High-Grade Silver and Open Depth Target at Big Badja 21 pages 1.7MB
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Exultant Mining Limited
- Ticker
- 10X
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- New South Wales
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Gold, Arsenic, Bismuth, Copper, Molybdenum, Sulfur, Antimony, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-10-01 02:07:52 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Exultant Mining Limited announced high-grade silver rock chip assay results from its Big Badja Silver Mine within the Peak View Project in New South Wales, including a new highest grade of 339 g/t Ag, 1.8% Pb, and 0.4 g/t Au. A trial Induced Polarisation (IP) survey successfully identified a chargeable anomaly beneath the historic workings, which remains open at depth, confirming a new method for targeting extensions. These results significantly strengthen the prospectivity of the project, which has seen no modern exploration or drilling.
Reasoning: The announcement confirms high-grade silver-lead-gold mineralization at the historic Big Badja Silver Mine through new rock chip assays, including a record 339 g/t Ag. A successful trial IP survey identified a chargeable anomaly open at depth, providing a new exploration tool and indicating potential for a larger system, significantly upgrading the project's prospectivity.
Positive factors
- high_grade_silver
- new_highest_grade
- geophysical_method_confirmed
- open_at_depth
- potential_for_larger_system
Negative factors
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
- historical_data_limitations
Facts used in scoring: 122
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 122. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (122)
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.02 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 34.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak silver grade of 34.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold but not particularly high.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“34.4”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 22.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 22.8 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“22.8”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 25.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 25.1 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“25.1”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 664Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 664
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 664 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“664”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 7.3 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 1460Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1460
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 1460 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1460”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.19%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 477Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 477
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 477 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“477”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-001Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 49Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-001
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 49
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715684.9149
- Northing
- 5996178.047
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 49 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“49”
Context: 8931-001
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.101Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.101
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.101 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.101”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 14.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a low silver grade of 14.4 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“14.4”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 42.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 42.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 42.9 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“42.9”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 33.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 33.4 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“33.4”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 145Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 145
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 145 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“145”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 3.04Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.04
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.04 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“3.04”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 649Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 649
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 649 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“649”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.03%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 937Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 937
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 937 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“937”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-002Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-002
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715654.259
- Northing
- 5996165.26
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 8931-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.028
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.028 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.028”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 63.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 63.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak silver grade of 63.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold but not particularly high.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“63.4”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 15Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 15
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 15 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“15”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 195.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 195.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 195.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“195.5”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 213Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 213
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 213 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“213”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.61
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.61 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2.61”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 2990Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2990
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 2990 ppm (0.299%), which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2990”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.06%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 17.35Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.35
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 17.35 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“17.35”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-003Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-003
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715659.3122
- Northing
- 5996173.017
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 18 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: 8931-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.115Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.115
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.115 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.115”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 108Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 108
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate silver grade of 108 g/t, which is above the moderate threshold for silver.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“108”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 17Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 17
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 17 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“17”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 192.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 192.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 192.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“192.5”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 781Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 781
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 781 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“781”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 5.32Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.32
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 5.32 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“5.32”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 2310Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2310
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 2310 ppm (0.231%), which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2310”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.2%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 363Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 363
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 363 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“363”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-004Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-004
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.5123
- Northing
- 5996180.363
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 10 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 8931-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.046
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.046 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.046”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 9.58Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 9.58 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“9.58”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 16.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 16.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“16.2”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 11.35Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.35
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 11.35 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“11.35”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 67.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 67.1 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“67.1”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 4.72Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.72
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 4.72 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“4.72”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 242Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 242
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 242 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“242”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.02%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 13 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-005Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-005
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715651.4488
- Northing
- 5996215.508
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 10 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 8931-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.364Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.364
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak gold grade of 0.364 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.364”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 256Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 256
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong silver grade of 256 g/t, which is above the strong threshold for silver.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_silver
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“256”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 30.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 30.8 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“30.8”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 686Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 686
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 686 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“686”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 1135Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1135
