Kingfisher Completes 2026 Drill Program at HWY 37 Project with 13,551 m Drilled, Golden Triangle

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Kingfisher Metals Corp.
Ticker
KFR.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver, Zinc, Lead
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-10-21 09:50:17 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Kingfisher Metals Corp. has completed its 2026 diamond drill program at the HWY 37 Project in British Columbia, drilling 13,551 meters across 24 new holes. The program yielded encouraging visual observations of porphyry-style copper-gold mineralization and alteration, with the system remaining open at depth and along strike. While assay results for the new holes are pending, the company is planning a larger 20,000-meter drill program for 2027.

Reasoning: Kingfisher Metals has completed a substantial 2026 drill program at its HWY 37 Project, with encouraging visual observations of porphyry-style mineralization and alteration, and plans for an even larger program in 2027. However, the economic significance of these new intercepts remains uncertain as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Completion of large drill program (13,551m)
  • Encouraging visual observations of porphyry-style mineralization and alteration
  • System remains open at depth and along strike
  • Planning for larger 20,000m drill program in 2027
  • Acquisition of Willow Creek Camp to support future exploration

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending for all new drill holes, introducing uncertainty
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for laboratory assays
  • True widths of mineralized intervals have not been determined
  • Metal equivalent assumptions for historical result not supported by metallurgical testwork

Facts used in scoring: 29

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 29. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (29)

HW-26-015HWY 37 · goldGrade: 20.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-015
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Grade
20.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.8 m
Hole Depth
1067 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
409062
Northing
6341823
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
99 °
Dip
-83 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported intercept from HW-26-015 shows bonanza grades for gold, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, although the metal equivalent assumptions lack metallurgical support.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High gold grade
  • Polymetallic mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not supported by metallurgical testwork

Evidence · table

“20.33 g/t Au”

Context: HW-26-015

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Gold grade of 20.33 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold for porphyry gold (1 g/t).

Evidence · table

“20.33 g/t Au”

Context: HW-26-015

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The intercept for HW-26-015 is explicitly stated as 'previously reported' in footnote 2.

Evidence · table

“Polymetallic vein with visible gold (8.8 m of 38.50 g/t AuEq (20.33 g/t Au, 2.98% Cu, 937.6 g/t Ag, 11.08% Zn)(2)(3)(5))”

Context: HW-26-015

HW-26-015HWY 37 · copperGrade: 2.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-015
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Grade
2.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.8 m
Hole Depth
1067 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
409062
Northing
6341823
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
99 °
Dip
-83 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported intercept from HW-26-015 shows bonanza grades for copper, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, although the metal equivalent assumptions lack metallurgical support.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High copper grade
  • Polymetallic mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not supported by metallurgical testwork

Evidence · table

“2.98% Cu”

Context: HW-26-015

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Copper grade of 2.98% is well above the exceptional threshold for porphyry copper (0.8%).

Evidence · table

“2.98% Cu”

Context: HW-26-015

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The intercept for HW-26-015 is explicitly stated as 'previously reported' in footnote 2.

Evidence · table

“Polymetallic vein with visible gold (8.8 m of 38.50 g/t AuEq (20.33 g/t Au, 2.98% Cu, 937.6 g/t Ag, 11.08% Zn)(2)(3)(5))”

Context: HW-26-015

HW-26-015HWY 37 · silverGrade: 937.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-015
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Grade
937.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.8 m
Hole Depth
1067 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
409062
Northing
6341823
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
99 °
Dip
-83 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported intercept from HW-26-015 shows bonanza grades for silver, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, although the metal equivalent assumptions lack metallurgical support.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High silver grade
  • Polymetallic mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not supported by metallurgical testwork

Evidence · table

“937.6 g/t Ag”

Context: HW-26-015

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Silver grade of 937.6 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold (500 g/t).

Evidence · table

“937.6 g/t Ag”

Context: HW-26-015

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The intercept for HW-26-015 is explicitly stated as 'previously reported' in footnote 2.

Evidence · table

“Polymetallic vein with visible gold (8.8 m of 38.50 g/t AuEq (20.33 g/t Au, 2.98% Cu, 937.6 g/t Ag, 11.08% Zn)(2)(3)(5))”

Context: HW-26-015

HW-26-015HWY 37 · zincGrade: 11.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-015
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Grade
11.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.8 m
Hole Depth
1067 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
409062
Northing
6341823
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
99 °
Dip
-83 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported intercept from HW-26-015 shows bonanza grades for zinc, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, although the metal equivalent assumptions lack metallurgical support.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept
  • High zinc grade
  • Polymetallic mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical result, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not supported by metallurgical testwork

Evidence · table

“11.08% Zn”

Context: HW-26-015

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Zinc grade of 11.08% is well above the strong threshold (10%) for zinc.

