KOB: Annual Report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Koba Resources Limited
- Ticker
- KOB
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- North Queensland
- Primary commodity
- Tin
- Secondary commodities
- Tungsten, Uranium, Copper, Silver, Gold, Yttrium
- Document categories
- Drill results, Capital raise, Agreement transaction
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 08:17:23 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Koba Resources Limited's annual report details active exploration across its tin-tungsten projects in North Queensland and uranium projects in South Australia. Recent work includes new drilling, extensive rock chip and soil sampling, leading to high-grade results and the extension of uranium mineralization trends. The company also strengthened its financial position through multiple capital raises, while rationalizing its portfolio with the impairment of cobalt assets and relinquishment of a lithium project.
Reasoning: Koba Resources' annual report highlights robust exploration activities across its tin-tungsten and uranium projects, yielding promising high-grade rock chip samples and extending known uranium mineralization. The company has also successfully completed significant capital raises to fund its ongoing programs, despite some asset impairments and pending drill results.
Positive factors
- Active exploration programs across multiple projects, including new drilling and extensive sampling.
- Discovery of new uranium prospect (Delord) and significant extension of mineralization trend (Everest).
- Numerous high-grade rock chip sample results for tin and tungsten, indicating strong prospectivity.
- Successful capital raises strengthening the company's financial position.
- Competent Person Statement confirms JORC 2012 compliance for reported exploration results.
Negative factors
- Assay results for recent drilling programs are pending, creating short-term uncertainty.
- Impairment of cobalt assets and relinquishment of a lithium project indicate portfolio rationalization.
- Many reported drill intercepts are historical, limiting novelty for those specific results.
Facts used in scoring: 68
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 68. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (68)
Fact 1Mt Garnet · tinGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 23.8 m
- To
- 24.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Mt_Garnet:23.8-24.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical high-grade tin intercept from the Gilmore Tin Mine, indicating past prospectivity but not new information.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin intercept.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Short intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1m @ 5.2% Sn from 23.8m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 2Mt Garnet · tinGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 121 m
- To
- 124 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Mt_Garnet:121-124
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical tin intercept from the Gilmore Tin Mine, showing mineralization but not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade tin intercept.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
Evidence · text
“3m @ 1.0% Sn from 121m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 3Mt Garnet · tungstenGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 27 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Mt_Garnet:27-30
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical tungsten intercept from the Gilmore Tin Mine, indicating past prospectivity but not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade tungsten intercept.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
Evidence · text
“3m @ 1.2% W from 27m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 4Mt Garnet · tungstenGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 178 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Mt_Garnet:175-178
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical tungsten intercept from the Gilmore Tin Mine, showing mineralization but not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade tungsten intercept.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
Evidence · text
“3m @ 0.95% W from 175m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 5Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 21.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Stannex Prospect, indicating significant surface mineralization and high prospectivity.
Positive factors
- Extremely high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“21.3% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 6Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 8.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.8
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Stannex Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“8.8% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 7Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Stannex Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“7.9% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 8Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Stannex Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“7.1% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 9Mt Garnet · tinGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.6 m
- From
- 64.4 m
- To
- 76 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Mt_Garnet:64.4-76
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept from the Stannex Prospect, showing a good width of moderate-grade tin mineralization.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length for tin mineralization.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Grade is moderate for tin.
Evidence · text
“11.6m @ 0.30% Sn from 64.4m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 10Mt Garnet · tinGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical high-grade tin sub-interval within a broader zone at Stannex Prospect, but its narrow width limits materiality.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin sub-interval.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Very short intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.8m @ 1.5% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 11Mt Garnet · tinGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 146.5 m
- To
- 147.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 146.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Mt_Garnet:146.5-147.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical moderate-grade tin intercept from the Stannex Prospect, but its narrow width limits materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade tin intercept.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Short intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.0m @ 0.98% Sn from 146.5m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 12Mt Garnet · tinGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.1 m
- From
- 52.4 m
- To
- 63.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Mt_Garnet:52.4-63.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept from the Stannex Prospect, showing a good width of low-grade tin mineralization.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length for tin mineralization.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Low grade for tin.
