Koryx Copper Provides Further Drill Results for the Haib Copper Project in Southern Namibia
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Koryx Copper S.A.
- Ticker
- KRY
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Southern Namibia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Molybdenum, Gold
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-25 18:37:38 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Koryx Copper announced further drill results from its Haib Copper Project in Namibia, highlighting wide intercepts with copper equivalent grades exceeding the average Mineral Resource Estimate. The program, which included infill and expansion drilling, also identified the highest gold metal intersections to date and extended mineralization to the south. These results are expected to significantly improve the project's economics in the upcoming Pre-Feasibility Study.
Reasoning: Koryx Copper reported excellent drill results from its infill and expansion program at the Haib Copper Project, with multiple very wide intercepts showing CuEq grades exceeding the average MRE grade. Notably, new high-grade gold intersections were recorded, and one hole extended mineralization to the south, indicating significant potential for resource improvement and positive impact on the upcoming PFS. The transparency in reporting metal equivalent assumptions and compositing parameters, along with QP sign-off, enhances confidence, though the lack of true width disclosure is a minor drawback.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercepts with CuEq grades exceeding average MRE grade
- Highest gold metal intersections recorded at Haib to date
- Extension of mineralization beyond known limits
- Detailed disclosure of metal equivalent assumptions and compositing parameters
- QP sign-off and NI 43-101 compliance
Negative factors
- True widths are unknown for reported intercepts
Facts used in scoring: 429
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 429. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (429)
HM135Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 416 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 416 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 416 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:0-416
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept confirms mineralization continuity within the porphyry deposit, with a CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, though the raw copper grade is below the prior average. It contributes positively to resource confidence.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (416m)
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 416
HM135Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 416 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 416 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 416 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is low compared to the project's prior average, indicating minor contribution from molybdenum in this section.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 416
HM135Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 416 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 416 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 416 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:0-416
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution in this section.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: 416
HM135Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 48 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:0-48
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good copper grade for a porphyry deposit, with CuEq exceeding the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (moderate to strong)
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: 48
HM135Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 48 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 48 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: 48
HM135Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.045
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:0-48
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade slightly above the project's prior average, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.045”
Context: 48
HM135Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:112-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade and CuEq exceeding the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 26
HM135Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 47Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 47
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“47”
Context: 26
HM135Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.046
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:112-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade slightly above the project's prior average, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.046”
Context: 26
HM135Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:116-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 4
HM135Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 106Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 106
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is close to the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is close to prior average (116.2 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“106”
Context: 4
HM135Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.048Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.048
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:116-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade matching the project's prior best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t) and matches prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.048”
Context: 4
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 459 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 459 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 459 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:0-459
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept confirms moderate copper mineralization and CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, contributing significantly to resource confidence in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (459m)
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 459
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 459 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 459 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 459 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“66”
Context: 459
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 459 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 459 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 459 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:0-459
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.030”
Context: 459
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 162 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 162 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:6-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity in an infill hole targeting the high-grade center.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (162m)
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 162
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 50Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 162 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 50
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 162 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“50”
Context: 162
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 162 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.034
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 162 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:6-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this wide intercept is slightly below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.034”
Context: 162
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:18-24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 35Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 35
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“35”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.027
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:18-24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.027”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 40 m
- To
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:40-50
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: 10
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 35Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 35
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 40 m
- To
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“35”
Context: 10
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 40 m
- To
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:40-50
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.050”
Context: 10
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:54-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.47
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, close to the prior best grade and significantly exceeding the MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Raw copper grade is close to prior best grade (1.42%)
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 82Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 82
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“82”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.085Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.085
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:54-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.085”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 96 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:94-96
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.01
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: 2
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 99
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 96 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“99”
Context: 2
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.063
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 96 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:94-96
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.063”
Context: 2
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 104 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:102-104
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, close to the prior best grade and significantly exceeding the MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Raw copper grade is close to prior best grade (1.42%)
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“1.28”
Context: 2
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 76Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 76
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 104 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“76”
Context: 2
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 104 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:102-104
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.070”
Context: 2
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:136-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 4
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 87Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 87
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“87”
Context: 4
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.055Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.055
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:136-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.055”
Context: 4
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 64 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 64 m
- From
- 196 m
- To
- 260 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:196-260
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good copper grade for a porphyry deposit, with CuEq exceeding the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (moderate to strong)
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 64
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 44Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 64 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 44
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 64 m
- From
- 196 m
- To
- 260 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“44”
Context: 64
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 64 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.036
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 64 m
- From
- 196 m
- To
- 260 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:196-260
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is consistent with the project's prior average, indicating a moderate gold contribution.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is consistent with prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.036”
Context: 64
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 238 m
- To
- 242 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:238-242
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.86
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 4
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 90Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 90
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 238 m
- To
- 242 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“90”
Context: 4
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.108Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.108
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 238 m
- To
- 242 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:238-242
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.108”
Context: 4
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 380 m
- To
- 386 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:380-386
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.47
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade and CuEq significantly exceeding the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 325Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 325
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 380 m
- To
- 386 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a molybdenum grade above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to molybdenum credits.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above prior average (116.2 ppm) and prior best grade (282 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“325”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.032
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 380 m
- To
- 386 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:380-386
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.032”
Context: 6
HM137Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 444 m
- To
- 456 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:444-456
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a low copper grade but a CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, confirming some mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%) and below moderate threshold for porphyry (0.25%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 12
HM137Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 339Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 339
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 444 m
- To
