GSN: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- GREAT SOUTHERN MINING LIMITED
- Ticker
- GSN
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-10-12 23:08:39 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Great Southern Mining Limited reported strong drill results from its Golden Boulder and Mon Ami gold projects in Western Australia, with multiple high-grade intercepts extending known mineralization and demonstrating continuity. The company also included its 2021 JORC Mineral Resource estimate for Mon Ami and provided an Appendix 5B cash flow report showing an estimated 1.13 quarters of funding available, which it plans to address through its placement capacity. Exploration is ongoing at Golden Boulder and Amy Clarke, with assays pending.
Reasoning: The report details multiple high-grade gold drill intercepts at Golden Boulder and Mon Ami, significantly extending known mineralization and demonstrating continuity, which is highly positive for resource potential. While the Mon Ami resource estimate is historical, its inclusion provides context. The short cash runway is a concern, though the company has plans to address it.
Positive factors
- Multiple high-grade gold intercepts reported at Golden Boulder and Mon Ami
- Mineralization extended down-dip and down-plunge at both projects
- High-grade zones defined on previously undrilled sections
- Several intercepts exceed the 75th percentile for orogenic gold deposits globally
- JORC compliant resource estimate for Mon Ami Gold Project
- Competent Person's Statement provides strong technical backing
Negative factors
- Mon Ami resource estimate is historical and stale (2021 effective date)
- Short estimated cash runway of 1.13 quarters
Facts used in scoring: 74
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The document includes a Competent Person's Statement and references JORC Code (2012) for exploration results, indicating QA/QC procedures are in place.
Evidence · text
“Competent Person’s Statement The information in this report that relates to exploration results at the Duketon Gold Project, East Laverton Project, Mon Ami Gold Project and Edinburgh Park Project is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation compiled and/or reviewed by Mr Matthew McCarthy. Mr McCarthy is an employee of Great Southern Mining Limited. He has sufficient experience relevant to the assessment and of this style of mineralisation to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves – The JORC Code (2012)”. Mr McCarthy consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which they appear.”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Mon Ami Mineral Resource is explicitly stated as a JORC Mineral Resource and the Competent Person's Statement references the JORC Code (2012).
Evidence · text
“The project is located on a granted Mining License (M38/1256) and has a JORC Mineral Resource of 1.56Mt at 1.11g/t Au for 55.5koz gold (refer page 19 of this announcement for details).”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Mr Matthew McCarthy is named as the Competent Person responsible for the exploration results and consents to their inclusion.
Evidence · text
“Mr Matthew McCarthy. Mr McCarthy is an employee of Great Southern Mining Limited. He has sufficient experience relevant to the assessment and of this style of mineralisation to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves – The JORC Code (2012)”. Mr McCarthy consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which they appear.”
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: The Mon Ami Mineral Resource estimate is explicitly stated as 'The 2021 Mineral Resource estimate' and refers to an ASX announcement dated 21 July 2021, making it over two years old.
Evidence · text
“The 2021 Mineral Resource estimate for the Mon Ami Gold Project is shown below.”
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: The document presents 'The 2021 Mineral Resource estimate' for Mon Ami, explicitly stating it is from a prior announcement and that assumptions 'continue to apply and have not materially changed', indicating it is a restatement of historical data.
Evidence · text
“The 2021 Mineral Resource estimate for the Mon Ami Gold Project is shown below. In relation to the Mineral Resource Statement, the Company confirms that all material assumptions and technical parameters that underpin the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Further information can be found in the ASX announcement of 21 July 2021.”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: A portion of the Mon Ami Mineral Resource is classified as Inferred, which is a speculative category with lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 0.15
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document includes a Mineral Resource Statement for the Mon Ami Gold Project, which is a revised estimate for an existing resource.
