# HLX: Annual Report to shareholders

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03146887

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-09-30T22:13:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-30T23:20:47.604Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-30T23:20:47.604Z

- Company: HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED

- Ticker: HLX

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: Unavailable

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Copper, Lithium, Nickel, Cobalt

- Document categories: Resource update, Metallurgy, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-30 23:20:48 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.10 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Helix Resources Limited's annual report for 2026 highlights a strategic shift towards Pilbara gold exploration, including the acquisition of interests in the Weerianna Gold-Lithium Project and a new tenement package in the East Pilbara. The company updated its Gold Basin gold resource estimate to 15.37 Mt at 0.57 g/t Au for 280 koz \(Inferred\), which was below initial expectations. The report also references unchanged resource estimates for Canbelego copper-gold and Homeville nickel-cobalt, and discusses metallurgical testwork for Gold Basin and Homeville.

Reasoning: The company is undergoing a strategic transition to focus on Pilbara gold, supported by new acquisitions and an updated Gold Basin MRE, though the latter was below expectations and is entirely Inferred. Historical estimates and a going concern warning temper the overall positive outlook.

- Positive factor: Strategic shift to Pilbara gold exploration

- Positive factor: Updated JORC compliant resource estimates for Gold Basin, Canbelego, and Homeville

- Positive factor: Positive metallurgical testwork results for Gold Basin and Homeville

- Negative factor: Gold Basin MRE was below initial expectations and is 100% Inferred

- Negative factor: Weerianna estimate is historical and not JORC compliant for Helix

- Negative factor: Homeville MRE is predominantly Inferred and from 2018, making it stale

- Negative factor: Going concern warning in financial statements

Facts used in scoring: 10

## Classification and evidence

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The Gold Basin Mineral Resource Estimate was updated and reported by the Company on 4 June 2026.

Evidence · text

> The Gold Basin Mineral Resource Estimate was updated and reported by the Company on 4 June 2026.

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The Gold Basin MRE states 'All material is classified as Inferred'.

Evidence · text

> All material is classified as Inferred

**All Inferred**

Polarity: negative

Definition: 100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The Gold Basin MRE states 'All material is classified as Inferred'.

Evidence · text

> All material is classified as Inferred

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Gold Basin Mineral Resource Estimate was completed in accordance with the JORC Code \(2012\).

Evidence · text

> The estimate was completed in accordance with the JORC Code \(2012\)

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Gold Basin Mineral Resource Estimate was completed by Mr. Ian Taylor, a Competent Person.

Evidence · text

> Competent Person: The Gold Basin Mineral Resource Estimate was completed by Mr. Ian Taylor

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The Gold Basin MRE was reported at a 0.2 g/t Au cut-off.

Evidence · text

> reported at a 0.2 g/t Au cut-off

**Historical Estimate Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The Weerianna Gold Project contains a historical gold estimate not reported by Helix as a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve under the JORC Code \(2012\).

Evidence · text

> not reported by Helix as a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve under the JORC Code \(2012\).

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: A Competent Person has not completed sufficient work on behalf of Helix to classify the historical estimate in accordance with the JORC Code \(2012\).

Evidence · text

> A Competent Person has not completed sufficient work on behalf of Helix to classify the historical estimate in accordance with the JORC Code \(2012\)

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Weerianna historical estimate was reported by Artemis Resources Limited in December 2018, making it over two years old.

Evidence · text

> reported by Artemis Resources Limited in December 2018

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The 2023 Canbelego MRE has been reported in accordance with the JORC Code \(2012\).

Evidence · text

> The 2023 MRE has been reported in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves 2012 \(JORC Code\).

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate for the Canbelego Deposit was completed by Mr Dean O'Keefe, a Competent Person.

Evidence · text

> The Mineral Resource Estimate for the Canbelego Deposit was completed by Mr Dean O'Keefe

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: Helix announced a significant upgrade to the Canbelego Main Lode MRE in June 2023.

Evidence · text

> In June 2023, Helix announced a significant upgrade to the Canbelego Main Lode MRE

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The Homeville Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate is predominantly classified as Inferred.

Evidence · text

> predominantly classified as Inferred

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Homeville MRE was classified and reported in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC Code \(2012\).

Evidence · text

> classified and reported in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC Code \(2012\)

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate for the Homeville deposit was compiled by Kahan Cervoj, a Competent Person.

Evidence · text

> The Mineral Resource Estimate for the Homeville deposit was compiled by Kahan Cervoj

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The Homeville MRE was completed at a 0.7% Ni cut-off.

Evidence · text

> at a 0.7% Ni cut-off

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Homeville MRE was completed in 2018, making it over two years old.

Evidence · text

> completed in 2018

**Low Reagent Consumption**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Previous metallurgical testwork indicated low preg-robbing and low reagent consumption for Gold Basin.

Evidence · text

> low preg-robbing and low reagent consumption

**Bench Scale Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: The Gold Basin metallurgical testwork is described as 'previous metallurgical testwork' without mention of pilot or locked-cycle scale.

