LAURION Reports Multiple Gold and Polymetallic Intercepts, Including 3.75 m Grading 0.568 g/t Au, 12.40 g/t Ag, 0.46% Cu and 1.75% Zn and 0.50 m Grading 3.220 g/t Au and 6.29% Zn at Ishkōday

Original announcement by prospectors_exchange on

Company
LAURION Mineral Exploration Inc.
Ticker
LME
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Northwestern Ontario
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-16 17:06:19 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

LAURION Mineral Exploration Inc. reported assay results from two drill holes, LBX26-106 and LBX26-107, at its Ishkōday Gold and Polymetallic Project in Northwestern Ontario. The drilling returned multiple polymetallic intercepts, including 0.50 m grading 1.730 g/t Au, 43.20 g/t Ag, 1.51% Cu and 3.40% Zn, and 0.50 m grading 3.220 g/t Au, 9.70 g/t Ag, 0.30% Cu and 6.29% Zn. This Phase 1 program aims to advance the A-Zone through infill, expansion, and exploration drilling to support a potential maiden Mineral Resource Estimate.

Reasoning: The drill results from Ishkōday show significant polymetallic mineralization, particularly for silver, copper, and zinc, which exceed prior project averages and bests, contributing to the evaluation of a potential maiden MRE and expanding the geological understanding of the A-Zone and McLeod systems. While gold grades are moderate, the overall polymetallic nature and strategic intent of the drilling are positive, supported by robust QA/QC, though true widths remain undetermined.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic intercepts with strong silver, copper, and zinc grades relative to project averages and bests
  • Drilling supports potential maiden Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)
  • Program includes expansion and exploration drilling, testing geophysical targets
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and QP sign-off

Negative factors

  • Gold grades are moderate compared to project's historical bests
  • Intercepts are reported as downhole lengths; true widths are not yet determined
  • Intervals are calculated using a nominal cut-off, but specific cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are not disclosed

Facts used in scoring: 99

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 99. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (99)

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
16 m
To
17.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:16-17.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is low grade (0.18 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold for gold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.180”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 5.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
5.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
16 m
To
17.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:16-17.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (5.57 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold for silver, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“5.57”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
16 m
To
17.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:16-17.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is low grade (0.05% Cu) and below the weak threshold for copper, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
16 m
To
17.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:16-17.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is above the weak threshold (2.19% Zn) and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Zinc grade is above the weak threshold
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.374Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.374
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
17 m
To
17.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:17-17.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.374 g/t Au) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.374”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 13.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
13.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
17 m
To
17.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:17-17.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (13.5 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold for silver, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“13.5”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
17 m
To
17.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:17-17.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is low grade (0.08% Cu) and below the weak threshold for copper, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 5.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
5.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
17 m
To
17.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:17-17.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is moderate grade (5.61% Zn) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade is moderate (above moderate threshold)
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“5.61”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
30.3 m
To
34.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:30.3-34.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.043 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
30.3 m
To
34.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:30.3-34.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (0.73 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
30.3 m
To
34.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:30.3-34.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.01% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
30.3 m
To
34.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:30.3-34.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.42% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.136
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
30.3 m
To
31 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:30.3-31
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.136 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.136”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
30.3 m
To
31 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:30.3-31
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (0.80 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
30.3 m
To
31 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:30.3-31
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.01% Cu) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
30.3 m
To
31 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:30.3-31
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.15% Zn) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.028
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
33 m
To
34.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:33-34.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.028 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.028”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
33 m
To
34.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:33-34.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (1.07 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
33 m
To
34.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:33-34.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.01% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
33 m
To
34.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:33-34.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.98% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.133Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.133
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
59.5 m
To
60 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:59.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.133 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.133”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
59.5 m
To
60 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:59.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (2.80 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.80”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
59.5 m
To
60 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:59.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.05% Cu) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 2.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
59.5 m
To
60 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:59.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is above the weak threshold (2.52% Zn) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.52”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.146Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.146
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.3 m
From
73 m
To
77.3 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73-77.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.146 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.146”

