Green Battery Minerals Reports Independent Lab Results of Volt Carbon's Dry Separated Graphite from Berkwood Graphite Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Green Battery Minerals Inc.
- Ticker
- GEM
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Quebec
- Primary commodity
- Graphite
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Metallurgy, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 09:40:43 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Green Battery Minerals has announced successful independent lab results from Prographite GmbH regarding the dry separation of graphite from the Berkwood project. The tests demonstrated high-quality expandable graphite with a 98.5% carbon content post-expansion and an expansion rate of 325 ml/g.
Reasoning: The announcement reports successful metallurgical test results for expandable graphite with high carbon content and expansion rates, validated by an independent German lab.
Positive factors
- high carbon content post-expansion
- successful expansion rate
- independent lab validation
Facts used in scoring: 3
Classification and evidence
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Technical report signed off by P.Geo and ing. professionals.
Evidence · text
“by Edward Lyons, PGeo., Florent Baril, ing., and Claude Duplessis, ing.”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: Resource estimate described in an NI 43-101 Technical Report.
Evidence · text
“described in the technical report entitled NI 43-101 Technical Report”
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: The resource estimate has an effective date of June 30, 2019.
Evidence · text
“effective date of June 30, 2019”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Metallurgical Results (3)
dry separationgraphiteHead Grade: 98.5Head Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- graphite
- Ticker
- GEM
Test Work
- Program Status
- scoping
- Test Type
- dry separation
- Sample
- dry separated Graphite (L#955) post-expansion
Recovery
- Head Grade
- 98.5
- Head Grade Unit
- %
Lab
- Laboratory
- Prographite GmbH
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-07-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Post-expansion carbon content of 98.5% is very high.
Positive factors
- high carbon content
Evidence · text
“The carbon content remained high at 98.5% post-expansion”
Fact 2graphiteHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- graphite
- Ticker
- GEM
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-07-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a 2019 resource estimate.
Positive factors
- high grade
Negative factors
- stale data
Evidence · table
“17.0”
Context: 1.76
Fact 3graphiteHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- graphite
- Ticker
- GEM
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-07-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a 2019 resource estimate.
Positive factors
- high grade
Negative factors
- stale data
Evidence · table
“16.4”
Context: 1.53
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.