GoldHaven Intersects New Skarn Zone at Kuhn; Drilling Underway from Second Pad
Original announcement by globenewswire on
- Company
- GoldHaven Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- GOH
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Unavailable
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-24 12:32:57 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
GoldHaven Resources Corp. has intersected a new skarn zone at its Kuhn target within the Magno Project in British Columbia. The intersection occurred in hole GOH26-04 after the drill was extended, revealing approximately 145m of drill length with an interpreted true thickness of 40-45m. Assays are currently pending.
Reasoning: The intersection of a new skarn zone with significant interpreted true thickness (40-45m) is a positive exploration signal, though economic significance is unconfirmed pending assays.
Positive factors
- new skarn zone identified
- significant true thickness interpreted
- extension of hole beyond planned depth
Negative factors
- assays pending
- preliminary geological interpretation
Facts used in scoring: 3
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The hole was extended beyond its originally planned termination depth to intersect a new zone.
Evidence · text
“GOH26-04 has now been completed following an extension of the hole beyond its originally planned termination depth.”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The release mentions samples are being submitted for analysis but does not disclose specific QA/QC protocols or lab certification.
Evidence · text
“The Company is continuing to log, photograph and sample the drill core, with samples being submitted for laboratory analysis.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (3)
GOH26-04MagnoIntercept: 145 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GOH26-04
- Project
- Magno
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Intercept
- 145 m
- True Width
- 42.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Kuhn
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant drill length and interpreted true width in a new zone, but grades are not yet reported.
Positive factors
- newly identified skarn zone
- significant width
Negative factors
- assays pending
- preliminary interpretation
Evidence · text
“The newly identified intervals total approximately 145 metres of drill length , with true thickness currently interpreted at approximately 40-45 metres”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 42.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
GOH26-04MagnoIntercept: 90 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GOH26-04
- Project
- Magno
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Intercept
- 90 m
- From
- 235 m
- To
- 325 m
- Intercept Depth
- 235 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GOH26-04:235-325
Location
- Location
- Kuhn
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Identified stockwork skarn mineralization.
Positive factors
- skarn mineralization zones
Evidence · text
“Drilling encountered a series of stockwork skarn mineralization zones from approximately 235 to 325m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
GOH26-04MagnoIntercept: 55 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GOH26-04
- Project
- Magno
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Intercept
- 55 m
- From
- 345 m
- To
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 345 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GOH26-04:345-400
Location
- Location
- Kuhn
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Identified continuous skarn mineralization.
Positive factors
- continuous skarn mineralization
Evidence · text
“followed by more continuous skarn mineralization from 345 to 400m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.