KNB: Annual Report to shareholders

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Koonenberry Gold Limited
Ticker
KNB
Exchange
ASX
Region
New South Wales
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver, Lead, Zinc, Antimony
Document categories
Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other
Extracted
2026-09-30 07:32:19 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Koonenberry Gold Limited's 2026 Annual Report highlights substantial exploration progress at its Enmore Gold Project in New South Wales, including high-grade gold intercepts and extensions to mineralization at Sunnyside, Postman's Gully, and Hand in Hand. The company also expanded its Lachlan Fold Belt portfolio through the acquisition of the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project and continued joint venture activities with Newmont. Despite reporting a net loss and an impairment expense, the company secured post-year-end funding to advance its projects.

Reasoning: The annual report details a year of significant exploration success and strategic growth through acquisitions and partnerships, particularly at the Enmore Gold Project, which balances the reported financial loss and impairment.

Positive factors

  • Significant exploration progress at Enmore Gold Project with high-grade gold intercepts and extensions to mineralization
  • Strategic acquisition of Gundagai Gold-Copper Project expanding Lachlan Fold Belt footprint
  • Ongoing joint venture and farm-in activities with Newmont providing funding and exploration support

Negative factors

  • Reporting a significant net loss for the financial year
  • Impairment expense recognized for the Koonenberry Gold Project
  • Historical drill results reported without explicit from/to depths for sub-intervals

Facts used in scoring: 45

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The report includes a Competent Persons Statement, indicating QA/QC procedures are in place.

Evidence · text

“Competent Persons Statement The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled under the supervision of Mr Brynache Ellingworth, who holds a BSc Geology (Hons.), is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and is a full-time employee as Principal Geologist at Koonenberry Gold Limited.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: No true width or drill orientation is stated for any of the reported drill intercepts, implying downhole widths are reported.

Evidence · text

“44.5m @ 1.01g/t Au from 340m”

Acquisitionpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company entered into a binding share sale and purchase agreement to acquire 100% of Gilmore Minerals Pty Ltd, which holds the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project.

Evidence · text

“On 19 May 2026, the Company significantly strengthened its Lachlan Fold Belt position by entering into a binding share sale and purchase agreement to acquire 100% of the issued shares in Gilmore Minerals Pty Ltd, which holds the rights to a 100% interest in the four contiguous exploration licences comprising the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project (EL8061, EL8586, EL8889 & EL8998).”

Joint Venturepositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company holds a 20% interest and is free-carried to commercial production with Joint Venture partner Newmont Exploration Pty Ltd.

Evidence · text

“At the Junee Copper-Gold Project, where the Company holds a 20% interest and is free-carried to commercial production with Joint Venture partner Newmont Exploration Pty Ltd, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”), drilling commenced in June 2026”

Farm-inpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Newmont has the right to earn up to an 80% interest through $5 million expenditure, with KNB free-carried up to $15 million of expenditure.

Evidence · text

“At the Fairholme Copper-Gold Project the Company holds a 51% interest with Newmont, who has the right to earn up to an 80% interest through $5 million expenditure, with KNB free-carried up to $15 million of expenditure by Newmont at Newmont’s election.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 42. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (42)

25ENDD015Enmore · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 139 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD015
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
139 m
From
327 m
To
466 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD015:327-466

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept reported at the Sunnyside Prospect, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“within 139m @ 0.44g/t Au from 327m (25ENDD015)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“44.5m @ 1.01g/t Au from 340m, incl. 0.3m @ 17.6g/t Au and 0.5m @ 26.4g/t Au, within 139m @ 0.44g/t Au from 327m (25ENDD015)”
25ENDD015Enmore · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD015
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.5 m
From
340 m
To
384.5 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD015:340-384.5

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept over a significant width at the Sunnyside Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“44.5m @ 1.01g/t Au from 340m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“44.5m @ 1.01g/t Au from 340m, incl. 0.3m @ 17.6g/t Au and 0.5m @ 26.4g/t Au, within 139m @ 0.44g/t Au from 327m (25ENDD015)”
25ENDD015Enmore · goldGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD015
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
17.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.3 m
From
327 m
To
327.3 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD015:327-327.3

