HWK: 2026 Annual Report to Shareholders

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Hawk Resources Limited
Ticker
HWK
Exchange
ASX
Region
Utah, USA
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver, Molybdenum, Scandium, Lithium, Rare earth elements
Document categories
Drill results, Agreement transaction
Extracted
2026-09-29 13:29:34 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Hawk Resources Limited's annual report highlights positive drill results from its Cactus copper-gold project in Utah, USA, with significant near-surface copper-gold-silver-molybdenum mineralization intersected in three diamond holes. The company also expanded its portfolio by securing options to acquire the Meerkat copper project in Arizona, USA, and the Olympus scandium project in Western Australia, with the latter option now exercised post year-end. Exploration efforts are ongoing across its critical and precious metal projects in the USA, Australia, and Brazil.

Reasoning: The new drill results from the Cactus project demonstrate significant near-surface copper-gold mineralization, including high-grade intervals, and DD26CT003 provides an indication of true width, which is positive. The company also successfully expanded its project pipeline with options for the Meerkat copper project and the Olympus scandium project, the latter now exercised, indicating active growth. However, the lack of explicit QA/QC disclosure for the new results and the reliance on historical, non-JORC compliant data for the acquired projects introduce some uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from the Cactus project show wide, near-surface copper-gold-silver-molybdenum mineralization, including high-grade intervals.
  • Drill hole DD26CT003 was oriented perpendicular to the interpreted strike, providing an indication of true thickness for the mineralized zone.
  • The company expanded its project portfolio by securing options for the Meerkat copper project and the Olympus scandium project, with the latter option now exercised.
  • Successful negotiation of approvals for the Olympus scandium project allows exploration to commence.

Negative factors

  • No significant mineralization was intersected in some of the Cactus project targets (Cactus, Wasp, and Copperopolis holes).
  • There is no explicit disclosure of QA/QC procedures, certified laboratories, or Qualified Person sign-off for the new drill results.
  • Historical drill results for the Meerkat and Olympus projects are pre-JORC 2012 or based on pXRF analyses, requiring verification and limiting their reliability.
  • Some drill hole parameters (e.g., hole depth, azimuth, dip for DD26CT005) are not fully disclosed for new intercepts.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 61

Classification and evidence

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The reported drill intercepts for DD26CT003, DD26CT004, and DD26CT005 are given as downhole lengths, and no true width values are explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“80.0m @ 0.48% Cu from surface”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Hole DD26CT005 was drilled to extend the mineralized zone to the north-west.

Evidence · text

“Hole DD26CT005, again drilled from the same pad as DD26CT003, was aimed at extending the mineralised zone to the north-west.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Hawk carried out infill soil sampling and DD26CT004 confirms the near-surface mineralized zone extends south-east, indicating infill-style drilling.

Evidence · text

“Hawk carried out infill soil sampling along the Cactus Corridor zone... The hole confirms that the near-surface mineralised zone extends south-east from DD26CT003”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: The document does not disclose QA/QC procedures, certified laboratories, or Competent/Qualified Person sign-off for the new drill results.

Evidence · text

“The three diamond holes, DD26CT003-005, which were drilled in a horizontal fan from the same drill site all intersected coarse, visible chalcopyrite mineralisation with laboratory assays confirming wide down hole intervals of near-surface copper-gold-silver-molybdenum mineralisation”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The document reports historical drill results for the Cactus, Meerkat, and Olympus projects, some explicitly noted as 'pre-JORC 2012' or from '2004'/'2024' in a 2026 report.

Evidence · text

“Historical (pre-JORC 2012) Bear Creek drill hole intersections reported in open file data by the Arizona Department of Mines & Minerals”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: Historical copper equivalent grades for the Meerkat project are reported without disclosing the underlying price, recovery, or payability assumptions.

Evidence · text

“48.0m @ 0.47% Cu Eq from 26.1m down hole”

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The Meerkat project's value proposition is linked to its location in the Laramide Arc, which contains multiple world-class copper mines, and the Olympus project is presented with potential for a 'major new scandium province'.