- 456 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a molybdenum grade above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to molybdenum credits.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above prior average (116.2 ppm) and prior best grade (282 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“339”
Context: 12
HM137Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.025
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 444 m
- To
- 456 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:444-456
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.025”
Context: 12
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 584 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 584 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 584 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:0-584
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept confirms moderate copper mineralization and CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, contributing significantly to resource confidence in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (584m)
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 584
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 42Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 584 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 584 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 584 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is low compared to the project's prior average, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 584
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 584 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 584 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 584 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:0-584
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This wide intercept shows a gold grade slightly above the project's prior average, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.040”
Context: 584
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:0-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 72
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 103Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 103
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“103”
Context: 72
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.031
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:0-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.031”
Context: 72
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:8-16
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.09
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“1.04”
Context: 8
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 59Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 59
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“59”
Context: 8
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.038
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:8-16
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade slightly above the project's prior average, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.038”
Context: 8
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:54-58
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“100”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.103Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.103
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:54-58
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.103”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 128 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 128 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 264 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:136-264
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.36
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept shows good copper mineralization and a CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, confirming good continuity in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (128m)
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (moderate to strong)
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 128
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 36Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 128 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 128 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 264 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“36”
Context: 128
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 128 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 128 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 264 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:136-264
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: 128
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:164-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, exceeding the prior best grade and significantly exceeding the MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Raw copper grade exceeds prior best grade (1.42%)
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“1.47”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 319Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 319
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a molybdenum grade above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to molybdenum credits.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above prior average (116.2 ppm) and prior best grade (282 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“319”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:164-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.050”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:194-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.44
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 10
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“24”
Context: 10
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:194-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: 10
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 258 m
- To
- 262 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:258-262
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 77Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 77
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 258 m
- To
- 262 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“77”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.035
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 258 m
- To
- 262 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:258-262
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is slightly below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.035”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 170 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 170 m
- From
- 306 m
- To
- 476 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:306-476
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (170m)
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (moderate to strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 170
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 42Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 170 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 170 m
- From
- 306 m
- To
- 476 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 170
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 170 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 170 m
- From
- 306 m
- To
- 476 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:306-476
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This wide intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.090”
Context: 170
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 328 m
- To
- 334 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:328-334
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade and CuEq significantly exceeding the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 6
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 328 m
- To
- 334 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 6
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 328 m
- To
- 334 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:328-334
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, representing one of the highest gold intersections at Haib to date.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
- Highest Au metal intersections recorded at Haib to date
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.500”
Context: 6
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 340 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:340-344
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 19Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 19
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 340 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“19”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 340 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:340-344
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade slightly above the project's prior average, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.040”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 354 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:354-362
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 8
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 354 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“66”
Context: 8
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 354 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:354-362
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.060”
Context: 8
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 374 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:368-374
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 6
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 74Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 74
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 374 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“74”
Context: 6
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 374 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:368-374
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: 6
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 404 m
- To
- 424 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:404-424
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 20
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 28Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 404 m
- To
- 424 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“28”
Context: 20
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.423Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.423
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 404 m
- To
- 424 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:404-424
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, representing one of the highest gold intersections at Haib to date.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
- Highest Au metal intersections recorded at Haib to date
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.423”
Context: 20
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 442 m
- To
- 446 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:442-446
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 93Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 93
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 442 m
- To
- 446 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“93”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 442 m
- To
- 446 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:442-446
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade slightly above the project's prior average, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.040”
Context: 4
HM138Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 508 m
- To
- 514 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:508-514
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 6
HM138Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 54Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 54
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 508 m
- To
- 514 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“54”
Context: 6
HM138Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.024
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 508 m
- To
- 514 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:508-514
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.024”
Context: 6
HM139Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 205 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 205 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 205 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:0-205
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This wide intercept confirms moderate copper mineralization, though the raw copper and CuEq grades are below the project averages. It contributes to resource confidence.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept (205m)
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- CuEq grade is below average MRE grade
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 205
HM139Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 21Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 205 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 205 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 205 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“21”
Context: 205
HM139Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 205 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.033
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 205 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 205 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:0-205
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.033”
Context: 205
HM139Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 65 m
- From
- 140 m
- To
- 205 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:140-205
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.55
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper mineralization, close to the prior average and significantly exceeding the MRE average, and importantly extends mineralization to the south, adding significant novelty.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Raw copper grade is close to prior average (0.492%)
- Drilling extends mineralization to the south
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: 65
HM139Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 65 m
- From
- 140 m
- To
- 205 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: 65
HM139Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 65 m
- From
- 140 m
- To
- 205 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:140-205
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.060”
Context: 65
HM139Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:150-164
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 14
HM139Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 37Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 37
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“37”
Context: 14
HM139Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.063
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:150-164
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.063”
Context: 14
HM139Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 196 m
- To
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:196-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity and extending mineralization to the south.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
- Drilling extends mineralization to the south
