HTM: Annual Report to Shareholders

Original announcement by asx on

Company
High-Tech Metals Limited
Ticker
HTM
Exchange
ASX
Region
Western Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update, Drill results, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-30 07:23:08 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

High-Tech Metals Limited's annual report for FY2026 details significant progress across its gold projects in Western Australia, including positive drill results from Mt Fisher and high-grade intercepts from Wagtail. Metallurgical testwork confirmed free-milling gold and high recoveries for both projects, de-risking future development. The company also updated its Wagtail Mineral Resource Estimate, which underpins ongoing development studies, and strengthened its balance sheet with successful capital raises, ending the year with $9.8 million in cash.

Reasoning: The annual report highlights significant progress in exploration, resource definition, and metallurgical testwork for its gold projects in Western Australia, supported by a strong cash position from recent capital raises, indicating positive momentum towards development. The updated Wagtail MRE and Mt Fisher drill results are key positive developments.

Positive factors

  • Strong cash position after successful capital raises
  • Positive drill results from Mt Fisher, including high-grade intercepts
  • Favorable metallurgical testwork results for both Mt Fisher and Wagtail, confirming free-milling gold and high recoveries
  • Updated Wagtail MRE underpins development studies
  • Progress towards near-term gold production at Wagtail and Mt Fisher
  • Expansion of Mt Eureka ownership

Negative factors

  • Continued net loss and cash outflows from operating activities (typical for an exploration company)
  • Werner Lake Cobalt Project remains in early stages with no exploration activities yet

Facts used in scoring: 12

Classification and evidence

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that the Mineral Resource Estimates are JORC (2012) compliant.

Evidence · text

“JORC (2012) Mineral Resource Estimate”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The report includes Competent Person's Statements for Exploration Results and Mineral Resource Estimates, with named CPs who are members of recognized professional associations.

Evidence · text

“Competent Person’s Statement”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document refers to an 'updated Wagtail Gold MRE' and 'updated Mineral Resource Estimate for Mt Fisher was expected in August 2026', indicating revisions to existing estimates.

Evidence · text

“Updated Wagtail Gold MRE Underpins Development Studies”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: Several resource facts are classified as 'Inferred', indicating lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 294,100

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: Several resource facts are classified as 'Indicated', indicating reasonable geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: 129,100

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: One resource fact is classified as 'Measured', indicating the highest level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Measured”

Context: 41,300

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The drill results are reported by a Competent Person, which implies adherence to QA/QC protocols, and the document states that 'all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Exploration Results... continue to apply'.

Evidence · text

“The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in those original market announcements, and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Exploration Results and Mineral Resource Estimates in those announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The Mt Fisher drilling program was designed to 'Extend mineralisation north, south and down dip of the current resource'.

Evidence · text

“Extend mineralisation north, south and down dip of the current resource.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The Mt Fisher drilling program was designed to 'Infill areas of limited drilling density to improve resource confidence'.

Evidence · text

“Infill areas of limited drilling density to improve resource confidence.”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Mt Fisher achieved up to 93% gold recovery and Wagtail achieved up to 97.2% gold recovery, which are high for their respective processing routes.

Evidence · text

“combined gravity and cyanide recoveries of up to ~93% achieved”

Free Millingpositive

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: Metallurgical testwork confirmed that Mt Fisher and Wagtail mineralisation is free-milling and non-refractory.

Evidence · text

“Mt Fisher mineralisation is free-milling and non-refractory”

Bench Scale Onlynegative

Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: The metallurgical testwork for Wagtail was completed on a 'master composite sample' and for Mt Fisher on 'historic stockpile material', indicating bench-scale or preliminary testwork rather than pilot scale.

Evidence · text

“completed on a master composite sample generated from recent drilling at Wagtail”

Low Reagent Consumptionpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Wagtail testwork showed 'low cyanide and lime consumption throughout the test program'.

Evidence · text

“low cyanide and lime consumption throughout the test program”

Rapid Leach Kineticspositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Wagtail testwork showed 'Rapid leach kinetics, with essentially all cyanide-recoverable gold extracted within the first 8 hours'.

Evidence · text

“Rapid leach kinetics, with essentially all cyanide-recoverable gold extracted within the first 8 hours”

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 12. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (11)

measuredMt Fisher Project · goldTonnes: 41300Grade: 1.94Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Fisher Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:30224faaf58fe7a9dfaa
Deposit or zone
Mt Fisher

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
41300
Grade
1.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A small Measured resource, part of a larger project, with high confidence but limited scale.

