i-80 Gold Announces Initial Assay Results From Mineral Point Open Pit Project in Nevada Including a Step-Out Hole of 1.33 g/t Au and 39.2 g/t Ag Over 225.6 Meters

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
i-80 GOLD CORP.
Ticker
IAU.TO
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-22 10:51:27 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

i-80 Gold announced initial drill results from its 2026 infill drilling campaign at the Mineral Point open pit heap leach project in Nevada. The program returned several broad, high-grade gold and silver intercepts, including a step-out hole of 1.33 g/t Au and 39.2 g/t Ag over 225.6 meters. These results are encouraging, with step-out drilling demonstrating potential to expand the existing mineralized footprint, and infill drilling meeting expectations, supporting a pre-feasibility study targeted for mid-2027.

Reasoning: The initial drill results from the Mineral Point project demonstrate broad, high-grade gold and silver mineralization, with step-out drilling successfully extending the known mineralized footprint. Infill drilling also met expectations, supporting the project's advancement towards a pre-feasibility study and indicating significant potential for resource growth.

Positive factors

  • Broad, high-grade gold and silver intercepts
  • Successful step-out drilling expanding mineralization
  • Infill drilling results meeting expectations
  • Potential for significant resource expansion
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and certified laboratory used
  • Qualified Person sign-off for both drill results and resource estimate

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated as a range, not precisely stated for each intercept

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 86

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole iMP26-07 returned 1.33 g/t Au over 225.6 m, resulting in a grade-width product of 300.77 g/t·m, which exceeds the exceptional threshold of 300 g/t·m for gold.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 225.6

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'Initial step-out drilling to the east demonstrates potential to expand the existing mineralized footprint' and '19 holes were step-out holes outside of the existing mineral resource'.

Evidence · text

“Initial step-out drilling to the east demonstrates potential to expand the existing mineralized footprint while the infill drill results are in line with expectations”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states that 'All samples were submitted to ALS Minerals (ALS) of Sparks, NV, which is an ISO 9001 and 17025 certified and accredited laboratory' and 'i-80 Gold's QA/QC program includes regular insertion of standards, duplicates, and blanks into the sample stream'.

Evidence · text

“All samples were submitted to ALS Minerals (ALS) of Sparks, NV, which is an ISO 9001 and 17025 certified and accredited laboratory, independent of the Company. Samples submitted through ALS are run through standard prep methods and analyzed using Au-AA23 (Au; 30g fire assay) and ME-MS61 (48 element suite; 0.25g four-acid/ICP-AES & ICP-MS). ALS also undertakes their own internal coarse and pulp duplicate analysis to ensure proper sample preparation and equipment calibration. i-80 Gold's QA/QC program includes regular insertion of standards, duplicates, and blanks into the sample stream with a stringent review of all results.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Paul Chawrun P.Eng. and Tyler Hill CPG. are named as Qualified Persons who supervised and approved the technical information in the press release.

Evidence · text

“The technical information contained in this press release has been prepared under the supervision of, and has been reviewed and approved by Paul Chawrun P.Eng., Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and Tyler Hill CPG., Vice President Geology, each of whom is an employee of the Company and a "qualified person" within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K ("S-K 1300").”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The document describes an 'ongoing 2026 infill drilling campaign' at the project.

Evidence · text

“i-80 Gold Announces Initial Assay Results From Mineral Point Open Pit Project in Nevada Including a Step-Out Hole of 1.33 g/t Au and 39.2 g/t Ag Over 225.6 Meters”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states 'True widths are estimated between approximately 75% - 95% of core width' but does not provide specific true width values for each intercept.

Evidence · text

“True widths are estimated between approximately 75% - 95% of core width. See Table 2 for complete drill results.”

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a category for 'Indicated Mineral Resources' with 216,982 thousand tonnes.

Evidence · table

“Indicated Mineral Resources”

Context: 216,982

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a category for 'Inferred Mineral Resources' with 194,442 thousand tonnes.

Evidence · table

“Inferred Mineral Resources”

Context: 194,442

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The 2025 PEA and the technical information are stated to be prepared in accordance with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The technical information contained in this press release has been prepared under the supervision of, and has been reviewed and approved by Paul Chawrun P.Eng., Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and Tyler Hill CPG., Vice President Geology, each of whom is an employee of the Company and a "qualified person" within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K ("S-K 1300").”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The mineral resource is reported above a 0.1 g/t Au cutoff grade.

