High-Grade Silver and Open Depth Target at Big Badja 21 pages 1.7MB

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Exultant Mining Limited
Ticker
10X
Exchange
ASX
Region
New South Wales
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Lead, Gold, Arsenic, Bismuth, Copper, Molybdenum, Sulfur, Antimony, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-10-01 02:07:52 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Exultant Mining Limited announced high-grade silver rock chip assay results from its Big Badja Silver Mine within the Peak View Project in New South Wales, including a new highest grade of 339 g/t Ag, 1.8% Pb, and 0.4 g/t Au. A trial Induced Polarisation (IP) survey successfully identified a chargeable anomaly beneath the historic workings, which remains open at depth, confirming a new method for targeting extensions. These results significantly strengthen the prospectivity of the project, which has seen no modern exploration or drilling.

Reasoning: The announcement confirms high-grade silver-lead-gold mineralization at the historic Big Badja Silver Mine through new rock chip assays, including a record 339 g/t Ag. A successful trial IP survey identified a chargeable anomaly open at depth, providing a new exploration tool and indicating potential for a larger system, significantly upgrading the project's prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_silver
  • new_highest_grade
  • geophysical_method_confirmed
  • open_at_depth
  • potential_for_larger_system

Negative factors

  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
  • historical_data_limitations

Facts used in scoring: 122

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 122. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (122)

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.02 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 34.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
34.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak silver grade of 34.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold but not particularly high.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“34.4”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 22.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
22.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 22.8 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“22.8”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 25.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
25.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 25.1 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“25.1”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 664Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
664
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 664 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“664”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
7.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 7.3 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“7.3”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 1460Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1460
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 1460 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1460”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.19%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 477Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
477
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 477 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“477”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 49Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-001
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
49
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715684.9149
Northing
5996178.047
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 49 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“49”

Context: 8931-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.101Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.101
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.101 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.101”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 14.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
14.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a low silver grade of 14.4 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“14.4”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 42.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
42.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 42.9 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“42.9”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 33.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
33.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 33.4 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“33.4”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 145Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
145
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 145 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“145”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 3.04Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.04
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.04 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“3.04”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 649Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
649
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 649 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“649”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.03%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 937Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
937
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 937 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“937”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-002
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715654.259
Northing
5996165.26
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“8”

Context: 8931-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.028
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.028 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.028”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 63.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
63.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak silver grade of 63.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold but not particularly high.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“63.4”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 15Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
15
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 15 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“15”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 195.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
195.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 195.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“195.5”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 213Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
213
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 213 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“213”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.61
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.61 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2.61”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 2990Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2990
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 2990 ppm (0.299%), which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2990”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.06%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 17.35Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
17.35
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 17.35 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“17.35”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-003
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
18
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715659.3122
Northing
5996173.017
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 18 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“18”

Context: 8931-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.115Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.115
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.115 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.115”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 108Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
108
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate silver grade of 108 g/t, which is above the moderate threshold for silver.

Positive factors

  • moderate_grade_silver

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“108”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 17Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
17
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 17 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“17”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 192.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
192.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 192.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“192.5”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 781Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
781
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 781 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“781”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 5.32Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
5.32
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 5.32 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“5.32”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 2310Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2310
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 2310 ppm (0.231%), which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2310”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.2%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 363Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
363
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 363 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“363”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-004
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.5123
Northing
5996180.363
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 10 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“10”

Context: 8931-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.046
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.046 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.046”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 9.58Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
9.58
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 9.58 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“9.58”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 16.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
16.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 16.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“16.2”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 11.35Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
11.35
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 11.35 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“11.35”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 67.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
67.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 67.1 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“67.1”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 4.72Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
4.72
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 4.72 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“4.72”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 242Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
242
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 242 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“242”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.02%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 13 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“13”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-005
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715651.4488
Northing
5996215.508
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 10 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“10”

Context: 8931-005

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.364Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.364
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak gold grade of 0.364 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.364”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 256Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
256
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong silver grade of 256 g/t, which is above the strong threshold for silver.