Evidence · text
“11.1m @ 0.15% Sn from 52.4m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 13Mt Garnet · tinGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 95.9 m
- To
- 102.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Mt_Garnet:95.9-102.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept from the Stannex Prospect, showing a moderate width of low-grade tin mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate intercept length for tin mineralization.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Low grade for tin.
Evidence · text
“6.2m @ 0.24% Sn from 95.9m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 14Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Starlight Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Starlight Prospect, indicating significant surface mineralization and high prospectivity.
Positive factors
- Extremely high-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“13.2% W (Starlight Prospect)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 15Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Gows Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Gows Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“5.4% W (Gows Prospect)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 16Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Ahmets Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Ahmets Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“5.1% W (Ahmets Prospect)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 17Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Crest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Crest Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“3.7% W (Crest Prospect)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 18Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Mountain Maid Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Mountain Maid Prospect, indicating surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“1.6% W (Mountain Maid Prospect)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 19Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Tungsten Knob Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Tungsten Knob Prospect, indicating surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“1.2% W (Tungsten Knob Prospect)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 20Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 7.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Maria Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Maria Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“7.7% Sn (Maria Prospect)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 21Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Stannex Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Stannex Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“4.5% Sn (Stannex Prospect)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 22Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Gows Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Gows Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“2.8% W”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 23Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Gows Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Gows Prospect, indicating surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“1.2% W”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 24Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Gows Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Gows Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization and polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“3.2% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 25Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · copperGrade: 35.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Gows Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade copper rock chip sample from the Gows Prospect, highlighting significant polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- Extremely high-grade copper rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
- Indicates polymetallic system.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“35.4% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 26Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · silverGrade: 378Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 378
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Gows Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade silver rock chip sample from the Gows Prospect, indicating polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
- Indicates polymetallic system.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“378ppm Ag”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 27Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Gows Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade gold rock chip sample from the Gows Prospect, indicating polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade gold rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
- Indicates polymetallic system.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“1.6 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 28Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · yttriumGrade: 3070Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- yttrium
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 3070
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Gows Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high yttrium value from a rock chip sample at the Gows Prospect, indicating polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- High yttrium values in rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
- Indicates polymetallic system.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“3,070ppm Yttrium”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 29Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Starlight Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade tin rock chip sample from the Starlight Prospect, indicating some surface mineralization but not high-grade.
Positive factors
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Low-grade tin rock chip sample.
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“0.13% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 30Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Crest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Crest Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“3.7% W”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 31Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Crest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Crest Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“2.2% W”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 32Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Ahmets Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Ahmets Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization and polymetallic potential with tin.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
- Associated with high-grade tin.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“5.0% W”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 33Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Tungsten Knob Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Tungsten Knob Prospect, indicating surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“1.2% W”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 34Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Tungsten Knob Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Tungsten Knob Prospect, indicating some surface mineralization but not high-grade.
Positive factors
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Low-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“0.3% W”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 35Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project · tungstenGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Tungsten Knob Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade tungsten rock chip sample from the Tungsten Knob Prospect, indicating some surface mineralization but not high-grade.
Positive factors
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Low-grade tungsten rock chip sample.
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“0.1% W”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 36Stannary Hills · tinGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.8 m
- From
- 7.3 m
- To
- 17.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Stannary_Hills:7.3-17.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kitchener Trend
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical high-grade tin intercept from the Kitchener Trend, indicating significant mineralization amenable to underground mining.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin intercept over a good width.
- Indicates underground mining potential.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
Evidence · text
“9.8m @ 1.3% Sn from 7.3m; (from underground)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 37Stannary Hills · tinGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 54 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 54 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Stannary_Hills:6-60
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Kitchener Trend
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept from the Kitchener Trend, showing a very wide zone of moderate-grade tin mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very significant intercept length for tin mineralization.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Grade is moderate for tin.
Evidence · text
“54.0m @ 0.45% Sn from 6.0m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 38Stannary Hills · tinGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Kitchener Trend
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical high-grade tin sub-interval within a broader zone at Kitchener Trend, indicating a higher-grade core.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin sub-interval over a good width.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
Evidence · text
“6.0m @ 1.7% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 39Stannary Hills · tinGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 20 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Stannary_Hills:18-20
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Kitchener Trend
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical high-grade tin intercept from the Kitchener Trend, but its narrow width limits overall materiality.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin intercept.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Short intercept length.