Evidence · text

“Meerkat lies in the Laramide Arc, which contains multiple world class copper mines in southern Arizona and northern Mexico”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 61. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (61)

DD26CT003Cactus North · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT003
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
80 m
From
0 m
To
80 m
Hole Depth
90.68 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT003:0-80
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-48 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide, near-surface copper intercept is positive for the project, and the perpendicular drill orientation is a good practice for understanding true thickness, though the value itself is not given.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept of copper mineralization from surface.
  • Drill hole oriented perpendicular to strike, indicating true thickness.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“80.0m @ 0.48% Cu from surface”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT003Cactus North · copperGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT003
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.6 m
From
60.5 m
To
80.1 m
Hole Depth
90.68 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT003:60.5-80.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-48 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included interval shows a significant increase in copper grade, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade copper intercept within a broader mineralized zone.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“19.6m @ 1.25% Cu from 60.5m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT003Cactus North · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT003
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.2 m
From
60.5 m
To
74.7 m
Hole Depth
90.68 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT003:60.5-74.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-48 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval demonstrates strong copper grades within the broader mineralized zone, indicating potential for higher-grade domains.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper sub-interval, further enhancing the overall intercept quality.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“14.2m @ 1.60% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT003Cactus North · copperGrade: 3.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT003
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
3.97
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.9 m
From
74.7 m
To
79.6 m
Hole Depth
90.68 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT003:74.7-79.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-48 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade copper interval is a very positive indicator for the project's potential, suggesting localized bonanza grades.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade copper sub-interval, indicating a bonanza-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“4.9m @ 3.97% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT003Cactus North · molybdenumGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 46.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT003
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
46.1 m
From
35.7 m
To
81.8 m
Hole Depth
90.68 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT003:35.7-81.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-48 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of anomalous molybdenum over a wide interval adds potential byproduct value to the copper-gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Significant molybdenum mineralization as a potential byproduct.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“0.03% over 46.1m from 35.7m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT003Cactus North · copperGrade: 5.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT003
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
5.57
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
0 m
To
0.4 m
Hole Depth
90.68 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT003:0-0.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-48 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very high-grade copper sample, even over a narrow width, is a strong positive indicator of bonanza-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Extremely high-grade copper in a narrow interval, indicating bonanza grades.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this highest-grade sample.

Evidence · text

“0.4m @ 5.57% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT003Cactus North · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT003
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
From
0 m
To
0.4 m
Hole Depth
90.68 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT003:0-0.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-48 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of high-grade gold alongside very high-grade copper in this narrow interval highlights the polymetallic nature and bonanza potential of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold in a narrow interval, indicating bonanza grades.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this highest-grade sample.

Evidence · text

“1.21g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT003Cactus North · silverGrade: 41.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT003
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
41.4
Grade Unit
ppm
From
0 m
Hole Depth
90.68 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-48 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of anomalous silver further enhances the polymetallic nature of the mineralization, contributing to overall project value.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous silver grades, adding to the polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • No specific interval length provided for this silver grade.

Evidence · text

“silver to 41.4ppm”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT004Cactus North · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 72.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
72.9 m
From
30 m
To
102.9 m
Hole Depth
111 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT004:30-102.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
196 °
Dip
-61 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide copper intercept confirms the extension of the near-surface mineralized zone, which is a positive for resource potential.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept of near-surface copper mineralization, confirming extension of the zone.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“72.9m @ 0.36% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT004Cactus North · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 72.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
72.9 m
From
30 m
To
102.9 m
Hole Depth
111 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT004:30-102.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
196 °
Dip
-61 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of silver adds to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization, contributing to overall project value.

Positive factors

  • Silver mineralization alongside copper, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“2.0ppm Ag from 30.0m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT004Cactus North · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
33.6 m
From
58 m
To
91.6 m
Hole Depth
111 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT004:58-91.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
196 °
Dip
-61 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included interval shows an improved copper grade, contributing positively to the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade copper intercept within the broader mineralized zone.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“33.6m @ 0.49% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT004Cactus North · silverGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 33.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
33.6 m
From
58 m
To
91.6 m
Hole Depth
111 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT004:58-91.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
196 °
Dip
-61 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of silver adds to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization, contributing to overall project value.

Positive factors

  • Silver mineralization alongside copper, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“1.9ppm Ag from 58.0m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT004Cactus North · copperGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.4 m
From
89.7 m
To
100.1 m
Hole Depth
111 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT004:89.7-100.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
196 °
Dip
-61 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade copper interval is a strong positive, indicating a richer zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept, further enhancing the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“10.4m @ 0.97% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT004Cactus North · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.4 m
From
89.7 m
To
100.1 m
Hole Depth
111 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT004:89.7-100.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
196 °
Dip
-61 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of silver adds to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization, contributing to overall project value.