Evidence · text
“Mon Ami Gold Project - Mineral Resource Statement”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 74. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (72)
26GBRC028Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 3.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC028
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 127 m
- To
- 136 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC028:127-136
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, contributing to the extension of mineralization at Golden Boulder, and is above the project average grade.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.36 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (9m)
- Contributes to extension of known mineralization
Evidence · text
“9m at 3.36 g/t Au from 127m, including 4m at 6.77 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC028”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC028Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 6.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC028
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 127 m
- To
- 131 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC028:127-131
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval is exceptional for an orogenic deposit, significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, indicating a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (6.77 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Good grade-thickness product (27.08 g/t·m)
- Indicates high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“9m at 3.36 g/t Au from 127m, including 4m at 6.77 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC028”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC011Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 2.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC011
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC011:20-30
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This shallow, strong gold intercept over a good width is positive, indicating near-surface mineralization and is above the project average grade.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.62 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (10m)
- Shallow intercept from 20m
Evidence · text
“10m at 2.62 g/t Au from 20m, including 2m at 10.72 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC011”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC011Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 10.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC011
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 22 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC011:20-22
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a very strong mineralized zone at shallow depth.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (10.72 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- High grade-thickness product (21.44 g/t·m)
- Indicates a very high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“10m at 2.62 g/t Au from 20m, including 2m at 10.72 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC011”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC035Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 11.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC035
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC035:45-49
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade intercept at shallow depth is very positive, significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, indicating a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (11.38 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- High grade-thickness product (45.52 g/t·m)
- Shallow intercept from 45m
Evidence · text
“4m at 11.38 g/t Au from 45m, including 1m at 29.71 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC035”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC035Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 29.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC035
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 46 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC035:45-46
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval is extremely positive, representing the highest grade reported for Golden Boulder in this announcement and significantly exceeding peer comparisons.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade (29.71 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, significantly exceeding 75th percentile
- Highest grade reported in this announcement for Golden Boulder
- Indicates a very high-grade core within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“4m at 11.38 g/t Au from 45m, including 1m at 29.71 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC035”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC022Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 7.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC022
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC022:70-72
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade intercept is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, indicating a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (7.27 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Good grade-thickness product (14.54 g/t·m)
- Indicates a high-grade zone
Evidence · text
“2m at 7.27 g/t Au from 70m, including 1m at 13.93 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC022”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC022Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 13.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC022
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC022:70-71
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a very strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (13.93 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, significantly exceeding 75th percentile
- Indicates a very high-grade core within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“2m at 7.27 g/t Au from 70m, including 1m at 13.93 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC022”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC020Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 3.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC020
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 74 m
- To
- 78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC020:74-78
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong gold intercept is above the project average grade and contributes to the overall positive results at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.11 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good grade-thickness product (12.44 g/t·m)
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“4m at 3.11 g/t Au from 74m, including 1m at 11.3 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC020”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC020Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC020
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 74 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC020:74-75
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (11.3 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Indicates a very high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“4m at 3.11 g/t Au from 74m, including 1m at 11.3 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC020”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC028Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC028
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC028:22-23
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept at shallow depth is positive, indicating near-surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.11 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Shallow intercept from 22m
Evidence · text
“1m at 1.11 g/t Au from 22m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC028Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC028
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC028:31-32
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept at shallow depth is positive, indicating near-surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.9 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Shallow intercept from 31m
Evidence · text
“1m at 3.9 g/t Au from 31m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC028Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC028
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC028:85-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.02 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“2m at 1.02g/t Au from 85m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC028Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC028
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 96 m
- To
- 100 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC028:96-100
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.73 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (4m)
Evidence · text
“4m at 1.73 g/t Au from 96m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC011Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC011
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC011:20-21
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept at shallow depth is positive, indicating near-surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.2 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Shallow intercept from 20m
Evidence · text
“1m at 2.20 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC011”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC003Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC003
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 41 m
- To
- 48 m
- Intercept Depth
- 41 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC003:41-48
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong gold intercept over a good width is positive, indicating significant mineralization and is above the project average grade.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.45 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (7m)
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“7m at 2.45 g/t Au from 41m, including 1m at 6.91 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC003”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC003Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 6.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC003
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 41 m
- To
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 41 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC003:41-42