Evidence · text
“2.0m @ 4.8% Sn from 18.0m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 40Stannary Hills · tinGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 7.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Stannary_Hills:6.1-7.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Kitchener Trend
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical high-grade tin intercept from the Kitchener Trend, but its very narrow width limits overall materiality.
Positive factors
- High-grade tin intercept.
Negative factors
- Result is historical, limiting novelty.
- Very short intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.2m @ 3.5% Sn from 6.1m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 41Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 26.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Jiminy Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Jiminy Prospect, indicating significant surface mineralization and high prospectivity.
Positive factors
- Extremely high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“26.1% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 42Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Jiminy Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Jiminy Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“12.4% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 43Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 9Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Jiminy Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Jiminy Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“9.0% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 44Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project · tinGrade: 6.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- North Queensland
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.8
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Jiminy Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high-grade tin rock chip sample from the Jiminy Prospect, indicating strong surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high-grade tin rock chip sample.
- New sampling results from a high-priority prospect.
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are not representative of bulk mineralization.
Evidence · text
“6.8% Sn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
OBRM093Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 693Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 1.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OBRM093
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 693
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 1.07 m
- From
- 88.4 m
- To
- 89.47 m
- Intercept Depth
- 88.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- OBRM093:88.4-89.47
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Delord Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade uranium intercept from the newly discovered Delord Prospect, indicating new mineralization.
Positive factors
- New discovery at Delord Prospect.
- Moderate-grade uranium intercept.
Negative factors
- Relatively narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.07m @ 693ppm eU3O8 from 88.4m (OBRM093)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
OBRM093Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 1045Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 0.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OBRM093
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1045
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 0.53 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Delord Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade uranium sub-interval from the newly discovered Delord Prospect, indicating a higher-grade core within the mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade uranium sub-interval.
- New discovery at Delord Prospect.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.53m @ 1,045ppm eU3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
OBRM093Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 265Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OBRM093
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 265
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 86.1 m
- To
- 86.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- OBRM093:86.1-86.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Delord Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade uranium intercept from the newly discovered Delord Prospect, indicating mineralization but at lower grades.
Positive factors
- New discovery at Delord Prospect.
Negative factors
- Low-grade uranium intercept.
- Narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.7m @ 265ppm eU3O8 from 86.1m (OBRM093)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MJRM042Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 790Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJRM042
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 790
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 103.2 m
- To
- 104.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJRM042:103.2-104.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Everest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade uranium intercept from the Everest Prospect, contributing to the extension of the known mineralized trend.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade uranium intercept.
- Contributes to extending known mineralization trend.
Negative factors
- Relatively narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.5m @ 790ppm eU3O8 from 103.2m (MJRM042)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MJRM042Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 1627Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJRM042
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1627
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Everest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade uranium sub-interval from the Everest Prospect, indicating a higher-grade core within the extended mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade uranium sub-interval.
- Contributes to extending known mineralization trend.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.6m @ 1,627ppm eU3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MJRM054Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 537Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJRM054
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 537
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 90.36 m
- To
- 91.46 m
- Intercept Depth
- 90.36 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJRM054:90.36-91.46
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Everest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade uranium intercept from the Everest Prospect, contributing to the extension of the known mineralized trend.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade uranium intercept.
- Contributes to extending known mineralization trend.
Negative factors
- Relatively narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.1m @ 537ppm eU3O8 from 90.36m (MJRM054)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MJRM054Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 1003Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJRM054
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1003
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Everest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade uranium sub-interval from the Everest Prospect, indicating a higher-grade core within the extended mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade uranium sub-interval.
- Contributes to extending known mineralization trend.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.4m @ 1,003ppm eU3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MJRM045Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 512Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJRM045
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 512
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 97.26 m
- To
- 98.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.26 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJRM045:97.26-98.36
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Everest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade uranium intercept from the Everest Prospect, contributing to the extension of the known mineralized trend.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade uranium intercept.
- Contributes to extending known mineralization trend.
Negative factors
- Relatively narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.1m @ 512ppm eU3O8 from 97.26m (MJRM045)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MJRM045Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 1000Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJRM045
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1000
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Everest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade uranium sub-interval from the Everest Prospect, indicating a higher-grade core within the extended mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade uranium sub-interval.