Positive factors

  • Silver mineralization alongside copper, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“3.0ppm Ag”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT004Cactus North · molybdenumGrade: 0.059Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.059
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.4 m
From
89.7 m
To
100.1 m
Hole Depth
111 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT004:89.7-100.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
196 °
Dip
-61 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of molybdenum adds potential byproduct value to the copper-silver mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Significant molybdenum mineralization as a potential byproduct.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“0.059% Mo from 89.7m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT004Cactus North · molybdenumGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: %Intercept: 39.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.027
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
39.2 m
From
59.9 m
To
99.1 m
Hole Depth
111 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT004:59.9-99.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
196 °
Dip
-61 °

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of a separate molybdenum zone adds potential byproduct value to the copper-gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Significant molybdenum mineralization as a potential byproduct.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“0.027% Mo over 39.2m from 59.9m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 71.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
71.7 m
From
20.3 m
To
92 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-92
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide copper intercept extends the mineralized zone, which is positive, but the lack of full drill orientation data reduces confidence in its geometry.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept of near-surface copper mineralization, extending the zone to the north-west.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“71.7m @ 0.45% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 71.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
71.7 m
From
20.3 m
To
92 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-92
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of gold adds to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization, contributing to overall project value, but the lack of full drill orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Gold mineralization alongside copper, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“0.06g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 71.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
71.7 m
From
20.3 m
To
92 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-92
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of silver adds to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization, contributing to overall project value, but the lack of full drill orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Silver mineralization alongside copper and gold, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“3ppm Ag from 20.3m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.3 m
From
20.3 m
To
24.6 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-24.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade copper sub-interval is a strong positive, indicating richer zones within the broader mineralization, but the lack of full depth and orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper sub-interval, enhancing the overall intercept quality.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this sub-interval.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“4.3m @ 2.2% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.3 m
From
20.3 m
To
24.6 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-24.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of gold alongside high-grade copper in this sub-interval adds to the polymetallic potential, but the lack of full depth and orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Gold mineralization alongside high-grade copper, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this sub-interval.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“0.13g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · silverGrade: 14Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.3 m
From
20.3 m
To
24.6 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-24.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of silver alongside copper and gold in this sub-interval adds to the polymetallic potential, but the lack of full depth and orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Silver mineralization alongside copper and gold, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this sub-interval.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“14ppm Ag”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.8 m
From
20.3 m
To
26.1 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-26.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade copper sub-interval is a strong positive, indicating richer zones within the broader mineralization, but the lack of full depth and orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper sub-interval, further enhancing the overall intercept quality.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this sub-interval.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“5.8m @ 1.4% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.8 m
From
20.3 m
To
26.1 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-26.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of gold alongside high-grade copper in this sub-interval adds to the polymetallic potential, but the lack of full depth and orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Gold mineralization alongside high-grade copper, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this sub-interval.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“0.33g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
5.8 m
From
20.3 m
To
26.1 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-26.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of silver alongside copper and gold in this sub-interval adds to the polymetallic potential, but the lack of full depth and orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Silver mineralization alongside copper and gold, indicating polymetallic potential.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this sub-interval.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“13ppm Ag”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DD26CT005Cactus North · molybdenumGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DD26CT005
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.016
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32.9 m
From
20.3 m
To
53.2 m
Intercept Depth
20.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DD26CT005:20.3-53.2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The presence of anomalous molybdenum adds potential byproduct value, but the lack of full depth and orientation data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous molybdenum mineralization as a potential byproduct.

Negative factors

  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • True width value not explicitly stated.
  • Specific depth interval not provided for this molybdenum zone.
  • Drill hole azimuth and dip not provided.

Evidence · text

“An anomalous molybdenum zone of 32.9m @ 0.016% Mo”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Newmont 2004Cactus North · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Newmont 2004
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.9 m
From
0 m
To
25.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Newmont 2004:0-25.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
ungrounded
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept indicates past exploration success, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence as new information.

Positive factors

  • Significant gold mineralization from surface.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“25.9m @ 1.53g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

DDH-8Cactus North · copperGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-8
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
6.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.9 m
From
207.9 m
To
212.8 m
Intercept Depth
207.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-8:207.9-212.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC, along with missing gold assays, reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No gold assays reported for this interval.

