Horizon Petroleum Successfully Completes Lachowice 7 Well Workover and Advances to Production Testing
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Horizon Petroleum Ltd.
- Ticker
- HPL.V
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- southern Poland
- Primary commodity
- Natural gas
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-14 12:53:13 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Horizon Petroleum has completed a workover on the Lachowice 7 well in Poland, perforating 35 metres of a carbonate reservoir. The company observed fluid losses and gas kicks indicating good fracture connectivity and plans to commence acid stimulation and production testing around September 23, 2026.
Reasoning: The company successfully completed a workover on the L7 well, expanding the perforated interval and observing signs of permeability, which advances the project toward production testing.
Positive factors
- Successful completion of well workover
- Expanded reservoir exposure via new perforations
- Encouraging indications of fracture connectivity (fluid losses and gas kicks)
- Strong historical flow rates (8.9 MMcf/d)
Negative factors
- Upcoming production testing is still pending
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive · Story-specific tag
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The workover included 14 metres of reservoir that had not previously been perforated, expanding the available interval.
Evidence · text
“including approximately 14 metres that had not previously been perforated”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Lachowice 7Lachowice · natural gasIntercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lachowice 7
- Project
- Lachowice
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- southern poland
- Reported Region
- southern poland
- Ticker
- HPL.V
Geometry
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 2762 m
- To
- 2820 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2762 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Lachowice 7:2762-2820
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Successful perforation of 35m within the target 58m reservoir interval.
Positive factors
- New perforation of 14m previously unperforated interval
Evidence · text
“A total of 35 metres of reservoir was perforated across a 58-metre interval”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lachowice 7LachowiceView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lachowice 7
- Project
- Lachowice
- Region
- southern poland
- Reported Region
- southern poland
- Ticker
- HPL.V
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical testing in 1999 showed significant flow potential.
Positive factors
- Historical flow rates of 8.9 MMcf/d
Evidence · text
“the well achieved flow rates of up to 8.9 MMcf/d”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.