Great Western Mining Corporation Plc Announces Excellent Tungsten Recovery Rate from Bulk Sample

Original announcement by investingnews on

Company
Great Western Mining Corporation Plc
Ticker
GWMO
Exchange
LSE
Region
Nevada, USA
Primary commodity
Tungsten
Secondary commodities
Molybdenum
Document categories
Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-16 15:18:19 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Great Western Mining Corporation Plc has announced highly encouraging initial metallurgical results from bench-scale flotation test work at its Defender Tungsten Project in Nevada. The tests achieved a 92.98% tungsten recovery, upgrading a 0.35% WO3 bulk sample to a 7.21% WO3 rougher concentrate with low levels of deleterious molybdenum.

Reasoning: The results demonstrate high recovery and significant grade upgrading from a bulk sample using standard flotation methods, providing a strong technical foundation for the project.

Positive factors

  • High tungsten recovery (92.98%)
  • Substantial grade upgrade (0.35% to 7.21% WO3)
  • Low levels of deleterious molybdenum
  • Successful sulphide pre-treatment

Negative factors

  • Preliminary results subject to third-party assay verification
  • Bench-scale test work only

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Tungsten recovery of 92.98% is exceptional for the reported flotation process.

Evidence · text

“92.98% of the tungsten was recovered”

Bench Scale Onlynegative

Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: Results are from bench-scale flotation test work on a 750 kg bulk sample.

Evidence · text

“initial metallurgical results from bench-scale flotation test work”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("flotation")

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (2)

flotationDefender Tungsten Project · tungstenRecovery: 92.98 %Head Grade: 0.35Head Grade Unit: % WO3View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Defender Tungsten Project
Commodity
tungsten
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
GWMO

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
sequential sulphide and scheelite flotation
Sample
primary recovery stage flotation column (post-sulphide removal)
Grind P80
150 µm

Recovery

Recovery
92.98 %
Head Grade
0.35
Head Grade Unit
% WO3
Conc. Grade
7.21
Conc. Grade Unit
% WO3
Mass Pull
4.55 %

Lab

Laboratory
Eriez Flotation Division

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 92.98% recovery and 7.21% concentrate grade from 0.35% head grade is a strong metallurgical result.

Positive factors

  • High recovery rate
  • Significant grade upgrade

Negative factors

  • Subject to third-party verification

Evidence · text

“92.98% of the tungsten was recovered from the pre-treated material into a rougher concentrate grading 7.21% WO3, compared with a starting bulk sample grade of 0.35% WO3”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

flotationDefender Tungsten Project · tungstenRecovery: 99.46 %Head Grade: 0.35Head Grade Unit: % WO3View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Defender Tungsten Project
Commodity
tungsten
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
GWMO

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
sequential sulphide and scheelite flotation
Sample
pre-float phase (sulphide removal)

Recovery

Recovery
99.46 %
Head Grade
0.35
Head Grade Unit
% WO3

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The pre-float phase successfully retained almost all tungsten in the main stream.

Positive factors

  • Minimal tungsten loss during sulphide removal

Evidence · text

“The pre-float phase retained 99.46% of the tungsten within the main sink stream at a grade of 0.35% WO3”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.