Goldstorm Metals Discovers Gold-Silver Mineralization over a 407.55-Meter (m) Length in Preliminary Drilling at the Crown Property on Trend with KSM and Treaty Creek Deposits, in British Columbia's Golden Triangle

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Goldstorm Metals Corp.
Ticker
GSTM.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-10-21 11:10:42 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Goldstorm Metals Corp. announced initial assay results from its Phase I diamond drill program at the Crown Property in British Columbia's Golden Triangle, revealing a significant gold-silver discovery. Hole OR-26-03 intersected 407.55 meters grading 0.39 g/t gold equivalent, including higher-grade sections such as 15.0 meters at 2.89 g/t gold equivalent. The company believes these results indicate a large precious metals system with bulk-tonnage potential, and further results are pending.

Reasoning: Goldstorm Metals has made a significant new discovery of a broad gold-silver mineralized system at its Crown Property, highlighted by a 407.55m intercept with high-grade zones, indicating potential for a large bulk-tonnage deposit in a prolific region. However, the early stage of the project means true widths are unknown and metal equivalent calculations rely on external metallurgical assumptions.

Positive factors

  • discovery_of_large_system
  • long_mineralized_intercept
  • high_grade_sub_intervals
  • strategic_location
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • qp_signed

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque
  • no_project_specific_metallurgy
  • partial_results_reported

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 23

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states that Ken Konkin, P.Geo., is the Qualified Person, and samples were prepared and assayed at MSA Labs, which complies with ISO 17025 and ISO 9001 standards.

Evidence · text

“The Qualified Person for this news release for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 is the Company's President and CEO, Ken Konkin, P.Geo. ... All samples were prepared at MSA Labs' Preparation Laboratory in Terrace, BC and assayed at MSA Labs' Geochemical Laboratory in Langley, BC. ... MSA Laboratories quality system complies with the requirements for the International Standards ISO 17025 and ISO 9001.”

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The project is described as being 'on trend with KSM and Treaty Creek deposits to the north', leveraging proximity to known major deposits.

Evidence · text

“appears to be on trend with the KSM and Treaty Creek deposits to the north.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.'

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: The metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed recoveries (85% for gold and silver) based on a nearby property (Treaty Creek) rather than project-specific metallurgical work for the Crown Project.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 23. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (23)

OR-26-01CrownView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-01
Project
Crown
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole OR-26-01 returned no significant values, indicating a lack of mineralization in this specific intercept.

Negative factors

  • no_significant_values

Evidence · table

“No Significant Values”

Context: OR-26-01

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Barren HoleRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Hole OR-26-01 returned 'No Significant Values', indicating a lack of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“No Significant Values”

Context: OR-26-01

OR-26-02Crown · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-02
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.9 m
From
325.1 m
To
339 m
Hole Depth
693 m
Intercept Depth
325.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-02:325.1-339
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold equivalent mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the newly discovered system, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • mineralized_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 13.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-02Crown · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-02
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.05 m
From
331.1 m
To
338.15 m
Hole Depth
693 m
Intercept Depth
325.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-02:331.1-338.15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows improved gold equivalent mineralization, further supporting the potential of the discovery, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • mineralized_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“1.30”

Context: 7.05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-02Crown · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-02
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.7 m
From
333.4 m
To
337.1 m
Hole Depth
693 m
Intercept Depth
325.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-02:333.4-337.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.07
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval further enhances the prospectivity of the discovery, indicating zones of stronger mineralization within the broader system, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“2.07”

Context: 3.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-03Crown · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 407.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
407.55 m
From
114.45 m
To
522 m
Hole Depth
627 m
Intercept Depth
114.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:114.45-522
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.39
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very long intercept of 407.55 meters at 0.39 g/t AuEQ represents a significant discovery of a large precious metals system, indicating substantial bulk-tonnage potential, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • discovery_of_large_system
  • long_mineralized_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 407.55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Long InterceptRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The intercept of 407.55 meters is exceptionally long, indicating a large mineralized system.

Evidence · table

“407.55”

Context: 407.55

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-03Crown · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 300 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
300 m
From
222 m
To
522 m
Hole Depth
627 m
Intercept Depth
114.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:222-522
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.43
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This 300-meter intercept at 0.43 g/t AuEQ confirms broad mineralization within the larger system, reinforcing the bulk-tonnage potential, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • long_mineralized_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 300.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Long InterceptRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The intercept of 300.0 meters is very long, indicating significant mineralization.