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 8
HM139Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 196 m
- To
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: 8
HM139Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.139Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.139
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 196 m
- To
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:196-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, and extends mineralization to the south.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
- Drilling extends mineralization to the south
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.139”
Context: 8
HM140Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 455 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 455 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 455 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:0-455
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept confirms mineralization, but both raw copper and CuEq grades are below project averages and moderate porphyry thresholds, indicating lower-grade material.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (455m)
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%) and below moderate threshold for porphyry (0.25%)
- CuEq grade is below average MRE grade
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 455
HM140Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 39Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 455 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 39
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 455 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 455 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“39”
Context: 455
HM140Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 455 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.035
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 455 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 455 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:0-455
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this wide intercept is slightly below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.035”
Context: 455
HM140Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 54 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:46-54
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a low copper grade but a CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, confirming some mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%) and below moderate threshold for porphyry (0.25%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 8
HM140Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 347Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 347
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 54 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a molybdenum grade above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to molybdenum credits.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above prior average (116.2 ppm) and prior best grade (282 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“347”
Context: 8
HM140Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.084Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.084
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 54 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:46-54
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.084”
Context: 8
HM140Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 80 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:72-80
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a low copper grade but a CuEq grade significantly exceeding the MRE average, confirming some mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%) and below moderate threshold for porphyry (0.25%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 8
HM140Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 80 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 8
HM140Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 80 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:72-80
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, confirming elevated gold in this area.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
- Confirms elevated gold in this part of Target 1
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.510”
Context: 8
HM140Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:100-110
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a low copper grade but a CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, confirming some mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%) and below moderate threshold for porphyry (0.25%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 10
HM140Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is very low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 10
HM140Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:100-110
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, confirming elevated gold in this area.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
- Confirms elevated gold in this part of Target 1
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.220”
Context: 10
HM140Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:134-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 6
HM140Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: 6
HM140Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.155Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.155
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:134-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, confirming elevated gold in this area.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
- Gold grade is exceptional for porphyry deposit
- Confirms elevated gold in this part of Target 1
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.155”
Context: 6
HM140Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 278 m
- To
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:278-346
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade and CuEq grade meeting the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade meets average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 68
HM140Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 43Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 43
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 278 m
- To
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is low, indicating minimal molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is low compared to prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“43”
Context: 68
HM140Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 278 m
- To
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:278-346
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is very low, indicating minimal gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is very low compared to prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: 68
HM140Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 418 m
- To
- 434 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:418-434
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade and CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 16
HM140Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 54Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 54
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 418 m
- To
- 434 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“54”
Context: 16
HM140Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.036
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 418 m
- To
- 434 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:418-434
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is consistent with the project's prior average, indicating a moderate gold contribution.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is consistent with prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.036”
Context: 16
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 582 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 582 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 582 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:0-582
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.25
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept confirms mineralization, but both raw copper and CuEq grades are below project averages and moderate porphyry thresholds, indicating lower-grade material.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (582m)
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%) and below moderate threshold for porphyry (0.25%)
- CuEq grade is below average MRE grade
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 582
HM141Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 51Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 582 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 51
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 582 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 582 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“51”
Context: 582
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 582 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 582 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 582 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:0-582
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: 582
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 106 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:106-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade and CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 32
HM141Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 99
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 106 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“99”
Context: 32
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.033
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 106 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:106-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.033”
Context: 32
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 106 m
- To
- 112 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:106-112
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 6
HM141Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 135Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 135
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 106 m
- To
- 112 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a molybdenum grade above the project's prior average, contributing positively to molybdenum credits.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above prior average (116.2 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“135”
Context: 6
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.075
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 106 m
- To
- 112 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:106-112
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.075”
Context: 6
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 158 m
- To
- 176 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:158-176
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade and CuEq grade meeting the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade meets average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 18
HM141Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 62Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 62
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 158 m
- To
- 176 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“62”
Context: 18
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.027
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 158 m
- To
- 176 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:158-176
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.027”
Context: 18
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 184 m
- To
- 210 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:184-210
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade and CuEq grade exceeding the MRE average, confirming mineralization in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Copper grade is moderate for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade exceeds average MRE grade
- Infill drilling confirms continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 26
HM141Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 184 m
- To
- 210 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a moderate molybdenum contribution.
Negative factors
- Molybdenum grade is below prior average (116.2 ppm)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“66”
Context: 26
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.027
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 184 m
- To
- 210 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:184-210
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.027”
Context: 26
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 84 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 84 m
- From
- 234 m
- To
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:234-318
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very wide intercept shows strong copper mineralization and a CuEq grade significantly above the MRE average, confirming good continuity in an infill hole.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept (84m)
- Good copper grade for porphyry deposit (strong)
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- Raw copper grade is below prior average (0.492%)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 84
HM141Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 163Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 84 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 163
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 84 m
- From
- 234 m
- To
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a molybdenum grade above the project's prior average, contributing positively to molybdenum credits.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above prior average (116.2 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“163”
Context: 84
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 84 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 84 m
- From
- 234 m
- To
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:234-318
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade for this wide intercept is below the project's prior average, indicating a minor gold contribution.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is below prior average (0.036 g/t)
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.030”
Context: 84
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 234 m
- To
- 244 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:234-244
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 10
HM141Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 120Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 120
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 234 m
- To
- 244 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a molybdenum grade above the project's prior average, contributing positively to molybdenum credits.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above prior average (116.2 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“120”
Context: 10
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.038
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 234 m
- To
- 244 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:234-244
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade slightly above the project's prior average, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is above prior average (0.036 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.038”
