# Grounded Lithium Releases Kindersley Lithium Project Pre-Feasibility Study Results Mineral Reserves Booked on the KLP Supported By Rigorous Technical De-risking

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/grounded-lithium-releases-kindersley-lithium-project-pre-feasibility-study-resul--8ffecf27-03f1-47eb-8a04-3c71a0815f74

Original source: https://orestocks.com/company/GRD.V/press-releases/6183755658865933

Publisher: orestocks

Original announcement: 2026-10-13T11:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-13T11:45:27.658Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-13T11:45:27.658Z

- Company: Grounded Lithium Corp.

- Ticker: GRD.V

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Saskatchewan

- Primary commodity: Lithium

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Other, Resource update, Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-10-13 11:45:28 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Grounded Lithium Corp. has released Pre-Feasibility Study \(PFS\) results for the Kindersley Lithium Project in Saskatchewan, marking the first declaration of Mineral Reserves for the project. The PFS reports an NPV of C$125 million and an IRR of 10.8%, supported by an estimated annual production of 3,200 tonnes of LCE.

Reasoning: The announcement of a Pre-Feasibility Study \(PFS\) that successfully converts resources to reserves and establishes positive economics is a major project milestone.

- Positive factor: First declaration of Mineral Reserves for the KLP

- Positive factor: Positive base-case project economics \(NPV C$125MM, IRR 10.8%\)

- Positive factor: Independent third-party validation by Stantec Consulting Ltd.

- Positive factor: Significant technical de-risking via advanced reservoir modelling

- Negative factor: Reduced production profile compared to 2023 PEA \(3,200 t/yr vs 10,000 t/yr\)

- Negative factor: High pre-production capital expenditure of ~$603 million

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Probable Reserve**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: The PFS declares Mineral Reserves which, in a PFS context, are typically Probable.

Evidence · text

> First declaration of Mineral Reserves for the KLP

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The study is explicitly stated to be NI 43-101 compliant.

Evidence · text

> the first NI 43-101 compliant lithium mineral reserves publicly declared in Saskatchewan

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Doug Ashton, P.Eng. is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the resource and reserve estimates.

Evidence · text

> Doug Ashton, P.Eng., of Sproule International Limited, is a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route \("concentrate"\)

**Single Domain Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (1)

### KLP

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/grounded-lithium-releases-kindersley-lithium-project-pre-feasibility-study-resul--8ffecf27-03f1-47eb-8a04-3c71a0815f74#fact-resource-facts-0)

Kindersley Lithium Project · lithium

#### Identity

- Project: Kindersley Lithium Project
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: canada\_sk
- Reported Region: Saskatchewan
- Ticker: GRD.V

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: reserve
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Doug Ashton
- Resource group id: resource:b689224233c027e3c551
- Deposit or zone: KLP

#### Resource Data

- Tonnes: 82499
- Contained Metal: 82499
- Contained Unit: t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-06-26

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: First declaration of Mineral Reserves for the KLP.

- Positive factor: First declaration of reserves for the project

Evidence · text

> Reserves \(LCE\): 82,499 tonnes

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## Metallurgical Results (1)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/grounded-lithium-releases-kindersley-lithium-project-pre-feasibility-study-resul--8ffecf27-03f1-47eb-8a04-3c71a0815f74#fact-metallurgical-facts-1)

Kindersley Lithium Project · lithium

#### Identity

- Project: Kindersley Lithium Project
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: canada\_sk
- Reported Region: Saskatchewan
- Ticker: GRD.V

#### Test Work

- Processing Route: adsorption-based DLE
- Sample: KLP Phase 1 development program

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 87 %

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 87% recovery reported for the selected adsorption-based DLE technology.

- Positive factor: Solid recovery for DLE technology

Evidence · text

> Saleable LCE include a Li process recovery of 87%

#### Tags used in scoring

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 87% is at or above the exceptional band \(80%\)

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
