Iconic Minerals Reports Further Positive Near Surface Gold and Silver Results in Second Batch of Assays from 2026 Drilling Program at New Pass Gold Property, Nevada
Original announcement by newsfile on
- Company
- Iconic Minerals Ltd.
- Ticker
- ICM
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Nevada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Antimony
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 13:41:52 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Iconic Minerals reports further positive near-surface gold and silver results from its 2026 drilling program at the New Pass Gold Property in Nevada. The assays confirm continuous mineralization, including a moderate gold intercept of 15m at 0.95 g/t Au and a strong intercept of 6m at 1.80 g/t Au, along with significant antimony. The program aimed to test up-dip extensions and infill deeper sections, with results supporting the potential for a bulk-tonnage Carlin-type deposit, building on a historical inferred resource.
Reasoning: The second batch of drill results confirms near-surface gold and silver mineralization, including a strong gold intercept and a significant antimony intercept, extending known mineralization. However, true widths are not determined, and silver grades are generally low. The historical resource is entirely inferred, requiring further work.
Positive factors
- Confirmation of near-surface gold and silver mineralization
- Strong gold intercept (1.80 g/t Au) in previously reported hole
- Significant antimony intercept, a critical mineral
- Drilling extends known mineralization up-dip
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- True widths not determined for reported intercepts
- Generally low silver grades in new assays
- Historical resource is 100% inferred and requires further work for verification
- Cut-off grade for new intercepts not disclosed
Facts used in scoring: 42
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release states that '10 foot (3 meter) sample intervals were submitted to ALS Reno with standards, blanks, and repeat samples', indicating QA/QC procedures were followed.
Evidence · text
“The 10 foot (3 meter) sample intervals were submitted to ALS Reno with standards, blanks, and repeat samples.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'Reported intervals represent downhole lengths. True widths have not yet been determined'.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals represent downhole lengths. True widths have not yet been determined”
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: The document reports a 'significant antimony intercept' and notes that 'Antimony is a U.S. critical mineral', indicating the presence of a penalty element.
Evidence · text
“Significant Antimony Intersected, New Data from Previously Reported Drill Hole In one of two holes targeting deeper mineralization in this exploration program (NP2601), multi-element assay analysis revealed a notable antimony intercept.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drilling program was 'designed to test the up-dip extensions of known mineralization', which is a form of step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“The program was designed to test the up-dip extensions of known mineralization”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling program was designed to test 'infilling selected deeper sections', indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“infilling selected deeper sections”
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: The document presents a 'Historic Inferred Resource Summary' and explicitly states 'The historical resource report was done by a Certified Professional Geologist in compliance with NI 43-101 guidelines. ... A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves; and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.'
Evidence · text
“Historic Inferred Resource Summary (Paul D. Noland, CPG, September 3, 2010)”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The historical resource is explicitly stated as an 'Inferred Resource Summary'.
Evidence · text
“Historic Inferred Resource Summary (Paul D. Noland, CPG, September 3, 2010)”
All Inferrednegative
100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Why it applies: The historical resource summary only reports 'Inferred Resource' categories, with no Measured or Indicated.
Evidence · text
“Historic Inferred Resource Summary (Paul D. Noland, CPG, September 3, 2010)”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The historical resource report is stated to be 'in compliance with NI 43-101 guidelines'.
Evidence · text
“The historical resource report was done by a Certified Professional Geologist in compliance with NI 43-101 guidelines.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The historical resource summary explicitly names 'Paul D. Noland, CPG' as the author of the NI 43-101 report.
Evidence · text
“Historic Inferred Resource Summary (Paul D. Noland, CPG, September 3, 2010)”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: The document does not state the cut-off grade used for reporting the new drill intercepts.
