Great Bear Drills 29.17 g/t Gold Over 15.50 m and 18.08 g/t Gold Over 15.80 m From Bedrock Surface at LP Fault

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Great Bear Resources Ltd.
Ticker
GBR
Exchange
TSX
Region
Ontario
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Metallurgy, Other
Extracted
2026-08-21 12:47:31 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Great Bear Resources announced significant drill results from its Dixie Project in Ontario, highlighted by 29.17 g/t gold over 15.50 m and 18.08 g/t gold over 15.80 m at the LP Fault. The program also identified a new high-grade vein zone and confirmed geological models at the Dixie Limb and Hinge zones, alongside regional exploration success. The company continues its fully funded exploration program with ongoing metallurgical test work and resource definition drilling.

Reasoning: Great Bear Resources reported multiple high-grade gold intercepts from its LP Fault, Dixie Limb, Hinge, and regional targets, including 29.17 g/t gold over 15.50 m and 18.08 g/t gold over 15.80 m. These results extend known mineralization, confirm geological models, and include new discoveries, supported by robust QA/QC protocols, although true widths are yet to be determined.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercepts over significant widths
  • Extension of mineralization along strike and at depth
  • Discovery of new high-grade vein zone
  • Confirmation of geological models
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and QP sign-off

Negative factors

  • True widths not yet determined for reported intercepts
  • Un-capped gold assays used for average grades

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 42

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states that certified gold reference standards, blanks, and field duplicates are routinely inserted into the sample stream, and Activation Laboratories, an accredited lab, is used.

Evidence · text

“Certified gold reference standards, blanks and field duplicates are routinely inserted into the sample stream, as part of Great Bear's quality control/quality assurance program (QAQC). No QAQC issues were noted with the results reported herein.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.10 g/t gold and internal dilution rules of up to 3 m of zero grade are clearly stated for interval calculations.

Evidence · text

“Interval widths are calculated using a 0.10 g/t gold cut-off grade with up to 3 m of internal dilution of zero grade .”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that widths are drill indicated core length and true widths have not been determined.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 42. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (42)

BR-254Dixie Project · goldGrade: 4.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-254
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
4.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.95 m
From
25.5 m
To
30.45 m
Hole Depth
237 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-254:25.50-30.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457574
Northing
5633821
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
353 m
Azimuth
204 °
Dip
-52 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade-width product (24.5 g/t·m) for an exploration target, with a strong grade (4.95 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“4.95”

Context: 4.95

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-255Dixie Project · goldGrade: 4.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-255
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
4.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30.4 m
From
22.1 m
To
52.5 m
Hole Depth
339 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-255:22.10-52.50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457585
Northing
5633855
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
354 m
Azimuth
202 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade-width product (124.3 g/t·m) over a significant width, indicating good continuity and a strong grade (4.09 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“4.09”

Context: 30.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-255Dixie Project · goldGrade: 4.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-255
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
4.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.75 m
From
63 m
To
78.75 m
Hole Depth
339 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-255:63.00-78.75
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457585
Northing
5633855
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
354 m
Azimuth
202 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade-width product (68.5 g/t·m) within a broader zone, with a strong grade (4.35 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“4.35”

Context: 15.75

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-255Dixie Project · goldGrade: 11.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-255
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
11.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.25 m
From
73.5 m
To
78.75 m
Hole Depth
339 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-255:73.50-78.75
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457585
Northing
5633855
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
354 m
Azimuth
202 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval (11.25 g/t) within a broader zone, with an exceptional grade for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“11.25”

Context: 5.25

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 11.25 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“11.25”

Context: 5.25

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-255Dixie Project · goldGrade: 4.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-255
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
4.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.3 m
From
271.05 m
To
274.35 m
Hole Depth
339 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-255:271.05-274.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457585
Northing
5633855
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
354 m
Azimuth
202 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade-width product (15.97 g/t·m) with a strong grade (4.84 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“4.84”

Context: 3.30

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-238Dixie Project · goldGrade: 29.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-238
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
29.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.5 m
From
41.8 m
To
57.3 m
Hole Depth
276 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-238:41.80-57.30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457506
Northing
5633874
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
350 m
Azimuth
194 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade-width product (452.1 g/t·m) and an exceptional grade (29.17 g/t) for an open-pit scenario, representing a headline intercept.

