# L1M: Annual Report to shareholders

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03146092

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-09-30T02:24:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-30T03:06:57.930Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-30T03:06:57.930Z

- Company: Lightning Minerals Ltd

- Ticker: L1M

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: North Queensland

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Copper, Tungsten, Zinc, Silver, Lead, Lithium

- Document categories: Drill results, Capital raise, Agreement transaction

- Extracted: 2026-09-30 03:06:58 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Lightning Minerals Ltd reported a strategic reset in FY2026, focusing on Australian gold, copper, and tungsten assets, leading to the divestment of non-core international lithium projects. The company completed its inaugural nine-hole diamond drilling program at the Mt Turner Gold + Copper Project in North Queensland, yielding high-grade gold and base metal intersections. To fund its exploration activities, Lightning Minerals successfully raised A$2.50 million and A$1.85 million through placements during the year.

Reasoning: The annual report highlights strong historical drill results and successful capital raises, indicating positive operational progress and funding. The strategic reset and divestment of non-core assets are also positive for focus. However, the drill results are not new, and the company reported a significant financial loss and asset impairment.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold and base metal drill intersections reported from Mt Turner project

- Positive factor: Successful capital raises provide funding for ongoing exploration

- Positive factor: Strategic divestment of non-core assets focuses the company on key projects

- Positive factor: Progress towards resource definition at Mt Turner and Warby projects

- Negative factor: Drill results are historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Significant loss reported for the financial year

- Negative factor: Impairment of previously capitalised exploration expenditure

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 19

## Classification and evidence

No classification tags are available.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 19. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (19)

### 25L1MP3DD001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-0)

Mt Turner · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: 25L1MP3DD001
- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 11.57
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 77 m
- To: 81 m
- Intercept Depth: 77 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: 25L1MP3DD001:77-81

#### Location

- Location: Pit 3
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade gold intercept with significant base metal credits, indicating strong mineralization. However, it is a re-reported historical result, reducing its novelty.

- Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(11.57 g/t Au\) for an epithermal deposit

- Positive factor: Significant intercept length \(4.0m\)

- Positive factor: Polymetallic nature with strong zinc and silver grades

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in October 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> 4.0 meters at 11.57g/t gold, 5.25% zinc and 27.1g/t silver from 77 meters in hole 25L1MP3DD001 at Pit 3.

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The gold grade of 11.57 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold for epithermal gold deposits.

Evidence · text

> 11.57g/t gold

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 4.0 meters with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 4.0 meters at 11.57g/t gold

### 25L1MP3DD001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-1)

Mt Turner · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: 25L1MP3DD001
- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 5.25
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 77 m
- To: 81 m
- Intercept Depth: 77 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: 25L1MP3DD001:77-81

#### Location

- Location: Pit 3
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The moderate zinc grade contributes positively to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept, enhancing its value, though it is a re-reported historical result.

- Positive factor: Moderate zinc grade \(5.25%\) adds to polymetallic value

- Positive factor: Significant intercept length \(4.0m\)

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in October 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> 4.0 meters at 11.57g/t gold, 5.25% zinc and 27.1g/t silver from 77 meters in hole 25L1MP3DD001 at Pit 3.

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 4.0 meters with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 4.0 meters at 11.57g/t gold

### 25L1MP3DD001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-2)

Mt Turner · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: 25L1MP3DD001
- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 27.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 77 m
- To: 81 m
- Intercept Depth: 77 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: 25L1MP3DD001:77-81

#### Location

- Location: Pit 3
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade, while not exceptional, adds to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept, contributing to its economic potential, but it is a re-reported historical result.

- Positive factor: Moderate silver grade \(27.1 g/t\) contributes to polymetallic value

- Positive factor: Significant intercept length \(4.0m\)

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in October 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> 4.0 meters at 11.57g/t gold, 5.25% zinc and 27.1g/t silver from 77 meters in hole 25L1MP3DD001 at Pit 3.

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 4.0 meters with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 4.0 meters at 11.57g/t gold

### Fact 4

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-3)

Mt Turner · gold

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 20.4 m
- From: 63 m
- To: 83.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 63 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:63-83.4

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a good width, suggesting significant mineralization. However, it is a re-reported historical result and lacks true width information.