Evidence · text
“The results are shown in the table below.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 42. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (40)
NP2605New Pass · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2605
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 98 m
- To
- 107 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2605:98-107
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms near-surface gold mineralization but the grade is below the weak threshold for an open pit Carlin-type deposit, and true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface gold mineralization
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for open pit gold
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2605New Pass · silverGrade: 4.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2605
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 98 m
- To
- 107 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2605:98-107
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms near-surface silver mineralization but the grade is below the weak threshold, and true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface silver mineralization
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for silver
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“4.83”
Context: 9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2612New Pass · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2612
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2612:0-30
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept confirms gold mineralization starting from surface, with a grade at the weak threshold for an open pit Carlin-type deposit. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface gold mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
Negative factors
- Grade is at the weak threshold for open pit gold
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 30
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2612New Pass · silverGrade: 4.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2612
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2612:0-30
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept confirms silver mineralization starting from surface, but the grade is below the weak threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface silver mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for silver
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“4.89”
Context: 30
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2613New Pass · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2613
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 55 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2613:0-55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This significant near-surface intercept confirms gold mineralization starting from surface, with a grade at the weak threshold for an open pit Carlin-type deposit. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface gold mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Grade is at the weak threshold for open pit gold
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 55
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2613New Pass · silverGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2613
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 55 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2613:0-55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept confirms silver mineralization starting from surface, but the grade is below the weak threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface silver mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for silver
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“3.21”
Context: 55
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2613New Pass · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2613
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2613:34-49
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade for an open pit Carlin-type deposit over a good length, but true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for open pit
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: 15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2613New Pass · silverGrade: 3.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2613
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2613:34-49
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval confirms silver mineralization but the grade is below the weak threshold, and true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms silver mineralization
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for silver
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“3.32”
Context: 15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2614New Pass · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2614
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 49 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2614:0-49
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This significant near-surface intercept confirms gold mineralization starting from surface, but the grade is below the weak threshold for an open pit Carlin-type deposit. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface gold mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for open pit gold
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 49
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2614New Pass · silverGrade: 5.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2614
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 49 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2614:0-49
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept confirms silver mineralization starting from surface, but the grade is below the weak threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface silver mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for silver
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“5.49”
Context: 49
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2615New Pass · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2615
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2615:0-9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept confirms gold mineralization starting from surface, but the grade is below the weak threshold for an open pit Carlin-type deposit. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface gold mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for open pit gold
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2615New Pass · silverGrade: 4.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2615
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2615:0-9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept confirms silver mineralization starting from surface, but the grade is below the weak threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface silver mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for silver
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“4.03”
Context: 9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2618New Pass · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2618
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 43 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2618:0-43
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This significant near-surface intercept confirms gold mineralization starting from surface, but the grade is below the weak threshold for an open pit Carlin-type deposit. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface gold mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for open pit gold
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 43
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2618New Pass · silverGrade: 6.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2618
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 43 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2618:0-43
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept confirms silver mineralization starting from surface, but the grade is below the weak threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms near-surface silver mineralization
- Intercept starts at surface
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for silver
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“6.49”
Context: 43
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2614New Pass · silverGrade: 20.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2614
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2614:18-21
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows silver mineralization with a grade approaching the weak threshold, but true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Grade is approaching weak threshold for silver
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“20.40”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2614New Pass · silverGrade: 30.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2614
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 58 m
- To
- 62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 58 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2614:58-62
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows silver mineralization with a grade at the weak threshold, but true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Grade is at the weak threshold for silver
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“30.30”
Context: 4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2618New Pass · silverGrade: 42.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2618
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 42.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 40 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 40 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2618:40-43
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows silver mineralization with a grade above the weak threshold, but true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Grade is above the weak threshold for silver
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“42.70”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2618New Pass · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2618
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2618:46-49
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows silver mineralization with a grade approaching the weak threshold, but true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Grade is approaching weak threshold for silver
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width not determined
Evidence · table
“20.00”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2601New Pass · antimonyGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2601
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 79 m
- To
- 85 m
- Hole Depth
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2601:79-85
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This significant antimony intercept, a critical mineral, exceeded the analytical upper detection limit, indicating high-grade mineralization. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Significant antimony intercept (critical mineral)
- Grade exceeded analytical upper detection limit
Negative factors
- True width not determined
Evidence · text
“From 79 to 85 meters (260 to 280 feet), exceeded the analytical upper detection limit of 1% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2601New Pass · antimonyGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2601
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- Hole Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows significant antimony mineralization, a critical mineral, but true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Significant antimony intercept (critical mineral)
Negative factors
- True width not determined
Evidence · text
“with the previous 10 feet (3 meters) assaying 0.26% Sb”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2601New Pass · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2601
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 79 m
- To
- 85 m
- Hole Depth
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2601:79-85
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade for an open pit Carlin-type deposit, but it was previously reported and true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for open pit Carlin-type deposit
Negative factors
- True width not determined
- Previously reported gold assay
Evidence · text
“returned an average of 1.80 g/t (0.053 oz/ton) Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2601New Pass · silverGrade: 11.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2601
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 79 m
- To
- 85 m
- Hole Depth
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2601:79-85
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms silver mineralization but the grade is below the weak threshold, it was previously reported, and true width is not determined.