Context: 10
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 250 m
- To
- 256 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:250-256
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, significantly exceeding the prior best grade and MRE average, confirming high-grade continuity in the infill program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for porphyry deposit
- CuEq grade significantly exceeds average MRE grade and prior best grade
- Infill drilling confirms high-grade continuity
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: 6
HM141Haib Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 124Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 124
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 250 m
- To
- 256 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a molybdenum grade above the project's prior average, contributing positively to molybdenum credits.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above prior average (116.2 ppm)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“124”
Context: 6
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.064Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.064
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 250 m
- To
- 256 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:250-256
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a gold grade significantly above the project's prior average and best grade, contributing positively to gold credits.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is significantly above prior average (0.036 g/t) and prior best grade (0.048 g/t)
Negative factors
- True width unknown
Evidence · table
“0.064”
Context: 6
HM135Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 416 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 416 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 416 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:0-416
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: HM135
HM135Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 48 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 48 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:0-48
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: HM135
HM135Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 47Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 47
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:112-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 47 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“47”
Context: HM135
HM135Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 106Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM135
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 106
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM135:116-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 106 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“106”
Context: HM135
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 459 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 459 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 459 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:0-459
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 66 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“66”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 50Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 162 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 50
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 162 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:6-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 50 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“50”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 35Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 35
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:18-24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“35”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 35Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 35
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 40 m
- To
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:40-50
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“35”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 82Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 82
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:54-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 82 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“82”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 99
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 96 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:94-96
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 99 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“99”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 76Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 76
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 104 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:102-104
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 76 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“76”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 87Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 87
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:136-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 87 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“87”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 44Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 64 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 44
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 64 m
- From
- 196 m
- To
- 260 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:196-260
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 44 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“44”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 90Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 90
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 238 m
- To
- 242 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:238-242
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 90 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“90”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 325Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 325
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 380 m
- To
- 386 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:380-386
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 325 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“325”
Context: HM137
HM137Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 339Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM137
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 339
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 444 m
- To
- 456 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM137:444-456
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 339 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“339”
Context: HM137
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 42Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 584 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 584 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 584 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:0-584
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 42 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 103Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 103
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:0-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 103 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“103”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 59Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 59
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:8-16
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 59 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“59”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:54-58
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 100 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“100”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 36Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 128 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 128 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 264 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:136-264
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 36 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“36”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 319Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 319
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:164-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 319 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“319”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:194-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 24 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“24”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 77Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 77
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 258 m
- To
- 262 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:258-262
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 77 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“77”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 42Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 170 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 170 m
- From
- 306 m
- To
- 476 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:306-476
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 42 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 328 m
- To
- 334 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:328-334
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 19Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 19
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 340 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:340-344
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“19”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 354 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:354-362
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 66 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“66”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 74Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 74
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 374 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:368-374
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 74 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“74”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 28Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 404 m
- To
- 424 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:404-424
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 28 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“28”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 93Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 93
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 442 m
- To
- 446 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:442-446
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 93 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“93”
Context: HM138
HM138Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 54Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM138
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 54
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 508 m
- To
- 514 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM138:508-514
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 54 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“54”
Context: HM138
HM139Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 21Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 205 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 205 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 205 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:0-205
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 21 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“21”
Context: HM139
HM139Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 65 m
- From
- 140 m
- To
- 205 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:140-205
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 32 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: HM139
HM139Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 37Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 37
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:150-164
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 37 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“37”
Context: HM139
HM139Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM139
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 196 m
- To
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM139:196-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 18 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: HM139
HM140Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 39Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 455 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 39
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 455 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 455 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:0-455
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 39 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“39”
Context: HM140
HM140Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 347Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 347
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 54 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:46-54
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 347 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“347”
Context: HM140
HM140Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 80 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:72-80
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: HM140
HM140Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:100-110
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: HM140
HM140Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:134-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 32 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: HM140
HM140Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 43Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 43
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 278 m
- To
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:278-346
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 43 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“43”
Context: HM140
HM140Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 54Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM140
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 54
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 418 m
- To
- 434 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM140:418-434
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 54 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“54”
Context: HM140
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 51Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 582 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 51
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 582 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 582 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:0-582
