LAURION Intersects High-Grade Gold, Silver and Zinc at Ishkoday A-Zone/McLeod/CRK Zone, Confirming Structural Continuity Along Mineralized Corridor

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Unavailable
Ticker
LME
Exchange
TSX
Region
north-western Ontario
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Zinc, Copper
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-21 03:32:34 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

LAURION Mineral Exploration has reported high-grade gold, silver, and zinc assay results from the first two drill holes at its Ishkōday Project in north-western Ontario. The drilling confirms structural continuity along the A-Zone/McLeod/CRK Zone mineralized corridor, with significant intercepts including 0.70 m at 5.97 g/t Au, 18.4 g/t Ag, and 10.8% Zn, and 0.55 m at 12.15 g/t Au, 16.1 g/t Ag, and 2.66% Zn. These results reinforce the company's understanding of the gold-zinc system and its potential for expansion.

Reasoning: LAURION's drill results confirm high-grade gold, silver, and zinc mineralization within a structurally controlled corridor, extending known mineralization and demonstrating continuity. The presence of multiple high-grade intervals within broader zones is a positive indicator for resource potential.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts
  • structural_continuity_confirmed
  • polymetallic_mineralization

Facts used in scoring: 105

Atlas analysis — LME: LAURION Intersects High-Grade Gold, Silver and Zinc at Ishkoday A-Zone/McLeod/CRK Zone, Confirming Structural Continuity Along Mineralized Corridor. 2 g/t over 4.5 m; 1.92 g/t over 3.85 m; 3 g/t over 2.4 m

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release explicitly states that LAURION employs an industry standard system of external standards, blanks, and duplicates, and that ALS Global Analytical Lab is used for analysis, with a Qualified Person sign-off.

Evidence · text

“LAURION employs an industry standard system of external standards, blanks and duplicates for all of its sampling, in addition to the QA/QC protocol employed by the laboratory. ... All core samples were shipped to the ALS facility in Thunder Bay, Ontario, which were then prepared by ALS Global Geochemistry in Thunder Bay and analyzed by ALS Global Analytical Lab in North Vancouver, British Columbia. ... The technical contents of this release were reviewed and approved by Jean-Philippe Paiement, P.Geo, MSc, a consultant to LAURION and a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole LBX25-096 was designed to test the eastern continuation of the mineralized corridor, indicating an attempt to extend known mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole LBX25-096, located approximately 52 metres east of LBX25-095, was designed to test the eastern continuation of the same structurally controlled mineralized corridor.”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 0.55 m at 12.15 g/t Au in LBX25-095 is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (5 g/t Au).

Evidence · table

“12.15”

Context: 0.55

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document reports core lengths (downhole intercepts) but does not provide true widths or sufficient information to infer them for the reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Core Length (m)”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 105. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (105)

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 1.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
From
27.4 m
To
30 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:27.40-30.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade gold intercept over a narrow width, contributing to overall continuity.

Evidence · table

“1.84”

Context: 2.60

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 7.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
7.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
27.9 m
To
28.5 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:27.90-28.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept over a narrow width, indicating a bonanza zone within a broader interval.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“7.25”

Context: 0.60

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
45.3 m
To
46.3 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:45.30-46.30
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a moderate gold grade, contributing to overall continuity.

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 1.00

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
91.25 m
To
95.25 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:91.25-95.25
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept over a moderate width, below typical economic thresholds for orogenic gold.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 4.00

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
132.1 m
To
132.6 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:132.10-132.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with a low gold grade, below typical economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
135.2 m
To
135.7 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:135.20-135.70
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with a weak gold grade, near the lower end of economic interest.

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
141 m
To
141.6 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:141.00-141.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with a low gold grade, below typical economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
143.8 m
To
147.8 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:143.80-147.80
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept over a moderate width, below typical economic thresholds for orogenic gold.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 4.00

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
145 m
To
147.8 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:145.00-147.80
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept over a narrow width, below typical economic thresholds for orogenic gold.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 2.80

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
From
162.5 m
To
166 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:162.50-166.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralized corridor.

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: 3.50

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 5.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
5.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
163.05 m
To
163.75 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:163.05-163.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“5.97”

Context: 0.70

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.15 m
From
167.2 m
To
169.35 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:167.20-169.35
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept over a narrow width, below typical economic thresholds for orogenic gold.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 2.15

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
188 m
To
192.5 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:188.00-192.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralized corridor.