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1135 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1135”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 1.62 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1.62”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 48200Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 48200
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate lead grade of 4.82%, which is above the moderate threshold for lead.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_lead
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“48200”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.16%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.02
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 3.02 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“3.02”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-006Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-006
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715694.0138
- Northing
- 5996181.93
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 8931-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.27 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 93.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 93.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate silver grade of 93.4 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for silver.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_silver
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“93.4”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 5.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“5.5”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 526Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 526
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 526 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“526”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 1055Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1055
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1055 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1055”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.01Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.01
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.01 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2.01”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 33200Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 33200
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a moderate lead grade of 3.32%, which is above the moderate threshold for lead.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_lead
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“33200”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.23%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 10 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-007Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-007
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715696.0174
- Northing
- 5996179.216
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 3 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 8931-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of 0.021 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 29.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a low silver grade of 29.4 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“29.4”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 5.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 75.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 75.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 75.5 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“75.5”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 1195Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1195
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 1195 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1195”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.45
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.45 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“3.45”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 11400Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 11400
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong lead grade of 1.14%, which is above the weak threshold for lead.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_lead
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“11400”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.4%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 27.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 27.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“27.2”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-008Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-008
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 99
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 715685.7032
- Northing
- 5996180.803
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 99 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“99”
Context: 8931-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 5.42Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows an exceptional gold grade of 5.42 g/t, which is above the exceptional threshold for gold.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_gold
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“5.42”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.69 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 2.2 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 1.38 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 9.6 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“9.6”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.97Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.97
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.97 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2.97”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 55.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 55.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 55.1 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“55.1”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.75
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 1.75%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1.75”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.71 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-009Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 17Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-009
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 17
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716515.1708
- Northing
- 5995118.057
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 17 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“17”
Context: 8931-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a strong gold grade of 2.61 g/t, which is above the strong threshold for gold.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_gold
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2.61”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 1.72 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1.72”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 2.3 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 4.66 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“4.66”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 13 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 3.01Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.01
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 3.01 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“3.01”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 348Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 348
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 348 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“348”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.76%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.76”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.38 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-010Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-010
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716510.5147
- Northing
- 5995119.06
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 24 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“24”
Context: 8931-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.644Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.644
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a weak gold grade of 0.644 g/t, which is above the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.644”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.14 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 8.6 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“8.6”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 0.19 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 10.1 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“10.1”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.15
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.15 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2.15”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 19.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 19.2 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“19.2”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.95
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 1.95%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1.95”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.27 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-011Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 23Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-011
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716665.3273
- Northing
- 5994889.745
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 23 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“23”
Context: 8931-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of <0.005 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“<0.005”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.01 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · arsenicGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains arsenic at 0.9 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · bismuthGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains bismuth at 0.04 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · copperGrade: 8.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a copper grade of 8.9 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“8.9”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · molybdenumGrade: 2.67Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.67
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a molybdenum grade of 2.67 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“2.67”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · leadGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a lead grade of 1.9 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · sulfurGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a sulfur grade of 0.01%, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · antimonyGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample contains antimony at 0.12 ppm, which is a deleterious element.
Negative factors
- deleterious_element
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-012Big Badja Silver Mine · zincGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-012
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716556.9204
- Northing
- 5995142.666
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a zinc grade of 8 ppm, which is not significant.
Negative factors
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 8931-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-013Big Badja Silver Mine · goldGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-013
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716517.541
- Northing
- 5995006.76
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low gold grade of <0.005 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for gold.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“<0.005”
Context: 8931-013
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
8931-013Big Badja Silver Mine · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 8931-013
- Project
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 716517.541
- Northing
- 5995006.76
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- EPSG
- 28355
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Orange
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, grind checks, repeat analyses
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, bismuth
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This previously reported rock chip sample shows a very low silver grade of 0.02 g/t, which is below the weak threshold for silver.
Negative factors
- low_grade
- previously_reported
- surface_sample_not_drill_intercept
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 8931-013
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "This work is expected to include: • Additional IP lines with longer arrays to achieve greater depth penetration beneath "
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.