Evidence · table

“300.0”

Context: 300.0

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-03Crown · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 79.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
79.5 m
From
222 m
To
301.5 m
Hole Depth
627 m
Intercept Depth
114.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:222-301.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.77
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This 79.5-meter intercept at 0.77 g/t AuEQ represents a good grade over a significant width, contributing positively to the overall discovery, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • mineralized_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: 79.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-03Crown · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.5 m
From
222 m
To
247.5 m
Hole Depth
627 m
Intercept Depth
114.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:222-247.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This 25.5-meter intercept at 1.97 g/t AuEQ represents a strong high-grade zone within the broader mineralization, significantly enhancing the project's potential, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“1.97”

Context: 25.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-03Crown · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
222 m
To
237 m
Hole Depth
627 m
Intercept Depth
114.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:222-237
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This 15.0-meter intercept at 2.89 g/t AuEQ represents a very strong high-grade zone, significantly boosting the project's potential and indicating the presence of economically attractive mineralization, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“2.89”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

High GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The intercept of 15.0 m at 2.89 g/t AuEQ is considered strong for a porphyry/bulk tonnage target.

Evidence · table

“2.89”

Context: 15.0

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-03Crown · goldIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Intercept
6 m
From
474 m
To
480 m
Hole Depth
627 m
Intercept Depth
114.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:474-480
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This 6.0-meter intercept at 1.63 g/t AuEQ represents another high-grade zone, further demonstrating the widespread mineralization within the system, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“1.63”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-03Crown · goldIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Intercept
3 m
From
502.5 m
To
505.5 m
Hole Depth
627 m
Intercept Depth
114.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:502.5-505.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
422736
Northing
6247732
Elevation
1586 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEQ
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This 3.0-meter intercept at 1.15 g/t AuEQ adds to the evidence of mineralization within the system, though true width and project-specific metallurgical assumptions are pending.

Positive factors

  • mineralized_intercept

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only
  • metal_equivalent_opaque

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.

Evidence · text

“True widths have not been determined as the mineralized body remains open in all directions.”

Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Reason: No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed; therefore, recoveries are assumed to be 85% for gold, and 85% for silver, based on metallurgical test results for mineralization at the nearby Treaty Creek property.”
OR-26-02Crown · silverGrade: 51.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-02
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
51.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.9 m
From
325.1 m
To
339 m
Intercept Depth
325.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-02:325.1-339
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 715.9 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“51.5”

Context: OR-26-02

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

OR-26-02Crown · silverGrade: 84.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-02
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
84.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.05 m
From
331.1 m
To
338.15 m
Intercept Depth
331.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-02:331.1-338.15
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 84.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 593.6 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“84.2”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

OR-26-02Crown · silverGrade: 135.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-02
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
135.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.7 m
From
333.4 m
To
337.1 m
Intercept Depth
333.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-02:333.4-337.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 135.5 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 501.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“135.5”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

OR-26-03Crown · silverGrade: 18.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 407.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
18.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
407.55 m
From
114.45 m
To
522 m
Intercept Depth
114.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:114.45-522
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.3 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7458.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 18.3 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.3”

Context: OR-26-03

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

OR-26-03Crown · silverGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 300 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
300 m
From
222 m
To
522 m
Intercept Depth
222 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:222-522
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.7 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5610.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 18.7 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.7”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

OR-26-03Crown · silverGrade: 42.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 79.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
42.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
79.5 m
From
222 m
To
301.5 m
Intercept Depth
222 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:222-301.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42.6 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3386.7 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 42.6 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“42.6”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

OR-26-03Crown · silverGrade: 111.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
111.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.5 m
From
222 m
To
247.5 m
Intercept Depth
222 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:222-247.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 111.5 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2843.3 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“111.5”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

OR-26-03Crown · silverGrade: 166.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
OR-26-03
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
166.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
222 m
To
237 m
Intercept Depth
222 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
OR-26-03:222-237
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 166.7 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2500.5 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“166.7”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andCrown · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
474 m
To
480 m
Intercept Depth
474 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:474-480
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andCrown · silverGrade: 90.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
90.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
474 m
To
480 m
Intercept Depth
474 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:474-480
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 90.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 543.6 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“90.6”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andCrown · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Crown
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
502.5 m
To
505.5 m
Intercept Depth
502.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:502.5-505.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andCrown · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Crown
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GSTM.V

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
502.5 m
To
505.5 m
Intercept Depth
502.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:502.5-505.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSA Labs
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.