Evidence · table

“29.17”

Context: 15.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 29.17 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“29.17”

Context: 15.50

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-238Dixie Project · goldGrade: 54.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-238
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
54.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
55 m
To
57.3 m
Hole Depth
276 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-238:55.00-57.30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457506
Northing
5633874
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
350 m
Azimuth
194 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high-grade sub-interval (54.91 g/t) significantly boosting the overall intercept, with an exceptional grade for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“54.91”

Context: 2.30

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 54.91 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“54.91”

Context: 2.30

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-238Dixie Project · goldGrade: 51.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-238
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
51.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
49.1 m
To
51.1 m
Hole Depth
276 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-238:49.10-51.10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457506
Northing
5633874
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
350 m
Azimuth
194 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high-grade sub-interval (51.73 g/t) significantly boosting the overall intercept, with an exceptional grade for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“51.73”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 51.73 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“51.73”

Context: 2.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-238Dixie Project · goldGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-238
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.2 m
From
147.15 m
To
152.35 m
Hole Depth
276 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-238:147.15-152.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457506
Northing
5633874
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
350 m
Azimuth
194 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade-width product (7.64 g/t·m) with a moderate grade (1.47 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: 5.20

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-244Dixie Project · goldGrade: 18.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-244
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
18.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.8 m
From
23.85 m
To
39.65 m
Hole Depth
318 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-244:23.85-39.65
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457487
Northing
5633860
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
351 m
Azimuth
206 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade-width product (285.7 g/t·m) and an exceptional grade (18.08 g/t) for an open-pit scenario, representing a headline intercept.

Evidence · table

“18.08”

Context: 15.80

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 18.08 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“18.08”

Context: 15.80

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-244Dixie Project · goldGrade: 78.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-244
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
78.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
23.85 m
To
25.15 m
Hole Depth
318 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-244:23.85-25.15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457487
Northing
5633860
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
351 m
Azimuth
206 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Extremely high-grade sub-interval (78.94 g/t) significantly boosting the overall intercept, with an exceptional grade for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“78.94”

Context: 1.30

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 78.94 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“78.94”

Context: 1.30

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-246Dixie Project · goldGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-246
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
1.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
57.2 m
From
424.3 m
To
481.5 m
Hole Depth
723 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-246:424.30-481.50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457651
Northing
5634177
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
361 m
Azimuth
208 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade-width product (104.0 g/t·m) over a continuous width, indicating broad mineralization with a moderate grade (1.82 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.82”

Context: 57.20

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-246Dixie Project · goldGrade: 36.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-246
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
36.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
From
459 m
To
460.9 m
Hole Depth
723 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-246:459.00-460.90
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457651
Northing
5634177
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
361 m
Azimuth
208 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval (36.17 g/t) within a broader zone, with an exceptional grade for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“36.17”

Context: 1.90

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 36.17 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“36.17”

Context: 1.90

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-245Dixie Project · goldGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-245
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.95 m
From
333.9 m
To
340.85 m
Hole Depth
675 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-245:333.90-340.85
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457596
Northing
5634180
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
211 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade-width product (15.23 g/t·m) with a strong grade (2.19 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: 6.95

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-245Dixie Project · goldGrade: 10.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-245
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
10.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
338.75 m
To
339.95 m
Hole Depth
675 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-245:338.75-339.95
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457596
Northing
5634180
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
211 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval (10.90 g/t) with an exceptional grade for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“10.90”

Context: 1.20

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 10.90 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“10.90”

Context: 1.20

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-245Dixie Project · goldGrade: 5.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-245
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
5.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
397.5 m
To
426.5 m
Hole Depth
675 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-245:397.50-426.50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457596
Northing
5634180
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
211 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade-width product (153.41 g/t·m) over a strong continuity width, indicating significant mineralization with an exceptional grade (5.29 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“5.29”

Context: 29.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 5.29 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“5.29”

Context: 29.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-245Dixie Project · goldGrade: 62.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-245
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
62.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
405 m
To
406.6 m
Hole Depth
675 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-245:405.00-406.60
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457596
Northing
5634180
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
211 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Extremely high-grade sub-interval (62.13 g/t) significantly boosting the overall intercept, with an exceptional grade for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“62.13”

Context: 1.60

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 62.13 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“62.13”

Context: 1.60

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BRH-001Dixie Project · goldGrade: 2.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BRH-001
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
2.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.25 m
From
77.75 m
To
93 m
Hole Depth
147 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BRH-001:77.75-93.00
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457435
Northing
5633944
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
352 m
Azimuth
204 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade-width product (35.53 g/t·m) from a metallurgical test hole, with a strong grade (2.33 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“2.33”

Context: 15.25

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”

Metallurgical DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole was completed to provide material for metallurgical testing.