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 4.50

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
188 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:188.00-188.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a very narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“3.30”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
190.1 m
To
192.5 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:190.10-192.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“3.00”

Context: 2.40

LBX25-095Ishkōday · goldGrade: 12.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
12.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
191.1 m
To
192.5 m
Hole Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:191.10-192.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446115.3
Northing
5512416
Elevation
332.5 m
Azimuth
124 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional gold grade over a very narrow width, representing a bonanza zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • bonanza_intercept
  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“12.15”

Context: 0.55

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
8.35 m
To
9.5 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:8.35-9.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralized corridor.

Evidence · table

“2.14”

Context: 1.15

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 4.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
4.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
9 m
To
9.5 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:9.00-9.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a very narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“4.76”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
10.9 m
To
11.4 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:10.90-11.40
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with a weak gold grade, near the lower end of economic interest.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
35.75 m
To
36.25 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:35.75-36.25
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with a low gold grade, below typical economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.85 m
From
38.7 m
To
42.55 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:38.70-42.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralized corridor.

Evidence · table

“1.92”

Context: 3.85

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
40.6 m
To
41.2 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:40.60-41.20
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a very narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“2.78”

Context: 0.60

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 9.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
9.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
42 m
To
42.55 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:42.00-42.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a very narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“9.59”

Context: 0.55

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
98.2 m
To
98.7 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:98.20-98.70
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with a weak gold grade, near the lower end of economic interest.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
108.5 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:106.80-108.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralized corridor.

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 1.70

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 3.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
106.8 m
To
107.3 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:106.80-107.30
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a very narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · table

“3.14”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
118.7 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:118.70-121.60
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept over a narrow width, below typical economic thresholds for orogenic gold.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 2.90

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
118.7 m
To
119.2 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:118.70-119.20
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a moderate gold grade, contributing to overall continuity.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 0.50

LBX25-096Ishkōday · goldGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129.6 m
To
130.1 m
Hole Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:129.60-130.10
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
446168
Northing
5512429
Elevation
331.4 m
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralized corridor.

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: 0.50

90-41Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.36 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
90-41
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
90-41:5.36m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical weak gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to overall mineralization.

Evidence · text

“5.36 m grading 0.44 g/t Au”
90-41Ishkōday · zincGrade: 4.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.36 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
90-41
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
4.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
90-41:5.36m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical moderate zinc grade over a moderate width, indicating base metal mineralization.

Evidence · text

“4.28% Zn”
90-41Ishkōday · silverGrade: 6.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.36 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
90-41
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
6.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
90-41:5.36m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical weak silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to polymetallic nature.

Evidence · text

“6.16 g/t Ag”
90-41Ishkōday · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
90-41
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
copper
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
90-41:0.91m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical low-grade copper intercept over a very narrow width, below typical economic thresholds.

Evidence · text

“0.16% Cu”
90-49Ishkōday · goldGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
90-49
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.73 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
90-49:1.73m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical high-grade gold intercept over a narrow width, providing context for current drilling.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts

Evidence · text

“1.73 m grading 3.46 g/t Au”
90-49Ishkōday · silverGrade: 20.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
90-49
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
20.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.73 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
90-49:1.73m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to polymetallic nature.

Evidence · text

“20.36 g/t Ag”
90-49Ishkōday · zincGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
90-49
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.73 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
90-49:1.73m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1990-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical moderate zinc grade over a narrow width, indicating base metal mineralization.

Evidence · text

“3.72% Zn”
LBX20-021Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.08 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX20-021
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.08 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX20-021:14.08m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-07-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical moderate gold grade over a significant width, demonstrating continuity.

Evidence · text

“14.08 m grading 0.89 g/t Au in drill hole LBX20-021”
LBX20-020Ishkōday · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.84 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX20-020
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.84 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX20-020:10.84m_1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-07-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical weak gold grade over a significant width, demonstrating mineralized width and continuity.

Evidence · text

“10.84 m grading 0.48 g/t Au”
LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
From
27.4 m
To
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:27.4-30
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.45 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
27.4 m
To
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:27.4-30
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: LBX25-095

includingIshkōday · goldGrade: 7.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
7.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
27.9 m
To
28.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:27.9-28.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.25 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.25 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.25”

Context: including

includingIshkōday · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
27.9 m
To
28.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:27.9-28.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: including

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
45.3 m
To
46.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:45.3-46.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
45.3 m
To
46.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:45.3-46.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.15 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
91.25 m
To
95.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:91.25-95.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
91.25 m
To
95.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:91.25-95.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
132.1 m
To
132.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:132.1-132.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
132.1 m
To
132.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:132.1-132.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.27 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.27 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
6.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
135.2 m
To
135.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:135.2-135.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.10”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
135.2 m
To
135.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:135.2-135.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
141 m
To
141.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:141-141.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
141 m
To
141.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:141-141.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 1.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
143.8 m
To
147.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:143.8-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.71 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.71 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.71”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
143.8 m
To
147.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:143.8-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.17 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
145 m
To
147.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:145-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.16 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.16 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.16”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m
From
145 m
To
147.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:145-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 4.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
4.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
From
162.5 m
To
166 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:162.5-166
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.27”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.5 m
From
162.5 m
To
166 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:162.5-166
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.30”