Evidence · text

“Mineral resources are reported above a 0.1 g/t Au cutoff grade.”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document refers to the 'Mineral Point Open Pit mineral resources' and confirms they 'remain current as of December 31, 2025', indicating an update or reaffirmation of an existing estimate.

Evidence · text

“Aaron Amoroso, a Qualified Person and an employee of the Company, has reviewed the Mineral Point Open Pit mineral resources and material assumptions included in the Ruby Hill Technical Report and confirmed that they remain current as of December 31, 2025.”

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is explicitly linked to supporting a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).

Evidence · text

“The mineral resource supporting the 2025 PEA was constrained by a pit-shell using a base case metals price assumptions of $2,175 per ounce of gold and $26 per ounce of silver.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 86. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (84)

iRH26-07Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 219.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-07
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
219.4 m
From
247.6 m
To
467 m
Intercept Depth
247.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-07:247.6-467
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
west of the known deposit
Easting
586037
Northing
4375983
CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N
Elevation
1965 m
Azimuth
192 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This step-out intercept shows moderate gold grades over a very broad width, contributing to the potential expansion of the mineralized footprint to the west.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Step-out hole indicating potential for expansion

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 219.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

iRH26-07Mineral Point · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 219.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-07
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
219.4 m
From
247.6 m
To
467 m
Intercept Depth
247.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-07:247.6-467
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
west of the known deposit
Easting
586037
Northing
4375983
CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N
Elevation
1965 m
Azimuth
192 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This step-out intercept shows weak silver grades over a very broad width, contributing to the potential expansion of the mineralized footprint to the west.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Step-out hole indicating potential for expansion

Evidence · table

“10.4”

Context: 219.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

iMP26-01Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-01
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
358.1 m
To
385.7 m
Intercept Depth
358.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-01:358.1-385.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: iMP26-01

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-01Mineral Point · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-01
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
358.1 m
To
385.7 m
Intercept Depth
358.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-01:358.1-385.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 101.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.7”

Context: iMP26-01

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-02*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 167.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-02*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
167.6 m
From
228.6 m
To
396.2 m
Intercept Depth
228.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-02*:228.6-396.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 57.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: iMP26-02*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-02*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 20.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 167.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-02*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
20.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
167.6 m
From
228.6 m
To
396.2 m
Intercept Depth
228.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-02*:228.6-396.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.6 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3452.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 20.6 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.6”

Context: iMP26-02*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-03*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-03*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
239.3 m
To
259.1 m
Intercept Depth
239.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-03*:239.3-259.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 19.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: iMP26-03*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-03*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-03*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
239.3 m
To
259.1 m
Intercept Depth
239.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-03*:239.3-259.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 52 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1029.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“52.0”

Context: iMP26-03*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-04*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 135.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-04*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
135.6 m
From
231.7 m
To
367.3 m
Intercept Depth
231.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-04*:231.7-367.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 39.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: iMP26-04*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-04*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 135.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-04*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
11.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
135.6 m
From
231.7 m
To
367.3 m
Intercept Depth
231.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-04*:231.7-367.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.6 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1573.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.6”

Context: iMP26-04*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-05*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-05*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
210.3 m
To
217.9 m
Intercept Depth
210.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-05*:210.3-217.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: iMP26-05*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-05*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 25.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-05*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
25.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
210.3 m
To
217.9 m
Intercept Depth
210.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-05*:210.3-217.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 191.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 25.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.2”

Context: iMP26-05*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
286.5 m
To
313.9 m
Intercept Depth
286.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:286.5-313.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
286.5 m
To
313.9 m
Intercept Depth
286.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:286.5-313.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 153.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.6”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
402.3 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
402.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:402.3-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.26 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · silverGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
7.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
402.3 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
402.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:402.3-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 175.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.2”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-07*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 225.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-07*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
225.6 m
From
216.4 m
To
442 m
Intercept Depth
216.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-07*:216.4-442
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 300.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.33 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: iMP26-07*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-07*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 39.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 225.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-07*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
39.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
225.6 m
From
216.4 m
To
442 m
Intercept Depth
216.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-07*:216.4-442
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.2 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8843.5 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 39.2 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“39.2”