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (6.91 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Indicates a high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“7m at 2.45 g/t Au from 41m, including 1m at 6.91 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC003”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC019Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC019
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 55 m
- To
- 56 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC019:55-56
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.33 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“1m at 1.33 g/t Au from 55m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC019Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC019
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC019:102-110
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong gold intercept over a good width is positive, indicating significant mineralization and is above the project average grade.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.24 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (8m)
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“8m at 2.24 g/t Au from 102m, including 2m at 7.20 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC019”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC019Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC019
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 104 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC019:102-104
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (7.2 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Good grade-thickness product (14.4 g/t·m)
- Indicates a high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“8m at 2.24 g/t Au from 102m, including 2m at 7.20 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC019”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC015Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 4.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC015
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 79 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC015:79-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional grade intercept is significantly above the project average, indicating a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (4.94 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 4.94 from 79m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC015Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC015
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 108 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC015:105-108
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept is above the project average, contributing to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.07 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“3m at 3.07 g/t Au from 105m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC015Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC015
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 138 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC015:134-138
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This weak grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.85 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (4m)
Evidence · text
“4m at 0.85 g/t Au from 134m, including 1m at 2.59 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC015”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC015Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 2.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC015
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC015:134-135
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade sub-interval is above the project average, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.59 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 2.59 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC015”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC018Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 3.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC018
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 121 m
- To
- 124 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC018:121-124
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept is above the project average, contributing to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.32 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“3m at 3.32 g/t Au from 121m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC018Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC018
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 151 m
- To
- 152 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC018:151-152
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.49 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“1m at 1.49 g/t Au from 151m in hole 26GBRC018”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC027Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 3.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC027
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC027:34-37
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept at shallow depth is positive, indicating near-surface mineralization and is above the project average grade.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.05 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Shallow intercept from 34m
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“3m at 3.05 g/t Au from 34m, including 1m at 6.89 g/t Au and 2m at 0.75 g/t Au from 51m in hole 26GBRC027”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC027Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 6.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC027
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC027:34-35
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone at shallow depth.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (6.89 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Indicates a high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“1m at 6.89 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC027Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC027
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC027:51-53
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This weak grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.75 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“2m at 0.75 g/t Au from 51m in hole 26GBRC027”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC022Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC022
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 57 m
- To
- 58 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC022:57-58
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept is above the project average, contributing to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.72 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 3.72 g/t Au from 57m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC022Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC022
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC022:85-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.46 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“2m at 1.46 g/t Au from 85m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC022Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC022
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 157 m
- To
- 160 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC022:157-160
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.41 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“3m at 1.41 g/t Au from 157m in hole 26GBRC022”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC030Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC030
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC030:22-23
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept at shallow depth is positive, indicating near-surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.86 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Shallow intercept from 22m
Evidence · text
“1m at 1.86g/t Au from 22m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC030Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC030
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 54 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC030:45-54
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a good width at shallow depth is positive, contributing to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.42 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (9m)
- Shallow intercept from 45m
Evidence · text
“9m at 1.42 g/t Au from 45m, including 4m at 2.74 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC030”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC030Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC030
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC030:45-49
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade sub-interval is above the project average, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept at shallow depth.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.74 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good grade-thickness product (10.96 g/t·m)
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“4m at 2.74 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC030”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC031Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 3.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC031
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 63 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC031:60-63
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept is above the project average, contributing to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.88 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“3m at 3.88 g/t Au from 60m, including 1m at 9.49 g/t Au and 10m at 1.33 g/t Au from 80m, including 5m at 2.31 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC031”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC031Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 9.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC031
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC031:60-61
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (9.49 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Indicates a very high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“1m at 9.49 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC031Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC031
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 80 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC031:80-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Golden Boulder.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.33 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (10m)