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 51 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“51”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 99
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 106 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:106-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 99 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“99”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 135Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 135
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 106 m
- To
- 112 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:106-112
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 135 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“135”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 62Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 62
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 158 m
- To
- 176 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:158-176
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 62 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“62”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 184 m
- To
- 210 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:184-210
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 66 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“66”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 163Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 84 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 163
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 84 m
- From
- 234 m
- To
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:234-318
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 163 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“163”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 120Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 120
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 234 m
- To
- 244 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:234-244
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 120 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“120”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 124Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 124
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 250 m
- To
- 256 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:250-256
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 124 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“124”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 274 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:270-274
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.14 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.14 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.14”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 158Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 158
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 274 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:270-274
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 158 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“158”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.054
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 274 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:270-274
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.054 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.054 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.054”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:304-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.57 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:304-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 32 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:304-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 58 m
- From
- 334 m
- To
- 392 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:334-392
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 20.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 34Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 58 m
- From
- 334 m
- To
- 392 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:334-392
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 34 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“34”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.028
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 58 m
- From
- 334 m
- To
- 392 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:334-392
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.028 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.028”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 342 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:342-358
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.54 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 49Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 49
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 342 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:342-358
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 49 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“49”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.045
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 342 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:342-358
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.045 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.045 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.045”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 566 m
- To
- 574 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:566-574
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.59 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 45Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 45
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 566 m
- To
- 574 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:566-574
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 45 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“45”
Context: HM141
HM141Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM141
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.036
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 566 m
- To
- 574 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM141:566-574
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.036 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.036 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.036”
Context: HM141
HM142Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 363 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 363 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 363 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:0-363
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 43.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: HM142
HM142Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 55Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 363 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 55
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 363 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 363 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:0-363
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 55 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“55”
Context: HM142
HM142Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 363 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 363 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 363 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:0-363
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: HM142
HM142Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 42 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 42 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 202 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:160-202
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 10.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: HM142
HM142Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 220Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 42 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 220
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 42 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 202 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:160-202
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 220 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“220”
Context: HM142
HM142Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 42 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 202 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:160-202
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: HM142
HM142Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:160-164
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: HM142
HM142Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 1360Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1360
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:160-164
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1360 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“1,360”
Context: HM142
HM142Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM142
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.028
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM142:160-164
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.028 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.028”
Context: HM142
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 706 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 706 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 706 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:0-706
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 148.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 111Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 706 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 111
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 706 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 706 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:0-706
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 111 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“111”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 706 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 706 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 706 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:0-706
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 12.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:16-22
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 378Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 378
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:16-22
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 378 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“378”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:16-22
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.040”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:34-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 182Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 182
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:34-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 182 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“182”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:34-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 114 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 114 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 226 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:112-226
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 22.8 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 335Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 114 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 335
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 114 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 226 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:112-226
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 335 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“335”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 114 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 114 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 226 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:112-226
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 174 m
- To
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:174-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 518Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 518
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 174 m
- To
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:174-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 518 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“518”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 174 m
- To
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:174-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 208 m
- To
- 226 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:208-226
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 945Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 945
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 208 m
- To
- 226 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:208-226
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 945 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“945”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 208 m
- To
- 226 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:208-226
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 230 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 230 m
- From
- 358 m
- To
- 588 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:358-588
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 69.0 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 64Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 230 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 64
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 230 m
- From
- 358 m
- To
- 588 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:358-588
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 64 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“64”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 230 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 230 m
- From
- 358 m
- To
- 588 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:358-588
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 410 m
- To
- 436 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:410-436
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 11.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.43 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 156Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 156
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 410 m
- To
- 436 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:410-436
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 156 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“156”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 410 m
- To
- 436 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:410-436
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 490 m
- To
- 504 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:490-504
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.63 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 490 m
- To
- 504 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:490-504
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 66 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“66”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.037