Context: iMP26-07*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-09*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 202.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-09*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
202.7 m
From
262.1 m
To
464.8 m
Intercept Depth
262.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-09*:262.1-464.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 166.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.82 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: iMP26-09*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-09*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 40.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 202.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-09*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
40.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
202.7 m
From
262.1 m
To
464.8 m
Intercept Depth
262.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-09*:262.1-464.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40.1 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8128.3 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 40.1 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“40.1”

Context: iMP26-09*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-11Mineral Point · goldGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 71.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-11
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
1.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
71.6 m
From
204.2 m
To
275.8 m
Intercept Depth
204.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-11:204.2-275.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.57 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 112.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.57 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.57”

Context: iMP26-11

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-11Mineral Point · silverGrade: 72.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 71.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-11
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
72.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
71.6 m
From
204.2 m
To
275.8 m
Intercept Depth
204.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-11:204.2-275.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 72.5 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5191.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 72.5 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“72.5”

Context: iMP26-11

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-12*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-12*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
251.5 m
To
278.9 m
Intercept Depth
251.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-12*:251.5-278.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 17.5 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: iMP26-12*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-12*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 23.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-12*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
23.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
251.5 m
To
278.9 m
Intercept Depth
251.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-12*:251.5-278.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 646.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.6”

Context: iMP26-12*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-13*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-13*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.9 m
From
249.9 m
To
275.8 m
Intercept Depth
249.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-13*:249.9-275.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: iMP26-13*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-13*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-13*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
10.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.9 m
From
249.9 m
To
275.8 m
Intercept Depth
249.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-13*:249.9-275.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 274.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.6”

Context: iMP26-13*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-14*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-14*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
268.2 m
To
275.8 m
Intercept Depth
268.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-14*:268.2-275.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: iMP26-14*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-14*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 7.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-14*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
7.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
268.2 m
To
275.8 m
Intercept Depth
268.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-14*:268.2-275.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 58.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.7”

Context: iMP26-14*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-16Mineral Point · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-16
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.6 m
From
146.3 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-16:146.3-185.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 43.6 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: iMP26-16

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-16Mineral Point · silverGrade: 56.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-16
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
56.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.6 m
From
146.3 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-16:146.3-185.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.1 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2221.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“56.1”

Context: iMP26-16

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 143.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
143.3 m
From
283.5 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
283.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:283.5-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 68.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · silverGrade: 14.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 143.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
14.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
143.3 m
From
283.5 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
283.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:283.5-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.9 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2135.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.9”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-17Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 93 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-17
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
93 m
From
176.8 m
To
269.8 m
Intercept Depth
176.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-17:176.8-269.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.85 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 79.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: iMP26-17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-17Mineral Point · silverGrade: 87.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 93 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-17
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
87.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
93 m
From
176.8 m
To
269.8 m
Intercept Depth
176.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-17:176.8-269.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 87.7 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8156.1 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 87.7 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“87.7”

Context: iMP26-17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-18Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-18
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.6 m
From
181.4 m
To
221 m
Intercept Depth
181.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-18:181.4-221
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.55 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 21.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: iMP26-18

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-18Mineral Point · silverGrade: 27.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-18
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
27.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.6 m
From
181.4 m
To
221 m
Intercept Depth
181.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-18:181.4-221
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.5 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1089.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.5”

Context: iMP26-18

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
42.7 m
From
384 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
384 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:384-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 20.1 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · silverGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
6.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
42.7 m
From
384 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
384 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:384-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 277.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.5”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-19Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-19
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
70.1 m
From
189 m
To
259.1 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-19:189-259.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: iMP26-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-19Mineral Point · silverGrade: 37.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-19
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
37.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
70.1 m
From
189 m
To
259.1 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-19:189-259.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.5 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2628.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“37.5”

Context: iMP26-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-20Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-20
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.4 m
From
161.5 m
To
249.9 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-20:161.5-249.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 47.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: iMP26-20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-20Mineral Point · silverGrade: 74.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-20
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
74.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.4 m
From
161.5 m
To
249.9 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-20:161.5-249.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 74.6 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6594.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 74.6 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“74.6”

Context: iMP26-20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-21*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-21*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
347.5 m
To
371.9 m
Intercept Depth
347.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-21*:347.5-371.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: iMP26-21*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-21*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-21*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
4.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
347.5 m
To
371.9 m
Intercept Depth
347.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-21*:347.5-371.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 119.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.9”