Context: 4.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 7.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
7.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.3 m
From
73 m
To
77.3 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73-77.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (7.79 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“7.79”

Context: 4.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.3 m
From
73 m
To
77.3 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73-77.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.11% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 4.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.3 m
From
73 m
To
77.3 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73-77.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.24% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 4.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.178Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.178
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
73.7 m
To
75 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73.7-75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.178 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.178”

Context: 1.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 20.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
20.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
73.7 m
To
75 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73.7-75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (20.41 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“20.41”

Context: 1.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
73.7 m
To
75 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73.7-75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is above the weak threshold (0.26% Cu) and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 1.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
73.7 m
To
75 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73.7-75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.68% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: 1.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.314Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.314
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.7 m
To
74.3 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73.7-74.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.314 g/t Au) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.314”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 40.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
40.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.7 m
To
74.3 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73.7-74.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is above the weak threshold (40.60 g/t Ag) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“40.60”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.7 m
To
74.3 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73.7-74.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is moderate grade (0.54% Cu) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade is moderate (above moderate threshold)
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.7 m
To
74.3 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:73.7-74.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.92% Zn) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.329Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.329
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
104 m
To
104.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:104-104.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.329 g/t Au) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.329”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
104 m
To
104.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:104-104.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (0.90 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
104 m
To
104.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:104-104.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.01% Cu) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
104 m
To
104.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:104-104.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.07% Zn) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.117Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.117
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
113 m
To
122 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:113-122
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.117 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.117”

Context: 9.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 2.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
113 m
To
122 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:113-122
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (2.42 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.42”

Context: 9.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
113 m
To
122 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:113-122
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.03% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 9.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
113 m
To
122 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:113-122
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.37% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 9.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.428Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.428
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
121 m
To
122 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:121-122
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.428 g/t Au) and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.428”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
8.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
121 m
To
122 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:121-122
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (8.20 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“8.20”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
121 m
To
122 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:121-122
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.09% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
121 m
To
122 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:121-122
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (1.23% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.23”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.336Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.336
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
149 m
To
150.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:149-150.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.336 g/t Au) and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.336”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
149 m
To
150.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:149-150.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (3.24 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“3.24”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
149 m
To
150.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:149-150.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.03% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
149 m
To
150.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:149-150.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.84% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.672Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.672
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
149.8 m
To
150.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:149.8-150.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.672 g/t Au) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.672”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
5.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
149.8 m
To
150.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:149.8-150.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (5.80 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“5.80”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
149.8 m
To
150.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:149.8-150.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.05% Cu) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
149.8 m
To
150.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:149.8-150.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.81% Zn) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.582Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.582
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.7 m
From
172.5 m
To
177.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:172.5-177.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.582 g/t Au) and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.582”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.7 m
From
172.5 m
To
177.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:172.5-177.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (2.53 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.53”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
172.5 m
To
177.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:172.5-177.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.07% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
172.5 m
To
177.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:172.5-177.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.93% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.742Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.742
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
174.5 m
To
177.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:174.5-177.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.742 g/t Au) and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.742”

Context: 2.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 3.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
174.5 m
To
177.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:174.5-177.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (3.88 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“3.88”

Context: 2.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.7 m
From
174.5 m
To
177.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:174.5-177.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.10% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 2.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.58
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.7 m
From
174.5 m
To
177.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:174.5-177.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (1.58% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.58”