Evidence · text
“10m at 1.33 g/t Au from 80m, including 5m at 2.31 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC031”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26GBRC031Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26GBRC031
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 80 m
- To
- 85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26GBRC031:80-85
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade sub-interval is above the project average, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.31 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good grade-thickness product (11.55 g/t·m)
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“5m at 2.31 g/t Au in hole 26GBRC031”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC001Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC001
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 169 m
- To
- 170 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC001:169-170
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.73 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“1m at 1.73 g/t Au from 169m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC001Mon Ami · goldGrade: 3.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC001
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 194 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC001:178-194
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong gold intercept over a significant width is positive, extending mineralization down-dip and matching the project's prior best GT product.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.37 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (16m)
- High grade-thickness product (53.92 g/t·m), matching prior best GT
- Extends mineralization down-dip
Evidence · text
“16m at 3.37 g/t Au from 178m, including 4m at 8.54 g/t Au and 2m at 6.86 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC001Mon Ami · goldGrade: 8.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC001
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 182 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC001:178-182
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a very strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (8.54 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- High grade-thickness product (34.16 g/t·m)
- Indicates a very high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“4m at 8.54 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC001Mon Ami · goldGrade: 6.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC001
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 180 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC001:178-180
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (6.86 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Good grade-thickness product (13.72 g/t·m)
- Indicates a high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“2m at 6.86 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC001Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC001
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 206 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC001:202-206
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.45 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (4m)
Evidence · text
“4m at 1.45 g/t Au from 202m in hole 26MARC001”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC002Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC002
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 141 m
- To
- 143 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC002:141-143
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.27 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“2m at 1.27 g/t Au from 141m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC002Mon Ami · goldGrade: 7.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC002
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 147 m
- To
- 148 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC002:147-148
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade intercept is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (7.53 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Indicates a high-grade zone
Evidence · text
“1m at 7.53 g/t Au from 147m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC002Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC002
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 155 m
- To
- 159 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC002:155-159
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.12 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (4m)
Evidence · text
“4m at 1.12 g/t Au from 155m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC002Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC002
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 226 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC002:221-226
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.31 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (5m)
Evidence · text
“5m at 1.31 g/t Au from 221m in hole 26MARC002”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC003Mon Ami · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC003
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 320 m
- To
- 325 m
- Intercept Depth
- 320 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC003:320-325
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This weak grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.96 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (5m)
Evidence · text
“5m at 0.96 g/t Au from 320m, including 1m at 3.63 g/t Au in Hole 26MARC003”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC003Mon Ami · goldGrade: 3.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC003
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 320 m
- To
- 321 m
- Intercept Depth
- 320 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC003:320-321
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade sub-interval is above the project average, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.63 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 3.63 g/t Au in Hole 26MARC003”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC004Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC004
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 156 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC004:150-156
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.83 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (6m)
Evidence · text
“6m at 1.83 g/t Au from 150m, including 1m at 7.28 g/t Au, and 1m at 2.03 g/t Au from 163m, and 17m at 1.26 g/t Au from 281m in hole 26MARC004”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC004Mon Ami · goldGrade: 7.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC004
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 151 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC004:150-151
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (7.28 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Indicates a high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“1m at 7.28 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC004Mon Ami · goldGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC004
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 164 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC004:163-164
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.03 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“1m at 2.03 g/t Au from 163m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC004Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC004
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 281 m
- To
- 298 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC004:281-298
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a very good width is positive, indicating significant mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.26 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Very good intercept length (17m)
- Good grade-thickness product (21.42 g/t·m)
Evidence · text
“17m at 1.26 g/t Au from 281m in hole 26MARC004”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC005Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC005
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 190 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC005:185-190
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This weak grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (1.09 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (5m)
Evidence · text
“5m at 1.09 g/t Au from 185m, including 1m at 3.66 g/t Au, and 7m at 1.52 g/t Au from 205m in hole 26MARC005”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC005Mon Ami · goldGrade: 3.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC005
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 186 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC005:185-186
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade sub-interval is above the project average, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.66 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 3.66 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC005Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC005
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 205 m
- To
- 212 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC005:205-212
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.52 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (7m)
Evidence · text
“7m at 1.52 g/t Au from 205m in hole 26MARC005”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC006Mon Ami · goldGrade: 3.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC006
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 107 m
- To
- 108 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC006:107-108
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade intercept is above the project average, contributing to the overall mineralization picture at Mon Ami.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.37 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 3.37 g/t Au from 107m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC006Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC006
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 232 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC006:213-232
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a very good width is positive, extending mineralization down-plunge and indicating significant mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.12 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Very good intercept length (19m)