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 490 m
- To
- 504 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:490-504
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.037 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.037”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 532 m
- To
- 536 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:532-536
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.49 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 75Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 75
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 532 m
- To
- 536 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:532-536
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 75 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“75”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.027
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 532 m
- To
- 536 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:532-536
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.027 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.027 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.027”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 546 m
- To
- 552 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:546-552
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.45 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 118Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 118
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 546 m
- To
- 552 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:546-552
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 118 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“118”
Context: HM143
HM143Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM143
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 546 m
- To
- 552 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM143:546-552
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: HM143
HM144Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 211 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM144
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 211 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 211 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM144:0-211
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 25.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: HM144
HM144Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 16Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 211 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM144
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 16
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 211 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 211 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM144:0-211
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 16 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“16”
Context: HM144
HM144Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 211 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM144
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 211 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 211 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM144:0-211
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: HM144
HM148Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 311 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 311 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 311 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:0-311
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 56.0 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 102Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 311 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 102
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 311 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 311 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:0-311
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 102 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“102”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 311 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 311 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 311 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:0-311
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 62 m
- To
- 74 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:62-74
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 227Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 227
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 62 m
- To
- 74 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:62-74
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 227 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“227”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 62 m
- To
- 74 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:62-74
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 180 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:136-180
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 11.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 195Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 195
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 44 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 180 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:136-180
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 195 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“195”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 44 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 180 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:136-180
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:136-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 2070Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 2070
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:136-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2070 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2,070”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:136-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 146 m
- To
- 152 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:146-152
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.46 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 121Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 121
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 146 m
- To
- 152 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:146-152
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 121 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“121”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 146 m
- To
- 152 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:146-152
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 232 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:224-232
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 21Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 232 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:224-232
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 21 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“21”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 232 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:224-232
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 246 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:246-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 10.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.45 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 97Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 97
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 246 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:246-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 97 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“97”
Context: HM148
HM148Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM148
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 246 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM148:246-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: HM148
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 428 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 428 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 428 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:0-428
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 132.7 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 56Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 428 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 56
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 428 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 428 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:0-428
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 56 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“56”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 428 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.027
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 428 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 428 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:0-428
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.027 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.027”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 54 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 80 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:26-80
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 26.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.49 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 38Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 38
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 54 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 80 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:26-80
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 38 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“38”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.037
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 54 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 80 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:26-80
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.037 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.037”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:32-34
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.11 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.11 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 77Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 77
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:32-34
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 77 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“77”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.057
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:32-34
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.057 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.057 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.057”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:46-50
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.92 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.92 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.92”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 40Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 40
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:46-50
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 40 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“40”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.066Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.066
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:46-50
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.066 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.066 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.066”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:66-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.78 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:66-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 24 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“24”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.047Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.047
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:66-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.047 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.047 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.047”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 124 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:92-124
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.66 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 21.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.66 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 45Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 45
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 124 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:92-124
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 45 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“45”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.036
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 124 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:92-124
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.036 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.036 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.036”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 104 m
- To
- 108 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:104-108
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.67 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.67 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 55Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 55
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 104 m
- To
- 108 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:104-108
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 55 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“55”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.084Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.084
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 104 m
- To
- 108 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:104-108
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.084 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.084 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.084”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 142 m
- To
- 178 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:142-178
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 9.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 68Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 68
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 142 m
- To
- 178 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:142-178
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 68 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“68”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 142 m
- To
- 178 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:142-178
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 186 m
- To
- 218 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:186-218
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 13.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.41 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 65Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 65
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 186 m
- To