- Positive factor: Strong gold grade \(2.4 g/t Au\) over a significant width \(20.4m\)

- Positive factor: Indicates good continuity of mineralization

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> 20.4m @ 2.4g/t Au \(from 63m\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 20.4m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 20.4m @ 2.4g/t Au

### Fact 5

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-4)

Mt Turner · gold

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 10.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptionally high-grade gold, indicating concentrated mineralization, but its narrow width and historical nature temper its overall impact.

- Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(10.5 g/t Au\) within a broader interval

- Positive factor: Highlights high-grade zones within the mineralization

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length \(1.9m\)

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> incl 1.9m @ 10.5g/t Au1

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The gold grade of 10.5 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold for epithermal gold deposits.

Evidence · text

> 10.5g/t Au

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 1.9m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 1.9m @ 10.5g/t Au

### Fact 6

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-5)

Mt Turner · gold

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 10.6
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.8 m
- From: 77 m
- To: 78.8 m
- Intercept Depth: 77 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:77-78.8

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This interval shows exceptionally high-grade gold with silver, highlighting concentrated mineralization, but its narrow width and historical nature temper its overall impact.

- Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(10.6 g/t Au\) with silver credits

- Positive factor: Indicates high-grade zones within the mineralization

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length \(1.8m\)

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> Incl. 1.8m @ 10.6g/t Au and 27.1g/t Ag from 77m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The gold grade of 10.6 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold for epithermal gold deposits.

Evidence · text

> 10.6g/t Au

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 1.8m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 1.8m @ 10.6g/t Au

### Fact 7

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-6)

Mt Turner · silver

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 27.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.8 m
- From: 77 m
- To: 78.8 m
- Intercept Depth: 77 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:77-78.8

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept, but its narrow width and historical context limit its individual impact.

- Positive factor: Moderate silver grade \(27.1 g/t\) adds to polymetallic value

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length \(1.8m\)

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> Incl. 1.8m @ 10.6g/t Au and 27.1g/t Ag from 77m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 1.8m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 1.8m @ 10.6g/t Au

### Fact 8

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-7)

Mt Turner · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.2
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 17.2 m
- From: 32 m
- To: 49.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 32 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:32-49.2

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong polymetallic intercept with good zinc, lead, and silver grades over a significant width, indicating substantial mineralization. However, it is a re-reported historical result.

- Positive factor: Moderate zinc grade \(6.2%\) over a significant width \(17.2m\)

- Positive factor: Polymetallic nature with lead and silver credits

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> 17.2m @ 6.2% Zn, 1.4% Pb and 10.3g/t Ag from 32m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 17.2m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 17.2m @ 6.2% Zn

### Fact 9

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-8)

Mt Turner · lead

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.4
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 17.2 m
- From: 32 m
- To: 49.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 32 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:32-49.2

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept, enhancing its overall value, but it is a re-reported historical result.

- Positive factor: Lead grade \(1.4%\) adds to polymetallic value

- Positive factor: Significant intercept length \(17.2m\)

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> 17.2m @ 6.2% Zn, 1.4% Pb and 10.3g/t Ag from 32m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 17.2m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 17.2m @ 6.2% Zn

### Fact 10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-9)

Mt Turner · silver

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 10.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 17.2 m
- From: 32 m
- To: 49.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 32 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:32-49.2

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept, but its individual impact is moderate, and it is a re-reported historical result.

- Positive factor: Moderate silver grade \(10.3 g/t\) adds to polymetallic value

- Positive factor: Significant intercept length \(17.2m\)

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> 17.2m @ 6.2% Zn, 1.4% Pb and 10.3g/t Ag from 32m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 17.2m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 17.2m @ 6.2% Zn

### Fact 11

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-10)

Mt Turner · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 11.6
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 5 m
- From: 43.8 m
- To: 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth: 43.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:43.8-48.8

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong zinc mineralization with additional lead and silver, indicating a high-grade zone. However, it is a re-reported historical result and lacks true width information.

- Positive factor: Strong zinc grade \(11.6%\) within a broader interval

- Positive factor: Highlights high-grade base metal zones

- Positive factor: Polymetallic nature with lead and silver credits

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> Incl. 5.0m @ 11.6% Zn, 0.5% Pb and 12.4g/t Ag from 43.8m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The zinc grade of 11.6% is above the strong threshold for zinc deposits.

Evidence · text

> 11.6% Zn

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 5.0m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 5.0m @ 11.6% Zn

### Fact 12

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-11)

Mt Turner · lead

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 5 m
- From: 43.8 m
- To: 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth: 43.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:43.8-48.8

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of this high-grade sub-interval, but its individual impact is moderate, and it is a re-reported historical result.