Evidence · text

“Two larger diameter (HQ) drill holes were completed into the LP Fault to provide material for metallurgical testing”
BRH-002Dixie Project · goldGrade: 6.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BRH-002
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
6.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.85 m
From
59.25 m
To
63.1 m
Hole Depth
249 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BRH-002:59.25-63.10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457467
Northing
5634028
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
353 m
Azimuth
201 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade intercept (6.71 g/t) from a metallurgical test hole, with an exceptional grade for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“6.71”

Context: 3.85

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 6.71 g/t gold is exceptional for an open-pit gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“6.71”

Context: 3.85

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”

Metallurgical DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole was completed to provide material for metallurgical testing.

Evidence · text

“Two larger diameter (HQ) drill holes were completed into the LP Fault to provide material for metallurgical testing”
BRH-002Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 43.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BRH-002
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
43.55 m
From
154 m
To
197.55 m
Hole Depth
249 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BRH-002:154.00-197.55
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457467
Northing
5634028
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
353 m
Azimuth
201 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade-width product (34.41 g/t·m) over a strong continuity width, indicating broad low-grade mineralization, from a metallurgical test hole.

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 43.55

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”

Metallurgical DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole was completed to provide material for metallurgical testing.

Evidence · text

“Two larger diameter (HQ) drill holes were completed into the LP Fault to provide material for metallurgical testing”
BR-228Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-228
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.9 m
From
373.4 m
To
422.3 m
Hole Depth
745 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-228:373.40-422.30
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457512
Northing
5634241
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
366 m
Azimuth
207 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade-width product (38.14 g/t·m) over a strong continuity width, indicating broad low-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 48.90

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
BR-229Dixie Project · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BR-229
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.5 m
From
455 m
To
480.5 m
Hole Depth
633 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BR-229:455.00-480.50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
457556
Northing
5634298
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
368 m
Azimuth
209 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade-width product (26.77 g/t·m) over a strong continuity width, with a moderate grade (1.05 g/t) for an open-pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 25.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the ongoing exploration program at the LP Fault.

Evidence · text

“New LP Fault drill results from this release are provided in Table 1”
DL-063ADixie Project · goldGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DL-063A
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
3.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
144.5 m
To
145.5 m
Hole Depth
741 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DL-063A:144.50-145.50
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
456723
Northing
5633985
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
362 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (3.5 g/t·m) for an underground target, with a weak grade (3.5 g/t) for an underground scenario.

Evidence · table

“3.50”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: The hole is part of the maiden resource definition drill program.

Evidence · text

“maiden resource definition drill program”
DL-064Dixie Project · goldGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DL-064
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
1.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.75 m
From
798.65 m
To
806.4 m
Hole Depth
1188 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DL-064:798.65-806.40
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
456790
Northing
5633950
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (14.41 g/t·m) for an underground target, with a weak grade (1.86 g/t) for an underground scenario, but confirms model.

Evidence · table

“1.86”

Context: 7.75

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: The hole is part of the maiden resource definition drill program.

Evidence · text

“maiden resource definition drill program”
DL-064Dixie Project · goldGrade: 5.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DL-064
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
5.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
803.55 m
To
804.55 m
Hole Depth
1188 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DL-064:803.55-804.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
456790
Northing
5633950
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good grade sub-interval (5.46 g/t) confirming the model, with a strong grade for an underground scenario.

Evidence · table

“5.46”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: The hole is part of the maiden resource definition drill program.

Evidence · text

“maiden resource definition drill program”
DL-064Dixie Project · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DL-064
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.2 m
From
1076.25 m
To
1082.45 m
Hole Depth
1188 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DL-064:1076.25-1082.45
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
456790
Northing
5633950
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (8.37 g/t·m) for an underground target, with a weak grade (1.35 g/t) for an underground scenario, but confirms model.

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: 6.20

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: The hole is part of the maiden resource definition drill program.

Evidence · text

“maiden resource definition drill program”
DL-064Dixie Project · goldGrade: 4.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DL-064
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
4.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
1076.25 m
To
1077.35 m
Hole Depth
1188 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DL-064:1076.25-1077.35
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
456790
Northing
5633950
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade sub-interval (4.28 g/t) confirming the model, with a moderate grade for an underground scenario.

Evidence · table

“4.28”

Context: 1.10

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: The hole is part of the maiden resource definition drill program.

Evidence · text

“maiden resource definition drill program”
DL-064Dixie Project · goldGrade: 4.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DL-064
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
4.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.05 m
From
1164.6 m
To
1166.65 m
Hole Depth
1188 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DL-064:1164.60-1166.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
456790
Northing
5633950
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade-width product (9.04 g/t·m) confirming a new zone, with a moderate grade (4.41 g/t) for an underground scenario.