- 218 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:186-218
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 65 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“65”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.031
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 186 m
- To
- 218 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:186-218
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.031 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.031 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.031”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 208 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:202-208
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.61 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 154Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 154
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 208 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:202-208
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 154 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“154”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.048Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.048
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 208 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:202-208
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.048 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.048 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.048”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 210 m
- To
- 212 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:210-212
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.63 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.63 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.63”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 93Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 93
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 210 m
- To
- 212 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:210-212
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 93 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“93”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.048Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.048
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 210 m
- To
- 212 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:210-212
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.048 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.048 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.048”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:252-276
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 10.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.45 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 88Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 88
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:252-276
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 88 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“88”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.042Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.042
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:252-276
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.042 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.042 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.042”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 260 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:256-260
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.64 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 119Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 119
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 260 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:256-260
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 119 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“119”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.059Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.059
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 260 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:256-260
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.059 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.059 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.059”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 262 m
- To
- 268 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:262-268
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.6 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 76Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 76
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 262 m
- To
- 268 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:262-268
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 76 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“76”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.043
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 262 m
- To
- 268 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:262-268
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.043 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.043 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.043”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 272 m
- To
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:272-276
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.59 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 58Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 58
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 272 m
- To
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:272-276
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 58 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“58”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.063
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 272 m
- To
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:272-276
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.063 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.063 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.063”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:304-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 548Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 548
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:304-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 548 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“548”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.035
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:304-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.035 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.035 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.035”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 308 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:308-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 1002Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1002
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 308 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:308-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1002 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“1,002”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 308 m
- To
- 312 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:308-312
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 388 m
- To
- 398 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:388-398
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 388 m
- To
- 398 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:388-398
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 13 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.025
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 388 m
- To
- 398 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:388-398
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.025 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.025 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.025”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 412 m
- To
- 422 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:412-422
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 20Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 412 m
- To
- 422 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:412-422
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 20 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“20”
Context: HM149
HM149Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM149
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.028
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 412 m
- To
- 422 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM149:412-422
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.028 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.028”
Context: HM149
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 714 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 714 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 714 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:0-714
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 185.6 %·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.26 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 101Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 714 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 101
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 714 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 714 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:0-714
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 101 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“101”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 714 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 714 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 714 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:0-714
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 12.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 2 m
- To
- 42 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:2-42
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 10.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 156Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 156
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 2 m
- To
- 42 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:2-42
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 156 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“156”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 2 m
- To
- 42 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:2-42
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 90 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:70-90
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 180Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 180
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 90 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:70-90
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 180 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“180”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 90 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:70-90
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 96 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:96-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 84Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 84
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 96 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:96-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 84 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“84”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 96 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:96-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28 m
- From
- 144 m
- To
- 172 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:144-172
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 51Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 51
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 28 m
- From
- 144 m
- To
- 172 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:144-172
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 51 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“51”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28 m
- From
- 144 m
- To
- 172 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:144-172
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 268 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:200-268
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 19.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 51Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 51
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 268 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:200-268
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 51 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“51”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 268 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:200-268
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 294 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:294-362
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 29.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.43 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 263Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 263
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 294 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:294-362
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 263 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“263”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68 m
- From
- 294 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:294-362
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 322 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:304-322
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 13.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.72 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 542Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 542
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 322 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:304-322
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 542 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“542”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.027
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 304 m
- To
- 322 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:304-322
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.027 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.027 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.027”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 328 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:328-344
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 410Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 410
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 328 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:328-344
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 410 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“410”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.025
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 328 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:328-344
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.025 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.025 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.025”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 82 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 82 m
- From
- 386 m
- To