- Good grade-thickness product (21.28 g/t·m)
- Extends mineralization down-plunge
Evidence · text
“19m at 1.12 g/t Au from 213m, including 1m at 4.00 g/t Au and including 1m at 5.00 g/t Au in hole 26MARC006”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC006Mon Ami · goldGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC006
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC006:213-214
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade sub-interval is above the project average, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (4.0 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 4.00 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC006Mon Ami · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC006
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC006:213-214
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional grade sub-interval is above the project average, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (5.0 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 5.00 g/t Au in hole 26MARC006”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC012Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC012
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC012:36-50
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept over a very good width at shallow depth is positive, indicating significant mineralization at the Blanc Platt target.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.05 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Very good intercept length (14m)
- Good grade-thickness product (14.7 g/t·m)
- Shallow intercept from 36m
Evidence · text
“14m at 1.05 g/t Au from 36m, incl. 1m at 6.33 g/t Au in drill hole 26MARC012”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC012Mon Ami · goldGrade: 6.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC012
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC012:36-37
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional high-grade sub-interval is significantly above the project average and 75th percentile, highlighting a strong mineralized zone at shallow depth.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (6.33 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type, exceeding 75th percentile
- Indicates a high-grade zone within a broader intercept
Evidence · text
“1m at 6.33 g/t Au in drill hole 26MARC012”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC015Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC015
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 41 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC015:38-41
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade intercept at shallow depth is positive, indicating near-surface mineralization at the Blanc Platt target.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.07 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Shallow intercept from 38m
Evidence · text
“3m at 1.07 g/t Au from 38m, including 1m at 2.55 g/t Au in drill hole 26MARC015”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC015Mon Ami · goldGrade: 2.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC015
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC015:38-39
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong grade sub-interval is above the project average, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept at shallow depth.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (2.55 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Above project average grade
Evidence · text
“1m at 2.55 g/t Au in drill hole 26MARC015”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC011Mon Ami · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC011
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 108 m
- To
- 114 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC011:108-114
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This weak grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at the Blanc Platt target.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.66 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (6m)
Evidence · text
“6m at 0.66 g/t Au from 108m, including 1m at 1.89 g/t Au in drill hole 26MARC011”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC011Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC011
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 108 m
- To
- 109 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC011:108-109
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade sub-interval contributes to the overall mineralization picture at the Blanc Platt target.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.89 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“1m at 1.89 g/t Au in drill hole 26MARC011”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC016Mon Ami · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC016
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 90 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 90 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC016:90-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This weak grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at the Blanc Platt target.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.79 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (4m)
Evidence · text
“4m at 0.79 g/t Au from 90m, including 1m at 1.81 g/t Au in drill hole 26MARC016”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC016Mon Ami · goldGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC016
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 90 m
- To
- 91 m
- Intercept Depth
- 90 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC016:90-91
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This moderate grade sub-interval contributes to the overall mineralization picture at the Blanc Platt target.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade (1.81 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
Evidence · text
“1m at 1.81 g/t Au in drill hole 26MARC016”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC013Mon Ami · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC013
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 77 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC013:70-77
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This weak grade intercept over a good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at the Blanc Platt target.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.70 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (7m)
Evidence · text
“7m at 0.70 g/t Au from 70m in drill hole 26MARC013”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MARC014Mon Ami · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MARC014
- Project
- Mon Ami
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 104 m
- To
- 117 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MARC014:104-117
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blanc Platt
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This weak grade intercept over a very good width contributes to the overall mineralization picture at the Blanc Platt target.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (0.43 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Very good intercept length (13m)
- Good grade-thickness product (5.59 g/t·m)
Evidence · text
“13m at 0.43 g/t Au from 104m in drill hole 26MARC014”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
21MARC010Golden Boulder · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 21MARC010
- Project
- Golden Boulder
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- GSN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 50 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, contributing to the extension of mineralization at Golden Boulder, and is above the project average grade.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (3.36 g/t Au) for orogenic deposit type
- Good intercept length (9m)
- Contributes to extension of known mineralization
Evidence · text
“14m at 1.05 g/t Au from 36m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (2)
indicatedMon Ami Gold Project · goldTonnes: 1410000Grade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 52500Contained Unit: oz auHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mon Ami Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GSN
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Matthew McCarthy
- Resource group id
- resource:8f8ab477ca3e1f090e29
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1410000
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 52500
- Contained Unit
- oz au
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2021-07-21
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-07-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a historical JORC compliant resource estimate, providing context but not new information. The estimate is stale, reducing its current relevance.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant resource
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Stale estimate (effective date 2021)
- Low novelty as it is a restatement of a prior estimate
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 1.41
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 5.2 years before this release
inferredMon Ami Gold Project · goldTonnes: 150000Grade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3000Contained Unit: oz auHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mon Ami Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GSN
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Matthew McCarthy
- Resource group id
- resource:5fb7f302b564fee3f5ea
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 150000
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 3000
- Contained Unit
- oz au
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2021-07-21
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-07-21T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a historical JORC compliant resource estimate in the inferred category, providing context but not new information. The estimate is stale and in a lower confidence category, reducing its current relevance.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant resource
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Stale estimate (effective date 2021)
- Low novelty as it is a restatement of a prior estimate
- Inferred category represents lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: 0.15
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 5.2 years before this release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.