Evidence · text

> Previous metallurgical testwork indicated gold extraction

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Metallurgical testwork for Homeville achieved &gt;90% nickel and cobalt recoveries.

Evidence · text

> &gt;90% nickel and cobalt recoveries

**Bench Scale Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: The Homeville metallurgical testwork is described as 'testwork undertaken in 2015 to 2017' without mention of pilot or locked-cycle scale.

Evidence · text

> Metallurgical testwork undertaken in 2015 to 2017 examined atmospheric counter-current acid leaching

**Heap Leach Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: the document describes a heap\_leach route \("heap-leach"\)

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route \("concentrate"\)

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 10. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (7)

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-resource-facts-0)

Gold Basin Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Gold Basin Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_az
- Reported Region: Arizona, USA
- Ticker: HLX

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr. Ian Taylor
- Resource group id: resource:ca043c26b745d59b4a44
- Deposit or zone: Cyclopic

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 12230000
- Grade: 0.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 195
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-06-04

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The updated Inferred resource for Cyclopic is JORC compliant with QP sign-off and disclosed cut-off, but its 100% Inferred classification and being below initial expectations temper its positive impact.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant resource update

- Positive factor: QP signed off on the estimate

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Positive factor: Considered prospective for open-pit mining

- Negative factor: Resource is entirely in the Inferred category

- Negative factor: Estimate was below initial expectations

Evidence · table

> 0.50

Context: 12.23

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-resource-facts-1)

Gold Basin Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Gold Basin Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_az
- Reported Region: Arizona, USA
- Ticker: HLX

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr. Ian Taylor
- Resource group id: resource:fa90f63fb13ed30acc58
- Deposit or zone: Stealth

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 3140000
- Grade: 0.84
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 85
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-06-04

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The updated Inferred resource for Stealth shows a higher grade than Cyclopic, is JORC compliant with QP sign-off and disclosed cut-off, but its 100% Inferred classification and being below initial expectations temper its positive impact.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant resource update

- Positive factor: QP signed off on the estimate

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Positive factor: Considered prospective for open-pit mining

- Positive factor: Higher grade than Cyclopic deposit

- Negative factor: Resource is entirely in the Inferred category

- Negative factor: Estimate was below initial expectations

Evidence · table

> 0.84

Context: 3.14

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-resource-facts-2)

Gold Basin Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Gold Basin Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_az
- Reported Region: Arizona, USA
- Ticker: HLX

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr. Ian Taylor
- Resource group id: resource:faeeaea5dda860f6e9c8
- Deposit or zone: Total Inferred

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 15370000
- Grade: 0.57
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 280
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-06-04

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total updated Inferred resource for Gold Basin is JORC compliant with QP sign-off and disclosed cut-off, but its 100% Inferred classification and being below initial expectations temper its positive impact.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant resource update

- Positive factor: QP signed off on the estimate

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Positive factor: Considered prospective for open-pit mining

- Negative factor: Resource is entirely in the Inferred category

- Negative factor: Estimate was below initial expectations

Evidence · table

> 0.57

Context: 15.37

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

### Fact 4

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-resource-facts-3)

Weerianna Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Weerianna Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_wa
- Reported Region: Western Australia
- Ticker: HLX

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: other
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Edward Mead
- Resource group id: resource:dbe62f3a001200cbc0a4

#### Resource Data

- Tonnes: 975700
- Grade: 2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 62739
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2018-12-XX

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Weerianna historical estimate provides some guidance but is not JORC compliant for Helix and is stale, indicating low confidence for current resource reporting.

- Positive factor: Historical estimate provides exploration guidance

- Positive factor: QP signed off on the historical estimate

- Negative factor: Not a current JORC compliant resource for Helix

- Negative factor: Uncertainty whether further exploration will result in a JORC-compliant resource

- Negative factor: Estimate is stale, reported in December 2018

Evidence · text

> The historical estimate comprises 975,700 t at 2.0 g/t Au for 62,739 oz of gold, reported above a 1.0 g/t Au cut-off.

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

### Fact 5

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-resource-facts-4)

Canbelego Main Lode · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Canbelego Main Lode
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales, Australia
- Ticker: HLX

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Dean O'Keefe
- Resource group id: resource:50beb158186352a7c7eb

#### Resource Data

- Grade: 0.54
- Grade Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2023-06-XX

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Canbelego MRE is JORC compliant with QP sign-off and represents a significant upgrade, but the lack of absolute tonnage and contained metal figures in this document limits full assessment.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant resource

- Positive factor: QP signed off on the estimate

- Positive factor: Significant upgrade in contained copper metal compared to prior MRE

- Negative factor: No absolute tonnage or contained metal figures provided in this document for the 2023 MRE

Evidence · text

> The 2023 MRE delivered a 77% increase in contained copper metal \(+13.8kt\) compared to the 2010 MRE, reflecting a 22% increase in tonnage \(+0.33Mt\) and 45% increase in Cu grade \(0.54% Cu\).