- 468 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:386-468
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 26.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 204Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 82 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 204
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 82 m
- From
- 386 m
- To
- 468 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:386-468
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 204 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“204”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 82 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 82 m
- From
- 386 m
- To
- 468 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:386-468
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 532 m
- To
- 556 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:532-556
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 155Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 155
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 532 m
- To
- 556 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:532-556
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 155 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“155”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 532 m
- To
- 556 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:532-556
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 658 m
- To
- 664 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:658-664
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.51 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 97Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 97
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 658 m
- To
- 664 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:658-664
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 97 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“97”
Context: HM153
HM153Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HM153
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 658 m
- To
- 664 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HM153:658-664
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.030”
Context: HM153
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 243 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 243 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 243 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:0-243
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 85.0 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 98Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 243 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 98
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 243 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 243 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:0-243
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 98 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“98”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 243 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 243 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 243 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:0-243
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:4-16
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.74 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.74”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 128Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 128
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:4-16
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 128 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“128”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.024
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:4-16
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.024 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.024 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.024”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:10-14
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.98 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.98 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 196Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 196
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:10-14
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 196 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“196”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.028
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:10-14
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.028 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.028”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 208 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 208 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:32-240
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 72.8 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 208 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 208 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:32-240
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 100 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“100”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 208 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 208 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:32-240
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 52 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:46-52
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.54 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 201Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 201
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 52 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:46-52
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 201 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“201”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 52 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:46-52
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 124 m
- To
- 130 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:124-130
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.61 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 302Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 302
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 124 m
- To
- 130 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:124-130
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 302 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“302”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.025
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 124 m
- To
- 130 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:124-130
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.025 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.025 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.025”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 144 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:136-144
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.51 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 171Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 171
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 144 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:136-144
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 171 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“171”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.033
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 144 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:136-144
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.033 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.033 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.033”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:164-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.49 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 193Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 193
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:164-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 193 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“193”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:164-168
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 198 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:194-198
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.58 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 70Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 70
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 198 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:194-198
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 70 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“70”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 198 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:194-198
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 236 m
- To
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:236-240
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.49 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 22Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 236 m
- To
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:236-240
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“22”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC001Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC001
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.027
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 236 m
- To
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC001:236-240
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.027 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.027 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.027”
Context: HMRC001
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 243 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 243 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 243 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:0-243
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 31.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 31Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 243 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 31
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 243 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 243 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:0-243
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“31”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 243 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 243 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 243 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:0-243
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 116 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:92-116
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 15.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.63 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 110Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 110
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 116 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:92-116
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 110 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“110”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 116 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:92-116
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.016 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.016 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 108 m
- To
- 116 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:108-116
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.09 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 112Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 112
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 108 m
- To
- 116 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:108-116
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 112 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“112”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 108 m
- To
- 116 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:108-116
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 146 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:126-146
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 130Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 130
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 146 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:126-146
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 130 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“130”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC002Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC002
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 146 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC002:126-146
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: HMRC002
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 138 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 138 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:0-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 37.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: HMRC003
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 45Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 138 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 45
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 138 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:0-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 45 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“45”
Context: HMRC003
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 138 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 138 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:0-138
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: HMRC003
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 76 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 76 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:0-76
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 25.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: HMRC003
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 69Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 69
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 76 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 76 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:0-76
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 69 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“69”
Context: HMRC003
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 76 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 76 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:0-76
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: HMRC003
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:36-46
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.58 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: HMRC003
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · moGrade: 61Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 61
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:36-46
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 61 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“61”
Context: HMRC003
HMRC003Haib Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- HMRC003
- Project
- Haib Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KRY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- HMRC003:36-46
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: HMRC003
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.