# High-Grade Silver and Open Depth Target at Big Badja 21 pages 1.7MB Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03077570 Publisher: asx Original announcement: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-01T02:07:51.970Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-01T02:07:51.970Z - Company: Exultant Mining Limited - Ticker: 10X - Exchange: ASX - Region: New South Wales - Primary commodity: Silver - Secondary commodities: Lead, Gold, Arsenic, Bismuth, Copper, Molybdenum, Sulfur, Antimony, Zinc - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-10-01 02:07:52 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Exultant Mining Limited announced high-grade silver rock chip assay results from its Big Badja Silver Mine within the Peak View Project in New South Wales, including a new highest grade of 339 g/t Ag, 1.8% Pb, and 0.4 g/t Au. A trial Induced Polarisation \(IP\) survey successfully identified a chargeable anomaly beneath the historic workings, which remains open at depth, confirming a new method for targeting extensions. These results significantly strengthen the prospectivity of the project, which has seen no modern exploration or drilling. Reasoning: The announcement confirms high-grade silver-lead-gold mineralization at the historic Big Badja Silver Mine through new rock chip assays, including a record 339 g/t Ag. A successful trial IP survey identified a chargeable anomaly open at depth, providing a new exploration tool and indicating potential for a larger system, significantly upgrading the project's prospectivity. - Positive factor: high\_grade\_silver - Positive factor: new\_highest\_grade - Positive factor: geophysical\_method\_confirmed - Positive factor: open\_at\_depth - Positive factor: potential\_for\_larger\_system - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept - Negative factor: historical\_data\_limitations Facts used in scoring: 122 ## Classification and evidence No classification tags are available. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 122. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (122) ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-0) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.02 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.02 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.02 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-1) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 34.4 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak silver grade of 34.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold but not particularly high. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 34.4 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-2) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 22.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 22.8 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 22.8 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-3) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 25.1 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 25.1 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 25.1 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-4) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 664 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 664 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 664 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-5) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 7.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 7.3 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 7.3 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-6) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1460 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 1460 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1460 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-7) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.19 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.19%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.19 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-8) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 477 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 477 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 477 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-9) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-001 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 49 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715684.9149 - Northing: 5996178.047 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 49 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 49 Context: 8931-001 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-10) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.101 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.101 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.101 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-11) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 14.4 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a low silver grade of 14.4 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 14.4 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-12) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 42.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 42.9 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 42.9 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-13) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 33.4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 33.4 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 33.4 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-14) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 145 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 145 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 145 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-15) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 3.04 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.04 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 3.04 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-16) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 649 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 649 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 649 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-17) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.03 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.03%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.03 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-18) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 937 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 937 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 937 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-19) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-002 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715654.259 - Northing: 5996165.26 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 8 Context: 8931-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-20) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.028 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.028 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.028 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-21) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 63.4 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak silver grade of 63.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold but not particularly high. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 63.4 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-22) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 15 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 15 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 15 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-23) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 195.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 195.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 195.5 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-24) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 213 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 213 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 213 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-25) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2.61 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.61 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2.61 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-26) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2990 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 2990 ppm \(0.299%\), which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2990 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-27) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.06 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.06%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.06 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-28) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 17.35 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 17.35 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 17.35 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-29) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-003 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 18 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715659.3122 - Northing: 5996173.017 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 18 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 18 Context: 8931-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-30) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.115 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.115 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.115 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-31) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 108 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate silver grade of 108 g/t, which is above the moderate threshold for silver. - Positive factor: moderate\_grade\_silver - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 108 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-32) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 17 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 17 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 17 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-33) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 192.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 192.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 192.5 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-34) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 781 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 781 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 781 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-35) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 5.32 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 5.32 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 5.32 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-36) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2310 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 2310 ppm \(0.231%\), which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2310 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-37) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.2 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.2%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.2 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-38) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 363 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 363 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 363 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-39) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-004 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 10 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.5123 - Northing: 5996180.363 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 10 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 10 Context: 8931-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-40) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.046 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.046 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.046 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-41) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 9.58 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 9.58 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 9.58 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-42) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 16.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 16.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 16.2 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-43) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 11.35 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 11.35 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 11.35 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-44) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 67.1 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 67.1 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 67.1 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-45) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 4.72 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 4.72 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 4.72 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-46) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 242 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 242 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 242 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-47) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.02 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.02%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.02 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-48) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 13 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 13 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 13 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-49) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-005 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 10 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715651.4488 - Northing: 5996215.508 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 10 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 10 Context: 8931-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-50) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.364 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak gold grade of 0.364 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.364 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-51) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 256 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong silver grade of 256 g/t, which is above the strong threshold for silver. - Positive factor: strong\_grade\_silver - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 256 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-52) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 30.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 30.8 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 30.8 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-53) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 686 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 686 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 686 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-54) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1135 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1135 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1135 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-55) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1.62 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 1.62 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1.62 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-56) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 48200 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate lead grade of 4.82%, which is above the moderate threshold for lead. - Positive factor: moderate\_grade\_lead - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 48200 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-57) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.16 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.16%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.16 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-58) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 3.02 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 3.02 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 3.02 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-59) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-006 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715694.0138 - Northing: 5996181.93 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 8 Context: 8931-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-60) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.27 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.27 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.27 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-61) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 93.4 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate silver grade of 93.