Evidence · table

“11.08% Zn”

Context: HW-26-015

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The intercept for HW-26-015 is explicitly stated as 'previously reported' in footnote 2.

Evidence · table

“Polymetallic vein with visible gold (8.8 m of 38.50 g/t AuEq (20.33 g/t Au, 2.98% Cu, 937.6 g/t Ag, 11.08% Zn)(2)(3)(5))”

Context: HW-26-015

HW-25-011the Upper HankView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-011
Project
the Upper Hank
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
983.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry (Extension)
Easting
408790
Northing
6342028
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
111 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled
  • System remains open at depth and along strike

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-25-011”

Context: 983.4

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-012HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-012
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
884 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
409125
Northing
6342136
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
145 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled
  • System remains open at depth and along strike

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-012”

Context: 884

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-013HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-013
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
406 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Pits Extension - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
410523
Northing
6341955
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
328 °
Dip
-81 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-013”

Context: 406

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-AHWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-A
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Hank Gold
Easting
410384
Northing
6341755
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-A”

Context: 26

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-014HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-014
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
652 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Cash - Early-Stage
Easting
410735
Northing
6342736
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
185 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-014”

Context: 652

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-016HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-016
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
1021 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
408791
Northing
6342030
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
117 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled
  • System remains open at depth and along strike

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-016”

Context: 1,021

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-017HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-017
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
883 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
408914
Northing
6341721
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
-76 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled
  • System remains open at depth and along strike

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-017”

Context: 883

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-018HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-018
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
508 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Flats - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
408663
Northing
6340805
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-018”

Context: 508

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-019HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-019
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
1085 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
408791
Northing
6342030
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-72 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled
  • System remains open at depth and along strike

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-019”

Context: 1,085

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-020HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-020
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
504 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Pits Extension - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
410342
Northing
6342315
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
115 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-020”

Context: 504

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-021HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-021
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
665 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
LAZ Porphyry - Early-Stage
Easting
409371
Northing
6342334
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
335 °
Dip
-72 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-021”

Context: 665

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-022HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-022
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
411 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Turquoise - Early-Stage
Easting
412156
Northing
6340509
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
310 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-022”

Context: 411

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-023HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-023
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
1061 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
408791
Northing
6342030
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-78 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled
  • System remains open at depth and along strike

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-023”

Context: 1,061

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-024HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-024
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
175 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Rojo Chico - Early-Stage
Easting
409590
Northing
6340634
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
289 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-024”

Context: 175

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-025HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-025
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
419 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Flats - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
408908
Northing
6341144
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
306 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-025”

Context: 419

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-026HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-026
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
157 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
West Bald Bluff - Early-Stage
Easting
409626
Northing
6340993
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
160 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-026”

Context: 157

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-027interpreted as a possible southern continuation of the Upper HankView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-027
Project
interpreted as a possible southern continuation of the Upper Hank
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
136 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Rojo Grande - Early-Stage
Easting
410347
Northing
6340507
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-027”

Context: 136

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-028HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-028
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
942 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
408791
Northing
6342118
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled
  • System remains open at depth and along strike

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-028”

Context: 942

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-029HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-029
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
232 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Felsite Hill - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
410194
Northing
6341712
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
159 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-029”

Context: 232

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-030HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-030
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
320 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Felsite Hill - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
410454
Northing
6341801
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
155 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-030”

Context: 320

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-031HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-031
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
1106 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Hank Porphyry
Easting
408772
Northing
6342210
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled
  • System remains open at depth and along strike

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-031”

Context: 1,106

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-032HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-032
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
151 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Pits - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
409953
Northing
6342034
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
311 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-032”

Context: 151

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-033HWY 37View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-033
Project
HWY 37
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
239 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Pits - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
409953
Northing
6342034
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
311 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-033”

Context: 239

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-034interpreted as a possible southern continuation of the Upper HankView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-034
Project
interpreted as a possible southern continuation of the Upper Hank
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
245 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Rojo Grande - Early-Stage
Easting
410347
Northing
6340507
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-034”

Context: 245

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”
HW-26-035These holes were designed to evaluate the scale of the broader Hank-Mary mineralView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-26-035
Project
These holes were designed to evaluate the scale of the broader Hank-Mary mineral
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
232 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Pits - Upper Hank Gold
Easting
409754
Northing
6342094
CRS
NAD 83, UTM Zone 9
EPSG
26909
Azimuth
160 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The drill program has been completed, providing new collar data, but the economic significance of these holes is yet to be determined as assay results are pending.

Positive factors

  • Drill program completed
  • New holes drilled

Negative factors

  • Assay results are pending
  • Visual observations are preliminary and not a proxy for assays
  • True widths not determined

Evidence · table

“HW-26-035”

Context: 232

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Footnote 3 states that true widths have not been determined for any reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning certified labs, QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QAQC)”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.