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very high-grade gold intercept, indicating bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone at Sunnyside.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 0.3m @ 17.6g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“incl. 0.3m @ 17.6g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“44.5m @ 1.01g/t Au from 340m, incl. 0.3m @ 17.6g/t Au and 0.5m @ 26.4g/t Au, within 139m @ 0.44g/t Au from 327m (25ENDD015)”
25ENDD015Enmore · goldGrade: 26.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD015
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
26.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
327 m
To
327.5 m
Intercept Depth
327 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD015:327-327.5

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very high-grade gold intercept, indicating bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone at Sunnyside.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“0.5m @ 26.4g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“0.5m @ 26.4g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“44.5m @ 1.01g/t Au from 340m, incl. 0.3m @ 17.6g/t Au and 0.5m @ 26.4g/t Au, within 139m @ 0.44g/t Au from 327m (25ENDD015)”
25ENDD013Enmore · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 90 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD013
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
90 m
From
135 m
To
225 m
Intercept Depth
135 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD013:135-225

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept reported at the Sunnyside Prospect, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“within 90m @ 0.72g/t Au from 135m (25ENDD013)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“36m @ 1.28g/t Au from 178m, within 90m @ 0.72g/t Au from 135m (25ENDD013)”
25ENDD013Enmore · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD013
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36 m
From
178 m
To
214 m
Intercept Depth
135 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD013:178-214

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept over a significant width at the Sunnyside Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“36m @ 1.28g/t Au from 178m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“36m @ 1.28g/t Au from 178m, within 90m @ 0.72g/t Au from 135m (25ENDD013)”
25ENDD014Enmore · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD014
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
79 m
From
263 m
To
342 m
Intercept Depth
263 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD014:263-342

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept reported at the Sunnyside Prospect, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“79m @ 0.74g/t Au from 263m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“79m @ 0.74g/t Au from 263m, incl. 8.5m @ 2.46g/t Au from 308m (25ENDD014)”
25ENDD014Enmore · goldGrade: 2.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD014
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
2.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.5 m
From
308 m
To
316.5 m
Intercept Depth
263 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD014:308-316.5

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept within a broader mineralized zone at the Sunnyside Prospect.

Positive factors

  • Good grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 8.5m @ 2.46g/t Au from 308m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“79m @ 0.74g/t Au from 263m, incl. 8.5m @ 2.46g/t Au from 308m (25ENDD014)”
25ENDD011Enmore · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 77 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD011
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
77 m
From
278 m
To
355 m
Intercept Depth
278 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD011:278-355

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept reported at the Sunnyside Prospect, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“within 77m @ 0.63g/t Au from 278m (25ENDD011)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“26m @ 1.01g/t Au from 326m, within 77m @ 0.63g/t Au from 278m (25ENDD011)”
25ENDD011Enmore · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENDD011
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26 m
From
326 m
To
352 m
Intercept Depth
278 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENDD011:326-352

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept over a significant width at the Sunnyside Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“26m @ 1.01g/t Au from 326m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“26m @ 1.01g/t Au from 326m, within 77m @ 0.63g/t Au from 278m (25ENDD011)”
26ENDD018Enmore · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD018
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31 m
From
41 m
To
72 m
Intercept Depth
41 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD018:41-72

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept over a significant width at the Sunnyside Prospect.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“31m @ 1.11g/t Au from 41m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“31m @ 1.11g/t Au from 41m, incl. 0.5m @ 62.3g/t Au from 71.5m (26ENDD018)”
26ENDD018Enmore · goldGrade: 62.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD018
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
62.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
71.5 m
To
72 m
Intercept Depth
41 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD018:71.5-72

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very high-grade gold intercept, indicating bonanza grades within the mineralized zone at Sunnyside.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 0.5m @ 62.3g/t Au from 71.5m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“incl. 0.5m @ 62.3g/t Au from 71.5m”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“31m @ 1.11g/t Au from 41m, incl. 0.5m @ 62.3g/t Au from 71.5m (26ENDD018)”
26ENDD017Enmore · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD017
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
54 m
From
311 m
To
365 m
Intercept Depth
311 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD017:311-365

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept reported at the Sunnyside Prospect, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“within 54m @ 0.62g/t Au from 311m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“19m @ 1.07g/t Au from 346m, within 54m @ 0.62g/t Au from 311m, incl. 1m @ 5.22g/t Au (26ENDD017)”
26ENDD017Enmore · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD017
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19 m
From
346 m
To
365 m
Intercept Depth
311 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD017:346-365