Positive factors

  • Resource is in the Measured category, indicating high confidence
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Evidence · table

“1.94”

Context: 41,300

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedMt Fisher Project · goldTonnes: 129100Grade: 1.97Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Fisher Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:69a089e1a70845896ee8
Deposit or zone
Mt Fisher

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
129100
Grade
1.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
8
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate Indicated resource, contributing to the overall project, with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Resource is in the Indicated category, indicating good geological confidence
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Evidence · table

“1.97”

Context: 129,100

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredMt Fisher Project · goldTonnes: 294100Grade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 24Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Fisher Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:5f97bf9933a3d3d3d714
Deposit or zone
Mt Fisher

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
294100
Grade
2.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
24
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate Inferred resource with good grade, but lower confidence due to its category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade for an Inferred resource
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Negative factors

  • Resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“2.53”

Context: 294,100

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedMt Fisher Project · goldTonnes: 726200Grade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 44Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Fisher Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:ba4cd407dfad479ef060
Deposit or zone
Damsel

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
726200
Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
44
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A substantial Indicated resource contributing significantly to the project's overall gold endowment.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated resource tonnage, indicating good geological confidence
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Evidence · table

“1.87”

Context: 726,200

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredMt Fisher Project · goldTonnes: 678000Grade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 31Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Fisher Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:30b19f84e6f02a2aa379
Deposit or zone
Damsel

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
678000
Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
31
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A large Inferred resource, adding to the project's potential, but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant Inferred resource tonnage, indicating potential for future growth
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Negative factors

  • Resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 678,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedMt Fisher Project · goldTonnes: 77500Grade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9.5Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Fisher Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jane Coll
Resource group id
resource:ac07c3c4cbee500418c8
Deposit or zone
Wagtail

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
77500
Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
9.5
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-27

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade Indicated resource with recent updates, providing a robust basis for development studies, despite the dual cut-off.

Positive factors

  • High-grade Indicated resource, supporting production potential
  • Updated MRE incorporates recent drilling, increasing confidence
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by an independent Competent Person

Negative factors

  • Cut-off grade is dual (0.5 g/t Au for open pit and 1.6 g/t Au for underground), which can complicate direct comparison

Evidence · table

“3.9”

Context: 77,500

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredMt Fisher Project · goldTonnes: 28000Grade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Fisher Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jane Coll
Resource group id
resource:04ae6bad2aabef0091df
Deposit or zone
Wagtail

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
28000
Grade
3.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-27

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade Inferred resource with potential for growth, but with lower confidence and dual cut-off considerations.

Positive factors

  • High-grade Inferred resource, indicating potential for future conversion
  • Updated MRE incorporates recent drilling
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by an independent Competent Person

Negative factors

  • Resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence
  • Cut-off grade is dual (0.5 g/t Au for open pit and 1.6 g/t Au for underground), which can complicate direct comparison

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: 28,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredMt Eureka Project · goldTonnes: 640800Grade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 25Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Eureka Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:e99e39af04cfc3a2d6e0
Deposit or zone
Taipan

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
640800
Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
25
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate-grade Inferred resource, contributing to the project's overall potential but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant Inferred resource tonnage, indicating exploration potential
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Negative factors

  • Resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: 640,800

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedMt Eureka Project · goldTonnes: 488400Grade: 1.32Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 21Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Eureka Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:78c523048bb1381fc99b
Deposit or zone
Southern

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
488400
Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
21
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate-grade Indicated resource, adding to the project's overall confidence and potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated resource tonnage, indicating good geological confidence
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 488,400

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredMt Eureka Project · goldTonnes: 457600Grade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 17Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Eureka Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:0c9f2217193cee859622
Deposit or zone
Southern

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
457600
Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
17
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate-grade Inferred resource, contributing to the project's potential but with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant Inferred resource tonnage, indicating exploration potential
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Negative factors

  • Resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 457,600

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredMt Eureka Project · goldTonnes: 640800Grade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 25Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Eureka Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:c1e13bb325e8d50507e0

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
640800
Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
25
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-26

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate-grade Inferred resource, contributing to the project's overall potential but with lower confidence. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Significant Inferred resource tonnage, indicating exploration potential
  • JORC (2012) compliant estimate signed off by a Competent Person

Negative factors

  • Resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: 640,800

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Metallurgical Results (1)

gravity and cyanide leachMt Fisher Project · goldRecovery: 97.2 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Fisher Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
HTM

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
gravity and cyanide leach
Processing Route
gravity and cyanide leach
Sample
master composite sample generated from recent drilling at Wagtail
Grind P80
75 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
JT Metallurgical Services

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Highly encouraging metallurgical testwork results for Wagtail confirm excellent gold recoveries and favorable processing characteristics, significantly de-risking the project and supporting future production.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold recoveries consistently high across all grind sizes tested
  • Confirmed free-milling and non-refractory nature of the ore
  • Rapid leach kinetics and low cyanide and lime consumption are highly favorable for operating costs
  • Significant gravity recoverable gold content
  • No deleterious elements or preg-robbing observed

Negative factors

  • Testwork was on a master composite sample, which may not fully capture variability across the deposit

Evidence · text

“overall gold extractions ranging from 96.8% at P80 180μm to 98.7% at P80 75μm, equating to recoveries of up to approximately 97.2%”

Tags used in scoring

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97.2% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.