Context: iMP26-21*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-22*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 208.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-22*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
208.8 m
From
208.8 m
To
417.6 m
Intercept Depth
208.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-22*:208.8-417.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 58.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: iMP26-22*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-22*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 208.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-22*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
7.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
208.8 m
From
208.8 m
To
417.6 m
Intercept Depth
208.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-22*:208.8-417.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.9 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1649.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.9”

Context: iMP26-22*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-23*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 170.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-23*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
170.7 m
From
249.9 m
To
420.6 m
Intercept Depth
249.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-23*:249.9-420.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 290.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.7 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.70”

Context: iMP26-23*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-23*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 61.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 170.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-23*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
61.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
170.7 m
From
249.9 m
To
420.6 m
Intercept Depth
249.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-23*:249.9-420.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 61.5 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10498.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 61.5 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“61.5”

Context: iMP26-23*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-24*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 147.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-24*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
147.8 m
From
288 m
To
435.9 m
Intercept Depth
288 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-24*:288-435.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 25.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: iMP26-24*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-24*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 147.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-24*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
147.8 m
From
288 m
To
435.9 m
Intercept Depth
288 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-24*:288-435.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 546.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.7”

Context: iMP26-24*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-25*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 169.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-25*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
169.2 m
From
257.6 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
257.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-25*:257.6-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 52.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: iMP26-25*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-25*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 7.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 169.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-25*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
7.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
169.2 m
From
257.6 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
257.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-25*:257.6-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.8 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1319.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.8”

Context: iMP26-25*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-26*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 208.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-26*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
208.8 m
From
248.4 m
To
457.2 m
Intercept Depth
248.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-26*:248.4-457.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 73.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: iMP26-26*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-26*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 208.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-26*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
10.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
208.8 m
From
248.4 m
To
457.2 m
Intercept Depth
248.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-26*:248.4-457.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.7 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2234.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.7”

Context: iMP26-26*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-30Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 257.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-30
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
257.6 m
From
161.5 m
To
419.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-30:161.5-419.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 74.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: iMP26-30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-30Mineral Point · silverGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 257.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-30
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
15.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
257.6 m
From
161.5 m
To
419.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-30:161.5-419.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.6 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4018.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 15.6 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.6”

Context: iMP26-30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-32Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 263.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-32
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
263.7 m
From
163.1 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-32:163.1-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 94.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: iMP26-32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-32Mineral Point · silverGrade: 24.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 263.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-32
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
24.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
263.7 m
From
163.1 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-32:163.1-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.1 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6355.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 24.1 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“24.1”

Context: iMP26-32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-33Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 61 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-33
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
61 m
From
170.7 m
To
231.6 m
Intercept Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-33:170.7-231.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.68 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 41.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: iMP26-33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-33Mineral Point · silverGrade: 56.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 61 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-33
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
56.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
61 m
From
170.7 m
To
231.6 m
Intercept Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-33:170.7-231.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.7 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3458.7 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 56.7 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“56.7”

Context: iMP26-33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-34Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 125 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-34
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
125 m
From
285 m
To
410 m
Intercept Depth
285 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-34:285-410
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 43.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: iMP26-34

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-34Mineral Point · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 125 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-34
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
125 m
From
285 m
To
410 m
Intercept Depth
285 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-34:285-410
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.7 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1087.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: iMP26-34

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-35Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 213.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-35
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
213.4 m
From
213.4 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
213.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-35:213.4-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 111.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.52 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: iMP26-35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-35Mineral Point · silverGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 213.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-35
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
213.4 m
From
213.4 m
To
426.7 m
Intercept Depth
213.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-35:213.4-426.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.5 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2454.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.5”

Context: iMP26-35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-58*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-58*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
54.9 m
From
402.3 m
To
457.2 m
Intercept Depth
402.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-58*:402.3-457.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 30.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: iMP26-58*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iMP26-58*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 24.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iMP26-58*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
24.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
54.9 m
From
402.3 m
To
457.2 m
Intercept Depth
402.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iMP26-58*:402.3-457.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.7 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1356.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“24.7”

Context: iMP26-58*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-01Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-01
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.6 m
From
151.6 m
To
164.2 m
Intercept Depth
151.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-01:151.6-164.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: iRH26-01

