Gold X2 QES Drilling Intercepts 100.75m of 1.50 g/t Au from 495m Including 14m of 3.94 g/t Au from 542m at the Base of the Resource Pit

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Gold X2 Mining Inc.
Ticker
AUXX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-24 06:07:03 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Gold X2 Mining Inc. announced the first assays from its drillhole extension program at the Moss Gold Project, targeting the base of the RPEEE pit shell. Highlights include 100.75m of 1.50 g/t Au from 494.0m in hole MQD-25-181, with a higher-grade sub-interval of 14.0m at 3.94 g/t Au. This infill and step-out drilling aims to upgrade Inferred resources to Indicated and potentially deepen the open pit or pursue underground mineralization.

Reasoning: The drill results demonstrate significant gold mineralization with long intercepts and good grades, supporting the company's strategy to expand and upgrade its resource base. The transparent reporting and QA/QC procedures add confidence to the results.

Positive factors

  • Long intercepts with good grades for an open pit mining scenario, including 100.75m at 1.50 g/t Au and 48.0m at 2.34 g/t Au.
  • Drilling aims to infill and upgrade existing Inferred resources to Indicated, supporting resource growth and potential pit expansion.
  • Detailed QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including accredited labs and QP sign-off, enhancing data credibility.
  • True widths are provided for all reported intercepts, improving geological confidence.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 53

Atlas analysis — Gold X2 Mining Inc.: Gold X2 QES Drilling Intercepts 100.75m of 1.50 g/t Au from 495m Including 14m of 3.94 g/t Au from 542m at the Base of the Resource Pit. 0.96 g/t over 88.6 m; 0.9 g/t over 78 m; 0.97 g/t over 55 m

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 53. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (53)

MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.5 m
From
282 m
To
284 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
3.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.5 m
From
290 m
To
292 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“3.03”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
3.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.5 m
From
290 m
To
292 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“3.03”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.5 m
From
329 m
To
331 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.95 m
True Width
2.2 m
From
456.05 m
To
459 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 2.95

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 2.2m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 2.95

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51 m
True Width
39 m
From
473 m
To
524 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 51.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 39.0m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“39.0”

Context: 51.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.3 m
From
476 m
To
479 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: 3.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 2.3m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: 3.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
True Width
4.6 m
From
504 m
To
510 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.58”

Context: 6.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 4.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“4.6”

Context: 6.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.4 m
True Width
4.9 m
From
516.6 m
To
523 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 6.40

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 4.9m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“4.9”

Context: 6.40

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.25 m
True Width
22.6 m
From
531 m
To
560.25 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 29.25

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 22.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“22.6”

Context: 29.25

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.25 m
True Width
8.7 m
From
549 m
To
560.25 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 11.25

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 8.7m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 11.25

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25 m
True Width
19.5 m
From
572 m
To
597 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Context: 25.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 19.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“19.5”

Context: 25.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.25 m
True Width
5.6 m
From
573 m
To
580.25 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.31”

Context: 7.25

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 5.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“5.6”

Context: 7.25

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
True Width
3.9 m
From
603 m
To
608 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 5.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 3.9m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“3.9”

Context: 5.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
606 m
To
608 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.6 m
True Width
6.7 m
From
616.4 m
To
625 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.86”

Context: 8.60

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 6.7m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“6.7”

Context: 8.60

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
4.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
618 m
To
621 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“4.58”

Context: 3.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 2.4m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: 3.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
635 m
To
637 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-148Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-148
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
643 m
To
645 m
Hole Depth
645 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669907
Northing
5379915
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.1 °
Dip
-44.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
True Width
3.5 m
From
293 m
To
298 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.64”

Context: 5.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 3.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: 5.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
True Width
3.5 m
From
293 m
To
298 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.64”

Context: 5.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 3.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: 5.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.4 m
From
369 m
To
371 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.4m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.4”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
True Width
8.7 m
From
381 m
To
393 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 12.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 8.7m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 12.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
True Width
2.9 m
From
439 m
To
443 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 2.9m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.9”

Context: 4.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
True Width
7.4 m
From
491 m
To
501 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 10.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 7.4m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“7.4”

Context: 10.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
2.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.2 m
From
492 m
To
495 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.64”

Context: 3.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 2.2m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 3.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
55 m
True Width
41.2 m
From
507 m
To
562 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 55.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 41.2m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“41.2”

Context: 55.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.2 m
True Width
14.3 m
From
517 m
To
536.2 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a significant width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: 19.20

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 14.3m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“14.3”

Context: 19.20

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
True Width
5.5 m
From
543.7 m
To
551 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.87”

Context: 7.30

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 5.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“5.5”