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept over a significant width at the Sunnyside Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“19m @ 1.07g/t Au from 346m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“19m @ 1.07g/t Au from 346m, within 54m @ 0.62g/t Au from 311m, incl. 1m @ 5.22g/t Au (26ENDD017)”
26ENDD017Enmore · goldGrade: 5.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD017
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
5.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
311 m
To
312 m
Intercept Depth
311 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD017:311-312

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept within the mineralized zone at Sunnyside.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 1m @ 5.22g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“19m @ 1.07g/t Au from 346m, within 54m @ 0.62g/t Au from 311m, incl. 1m @ 5.22g/t Au (26ENDD017)”
26ENDD020Enmore · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD020
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24 m
From
172 m
To
196 m
Intercept Depth
172 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD020:172-196

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept over a significant width at the Sunnyside Prospect.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“24m @ 1.03g/t Au from 172m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“24m @ 1.03g/t Au from 172m and 4.6m @ 8.82g/t Au from 303m, within 105m @ 0.71g/t Au from 260m, incl. 0.6m @ 29.25g/t Au (26ENDD020)”
26ENDD020Enmore · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 105 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD020
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
105 m
From
260 m
To
365 m
Intercept Depth
172 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD020:260-365

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept reported at the Sunnyside Prospect, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“within 105m @ 0.71g/t Au from 260m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“24m @ 1.03g/t Au from 172m and 4.6m @ 8.82g/t Au from 303m, within 105m @ 0.71g/t Au from 260m, incl. 0.6m @ 29.25g/t Au (26ENDD020)”
26ENDD020Enmore · goldGrade: 8.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD020
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
8.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
303 m
To
307.6 m
Intercept Depth
172 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD020:303-307.6

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept within the mineralized zone at Sunnyside.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“4.6m @ 8.82g/t Au from 303m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“24m @ 1.03g/t Au from 172m and 4.6m @ 8.82g/t Au from 303m, within 105m @ 0.71g/t Au from 260m, incl. 0.6m @ 29.25g/t Au (26ENDD020)”
26ENDD020Enmore · goldGrade: 29.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD020
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
29.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
172 m
To
172.6 m
Intercept Depth
172 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD020:172-172.6

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very high-grade gold intercept, indicating bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone at Sunnyside.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 0.6m @ 29.25g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“incl. 0.6m @ 29.25g/t Au”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“24m @ 1.03g/t Au from 172m and 4.6m @ 8.82g/t Au from 303m, within 105m @ 0.71g/t Au from 260m, incl. 0.6m @ 29.25g/t Au (26ENDD020)”
26ENDD022Enmore · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 94 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD022
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
94 m
From
153 m
To
247 m
Intercept Depth
153 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD022:153-247

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept reported at the Sunnyside Prospect, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“within 94m @ 0.56g/t Au from 153m (26ENDD022)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“30m @ 1.13g/t Au from 163m, within 94m @ 0.56g/t Au from 153m (26ENDD022)”
26ENDD022Enmore · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD022
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30 m
From
163 m
To
193 m
Intercept Depth
153 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD022:163-193

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept over a significant width at the Sunnyside Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“30m @ 1.13g/t Au from 163m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“30m @ 1.13g/t Au from 163m, within 94m @ 0.56g/t Au from 153m (26ENDD022)”
26ENDD023Enmore · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 84 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD023
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
84 m
From
197 m
To
281 m
Intercept Depth
197 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD023:197-281

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept from maiden drill testing at the Postman’s Gully Prospect, indicating new mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Maiden drill testing

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“within 84m @ 0.35g/t Au from 197m (26ENDD023)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“12m @ 1.02g/t Au from 227m, incl. 4m @ 2.54g/t Au, within 84m @ 0.35g/t Au from 197m (26ENDD023)”
26ENDD023Enmore · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD023
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
227 m
To
239 m
Intercept Depth
197 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD023:227-239

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept from maiden drill testing at the Postman’s Gully Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade
  • Maiden drill testing

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“12m @ 1.02g/t Au from 227m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“12m @ 1.02g/t Au from 227m, incl. 4m @ 2.54g/t Au, within 84m @ 0.35g/t Au from 197m (26ENDD023)”
26ENDD023Enmore · goldGrade: 2.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD023
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
2.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
197 m
To
201 m
Intercept Depth
197 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD023:197-201

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept from maiden drill testing at the Postman’s Gully Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade
  • Maiden drill testing

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 4m @ 2.54g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“12m @ 1.02g/t Au from 227m, incl. 4m @ 2.54g/t Au, within 84m @ 0.35g/t Au from 197m (26ENDD023)”
26ENDD027Enmore · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD027
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
81 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD027:81-88

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept from maiden drill testing at the Postman’s Gully Prospect.