Positive factors
- Confirms silver mineralization
Negative factors
- Grade is below weak threshold for silver
- True width not determined
- Previously reported silver assay
Evidence · text
“and 11.9 g/t (0.335 oz/ton) Ag”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
NP2605New Pass · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2605
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 320 m
- To
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 320 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2605:320-350
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: NP2605
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2605New Pass · silverGrade: 4.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2605
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 320 m
- To
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 320 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2605:320-350
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.83 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 144.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.83 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.83”
Context: NP2605
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2612New Pass · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2612
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 100 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 100 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2612:0-100
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 40.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: NP2612
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2612New Pass · silverGrade: 4.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2612
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 100 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 100 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2612:0-100
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.89 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 489.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.89”
Context: NP2612
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2613New Pass · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 180 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2613
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 180 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 180 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2613:0-180
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 79.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: NP2613
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2613New Pass · silverGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 180 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2613
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 180 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 180 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2613:0-180
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.21 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 577.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.21”
Context: NP2613
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2613New Pass · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2613
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50 m
- From
- 110 m
- To
- 160 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2613:110-160
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 47.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2613New Pass · silverGrade: 3.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2613
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50 m
- From
- 110 m
- To
- 160 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2613:110-160
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.32 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 166.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.32 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.32”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2614New Pass · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 160 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2614
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 160 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 160 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2614:0-160
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 59.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: NP2614
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2614New Pass · silverGrade: 5.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 160 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2614
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 160 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 160 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2614:0-160
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.49 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 878.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.49”
Context: NP2614
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2615New Pass · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2615
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2615:0-30
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.4 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: NP2615
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2615New Pass · silverGrade: 4.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2615
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2615:0-30
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.03 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 120.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.03 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.03”
Context: NP2615
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2618New Pass · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 140 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2618
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 140 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 140 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2618:0-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 42.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: NP2618
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2618New Pass · silverGrade: 6.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 140 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2618
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 140 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 140 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2618:0-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.49 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 908.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.49”
Context: NP2618
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2614New Pass · silverGrade: 20.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2614
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 70 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2614:60-70
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 204.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.40”
Context: NP2614
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2614New Pass · silverGrade: 30.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2614
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 190 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2614:190-202
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 363.6 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“30.30”
Context: NP2614
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2618New Pass · silverGrade: 42.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2618
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 42.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 130 m
- To
- 140 m
- Intercept Depth
- 130 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2618:130-140
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 427.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“42.70”
Context: NP2618
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NP2618New Pass · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NP2618
- Project
- New Pass
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- ICM
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 160 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NP2618:150-160
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Reno
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 200.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.00”
Context: NP2618
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (2)
inferredNew Pass Gold Property · goldTonnes: 14075000Grade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 282986Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- New Pass Gold Property
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada
- Ticker
- ICM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul D. Noland
- Resource group id
- resource:9f1eec712ce02ebadf82
- Deposit or zone
- New Pass Au-Ag deposit
- Material type
- oxide
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 14075000
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 282986
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2010-09-03
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-09-03T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical inferred resource, not a current estimate, with a low gold grade and 100% inferred category, limiting its economic confidence. Metal equivalent assumptions are not disclosed.
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant historical estimate
- QP signed off on historical estimate
Negative factors
- Historical estimate only, not current mineral resource
- 100% Inferred category
- Low gold grade for a resource
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed
Evidence · text
“Average Gold Grade: 0.018 oz/ton (0.62 g/t) Contained Gold Ounces: 282,986”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 16.0 years before this release
inferredNew Pass Gold Property · silverTonnes: 14075000Grade: 6.93Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3139054Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- New Pass Gold Property
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada
- Ticker
- ICM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul D. Noland
- Resource group id
- resource:9f1eec712ce02ebadf82
- Deposit or zone
- New Pass Au-Ag deposit
- Material type
- oxide
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 14075000
- Grade
- 6.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 3139054
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2010-09-03
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-09-03T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical inferred resource, not a current estimate, with a low silver grade and 100% inferred category, limiting its economic confidence. Metal equivalent assumptions are not disclosed.
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant historical estimate
- QP signed off on historical estimate
Negative factors
- Historical estimate only, not current mineral resource
- 100% Inferred category
- Low silver grade for a resource
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed
Evidence · text
“Average Silver Grade: 0.202 oz/ton (6.93 g/t) Contained Silver Ounces: 3,139,054”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 16.0 years before this release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.