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for silver. - Positive factor: moderate\_grade\_silver - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 93.4 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-62) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 5.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 5.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 5.5 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-63) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 526 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 526 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 526 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-64) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1055 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1055 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1055 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-65) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2.01 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.01 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2.01 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-66) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 33200 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate lead grade of 3.32%, which is above the moderate threshold for lead. - Positive factor: moderate\_grade\_lead - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 33200 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-67) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.23 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.23%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.23 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-68) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 10 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 10 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 10 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-69) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-007 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715696.0174 - Northing: 5996179.216 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 3 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 3 Context: 8931-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-70) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.021 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.021 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.021 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-71) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 29.4 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a low silver grade of 29.4 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 29.4 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-72) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 5.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 5.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 5.2 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-73) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 75.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 75.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 75.5 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-74) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1195 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1195 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1195 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-75) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 3.45 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.45 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 3.45 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-76) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 11400 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong lead grade of 1.14%, which is above the weak threshold for lead. - Positive factor: strong\_grade\_lead - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 11400 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-77) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.4%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.4 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-78) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 27.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 27.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 27.2 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-79) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-008 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 99 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 715685.7032 - Northing: 5996180.803 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 99 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 99 Context: 8931-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-80) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 5.42 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows an exceptional gold grade of 5.42 g/t, which is above the exceptional threshold for gold. - Positive factor: exceptional\_grade\_gold - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 5.42 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-81) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.69 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.69 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.69 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-82) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 2.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2.2 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-83) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1.38 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 1.38 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1.38 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-84) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 9.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 9.6 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 9.6 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-85) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2.97 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.97 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2.97 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-86) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 55.1 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 55.1 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 55.1 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-87) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1.75 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 1.75%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1.75 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-88) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.71 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.71 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.71 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-89) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-009 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 17 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716515.1708 - Northing: 5995118.057 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 17 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 17 Context: 8931-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-90) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2.61 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong gold grade of 2.61 g/t, which is above the strong threshold for gold. - Positive factor: strong\_grade\_gold - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2.61 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-91) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1.72 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 1.72 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1.72 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-92) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 2.3 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2.3 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-93) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 4.66 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 4.66 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 4.66 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-94) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 13 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 13 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 13 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-95) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 3.01 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.01 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 3.01 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-96) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 348 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 348 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 348 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-97) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.76 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.76%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.76 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-98) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.38 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.38 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.38 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-99) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-010 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 24 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716510.5147 - Northing: 5995119.06 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 24 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 24 Context: 8931-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-100) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.644 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak gold grade of 0.644 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.644 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-101) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.14 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.14 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.14 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-102) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 8.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 8.6 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 8.6 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-103) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.19 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 0.19 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.19 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-104) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 10.1 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 10.1 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 10.1 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-105) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2.15 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.15 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2.15 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-106) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 19.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 19.2 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 19.2 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-107) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1.95 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 1.95%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1.95 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-108) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.27 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.27 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.27 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-109) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-011 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 23 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716665.3273 - Northing: 5994889.745 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 23 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 23 Context: 8931-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-110) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.005 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of <0.005 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > <0.005 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-111) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.01 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.01 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.01 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-112) Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: arsenic - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 0.9 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.9 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-113) Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: bismuth - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.04 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 0.04 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.04 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-114) Big Badja Silver Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 8.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 8.9 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 8.9 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-115) Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: molybdenum - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 2.67 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.67 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 2.67 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-116) Big Badja Silver Mine · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: lead - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 1.9 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 1.9 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-117) Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: sulfur - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.01 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.01%, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.01 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-118) Big Badja Silver Mine · antimony Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: antimony - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.12 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.12 ppm, which is a deleterious element. - Negative factor: deleterious\_element - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.12 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-119) Big Badja Silver Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-012 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716556.9204 - Northing: 5995142.666 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant. - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 8 Context: 8931-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-013 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-120) Big Badja Silver Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-013 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.005 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716517.541 - Northing: 5995006.76 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of <0.005 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > <0.005 Context: 8931-013 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ### 8931-013 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/high-grade-silver-and-open-depth-target-at-big-badja-21-pages-1-7mb--39416f27-5bc5-4844-952b-ea87dfa6058e#fact-drill-facts-121) Big Badja Silver Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 8931-013 - Project: Big Badja Silver Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: New South Wales - Ticker: 10X #### Geometry - Grade: 0.02 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 716517.541 - Northing: 5995006.76 - CRS: MGA94 Zone 55 - EPSG: 28355 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Orange - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, antimony, bismuth #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.02 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver. - Negative factor: low\_grade - Negative factor: previously\_reported - Negative factor: surface\_sample\_not\_drill\_intercept Evidence · table > 0.02 Context: 8931-013 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath " ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.