Positive factors

  • Good grade
  • Maiden drill testing

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“7m @ 1.18g/t Au from 81m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“7m @ 1.18g/t Au from 81m, incl. 1m @ 2.78g/t Au from 84m (26ENDD027)”
26ENDD027Enmore · goldGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD027
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
2.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
84 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD027:84-85

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade gold intercept from maiden drill testing at the Postman’s Gully Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade
  • Maiden drill testing

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 1m @ 2.78g/t Au from 84m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“7m @ 1.18g/t Au from 81m, incl. 1m @ 2.78g/t Au from 84m (26ENDD027)”
25ENRC003Enmore · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENRC003
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50 m
From
0 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENRC003:0-50

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept from surface in first-pass RC drilling at the Hand in Hand Prospect, confirming mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • From surface
  • First-pass drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“50m @ 0.36g/t Au from surface (25ENRC003)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“50m @ 0.36g/t Au from surface (25ENRC003)”
25ENRC007Enmore · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENRC007
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
46 m
From
23 m
To
69 m
Intercept Depth
23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENRC007:23-69

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept from first-pass RC drilling at the Hand in Hand Prospect, confirming mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • First-pass drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“46m @ 0.28g/t Au from 23m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“46m @ 0.28g/t Au from 23m, incl. 1m @ 4.2g/t Au (25ENRC007)”
25ENRC007Enmore · goldGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25ENRC007
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
23 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25ENRC007:23-24

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept from first-pass RC drilling at the Hand in Hand Prospect, within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • First-pass drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 1m @ 4.2g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“46m @ 0.28g/t Au from 23m, incl. 1m @ 4.2g/t Au (25ENRC007)”
26ENDD029Enmore · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26ENDD029
Project
Enmore
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28 m
From
200 m
To
228 m
Intercept Depth
200 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26ENDD029:200-228

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A broad gold intercept with modest grades from follow-up drilling at the Hand in Hand Prospect, which is now considered tested.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Modest grades
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“broadest result of 28m @ 0.28g/t Au from 200m (26ENDD029)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“broadest result of 28m @ 0.28g/t Au from 200m (26ENDD029)”
BBRC007Gundagai · goldGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BBRC007
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
27 m
To
47 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BBRC007:27-47

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing good gold grades over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Historical data
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“20m @ 1.78g/t Au from 27m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Limited shallow drilling across the project returning significant gold intersections including 20m @ 1.78g/t Au from 27m, incl. 1m @ 23g/t Au (BBRC007)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“20m @ 1.78g/t Au from 27m, incl. 1m @ 23g/t Au (BBRC007)”
BBRC007Gundagai · goldGrade: 23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BBRC007
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
27 m
To
28 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BBRC007:27-28

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing bonanza gold grades within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Historical data
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 1m @ 23g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“incl. 1m @ 23g/t Au”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Limited shallow drilling across the project returning significant gold intersections including 20m @ 1.78g/t Au from 27m, incl. 1m @ 23g/t Au (BBRC007)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“20m @ 1.78g/t Au from 27m, incl. 1m @ 23g/t Au (BBRC007)”
BAB006Gundagai · goldGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BAB006
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
3.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
16 m
To
25 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BAB006:16-25

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing good gold grades.

Positive factors

  • Good grade

Negative factors

  • Historical data
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“9m @ 3.22g/t Au from 16m to EOH”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“9m @ 3.22g/t Au from 16m to EOH, incl. 1m @ 12.15g/t Au (BAB006)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“9m @ 3.22g/t Au from 16m to EOH, incl. 1m @ 12.15g/t Au (BAB006)”
BAB006Gundagai · goldGrade: 12.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BAB006
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
12.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
16 m
To
17 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BAB006:16-17

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing high gold grades within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Historical data
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 1m @ 12.15g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“9m @ 3.22g/t Au from 16m to EOH, incl. 1m @ 12.15g/t Au (BAB006)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“9m @ 3.22g/t Au from 16m to EOH, incl. 1m @ 12.15g/t Au (BAB006)”
GUC004Gundagai · goldGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GUC004
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
3.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
39 m
To
46 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GUC004:39-46

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing good gold grades.