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-resource-facts-5)

Homeville Ni-Co Deposit · nickel

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Homeville Ni-Co Deposit
- Commodity: nickel
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales, Australia
- Ticker: HLX

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kahan Cervoj
- Resource group id: resource:bfed64fdc2dc658b255b

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 18000000
- Grade: 0.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 0.7
- Cutoff Unit: % Ni

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2018-09-XX

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Homeville nickel resource is JORC compliant with QP sign-off and disclosed cut-off, but its predominantly Inferred classification and stale effective date reduce its current materiality and confidence.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant estimate

- Positive factor: QP signed off on the estimate

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Resource is predominantly Inferred

- Negative factor: Estimate is stale, completed in 2018

Evidence · text

> The Homeville Deposit features a 18Mt at 0.9% Ni &amp; 0.06% Co Mineral Resource Estimate which is predominantly classified as Inferred \(Table 3\).

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-resource-facts-6)

Homeville Ni-Co Deposit · cobalt

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Homeville Ni-Co Deposit
- Commodity: cobalt
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales, Australia
- Ticker: HLX

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kahan Cervoj
- Resource group id: resource:bfed64fdc2dc658b255b

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 18000000
- Grade: 0.06
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 0.7
- Cutoff Unit: % Ni

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2018-09-XX

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Homeville cobalt resource is JORC compliant with QP sign-off and disclosed cut-off, but its predominantly Inferred classification and stale effective date reduce its current materiality and confidence.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant estimate

- Positive factor: QP signed off on the estimate

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Resource is predominantly Inferred

- Negative factor: Estimate is stale, completed in 2018

Evidence · text

> The Homeville Deposit features a 18Mt at 0.9% Ni &amp; 0.06% Co Mineral Resource Estimate which is predominantly classified as Inferred \(Table 3\).

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

## Metallurgical Results (3)

### unspecified

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-metallurgical-facts-7)

Gold Basin Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Gold Basin Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_az
- Reported Region: Arizona, USA
- Ticker: HLX

#### Test Work

- Program Status: preliminary
- Test Type: unspecified

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 79 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test

#### Reagents

- Reagent Notes: low preg-robbing and low reagent consumption

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Previous metallurgical testwork for Gold Basin indicates good gold extraction with low consumption, which is positive, but the preliminary nature and lack of specific test details limit confidence.

- Positive factor: Indicated good gold extraction \(72% to 86%\)

- Positive factor: Low preg-robbing and low reagent consumption are positive indicators

- Negative factor: Testwork is 'previous' and not explicitly recent

- Negative factor: Specific test type not disclosed \(e.g., bottle roll, column leach\)

- Negative factor: No Ore Reserve or economic viability established yet

Evidence · text

> Previous metallurgical testwork indicated gold extraction of approximately 72% to 86%, with low preg-robbing and low reagent consumption

#### Tags used in scoring

**Low Recovery**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 79% is below the weak band \(80%\)

### leaching

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-metallurgical-facts-8)

Homeville Ni-Co Deposit · nickel

#### Identity

- Project: Homeville Ni-Co Deposit
- Commodity: nickel
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales, Australia
- Ticker: HLX

#### Test Work

- Program Status: preliminary
- Test Type: leaching
- Processing Route: atmospheric counter-current acid leaching

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 90 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical metallurgical testwork for Homeville showed high nickel recoveries, which is positive for the project's potential, but the age of the data reduces its current novelty and confidence.

- Positive factor: High nickel recovery \(&gt;90%\) achieved through atmospheric counter-current acid leaching

- Positive factor: Testwork aimed at producing nickel cathode

- Negative factor: Testwork is historical \(2015-2017\)

- Negative factor: No recent updates on metallurgical work

Evidence · text

> Metallurgical testwork undertaken in 2015 to 2017 examined atmospheric counter-current acid leaching, achieving &gt;90% nickel and cobalt recoveries to produce nickel cathode and a cobalt-carbonate.

#### Tags used in scoring

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 90% is at or above the exceptional band \(90%\)

### leaching

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/hlx-annual-report-to-shareholders--17fe8a97-f72b-42ad-9732-b432d4fe60a5#fact-metallurgical-facts-9)

Homeville Ni-Co Deposit · cobalt

#### Identity

- Project: Homeville Ni-Co Deposit
- Commodity: cobalt
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales, Australia
- Ticker: HLX

#### Test Work

- Program Status: preliminary
- Test Type: leaching
- Processing Route: atmospheric counter-current acid leaching

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 90 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical metallurgical testwork for Homeville showed high cobalt recoveries, which is positive for the project's potential, but the age of the data reduces its current novelty and confidence.

- Positive factor: High cobalt recovery \(&gt;90%\) achieved through atmospheric counter-current acid leaching

- Positive factor: Testwork aimed at producing cobalt-carbonate

- Negative factor: Testwork is historical \(2015-2017\)

- Negative factor: No recent updates on metallurgical work

Evidence · text

> Metallurgical testwork undertaken in 2015 to 2017 examined atmospheric counter-current acid leaching, achieving &gt;90% nickel and cobalt recoveries to produce nickel cathode and a cobalt-carbonate.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