Context: LBX25-095

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 5.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
5.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
163.05 m
To
163.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:163.05-163.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.97 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.97”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 18.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
18.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
163.05 m
To
163.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:163.05-163.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.40”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
10.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
163.05 m
To
163.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:163.05-163.75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.8 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.8 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.80”

Context: Including

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.15 m
From
167.2 m
To
169.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:167.2-169.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.36 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.36 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.15 m
From
167.2 m
To
169.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:167.2-169.35
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.18 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · silverGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
5.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
188 m
To
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:188-192.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.75 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.75 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.75”

Context: LBX25-095

LBX25-095Ishkōday · zincGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-095
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.5 m
From
188 m
To
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-095:188-192.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.22 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.22 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: LBX25-095

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
188 m
To
188.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:188-188.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.30”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 17.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
17.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
188 m
To
188.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:188-188.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 17.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.80”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 6.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
6.84
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
188 m
To
188.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:188-188.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.84 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.84”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
190.1 m
To
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:190.1-192.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.00”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
190.1 m
To
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:190.1-192.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.80”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
190.1 m
To
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:190.1-192.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.78 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 12.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
12.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
191.1 m
To
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:191.1-192.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.15 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.15 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.15”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 16.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
16.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
191.1 m
To
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:191.1-192.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.10”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.55 m
From
191.1 m
To
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:191.1-192.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.66 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.66”

Context: Including

LBX25-096Ishkōday · silverGrade: 5.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
5.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
8.35 m
To
9.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:8.35-9.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.18”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.15 m
From
8.35 m
To
9.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:8.35-9.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.61 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: LBX25-096

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 4.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
4.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
9 m
To
9.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:9-9.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.76 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.76”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
8.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
9 m
To
9.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:9-9.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.40”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
9 m
To
9.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:9-9.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.35 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.35 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: Including

LBX25-096Ishkōday · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
10.9 m
To
11.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:10.9-11.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
10.9 m
To
11.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:10.9-11.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
35.75 m
To
36.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:35.75-36.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.70”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
35.75 m
To
36.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:35.75-36.25
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · silverGrade: 2.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.85 m
From
38.7 m
To
42.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:38.7-42.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.41 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.41 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.41”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.85 m
From
38.7 m
To
42.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:38.7-42.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: LBX25-096

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
40.6 m
To
41.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:40.6-41.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.78 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.78”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
6.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
40.6 m
To
41.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:40.6-41.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.30”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
40.6 m
To
41.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:40.6-41.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.62 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 9.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
9.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
42 m
To
42.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:42-42.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.59 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.59 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.59”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
5.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
42 m
To
42.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:42-42.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.50”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.55 m
From
42 m
To
42.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:42-42.55
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: Including

LBX25-096Ishkōday · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
98.2 m
To
98.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:98.2-98.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.80”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
98.2 m
To
98.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:98.2-98.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · silverGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
108.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:106.8-108.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.49 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.49”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
108.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:106.8-108.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: LBX25-096

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 3.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
106.8 m
To
107.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:106.8-107.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.14 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.14”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
106.8 m
To
107.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:106.8-107.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.20”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
106.8 m
To
107.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:106.8-107.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: Including

LBX25-096Ishkōday · silverGrade: 3.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
118.7 m
To
121.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:118.7-121.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.65 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.65 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.65”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · zincGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
1.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.9 m
From
118.7 m
To
121.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:118.7-121.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.41 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.41 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.41”

Context: LBX25-096

IncludingIshkōday · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
gold
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
118.7 m
To
119.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:118.7-119.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.9 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · silverGrade: 14.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
14.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
118.7 m
To
119.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:118.7-119.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.90”

Context: Including

IncludingIshkōday · zincGrade: 8.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
8.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
118.7 m
To
119.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:118.7-119.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.18 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.18”

Context: Including

LBX25-096Ishkōday · silverGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
silver
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
10.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129.6 m
To
130.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:129.6-130.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.10”

Context: LBX25-096

LBX25-096Ishkōday · zincGrade: 3.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LBX25-096
Project
Ishkōday
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
LME

Geometry

Grade
3.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129.6 m
To
130.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LBX25-096:129.6-130.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.05 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.05”

Context: LBX25-096

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.