Context: 7.30

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 45.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
45.2 m
True Width
34.5 m
From
570 m
To
615.2 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 45.20

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 34.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“34.5”

Context: 45.20

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
True Width
4.6 m
From
586 m
To
592 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.31”

Context: 6.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 4.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“4.6”

Context: 6.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.6 m
True Width
14.3 m
From
641.3 m
To
659.9 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a significant width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: 18.60

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 14.3m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“14.3”

Context: 18.60

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-176Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-176
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.55 m
True Width
11.2 m
From
643.45 m
To
658 m
Hole Depth
678 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669941
Northing
5379939
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
155.2 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a significant width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 14.55

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 11.2m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“11.2”

Context: 14.55

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
True Width
1.7 m
From
274 m
To
276.4 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 2.40

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.7m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: 2.40

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.2 m
From
391 m
To
394 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 3.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 2.2m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 3.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.6 m
True Width
67.3 m
From
481.4 m
To
570 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a strong positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.96”

Context: 88.60

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 67.3m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“67.3”

Context: 88.60

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 46.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
46.8 m
True Width
35.6 m
From
500 m
To
546.8 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a strong positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 46.80

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 35.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“35.6”

Context: 46.80

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
True Width
3.8 m
From
565 m
To
570 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: 5.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 3.8m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“3.8”

Context: 5.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.05 m
True Width
20.1 m
From
581.85 m
To
607.9 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 26.05

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 20.1m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“20.1”

Context: 26.05

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 8.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
8.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.05 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
587.2 m
To
589.25 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows exceptional gold grades over a narrow width, representing a high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“8.49”

Context: 2.05

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 8.49 g/t Au exceeds the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“8.49”

Context: 2.05

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.6m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: 2.05

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
True Width
4.2 m
From
596.6 m
To
602 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 5.40

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 4.2m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: 5.40

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.4 m
True Width
16.7 m
From
625 m
To
646.4 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a significant width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 21.40

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 16.7m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“16.7”

Context: 21.40

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-177Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-177
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
True Width
1.9 m
From
625.5 m
To
628 m
Hole Depth
651 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669867
Northing
5379892
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.1 °
Dip
-48.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 2.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.9m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 2.50

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.85 m
True Width
3.5 m
From
416.15 m
To
421 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 4.85

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 3.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: 4.85

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.5 m
From
438 m
To
440 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grades over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 2.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
True Width
10.3 m
From
454 m
To
468 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 14.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 10.3m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“10.3”

Context: 14.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38 m
True Width
28.2 m
From
474 m
To
512 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 38.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 28.2m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“28.2”

Context: 38.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
2.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.2 m
From
504 m
To
507 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.49”

Context: 3.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 2.2m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 3.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 78 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
78 m
True Width
58.8 m
From
523 m
To
601 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very long intercept with moderate gold grades and good true width is a strong positive result for the infill drilling program, supporting resource continuity.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 78.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 58.8m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“58.8”

Context: 78.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
True Width
4.5 m
From
532 m
To
538 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 6.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 4.5m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“4.5”

Context: 6.00

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
4.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.6 m
True Width
5 m
From
552 m
To
558.6 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“4.59”

Context: 6.60

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 5.0m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“5.0”

Context: 6.60

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.9 m
True Width
2.9 m
From
568.1 m
To
572 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: 3.90

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 2.9m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.9”

Context: 3.90

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”
MQD-25-180Moss Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MQD-25-180
Project
Moss Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Northwest Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AUXX

Geometry

Grade
2.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
True Width
1.8 m
From
582 m
To
584.35 m
Hole Depth
705 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
669706
Northing
5379798
CRS
unknown
Elevation
428 m
Azimuth
157.6 °
Dip
-50.2 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the infill drilling program with transparent reporting.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • QA/QC Disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.73”

Context: 2.35

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program is described as targeting 'infill gaps in the resource model' and 'low grade Inferred blocks'.

Evidence · text

“Five drillholes, drilled as part of the 2025 drilling program and targeting the Superion Zone, were extended to infill gaps in the resource model where no grade was interpolated because of sparse drilling, as well as low grade Inferred blocks in the base of the current RPEEE pit shell.”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The true width of 1.8m is explicitly stated for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: 2.35

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including accredited labs, certified reference materials, and blank material.

Evidence · text

“All samples were sent to Paragon Geochemical in Timmins for sample preparation. Samples were analysed for gold via PhotonAssay™ ("PA-AU02") by Paragon's laboratory in Hamilton and then shipped to Activation Laboratories (ActLabs) Ancaster for 60 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion ("UT-6"). Paragon and ActLabs are accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN-P-4E ISO/IEC 17025.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres are clearly stated for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 5 metres.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.