Evidence · text

“4.9m @ 6.7% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

DDH-8Cactus North · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 43.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-8
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
43.6 m
From
207.9 m
To
251.5 m
Intercept Depth
207.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-8:207.9-251.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical wide copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC, along with missing gold assays, reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept of copper mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No gold assays reported for this interval.

Evidence · text

“43.6m @ 1.7% Cu from 207.9m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

R-12Cactus North · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
R-12
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
39.6 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
R-12:39.6-51.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC, along with missing gold assays, reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No gold assays reported for this interval.

Evidence · text

“12.2m @ 3.2% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

R-12Cactus North · copperGrade: 2.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
R-12
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
2.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22.9 m
From
39.6 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
R-12:39.6-62.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC, along with missing gold assays, reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant copper mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No gold assays reported for this interval.

Evidence · text

“22.9m @ 2.41% Cu from 39.6m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

ALCA-10Cactus North · copperGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALCA-10
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
61 m
To
69 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALCA-10:61-69
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“8.0m @ 3.1% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

ALCA-10Cactus North · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALCA-10
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
61 m
To
69 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALCA-10:61-69
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept alongside copper is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant gold mineralization alongside copper.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“0.96g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

ALCA-10Cactus North · copperGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALCA-10
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32 m
From
61 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALCA-10:61-93
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical wide copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept of copper mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“32m @ 1.24% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

ALCA-10Cactus North · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALCA-10
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32 m
From
61 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALCA-10:61-93
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept alongside copper is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Gold mineralization alongside copper.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“0.3g/t Au from 61m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

R-13BCactus North · copperGrade: 2.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
R-13B
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
2.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
42.7 m
To
54.9 m
Intercept Depth
42.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
R-13B:42.7-54.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“12.2m @ 2.77% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

R-13BCactus North · copperGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
R-13B
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.9 m
From
42.7 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
42.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
R-13B:42.7-68.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant copper mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“25.9m @ 1.62% Cu from 42.7m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

SAWM0001Cactus North · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAWM0001
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
41 m
From
252 m
To
293 m
Intercept Depth
252 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAWM0001:252-293
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant copper mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“41m @ 1.9% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

SAWM0001Cactus North · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAWM0001
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41 m
From
252 m
To
293 m
Intercept Depth
252 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAWM0001:252-293
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept alongside copper is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant gold mineralization alongside copper.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“0.6g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

SAWM0001Cactus North · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 74 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAWM0001
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
74 m
From
252 m
To
326 m
Intercept Depth
252 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAWM0001:252-326
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical wide copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept of copper mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“74m @ 1.1% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

SAWM0001Cactus North · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAWM0001
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
74 m
From
252 m
To
326 m
Intercept Depth
252 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAWM0001:252-326
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept alongside copper is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Gold mineralization alongside copper.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“0.3g/t Au from 252m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

PCT04-1Cactus North · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PCT04-1
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.8 m
From
1.5 m
To
18.3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PCT04-1:1.5-18.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical shallow gold intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant gold mineralization from shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole PCT04-1: 16.8m @ 1.15g/t Au from 1.5m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

PCT04-1ACactus North · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PCT04-1A
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.9 m
From
0 m
To
25.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PCT04-1A:0-25.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical shallow gold intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant gold mineralization from surface.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole PCT04-1A: 25.9m @ 1.53g/t Au from surface”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

PCT04-3Cactus North · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PCT04-3
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.3 m
From
0 m
To
18.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PCT04-3:0-18.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical shallow gold intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant gold mineralization from surface.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole PCT04-3: 18.3m @ 0.88g/t Au from surface”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

New YearsCactus North · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
New Years
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
26 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC, along with missing depth data, reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant copper mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided.

Evidence · text

“26m @ 1.3% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

New YearsCactus North · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
New Years
Project
Cactus North
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is positive, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC, along with missing depth data, reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant copper mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided.