- Contributes to extending known mineralization trend.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.4m @ 1,000ppm eU3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MJRM037Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 548Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJRM037
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 548
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 87.25 m
- To
- 88.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJRM037:87.25-88.25
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Everest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade uranium intercept from the Everest Prospect, contributing to the extension of the known mineralized trend.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade uranium intercept.
- Contributes to extending known mineralization trend.
Negative factors
- Relatively narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.0m @ 548ppm eU3O8 from 87.25m (MJRM037)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MJRM037Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 1002Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJRM037
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1002
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Everest Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade uranium sub-interval from the Everest Prospect, indicating a higher-grade core within the extended mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade uranium sub-interval.
- Contributes to extending known mineralization trend.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.4m @ 1,002ppm eU3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
OBRM098Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 482Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OBRM098
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 482
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 86.5 m
- To
- 88.02 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- OBRM098:86.5-88.02
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Chivas Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade uranium intercept from the Chivas Prospect, providing further data on mineralization in the target area.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade uranium intercept.
- Contributes to understanding mineralization in the area.
Negative factors
- Relatively narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.52m @ 482ppm eU3O8 from 86.5m (OBRM098)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
OBRM098Yarramba Uranium · uraniumGrade: 1071Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8Intercept: 0.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- OBRM098
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- KOB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1071
- Grade Unit
- ppm eU3O8
- Intercept
- 0.52 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Chivas Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade uranium sub-interval from the Chivas Prospect, indicating a higher-grade core within the mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade uranium sub-interval.
- Contributes to understanding mineralization in the area.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.52m @ 1,071ppm eU3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 58View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company successfully completed an entitlement offer, raising over $440k and issuing shares with free attaching options, strengthening its financial position.
Positive factors
- Successful capital raise providing funding for operations.
- Included free attaching options.
Evidence · text
“issue on 4 July 2025 of 12,293,309 fully paid ordinary shares (“Shares”) at an issue price of $0.036 per Share, together with 6,146,639 free attaching unlisted options pursuant to a non-renounceable rights issue (“Entitlement Offer”) which raised proceeds of $442,559”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 59View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company successfully placed the shortfall from its entitlement offer, raising over $400k and issuing shares with free attaching options, further strengthening its financial position.
Positive factors
- Successful capital raise providing additional funding.
- Included free attaching options.
Evidence · text
“issue on 25 July 2025 of 11,150,000 Shares at an issue price of $0.036 per Share, together with 5,575,000 free attaching June 2028 Options, pursuant to the placement of the Entitlement Offer shortfall, which raised gross proceeds of $401,400”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 60View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company completed a significant placement, raising $4.35 million and issuing a large number of shares with free attaching options, substantially boosting its financial capacity.
Positive factors
- Significant capital raise providing substantial funding for operations.
- Included free attaching options.
Evidence · text
“issue on 8 December 2025 of 87,000,000 Shares (“Placement Shares”) at an issue price of $0.05 per Share, together with 42,799,991 free attaching June 2028 Options pursuant to a placement (“Placement”), which raised gross proceeds of $4.35 million”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 61Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Koba acquired a 100% interest in two highly prospective tin-tungsten projects, significantly expanding its portfolio and exploration potential in North Queensland.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of highly prospective tin-tungsten projects.
- Expands company's project portfolio in a key commodity.
Evidence · text
“On 7 October 2025, the Company entered into a binding agreement with EV Resources Limited ("EVR") to acquire a 100% interest in the Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project and the Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project, located within the historic Herberton Tin Field in North Queensland. The consideration payable to EVR comprises: (i) a non-refundable cash deposit of $100,000 (paid 3 September 2025); (ii) cash consideration of $600,000 payable on completion (paid 16 January 2026); and (iii) the grant of a 1% net smelter return royalty over the projects.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 62Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Koba acquired a 100% interest in two highly prospective tin-tungsten projects, significantly expanding its portfolio and exploration potential in North Queensland.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of highly prospective tin-tungsten projects.
- Expands company's project portfolio in a key commodity.
Evidence · text
“On 7 October 2025, the Company entered into a binding agreement with EV Resources Limited ("EVR") to acquire a 100% interest in the Stannary Hills Tin-Tungsten Project and the Mt Garnet Tin-Tungsten Project, located within the historic Herberton Tin Field in North Queensland. The consideration payable to EVR comprises: (i) a non-refundable cash deposit of $100,000 (paid 3 September 2025); (ii) cash consideration of $600,000 payable on completion (paid 16 January 2026); and (iii) the grant of a 1% net smelter return royalty over the projects.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 63JB1 Lithium ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- JB1 Lithium Project
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec, Canada
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company relinquished its claims on the JB1 Lithium Project, indicating a strategic decision to exit this asset.