Positive factors

  • strong_grade_silver

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“256”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 30.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
30.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 30.8 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“30.8”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 686Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
686
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 686 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“686”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 1135Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1135
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1135 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1135”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 1.62 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 48200Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
48200
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate lead grade of 4.82%, which is above the moderate threshold for lead.

Positive factors

  • moderate_grade_lead

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“48200”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.16%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.02
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 3.02 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“3.02”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-006
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715694.0138
Northing
5996181.93
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“8”

Context: 8931-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.27 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 93.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
93.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate silver grade of 93.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for silver.

Positive factors

  • moderate_grade_silver

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“93.4”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
5.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 5.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“5.5”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 526Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
526
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 526 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“526”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 1055Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1055
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1055 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1055”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.01Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.01
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.01 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2.01”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 33200Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
33200
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate lead grade of 3.32%, which is above the moderate threshold for lead.

Positive factors

  • moderate_grade_lead

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“33200”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.23%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 10 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“10”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-007
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715696.0174
Northing
5996179.216
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 3 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“3”

Context: 8931-007

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.021 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 29.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
29.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a low silver grade of 29.4 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“29.4”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
5.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 5.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“5.2”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 75.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
75.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 75.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“75.5”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 1195Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1195
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1195 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1195”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.45
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.45 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“3.45”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 11400Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
11400
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong lead grade of 1.14%, which is above the weak threshold for lead.

Positive factors

  • strong_grade_lead

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“11400”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.4%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 27.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
27.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 27.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“27.2”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-008
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
99
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
715685.7032
Northing
5996180.803
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 99 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“99”

Context: 8931-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 5.42Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
5.42
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows an exceptional gold grade of 5.42 g/t, which is above the exceptional threshold for gold.

Positive factors

  • exceptional_grade_gold

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“5.42”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.69 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 2.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.38
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 1.38 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1.38”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
9.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 9.6 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“9.6”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.97Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.97
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.97 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2.97”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 55.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
55.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 55.1 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“55.1”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 1.75%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.71 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 17Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-009
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
17
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716515.1708
Northing
5995118.057
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 17 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“17”

Context: 8931-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.61
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong gold grade of 2.61 g/t, which is above the strong threshold for gold.

Positive factors

  • strong_grade_gold

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2.61”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 1.72 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 2.3 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 4.66 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 13 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“13”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 3.01Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.01
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.01 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“3.01”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 348Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
348
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 348 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“348”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.76%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.38 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-010
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
24
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716510.5147
Northing
5995119.06
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 24 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“24”

Context: 8931-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.644Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.644
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak gold grade of 0.644 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.644”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.14 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
8.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 8.6 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“8.6”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 0.19 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
10.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 10.1 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“10.1”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.15
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.15 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2.15”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 19.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
19.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 19.2 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“19.2”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.95
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 1.95%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1.95”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.27 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 23Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-011
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
23
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716665.3273
Northing
5994889.745
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 23 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“23”

Context: 8931-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of <0.005 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“<0.005”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.01 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
arsenic
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 0.9 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.9”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
bismuth
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 0.04 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 8.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
8.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 8.9 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“8.9”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.67Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.67
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.67 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“2.67”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 1.9 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
sulfur
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.01%, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.12 ppm, which is a deleterious element.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_element
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-012
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716556.9204
Northing
5995142.666
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant.

Negative factors

  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“8”

Context: 8931-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-013Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-013
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716517.541
Northing
5995006.76
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of <0.005 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“<0.005”

Context: 8931-013

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

8931-013Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
8931-013
Project
Big Badja Silver Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
716517.541
Northing
5995006.76
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
EPSG
28355
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Orange
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony, bismuth

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.02 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.

Negative factors

  • low_grade
  • previously_reported
  • surface_sample_not_drill_intercept

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 8931-013

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.