Hercules Metals Intersects 81 m of 1.5% Copper Within 346 m of 0.66% Copper in First 2025 Drill Hole Completed at the Leviathan Porphyry System in Idaho

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Hercules Metals Corp.
Ticker
BIG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Idaho
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Silver, Molybdenum
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-21 06:55:18 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Hercules Metals reported strong results from its first 2025 drill hole, HER-25-02, at the Leviathan porphyry system in Idaho. The hole intersected 81 m of 1.5% Cu and 8.9 g/t Ag, extending the system's strike length to 1.3 km.

Reasoning: The drill hole HER-25-02 returned high-grade copper (1.5% Cu) and silver (8.9 g/t Ag) over a significant width (81 m) in a step-out location, validating the porphyry model and extending the known strike length.

Positive factors

  • High-grade hypogene enrichment intersected
  • Step-out drilling successfully extended strike length
  • Strong geophysical correlation with drilling
  • QA/QC protocols clearly disclosed

Facts used in scoring: 18

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 18. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (18)

HER-25-02Leviathan · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 346 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HER-25-02
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
346 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HER-25-02:unknown
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 346 m at 0.66% Cu provides significant volume.

Positive factors

  • Broad mineralized zone

Evidence · text

“broad zone of 346 m grading 0.66% Cu, 3.2 g/t Ag and 78 ppm Mo”
HER-25-02Leviathan · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 346 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HER-25-02
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
346 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HER-25-02:unknown
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade within the broad copper zone.

Evidence · text

“broad zone of 346 m grading 0.66% Cu, 3.2 g/t Ag and 78 ppm Mo”
HER-25-02Leviathan · molybdenumGrade: 78Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 346 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HER-25-02
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
78
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
346 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HER-25-02:unknown
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Molybdenum presence within the broad copper zone.

Evidence · text

“broad zone of 346 m grading 0.66% Cu, 3.2 g/t Ag and 78 ppm Mo”
HER-25-02Leviathan · copperGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HER-25-02
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15.5 m
From
316.75 m
To
332.23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HER-25-02:316.75-332.23
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.28 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 19.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.28 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: HER-25-02

HER-25-02Leviathan · silverGrade: 22.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HER-25-02
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
22.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.5 m
From
316.75 m
To
332.23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HER-25-02:316.75-332.23
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 353.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.8”

Context: HER-25-02

HER-25-02Leviathan · moGrade: 36Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HER-25-02
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
mo
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
36
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15.5 m
From
316.75 m
To
332.23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HER-25-02:316.75-332.23
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 36 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“36”

Context: HER-25-02

ANDLeviathan · copperGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 385.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AND
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
385.9 m
From
434.34 m
To
820.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AND:434.34-820.25
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 235.4 %·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 0.61 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: AND

ANDLeviathan · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 385.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AND
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
385.9 m
From
434.34 m
To
820.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AND:434.34-820.25
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1157.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.0”

Context: AND

ANDLeviathan · moGrade: 77Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 385.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AND
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
mo
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
77
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
385.9 m
From
434.34 m
To
820.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AND:434.34-820.25
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 77 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“77”

Context: AND

includingLeviathan · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 345.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
345.9 m
From
440.44 m
To
786.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-786.38
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.66 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 228.3 %·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 0.66 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: including

includingLeviathan · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 345.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
345.9 m
From
440.44 m
To
786.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-786.38
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1106.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.2”

Context: including

includingLeviathan · moGrade: 78Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 345.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
mo
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
78
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
345.9 m
From
440.44 m
To
786.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-786.38
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 78 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“78”

Context: including

includingLeviathan · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 126.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
126.5 m
From
440.44 m
To
566.93 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-566.93
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 139.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.1 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: including

includingLeviathan · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 126.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
126.5 m
From
440.44 m
To
566.93 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-566.93
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 885.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.0”

Context: including

includingLeviathan · moGrade: 45Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 126.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
mo
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
45
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
126.5 m
From
440.44 m
To
566.93 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-566.93
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 45 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“45”

Context: including

includingLeviathan · copperGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
80.8 m
From
440.44 m
To
521.21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-521.21
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.49 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 120.4 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.49 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.49”

Context: including

includingLeviathan · silverGrade: 8.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
8.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
80.8 m
From
440.44 m
To
521.21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-521.21
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 719.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.9”

Context: including

includingLeviathan · moGrade: 41Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 80.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Leviathan
Commodity
mo
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho
Ticker
BIG

Geometry

Grade
41
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
80.8 m
From
440.44 m
To
521.21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:440.44-521.21
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 41 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“41”

Context: including

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.