Positive factors
- Rationalization of non-core assets.
Negative factors
- Relinquishment of a project indicates lack of prospectivity or strategic fit.
Evidence · text
“During the year the Company relinquished its mineral claims that comprised the JB1 Lithium Project in Quebec, Canada.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 64Harrier Uranium ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Harrier Uranium Project
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Koba assigned its Harrier Uranium Project to Azincourt Energy Corp., retaining a significant shareholding in the counterparty, allowing for continued exposure while focusing on other projects.
Positive factors
- Strategic assignment of project to focus on core assets.
- Retained equity interest in the project's future through shareholding.
Evidence · text
“On 30 April 2025 Koba announced that it had entered into an option agreement to assign its rights to a 100% interest in the Harrier Uranium Project in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada to Azincourt Energy Corp (TSXV: AAZ; “Azincourt”). The transaction completed on 15 June 2025. Koba remains the named claim holder pending issue of the Þnal tranche of 1,666,666 shares in June 2027 at which time title will transfer to Azincourt. Koba currently holds 3,333,332 shares in Azincourt.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 65Blackpine Cobalt-Copper ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Blackpine Cobalt-Copper Project
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho, USA
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company impaired its Blackpine and Colson Cobalt Projects, writing them down to $700,000 and classifying them as held for sale, indicating a significant reduction in their carrying value and a move towards divestment.
Positive factors
- Strategic decision to re-evaluate asset value.
Negative factors
- Significant impairment of cobalt assets indicates reduced perceived value or difficulty in monetization.
- Assets classified as held for sale, suggesting divestment.
Evidence · text
“During the year ended 30 June 2026, the cobalt assets comprising the Blackpine and Colson Projects were written down to fair value less cost to sell of $700,000.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 66Colson Cobalt-Copper ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Colson Cobalt-Copper Project
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho, USA
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company impaired its Blackpine and Colson Cobalt Projects, writing them down to $700,000 and classifying them as held for sale, indicating a significant reduction in their carrying value and a move towards divestment.
Positive factors
- Strategic decision to re-evaluate asset value.
Negative factors
- Significant impairment of cobalt assets indicates reduced perceived value or difficulty in monetization.
- Assets classified as held for sale, suggesting divestment.
Evidence · text
“During the year ended 30 June 2026, the cobalt assets comprising the Blackpine and Colson Projects were written down to fair value less cost to sell of $700,000.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 67Blackpine Cobalt-Copper ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Blackpine Cobalt-Copper Project
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho, USA
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Koba holds an option to acquire 100% of the Blackpine claims by 2037, with consideration tied to production royalty or a cash payment, providing future flexibility.
Positive factors
- Option provides flexibility for future acquisition.
Negative factors
- Terms are historical and may be impacted by recent impairment.
Evidence · text
“Koba has the right to acquire 100% of those claims before May 2037 by either; (i) paying the underlying patent owners a 2.0% NSR royalty on production from the patented claims to a maximum amount of US$1,500,000; or (ii) paying US$1,500,000 (less the sum of any previous royalties paid) in cash.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 68Yarramba Uranium ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarramba Uranium Project
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- South Australia
- Ticker
- KOB
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Koba secured an earn-in agreement for an 80% interest in the Yarramba Uranium Project, committing to a significant exploration spend to advance this key uranium asset.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of a significant interest in a prospective uranium project.
- Clear earn-in terms with a substantial exploration commitment.
Negative factors
- Havilah retains rights to base and precious metals, limiting full project ownership.
Evidence · text
“On 22 January 2024, the Company entered into an agreement with Havilah that provides it the right to acquire an 80% interest in the Yarramba Uranium Project in South Australia. As Havilah will retain the rights to base and precious metals within the project area, the Company and Havilah have also entered into an Access and Mineral Rights Agreement which governs how the parties will exercise their respective rights and obligations under the Agreement. The Company is also required to spend a minimum of $6 million on exploration and development by 11 April 2028.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.