Gold Springs Resource A Significant High-Grade Extension of the North Jumbo Deposit
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Gold Springs Resource Corp.
- Ticker
- GRC
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-23 15:17:37 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Gold Springs Resource Corp. announced new assay results from its Gold Springs project, confirming a significant 425-meter southward extension of the higher-grade North Jumbo deposit. Hole J-22-020 returned a highlight intercept of 3.98 g/t gold equivalent over 12.2 meters, extending a previously discovered high-grade structural block. The company states the deposit remains open to the south, indicating further exploration potential.
Reasoning: Gold Springs Resource reports new drill results from the North Jumbo deposit, confirming a significant 425-meter southward extension of higher-grade gold mineralization. The highlight intercept of 3.98 g/t AuEq over 12.2 meters in hole J-22-020 is material, extending the known high-grade zone and improving the project's overall potential. The results are supported by robust QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Significant high-grade extension of the North Jumbo deposit by 425 meters to the south, which remains open.
- High-grade intercept of 3.98 g/t AuEq over 12.2 meters, which represents a strong grade-width product (48.56 g/t*m) exceeding the company's prior best GT for gold.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab (ALS Geochemical, ISO 9001:2000), standards, blanks, and QP sign-off.
- The drilling extends a previously identified higher-grade structural block.
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation uses a relatively low 50% silver recovery assumption, which may understate silver's contribution or reflect metallurgical challenges.
- True thickness is estimated as a range (60-100%) rather than a specific value for each intercept.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 34
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that drilling confirms a 'significant 425 meters higher-grade southward extension of the North Jumbo deposit' and that hole J-22-020 'extends this higher-grade gold system by a further 225 meters for a total significant extension of our North Jumbo deposit of 425 meters to the south'.
Evidence · text
“confirming a significant 425 meters higher-grade southward extension of the North Jumbo deposit”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including the use of standards and blanks at a 15% rate, laboratory duplicates, and assays performed by ALS Geochemical, an ISO 9001:2000 certified laboratory. It also states that Randall Moore, Executive Vice-President Exploration, is the Qualified Person.
Evidence · text
“Standards and blanks are submitted into the sample stream at the rate of 15% for QA/QC purposes. In addition, the laboratory also includes duplicates of samples, standards and blanks. ... Assays were performed in Reno, Nevada by ALS Geochemical, an ISO 9001:2000 certified and independent laboratory.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states 'True thickness is estimated to be 60-100% of reported length' rather than providing specific true width values for each intercept, indicating that only apparent downhole lengths are reported directly.
Evidence · text
“True thickness is estimated to be 60-100% of reported length.”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: While prices for gold and silver are disclosed (US$1,800/oz gold, US$25/oz silver), the silver recovery assumption is stated as 50%, which is relatively low and could impact the perceived value of the silver component in the AuEq calculation.
Evidence · text
“Gold equivalent based on US$1,800/oz gold, US$25/oz silver and 50% for silver recovery.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 34. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (32)
J-22-020North Jumbo · goldGrade: 3.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-020
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 129.5 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 219.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-020:129.5-141.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 761004
- Northing
- 4198028
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
- Elevation
- 2058 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept of 3.98 g/t gold equivalent over 12.2 meters is a very strong result, well above the project average and a key highlight of the extension, demonstrating significant materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- High-grade intercept significantly above the project average for gold (2.148 g/t) over a good width (12.2m).
- Grade-width product (48.56 g/t*m AuEq) is strong and exceeds the company's prior best GT for gold (37.8 g/t*m).
- This intercept is a key highlight of the significant 425-meter southward extension of the North Jumbo deposit.
Evidence · table
“3.98”
Context: 12.2
J-22-020North Jumbo · silverGrade: 32.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-020
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 129.5 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 219.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-020:129.5-141.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 761004
- Northing
- 4198028
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
- Elevation
- 2058 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This silver intercept of 32.8 g/t over 12.2 meters is well above the project's average silver grade, indicating good materiality for this interval.
Positive factors
- Grade is significantly above the project average for silver (19.653 g/t) over a good width (12.2m).
Evidence · table
“32.8”
Context: 12.2
J-22-014North Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-014
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 36.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-014:27.4-36.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: J-22-014
J-22-014North Jumbo · silverGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-014
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 36.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-014:27.4-36.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: J-22-014
andNorth Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:51.8-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · silverGrade: 8.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:51.8-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.9”
Context: and
J-22-015North Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-015
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-015:13.7-21.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.68 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: J-22-015
J-22-015North Jumbo · silverGrade: 18.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-015
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-015:13.7-21.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 141.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.6”
Context: J-22-015
J-22-016North Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-016
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 114.3 m
- To
- 117.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-016:114.3-117.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: J-22-016
J-22-016North Jumbo · silverGrade: 38.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-016
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 114.3 m
- To
- 117.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-016:114.3-117.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 116.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“38.7”
Context: J-22-016
andNorth Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 147.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:138.7-147.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 147.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:138.7-147.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 79.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.7”
Context: and
J-22-017North Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-017
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.7 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 99.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-017:91.4-99.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: J-22-017
J-22-017North Jumbo · silverGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-017
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.7 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 99.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-017:91.4-99.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 63.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.2”
Context: J-22-017
J-22-018North Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-018
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-018:25.9-29
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: J-22-018
J-22-018North Jumbo · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-018
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-018:25.9-29
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: J-22-018
andNorth Jumbo · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:51.8-53.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.22 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.22”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:51.8-53.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: and
J-22-19North Jumbo · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-19
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-19:45.7-50.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: J-22-19
J-22-19North Jumbo · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-19
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-19:45.7-50.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: J-22-19
andNorth Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94.5 m
- To
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:94.5-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.66 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · silverGrade: 26.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94.5 m
- To
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:94.5-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 80.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 26.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.8”
Context: and
J-22-020North Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-020
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 7.6 m
- To
- 16.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-020:7.6-16.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: J-22-020
J-22-020North Jumbo · silverGrade: 26.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-22-020
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 7.6 m
- To
- 16.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-22-020:7.6-16.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 246.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.8”
Context: J-22-020
andNorth Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 56.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:47.2-56.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · silverGrade: 19.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 56.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:47.2-56.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 181.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.7”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 108.2 m
- To
- 117.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:108.2-117.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · silverGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 108.2 m
- To
- 117.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:108.2-117.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 152.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.8”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · goldGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 150.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:128-150.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.12 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 48.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.12 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.12”
Context: and
andNorth Jumbo · silverGrade: 23.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 150.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:128-150.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 535.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.4”
Context: and
inc.North Jumbo · goldGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- inc.
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 129.5 m
- To
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- inc.:129.5-141.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.52 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 42.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.52 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.52”
Context: inc.
inc.North Jumbo · silverGrade: 32.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- inc.
- Project
- North Jumbo
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 129.5 m
- To
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- inc.:129.5-141.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 400.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.8”
Context: inc.
Resource Estimates (2)
inferredgoldTonnes: 1725Grade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- GRC
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1725
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 0.39 g/t gold over 9.2 meters is below the project's average gold grade, indicating lower materiality for this specific interval. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average for gold (2.148 g/t).
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 1,725
inferredsilverTonnes: 1725Grade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- GRC
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1725
- Grade
- 4.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 0.39 g/t gold over 9.2 meters is below the project's average gold grade, indicating lower materiality for this specific interval. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average for gold (2.148 g/t).
Evidence · table
“4.51”
Context: 1,725
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.