dump samples, indicating potential
- Workings extend over 500m of strike, suggesting significant scale
- Project located within an established and well-endowed mining province (Mt Bischoff tin mine)
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: NV004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 83Silver Hills Project · tinGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Tin presence in surface grab samples from North Valley Lodes indicates exploration potential in a proven mining district.
Positive factors
- Tin presence (0.71%) from North Valley Lodes dump samples, indicating potential
- Workings extend over 500m of strike, suggesting significant scale
- Project located within an established and well-endowed mining province (Mt Bischoff tin mine)
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: NV005
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 84Silver Hills Project · tinGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Tin presence in surface grab samples from North Valley Lodes indicates exploration potential in a proven mining district.
Positive factors
- Tin presence (0.89%) from North Valley Lodes dump samples, indicating potential
- Workings extend over 500m of strike, suggesting significant scale
- Project located within an established and well-endowed mining province (Mt Bischoff tin mine)
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Evidence · table
“0.89”
Context: NV006
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 85Silver Hills Project · tinGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade tin in surface grab samples from North Valley Lodes indicates strong exploration potential in a proven mining district.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin (1.29%) from North Valley Lodes dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Workings extend over 500m of strike, suggesting significant scale
- Project located within an established and well-endowed mining province (Mt Bischoff tin mine)
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: NV007
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 86Silver Hills Project · tinGrade: 2.63Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Hills Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Resource scope
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a4af580b50613d7cca89
Resource Data
- Grade
- 2.63
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade tin in surface grab samples from North Valley Lodes indicates strong exploration potential in a proven mining district.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin (2.63%) from North Valley Lodes dump samples, indicating strong potential
- Workings extend over 500m of strike, suggesting significant scale
- Project located within an established and well-endowed mining province (Mt Bischoff tin mine)
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ mineralisation
Evidence · table
“2.63”
Context: NV008
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Metallurgical Results (4)
flotationMontezuma Silver & Antimony Project · antimonyRecovery: 88.4 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 88.4 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS Metallurgy (Burnie)
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Preliminary flotation testwork shows strong recovery for antimony, indicating good metallurgical amenability for this critical metal.
Positive factors
- Strong recovery for antimony (88.4%) from preliminary flotation testwork
- Recovery is from actual testwork, not theoretical
Evidence · text
“recoveries achieved were 88.4% antimony”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
flotationMontezuma Silver & Antimony Project · silverRecovery: 93 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 93 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS Metallurgy (Burnie)
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Preliminary flotation testwork shows high recovery for silver, which is a key metal in the polymetallic resource.
Positive factors
- High recovery for silver (93.0%) from preliminary flotation testwork
- Recovery is from actual testwork, not theoretical
Evidence · text
“93.0% silver”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 93% is at or above the exceptional band (90%)
flotationMontezuma Silver & Antimony Project · leadRecovery: 88.4 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 88.4 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS Metallurgy (Burnie)
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Preliminary flotation testwork shows strong recovery for lead, contributing positively to the polymetallic project's economics.
Positive factors
- Strong recovery for lead (88.4%) from preliminary flotation testwork
- Recovery is from actual testwork, not theoretical
Evidence · text
“88.4% lead”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
flotationMontezuma Silver & Antimony Project · copperRecovery: 91.5 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Montezuma Silver & Antimony Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- LDR
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 91.5 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS Metallurgy (Burnie)
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Preliminary flotation testwork shows high recovery for copper, which is a significant component of the polymetallic resource.
Positive factors
- High recovery for copper (91.5%) from preliminary flotation testwork
- Recovery is from actual testwork, not theoretical
Evidence · text
“91.5% copper”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.