- Positive factor: Lead grade \(0.5%\) adds to polymetallic value within the sub-interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> Incl. 5.0m @ 11.6% Zn, 0.5% Pb and 12.4g/t Ag from 43.8m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 5.0m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 5.0m @ 11.6% Zn

### Fact 13

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-12)

Mt Turner · silver

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 12.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 5 m
- From: 43.8 m
- To: 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth: 43.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Mt\_Turner:43.8-48.8

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of this high-grade sub-interval, but its individual impact is moderate, and it is a re-reported historical result.

- Positive factor: Moderate silver grade \(12.4 g/t\) adds to polymetallic value within the sub-interval

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in late 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> Incl. 5.0m @ 11.6% Zn, 0.5% Pb and 12.4g/t Ag from 43.8m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as a downhole length of 5.0m with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · text

> 5.0m @ 11.6% Zn

### Fact 14

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-13)

#### Identity

- Ticker: L1M

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This capital raise provides significant funding for the company's operations and exploration programs, demonstrating investor support.

- Positive factor: Successful capital raise provides funding for exploration activities

- Positive factor: Part of a larger A$2.50m raising, indicating investor confidence

Evidence · text

> Placement - Tranche 1 December 2025 A$1.56m Issued under available placement capacity as part of A$2.50m raising.

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

### Fact 15

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-14)

#### Identity

- Ticker: L1M

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The completion of this tranche signifies the successful funding of the company's activities and strong shareholder backing.

- Positive factor: Successful completion of the A$2.50m raising, providing additional funds

- Positive factor: Shareholder approval indicates strong support

Evidence · text

> Placement - Tranche 2 March 2026 A$0.94m Completed following shareholder approval; completed A$2.50m raising.

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

### Fact 16

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-15)

#### Identity

- Ticker: L1M

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This capital raise is highly positive as it secures substantial funding for critical exploration activities, particularly at the flagship Mt Turner project.

- Positive factor: Significant capital raise provides substantial funding for key projects

- Positive factor: Funds specifically allocated to Mt Turner Phase 2 drilling and Australian exploration

Evidence · text

> Capital raising June 2026 A$1.85m Supported Mt Turner Phase 2 drilling, priority Australian exploration and working capital.

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

### Fact 17

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-16)

lithium

#### Identity

- Commodity: lithium
- Region: canada
- Reported Region: Canada and Brazil
- Ticker: L1M

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The divestment of non-core lithium assets is a positive strategic move, enabling the company to streamline its portfolio and concentrate resources on its primary Australian projects.

- Positive factor: Divestment allows the company to focus capital and management attention on core Australian assets

- Positive factor: Reduces exposure to non-core projects

Evidence · text

> After 30 June 2026, the Company divested it’s Canadian and Brazilian tenements and rights.

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

### Fact 18

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-17)

gold

#### Identity

- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: Queensland and New South Wales
- Ticker: L1M

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The acquisition of Lotus Minerals was a significant strategic move, adding key gold and copper projects in Australia and expanding the company's exploration potential.

- Positive factor: Acquisition expanded Australian exploration footprint

- Positive factor: Added highly prospective gold and copper assets \(Mt Turner and others\) to the portfolio

Evidence · text

> Lightning completed the acquisition of Lotus Minerals during September 2025

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

### NS4

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/l1m-annual-report-to-shareholders--37a86866-530b-4c11-8a11-b0c73c0760d3#fact-drill-facts-18)

Mt Turner · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: NS4
- Project: Mt Turner
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_qld
- Reported Region: australia\_qld
- Ticker: L1M

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.35
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 48 m
- From: 96 m
- To: 144 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Sample Type: drill

#### Location

- Location: Pit 3
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade gold intercept with significant base metal credits, indicating strong mineralization. However, it is a re-reported historical result, reducing its novelty.

- Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(11.57 g/t Au\) for an epithermal deposit

- Positive factor: Significant intercept length \(4.0m\)

- Positive factor: Polymetallic nature with strong zinc and silver grades

- Negative factor: Result is historical, previously announced in October 2025

- Negative factor: Apparent width only, true width not disclosed

Evidence · text

> 48 metres at 0.35% copper and 0.31g/t gold from 96 metres

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only 14 02 REVIEW OF PORTFOLIO &amp; AUSTRALIAN OPERATIONS For personal use only 15 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW The "

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
