# Jaganda Mines issues update on the Paranaíta Gold Project

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/jaganda-mines-issues-update-on-the-paranai-ta-gold-project--60f0ae07-8a28-446c-b12e-733484e8ddf7

Original source: https://www.globalminingreview.com/exploration-development/11062026/jaganda-mines-issues-update-on-the-paranata-gold-project/

Publisher: globalminingreview

Original announcement: 2026-06-11T15:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Jangada Mines plc

- Ticker: Unavailable

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Brazil

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-08-20 21:54:49 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Jangada Mines has reported encouraging exploration results at the Paranaíta Gold Project in Brazil, identifying a 1.2 km mineralised corridor. The results include high-grade intercepts and suggest the potential to add over 50,000 oz of inferred gold resources to the existing 210,000 oz.

Reasoning: Drilling confirmed a large-scale hydrothermal gold system with high-grade intercepts and significant structural continuity, supporting potential resource growth.

- Positive factor: high-grade gold intercepts

- Positive factor: identification of 1.2 km mineralised structure

- Positive factor: potential for 50,000 oz resource expansion

- Positive factor: low-capex open-pit potential

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Bonanza Intercept**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 43.61 g/t gold is exceptionally high grade for the deposit type.

Evidence · text

> 1.32 m @ 43.61 g/t Au

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Identification of 1.2 km of mineralised structure at the TP2 target.

Evidence · text

> Approximately 1200 m of mineralised structure along a NE-trending corridor identified at the TP2 target.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (2)

### DDJG25-051

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/jaganda-mines-issues-update-on-the-paranai-ta-gold-project--60f0ae07-8a28-446c-b12e-733484e8ddf7#fact-drill-facts-0)

Paranaíta Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: DDJG25-051
- Project: Paranaíta Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: brazil
- Reported Region: Brazil

#### Geometry

- Grade: 43.61
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.32 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: DDJG25-051:0-1.32
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 43.61 g/t gold over 1.32 m is an exceptional high-grade intercept.

- Positive factor: bonanza grade

Evidence · text

> 1.32 m @ 43.61 g/t Au \(DDJG25-051\)

### DDJG25-02

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/jaganda-mines-issues-update-on-the-paranai-ta-gold-project--60f0ae07-8a28-446c-b12e-733484e8ddf7#fact-drill-facts-1)

Paranaíta Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: DDJG25-02
- Project: Paranaíta Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: brazil
- Reported Region: Brazil

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.83
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 11.2 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: DDJG25-02:0-11.2
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Thicker intersection of 11.2 m at 0.83 g/t Au provides continuity.

- Positive factor: significant width

Evidence · text

> 11.20 m @ 0.83 g/t Au \(DDJG25-02\)

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.