Evidence · table

“4.41”

Context: 2.05

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The intercept is from a new Hinge style vein zone to the southwest of the Hinge zone.

Evidence · text

“intersected a new Hinge style vein zone to the southwest of the Hinge zone”

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: The hole is part of the maiden resource definition drill program.

Evidence · text

“maiden resource definition drill program”
DL-064Dixie Project · goldGrade: 11.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DL-064
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
11.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
1166 m
To
1166.65 m
Hole Depth
1188 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DL-064:1166.00-1166.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
456790
Northing
5633950
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-54 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval (11.80 g/t) confirming a new zone, with a strong grade for an underground scenario.

Evidence · table

“11.80”

Context: 0.65

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 11.80 g/t gold is strong for an underground gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“11.80”

Context: 0.65

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The intercept is from a new Hinge style vein zone to the southwest of the Hinge zone.

Evidence · text

“intersected a new Hinge style vein zone to the southwest of the Hinge zone”

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: The hole is part of the maiden resource definition drill program.

Evidence · text

“maiden resource definition drill program”
REG-003Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-003
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
390.4 m
To
394 m
Hole Depth
561 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-003:390.40-394.00
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
456059
Northing
5634396
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
369 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (1.26 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.35 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 3.60

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-004Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-004
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
630 m
To
631.5 m
Hole Depth
714 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-004:630.00-631.50
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
456214
Northing
5634182
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
376 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low grade-width product (0.39 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.26 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-004Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-004
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
688 m
To
689.5 m
Hole Depth
714 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-004:688.00-689.50
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
456214
Northing
5634182
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
376 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (0.96 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.64 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-005Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-005
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.85 m
From
96.5 m
To
97.35 m
Hole Depth
540 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-005:96.50-97.35
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
455339
Northing
5634318
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
373 m
Azimuth
218 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (0.54 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.64 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 0.85

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-005Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-005
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
274.5 m
To
275 m
Hole Depth
540 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-005:274.50-275.00
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
455339
Northing
5634318
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
373 m
Azimuth
218 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low grade-width product (0.28 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.57 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 0.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-006Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-006
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
352.75 m
To
353.75 m
Hole Depth
556 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-006:352.75-353.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
455145
Northing
5633967
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
361 m
Azimuth
217 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low grade-width product (0.43 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.43 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-007Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-007
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
266.45 m
To
267 m
Hole Depth
516 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-007:266.45-267.00
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
454953
Northing
5633693
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
214 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low grade-width product (0.17 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.32 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 0.55

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-008Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-008
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
240 m
To
241.5 m
Hole Depth
493 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-008:240.00-241.50
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
455602
Northing
5633733
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
364 m
Azimuth
219 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (0.81 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.54 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-009Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-009
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.15 m
From
76.9 m
To
83.05 m
Hole Depth
699 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-009:76.90-83.05
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
455737
Northing
5634007
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
209 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very low grade-width product (1.66 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.27 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 6.15

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-009Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-009
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
562.2 m
To
563.2 m
Hole Depth
699 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-009:562.20-563.20
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
455737
Northing
5634007
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
209 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (0.6 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.60 g/t).

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-011Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-011
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
115.5 m
To
117 m
Hole Depth
468 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-011:115.50-117.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
455601
Northing
5633940
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (0.82 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.55 g/t) for an underground scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 1.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”
REG-011Dixie Project · goldGrade: 8.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-011
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
8.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
251 m
To
252 m
Hole Depth
468 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-011:251.00-252.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
455601
Northing
5633940
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade intercept (8.29 g/t) from regional exploration, indicating new potential, with a strong grade for an underground scenario.

Evidence · table

“8.29”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 8.29 g/t gold is strong for an underground gold deposit.

Evidence · table

“8.29”

Context: 1.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The gold-bearing veins in REG-011 are visually identical to the Arrow zone discovery and may comprise the up-dip, along strike extension of the zone.

Evidence · text

“The gold-bearing veins in REG-011 are visually identical to the Arrow zone discovery and may comprise the up-dip, along strike extension of the zone.”
REG-011Dixie Project · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
REG-011
Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GBR

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
279 m
To
281 m
Hole Depth
468 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
REG-011:279.00-281.00
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
455601
Northing
5633940
CRS
NAD 83 UTM zone 15N
Elevation
363 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, metallic_screen_fire_assay

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade-width product (1.56 g/t·m) from regional exploration, with a weak grade (0.78 g/t) for an underground scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.

Evidence · text

“* Widths are drill indicated core length, as insufficient drilling has been undertaken to determine true widths at this time.”

Exploration DrillingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The hole is part of the regional reconnaissance drilling program.

Evidence · text

“Regional reconnaissance drilling”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.