Evidence · text

“30m @ 0.78% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear CreekMeerkat · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear Creek
Project
Meerkat
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
48 m
From
26.1 m
To
74.1 m
Intercept Depth
26.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear Creek:26.1-74.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper equivalent intercept indicates past exploration success, but its age, pre-JORC compliance, and opaque metal equivalent assumptions reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant copper equivalent mineralization from shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Historical data (pre-JORC 2012), not new results.
  • Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing assumptions.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“48.0m @ 0.47% Cu Eq from 26.1m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear CreekMeerkat · copperGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear Creek
Project
Meerkat
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.2 m
From
127.9 m
To
135.1 m
Intercept Depth
127.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear Creek:127.9-135.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.91
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical higher-grade copper equivalent intercept indicates past exploration success, but its age, pre-JORC compliance, and opaque metal equivalent assumptions reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade copper equivalent mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Historical data (pre-JORC 2012), not new results.
  • Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing assumptions.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“7.2m @ 0.91% Cu Eq from 127.9m down hole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

RABOlympus · scandiumGrade: 2164Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RAB
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
2164
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade scandium result is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade scandium in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided.

Evidence · text

“2,164ppm Sc over 1.0m sample intervals”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0002Olympus · scandiumGrade: 948Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0002
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
948
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
5 m
From
0 m
To
5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0002:0-5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical shallow scandium result is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Significant scandium mineralization from surface in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole MMB0002 5m @ 948ppm Sc from surface”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0002Olympus · scandiumGrade: 1139Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0002
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1139
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
0 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0002:0-3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical higher-grade scandium sub-interval is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade scandium sub-interval in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided for this sub-interval.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 1,139ppm Sc”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0001Olympus · scandiumGrade: 821Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0001
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
821
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6 m
From
2 m
To
8 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0001:2-8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical scandium result is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Significant scandium mineralization in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole MMB0001 6m @ 821ppm Sc from 2m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0001Olympus · scandiumGrade: 1547Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0001
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1547
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
2 m
To
4 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0001:2-4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical higher-grade scandium sub-interval is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade scandium sub-interval in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided for this sub-interval.

Evidence · text

“2m @ 1,547ppm Sc”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0004Olympus · scandiumGrade: 600Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0004
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
600
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
5 m
From
0 m
To
5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0004:0-5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical shallow scandium result is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Significant scandium mineralization from surface in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole MMB0004 5m @ 600ppm Sc from surface”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0004Olympus · scandiumGrade: 2037Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0004
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
2037
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m
From
0 m
To
1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0004:0-1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical very high-grade scandium sub-interval is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade scandium sub-interval in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided for this sub-interval.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 2,037ppm Sc”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0017Olympus · scandiumGrade: 934Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0017
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
934
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
11 m
From
0 m
To
11 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0017:0-11
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical wide shallow scandium result is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept of significant scandium mineralization from surface in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole MMB0017 11m @ 934ppm Sc from surface”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0017Olympus · scandiumGrade: 1613Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0017
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1613
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
0 m
To
2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0017:0-2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical higher-grade scandium sub-interval is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade scandium sub-interval in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided for this sub-interval.

Evidence · text

“2m @ 1,613ppm Sc”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0019Olympus · scandiumGrade: 700Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0019
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
700
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7 m
From
0 m
To
7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0019:0-7
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
ungrounded
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical shallow scandium result is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Significant scandium mineralization from surface in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole MMB 0019 7m @ 700ppm Sc from surface”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0019Olympus · scandiumGrade: 1205Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0019
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1205
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m
From
0 m
To
1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0019:0-1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
ungrounded
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical higher-grade scandium sub-interval is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade scandium sub-interval in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided for this sub-interval.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 1,205ppm Sc”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0016Olympus · scandiumGrade: 664Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0016
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
664
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8 m
From
1 m
To
9 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0016:1-9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical shallow scandium result is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Significant scandium mineralization in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Hole MMB0016 8m @ 664ppm Sc from 1m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MMB0016Olympus · scandiumGrade: 1161Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MMB0016
Project
Olympus
Commodity
scandium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
HWK

Geometry

Grade
1161
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m
From
1 m
To
2 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MMB0016:1-2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical higher-grade scandium sub-interval is indicative of potential, but its reliance on pXRF and non-compliance with modern reporting standards significantly reduce its reliability and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade scandium sub-interval in historical pXRF assays.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new results.
  • pXRF analyses are not laboratory assays and require verification.
  • Not compliant with JORC 2012.
  • No explicit QA/QC disclosure.
  • No specific depth interval provided for this sub-interval.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 1,161ppm Sc”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.