Context: 2.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
174.5 m
To
175 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:174.5-175
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is strong grade (3.22 g/t Au) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval with notable zinc, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (above strong threshold)
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept with high zinc
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“3.220”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
9.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
174.5 m
To
175 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:174.5-175
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (9.70 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“9.70”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
174.5 m
To
175 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:174.5-175
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is above the weak threshold (0.30% Cu) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 6.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
6.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
174.5 m
To
175 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:174.5-175
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is moderate grade (6.29% Zn) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval with notable gold, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Moderate zinc grade (above moderate threshold)
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept with strong gold
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“6.29”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.284Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.284
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
182 m
To
182.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:182-182.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is low grade (0.284 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.284”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
10.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
182 m
To
182.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:182-182.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (10.80 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“10.80”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
182 m
To
182.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:182-182.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is low grade (0.24% Cu) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
182 m
To
182.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:182-182.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.06% Zn) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
215 m
To
216 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:215-216
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.11 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.110”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
215 m
To
216 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:215-216
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (1.40 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
215 m
To
216 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:215-216
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.03% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
215 m
To
216 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:215-216
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.25% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
235 m
To
236.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:235-236.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.10 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
235 m
To
236.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:235-236.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (2.50 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.50”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
235 m
To
236.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:235-236.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.11% Cu) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
235 m
To
236.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:235-236.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.42% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.617Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.617
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
250.7 m
To
251.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:250.7-251.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.617 g/t Au) over a narrow width, and is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.617”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
250.7 m
To
251.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:250.7-251.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (2.80 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.80”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
250.7 m
To
251.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:250.7-251.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.01% Cu) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
250.7 m
To
251.2 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:250.7-251.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.10% Zn) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
271.1 m
To
271.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:271.1-271.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is very low grade (0.18 g/t Au) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
271.1 m
To
271.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:271.1-271.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is very low grade (2.90 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.90”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
271.1 m
To
271.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:271.1-271.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is very low grade (0.11% Cu) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low copper grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
271.1 m
To
271.7 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:271.1-271.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is very low grade (0.93% Zn) and below the weak threshold, over a narrow width, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Very low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.568Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.568
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.75 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:278.75-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.568 g/t Au) and is part of a significant polymetallic interval, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a significant polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.568”

Context: 3.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
12.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.75 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:278.75-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (12.40 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a significant polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a significant polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“12.40”

Context: 3.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.75 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:278.75-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is above the weak threshold (0.46% Cu) and is part of a significant polymetallic interval, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a significant polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 3.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.75 m
From
278.75 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:278.75-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is low grade (1.75% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a significant polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a significant polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: 3.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 0.886Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.886
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
280.2 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:280.2-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is above the weak threshold (0.886 g/t Au) and is part of a polymetallic interval, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.886”

Context: 2.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 19.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
19.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
280.2 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:280.2-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is low grade (19.26 g/t Ag) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“19.26”

Context: 2.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.3 m
From
280.2 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:280.2-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is moderate grade (0.73% Cu) and is part of a polymetallic interval, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade is moderate (above moderate threshold)
  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 2.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · zincGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.3 m
From
280.2 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:280.2-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This zinc intercept is low grade (1.64% Zn) and below the weak threshold, but is part of a polymetallic interval that contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Part of a polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Low zinc grade (below weak threshold)
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.64”

Context: 2.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
282 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:282-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is moderate grade (1.73 g/t Au) over a narrow width, and is part of a high-grade polymetallic interval, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is moderate (above moderate threshold)
  • Part of a high-grade polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.730”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · silverGrade: 43.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
43.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
282 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:282-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is above the weak threshold (43.20 g/t Ag) and significantly higher than prior project averages/bests, over a narrow width, and is part of a high-grade polymetallic interval, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit for MRE evaluation.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the weak threshold and significantly above project average/best
  • Part of a high-grade polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“43.20”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LBX26-106and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized · copperGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX26-106
Project
and is being evaluated to assess continuity within the mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
282 m
To
282.5 m
Hole Depth
360 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX26-106:282-282.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
446098
Northing
5512521
Elevation
324 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade (above strong threshold) and significantly above project average/best
  • Part of a high-grade polymetallic intercept
  • Drilling contributes to MRE evaluation

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.