Positive factors

  • Good grade

Negative factors

  • Historical data
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“7m @ 3.52g/t Au from 39m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“7m @ 3.52g/t Au from 39m, incl. 1m @ 8.47g/t Au (GUC004)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“7m @ 3.52g/t Au from 39m, incl. 1m @ 8.47g/t Au (GUC004)”
GUC004Gundagai · goldGrade: 8.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GUC004
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
8.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
39 m
To
40 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GUC004:39-40

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing high gold grades within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Historical data
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 1m @ 8.47g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“7m @ 3.52g/t Au from 39m, incl. 1m @ 8.47g/t Au (GUC004)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“7m @ 3.52g/t Au from 39m, incl. 1m @ 8.47g/t Au (GUC004)”
DDH4Gundagai · copperGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH4
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
143.9 m
To
151.5 m
Intercept Depth
143.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH4:143.9-151.5

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical, non-JORC compliant drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing good copper grades.

Positive factors

  • Good grade

Negative factors

  • Historical data
  • Non-JORC compliant
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“7.6m @ 1.08% Cu from 143.9m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Multiple open historical copper drill intercepts (non-JORC compliant) including 7.6m @ 1.08% Cu from 143.9m, incl. 1.5m @ 2.96% Cu (DDH4)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“Multiple open historical copper drill intercepts (non-JORC compliant) including 7.6m @ 1.08% Cu from 143.9m, incl. 1.5m @ 2.96% Cu (DDH4)”
DDH4Gundagai · copperGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH4
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
2.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.9 m
To
145.4 m
Intercept Depth
143.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH4:143.9-145.4

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical, non-JORC compliant drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing high copper grades within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Historical data
  • Non-JORC compliant
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 1.5m @ 2.96% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Multiple open historical copper drill intercepts (non-JORC compliant) including 7.6m @ 1.08% Cu from 143.9m, incl. 1.5m @ 2.96% Cu (DDH4)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“Multiple open historical copper drill intercepts (non-JORC compliant) including 7.6m @ 1.08% Cu from 143.9m, incl. 1.5m @ 2.96% Cu (DDH4)”
DDH5Gundagai · copperGrade: 2.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH5
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
2.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
139.8 m
To
142.2 m
Intercept Depth
139.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH5:139.8-142.2

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical, non-JORC compliant drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing high copper grades.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Historical data
  • Non-JORC compliant
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“2.4m @ 2.93% Cu from 139.8m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“2.4m @ 2.93% Cu from 139.8m, incl. 1.5m @ 3.71% Cu (DDH5)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“2.4m @ 2.93% Cu from 139.8m, incl. 1.5m @ 3.71% Cu (DDH5)”
DDH5Gundagai · copperGrade: 3.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH5
Project
Gundagai
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
3.71
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
139.8 m
To
141.3 m
Intercept Depth
139.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH5:139.8-141.3

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical, non-JORC compliant drill result from the Gundagai Gold-Copper Project showing high copper grades within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Historical data
  • Non-JORC compliant
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 1.5m @ 3.71% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“2.4m @ 2.93% Cu from 139.8m, incl. 1.5m @ 3.71% Cu (DDH5)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“2.4m @ 2.93% Cu from 139.8m, incl. 1.5m @ 3.71% Cu (DDH5)”
JNRC025Junee · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JNRC025
Project
Junee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
60 m
To
80 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JNRC025:60-80

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill result from the Junee Copper-Gold Project showing good gold grades over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a significant width

Negative factors

  • Historical data
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“20m @ 1.15g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“including 20m @ 1.15g/t Au, incl. 4m @ 2.84g/t Au from 60m (JNRC025)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“including 20m @ 1.15g/t Au, incl. 4m @ 2.84g/t Au from 60m (JNRC025)”
JNRC025Junee · goldGrade: 2.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JNRC025
Project
Junee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
KNB

Geometry

Grade
2.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
60 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JNRC025:60-64

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill result from the Junee Copper-Gold Project showing good gold grades within a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Good grade

Negative factors

  • Historical data
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“incl. 4m @ 2.84g/t Au from 60m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“including 20m @ 1.15g/t Au, incl. 4m @ 2.84g/t Au from 60m (JNRC025)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“including 20m @ 1.15g/t Au, incl. 4m @ 2.84g/t Au from 60m (JNRC025)”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.