# Great Western Mining Corporation Plc Announces Excellent Tungsten Recovery Rate from Bulk Sample

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/great-western-mining-corporation-plc-announces-excellent-tungsten-recovery-rate--be6ffb63-20eb-41b4-84e2-7e4f71af9b52

Original source: https://investingnews.com/great-western-mining-corporation-plc-announces-excellent-tungsten-recovery-rate-from-bulk-sample/

Publisher: investingnews

Original announcement: 2026-09-16T05:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-16T15:18:18.852Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-16T15:18:18.852Z

- Company: Great Western Mining Corporation Plc

- Ticker: GWMO

- Exchange: LSE

- Region: Nevada, USA

- Primary commodity: Tungsten

- Secondary commodities: Molybdenum

- Document categories: Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-09-16 15:18:19 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Great Western Mining Corporation Plc has announced highly encouraging initial metallurgical results from bench-scale flotation test work at its Defender Tungsten Project in Nevada. The tests achieved a 92.98% tungsten recovery, upgrading a 0.35% WO3 bulk sample to a 7.21% WO3 rougher concentrate with low levels of deleterious molybdenum.

Reasoning: The results demonstrate high recovery and significant grade upgrading from a bulk sample using standard flotation methods, providing a strong technical foundation for the project.

- Positive factor: High tungsten recovery \(92.98%\)

- Positive factor: Substantial grade upgrade \(0.35% to 7.21% WO3\)

- Positive factor: Low levels of deleterious molybdenum

- Positive factor: Successful sulphide pre-treatment

- Negative factor: Preliminary results subject to third-party assay verification

- Negative factor: Bench-scale test work only

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Tungsten recovery of 92.98% is exceptional for the reported flotation process.

Evidence · text

> 92.98% of the tungsten was recovered

**Bench Scale Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: Results are from bench-scale flotation test work on a 750 kg bulk sample.

Evidence · text

> initial metallurgical results from bench-scale flotation test work

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route \("flotation"\)

**Multi-Domain Tested**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Variability across ore domains \(oxide, transition, fresh\) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Metallurgical Results (2)

### flotation

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/great-western-mining-corporation-plc-announces-excellent-tungsten-recovery-rate--be6ffb63-20eb-41b4-84e2-7e4f71af9b52#fact-metallurgical-facts-0)

Defender Tungsten Project · tungsten

#### Identity

- Project: Defender Tungsten Project
- Commodity: tungsten
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada, USA
- Ticker: GWMO

#### Test Work

- Program Status: preliminary
- Test Type: flotation
- Processing Route: sequential sulphide and scheelite flotation
- Sample: primary recovery stage flotation column \(post-sulphide removal\)
- Grind P80: 150 µm

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 92.98 %
- Head Grade: 0.35
- Head Grade Unit: % WO3
- Conc. Grade: 7.21
- Conc. Grade Unit: % WO3
- Mass Pull: 4.55 %

#### Lab

- Laboratory: Eriez Flotation Division

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 92.98% recovery and 7.21% concentrate grade from 0.35% head grade is a strong metallurgical result.

- Positive factor: High recovery rate

- Positive factor: Significant grade upgrade

- Negative factor: Subject to third-party verification

Evidence · text

> 92.98% of the tungsten was recovered from the pre-treated material into a rougher concentrate grading 7.21% WO3, compared with a starting bulk sample grade of 0.35% WO3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

### flotation

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/great-western-mining-corporation-plc-announces-excellent-tungsten-recovery-rate--be6ffb63-20eb-41b4-84e2-7e4f71af9b52#fact-metallurgical-facts-1)

Defender Tungsten Project · tungsten

#### Identity

- Project: Defender Tungsten Project
- Commodity: tungsten
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada, USA
- Ticker: GWMO

#### Test Work

- Program Status: preliminary
- Test Type: flotation
- Processing Route: sequential sulphide and scheelite flotation
- Sample: pre-float phase \(sulphide removal\)

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 99.46 %
- Head Grade: 0.35
- Head Grade Unit: % WO3

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The pre-float phase successfully retained almost all tungsten in the main stream.

- Positive factor: Minimal tungsten loss during sulphide removal

Evidence · text

> The pre-float phase retained 99.46% of the tungsten within the main sink stream at a grade of 0.35% WO3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
