Hercules Metals Intersects 670 m of 0.45% Copper, 4 g/t Ag and 95 ppm Mo, including 213 m of 0.67% Copper, 10 g/t Ag, 128 ppm Mo at the Leviathan Porphyry System in Idaho

Reasoning: This is the longest and a strong copper intercept to date for a porphyry system, significantly extending the known mineralization in a 200-meter step-out.

Reasoning: This sub-interval contains strong copper grades within the broader significant intercept, indicating a high-grade zone.

Reasoning: This sub-interval contains exceptional copper grades, representing a bonanza intercept within the broader significant interval.

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong copper grades over a good length within the main intercept.

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a moderate length.

Reasoning: This intercept shows exceptional copper grades, representing a bonanza intercept, though over a narrow width.

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a moderate length.

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a very long length.

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows strong copper grades over a good length within a broader intercept.

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a long length.

Reasoning: This sub-interval contains exceptional copper grades, representing a bonanza intercept within a broader interval.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance intercept shows moderate silver grades over a good length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance intercept shows moderate silver grades over a narrow length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance intercept shows low silver grades over a narrow length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance intercept shows moderate silver grades over a very narrow length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance intercept shows strong silver grades over a very narrow length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance intercept shows low silver grades over a good length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance intercept shows low silver grades over a very long length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance sub-interval shows moderate silver grades over a good length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance sub-interval shows moderate silver grades over a good length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This reconnaissance sub-interval shows moderate silver and strong zinc grades over a narrow length, with undisclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: This is a previously reported, high-grade silver intercept from reconnaissance drilling, with metal equivalent assumptions undisclosed.

Reasoning: This is a previously reported, moderate-grade lead intercept from reconnaissance drilling.

Reasoning: This is a previously reported, moderate-grade zinc intercept from reconnaissance drilling.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 95 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2681.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 142.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 128 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.2 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2170.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.06 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 60.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 112 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 206.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 68.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 84 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 112.1 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 17 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.9 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 75.5 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 21 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 73.2 %·m is moderate.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 95 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 212.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 36.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 175 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 107.5 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 360.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.55 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 61.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 94.8 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 10.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 22.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 411.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 259.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 64.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).