# Laramide Resources Announces Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment and Positions Westmoreland Uranium Project for the Next Phase of Development

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/laramide-resources-announces-updated-preliminary-economic-assessment-and-positio--70a7b60a-21d9-4c00-b1d8-9144ff148a15

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/LAM/news/6892308286380395/laramide-resources-announces-updated-preliminary-economic-assessment-and-positio

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-07-22T13:52:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Laramide Resources Ltd.

- Ticker: LAM

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Queensland, Australia

- Primary commodity: Uranium

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-08-25 18:31:47 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Laramide Resources announced an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for its Westmoreland Uranium Project in Queensland, Australia, revealing strong economics with a post-tax NPV of US$741.1 million and an IRR of 33%. The PEA incorporates updated Mineral Resources, including 27.8 Mt Indicated at 770 ppm U₃O₈ and 11.8 Mt Inferred at 680 ppm U₃O₈, and projects an overall uranium recovery of 95% from conventional agitated tank leaching. This study, compliant with JORC 2012 and NI 43-101, positions Westmoreland as a large-scale, low-cost uranium operation for future development.

Reasoning: The updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Westmoreland Uranium Project demonstrates robust financial metrics, supported by a large, high-recovery resource base, positioning the project for the next phase of development, although a portion of the production target relies on inferred resources.

- Positive factor: Strong project economics \(NPV, IRR, payback\)

- Positive factor: Exceptional uranium recovery \(95%\)

- Positive factor: Large contained metal \(65.8 MLbs total\)

- Positive factor: Strong M&amp;I confidence \(70.2% M&amp;I\)

- Positive factor: Updated study incorporating technical advancements

- Positive factor: Compliant reporting \(JORC 2012, NI 43-101\)

- Positive factor: Low operating costs \(US$32.40/lb U3O8\)

- Negative factor: Significant portion of LOM production target based on Inferred Resources \(21%\)

- Negative factor: PEA is preliminary in nature and includes speculative Inferred Mineral Resources

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document announces an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment incorporating updated Mineral Resources.

Evidence · text

> updated Preliminary Economic Assessment \("PEA"\) for its 100%-owned Westmoreland Uranium Project

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The mineral resource estimate has been reviewed to ensure compliance with JORC 2012.

Evidence · text

> reviewed to ensure compliance with JORC 2012

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The mineral resource estimate complies with National Instrument NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

> complies with National Instrument NI 43-101

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Multiple Qualified Persons and Competent Persons are named and have approved the technical information.

Evidence · text

> The information has been reviewed and approved by Rhys Davies, MGeol, MSc, MAIG \(RPGeo\), FGS, a Qualified Person under the definition established by National Instrument 43-101 and JORC.

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The mineral resources are reported above a cut-off grade of 200 ppm U₃O₈.

Evidence · table

> 200 ppm U 3 O 8

Context: Reported above a cut-off grade of 200 ppm U 3 O 8 . Effective 31 January 2025.

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion \(21%\) of the Life of Mine production target is based on Inferred Resources, which have a low level of geological confidence.

Evidence · text

> The Life of Mine \(LOM\) production targets are based on approximately 79% indicated resources and 21% inferred resources.

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is presented as part of an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment.

Evidence · text

> updated Preliminary Economic Assessment \("PEA"\) for its 100%-owned Westmoreland Uranium Project

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The overall process recovery of 95% for uranium is exceptional according to rubrics for uranium processing.

Evidence · table

> 95%

Context: Overall process recovery

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: The proposed processing route involves milling and agitated tank leaching.

Evidence · text

> The proposed processing route comprises milling followed by conventional agitated tank leaching with sulphuric acid and pyrolusite.

**Open Pit Mining**

Polarity: neutral

Story-specific tag

Definition: No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The PEA contemplates a conventional open pit mining operation.

Evidence · text

> The PEA contemplates a conventional open pit mining operation

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (3)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/laramide-resources-announces-updated-preliminary-economic-assessment-and-positio--70a7b60a-21d9-4c00-b1d8-9144ff148a15#fact-resource-facts-0)

Westmoreland Uranium Project · uranium

#### Identity

- Project: Westmoreland Uranium Project
- Commodity: uranium
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: Queensland, Australia
- Ticker: LAM

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 27800000
- Grade: 770
- Grade Unit: ppm U3O8
- Contained Metal: 48.1
- Contained Unit: MLbs
- Cutoff Grade: 200

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The updated indicated resource provides a substantial and well-defined base for the project's economic assessment, demonstrating strong geological confidence and scale.

- Positive factor: Large indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Strong contained metal

- Positive factor: Compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 standards

- Positive factor: QP/CP sign-off

Evidence · table

> 27,800,000

Context: Total Indicated

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/laramide-resources-announces-updated-preliminary-economic-assessment-and-positio--70a7b60a-21d9-4c00-b1d8-9144ff148a15#fact-resource-facts-1)

Westmoreland Uranium Project · uranium

#### Identity

- Project: Westmoreland Uranium Project
- Commodity: uranium
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: Queensland, Australia
- Ticker: LAM

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 11800000
- Grade: 680
- Grade Unit: ppm U3O8
- Contained Metal: 17.7
- Contained Unit: MLbs
- Cutoff Grade: 200

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource contributes to the overall project scale but carries lower geological confidence, as acknowledged by the company regarding its use in the production target.

- Positive factor: Adds to overall resource scale

- Positive factor: Compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 standards

- Positive factor: QP/CP sign-off

- Negative factor: Lower geological confidence compared to indicated resources

- Negative factor: Portion of LOM production target based on inferred resources

Evidence · table

> 11,800,000

Context: Total Inferred

### Fact 3

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/laramide-resources-announces-updated-preliminary-economic-assessment-and-positio--70a7b60a-21d9-4c00-b1d8-9144ff148a15#fact-resource-facts-2)

Westmoreland Uranium Project · uranium

#### Identity

- Project: Westmoreland Uranium Project
- Commodity: uranium
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: Queensland, Australia
- Ticker: LAM

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 95% overall uranium recovery is exceptional and significantly de-risks the project's metallurgical aspects, contributing strongly to the positive economic assessment.

- Positive factor: Exceptional recovery percentage for uranium

- Positive factor: Detailed processing route described

- Positive factor: Supports strong project economics

Evidence · table

> 95%

Context: Overall process recovery

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