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-01Mineral Point · silverGrade: 38.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-01
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
38.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.6 m
From
151.6 m
To
164.2 m
Intercept Depth
151.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-01:151.6-164.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 487.6 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“38.7”

Context: iRH26-01

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-02Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-02
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.6 m
From
287.6 m
To
293.2 m
Intercept Depth
287.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-02:287.6-293.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.29 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: iRH26-02

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-02Mineral Point · silverGrade: 11.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-02
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
11.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.6 m
From
287.6 m
To
293.2 m
Intercept Depth
287.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-02:287.6-293.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 66.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.8”

Context: iRH26-02

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 78.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
78.6 m
From
311.5 m
To
390.1 m
Intercept Depth
311.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:311.5-390.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 78.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
78.6 m
From
311.5 m
To
390.1 m
Intercept Depth
311.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:311.5-390.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 251.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.2”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-03Mineral Point · goldGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-03
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
212.5 m
To
221.6 m
Intercept Depth
212.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-03:212.5-221.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.85 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 16.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: iRH26-03

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-03Mineral Point · silverGrade: 59.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-03
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
59.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
212.5 m
To
221.6 m
Intercept Depth
212.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-03:212.5-221.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 59.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 541.4 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“59.5”

Context: iRH26-03

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
80.5 m
From
323.2 m
To
403.7 m
Intercept Depth
323.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:323.2-403.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.69 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 55.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndMineral Point · silverGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
4.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
80.5 m
From
323.2 m
To
403.7 m
Intercept Depth
323.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
And:323.2-403.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 370.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.6”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-04*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-04*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.5 m
From
206.9 m
To
231.3 m
Intercept Depth
206.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-04*:206.9-231.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: iRH26-04*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-04*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 25.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-04*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
25.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.5 m
From
206.9 m
To
231.3 m
Intercept Depth
206.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-04*:206.9-231.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 615.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.1”

Context: iRH26-04*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-05Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 201.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-05
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
201.4 m
From
193.9 m
To
395.3 m
Intercept Depth
193.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-05:193.9-395.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.99 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 199.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.99 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: iRH26-05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-05Mineral Point · silverGrade: 5.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 201.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-05
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
5.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
201.4 m
From
193.9 m
To
395.3 m
Intercept Depth
193.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-05:193.9-395.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.9 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1188.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.9”

Context: iRH26-05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-06*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 65.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-06*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
65.7 m
From
358.7 m
To
424.4 m
Intercept Depth
358.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-06*:358.7-424.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: iRH26-06*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-06*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 65.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-06*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
65.7 m
From
358.7 m
To
424.4 m
Intercept Depth
358.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-06*:358.7-424.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 755.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.5”

Context: iRH26-06*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-07*Mineral Point · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 219.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-07*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
219.4 m
From
247.6 m
To
467 m
Intercept Depth
247.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-07*:247.6-467
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 85.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: iRH26-07*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

iRH26-07*Mineral Point · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 219.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
iRH26-07*
Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
IAU.TO

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
219.4 m
From
247.6 m
To
467 m
Intercept Depth
247.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
Core
Group ID
iRH26-07*:247.6-467
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
NAD83 Zone 11N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.4 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2281.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.4”

Context: iRH26-07*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (2)

inferredMineral Point · goldTonnes: 194442Grade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
IAU.TO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Aaron Amoroso
Resource group id
resource:8c9bdcee63c49677f414
Deposit or zone
Mineral Point
Mining method
combined
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
194442
Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Mineral Point project hosts a significant inferred gold resource, indicating future potential, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence for economic studies. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large inferred gold resource
  • QP/CP signed
  • NI 43-101 and S-K 1300 compliant
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category has lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 194,442

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredMineral Point · silverTonnes: 194442Grade: 14.6Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mineral Point
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
IAU.TO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Aaron Amoroso
Resource group id
resource:8c9bdcee63c49677f414
Deposit or zone
Mineral Point
Mining method
combined
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
194442
Grade
14.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Mineral Point project hosts a significant inferred gold resource, indicating future potential, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence for economic studies. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Large inferred gold resource
  • QP/CP signed
  • NI 43-101 and S-K 1300 compliant
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category has lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“14.6”

Context: 194,442

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.