GGR: 2026 Annual Report
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Golden Globe Resources Limited
- Ticker
- GGR
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Silver, Bismuth, Molybdenum, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results, Capital raise, Agreement transaction
- Extracted
- 2026-09-23 06:11:14 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Golden Globe Resources Limited released its 2026 Annual Report, highlighting successful exploration activities and a strengthened financial position. The company reported positive gold and copper drill results from its Dooloo Creek project in Queensland, which validated its geological model and led to follow-up drilling. This was supported by a successful $8.5 million Initial Public Offering (IPO) in October 2025, providing significant funding for ongoing exploration across its Australian project portfolio.
Reasoning: Golden Globe Resources Limited reported strong initial drill results from its Dooloo Creek gold-copper project, validating its exploration model and indicating a significant mineralized system. This positive exploration news, combined with a successful $8.5 million IPO that strengthened the company's financial position, provides a strong platform for future growth despite ongoing operational losses and limited activity at other projects.
Positive factors
- Successful IPO
- Strong Drill Results
- Geological Model Validation
- Planned Follow-up Drilling
- Strengthened Balance Sheet
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- No Material Assays from Neila Creek
- Alma Project Inactive
- Ongoing Losses
Facts used in scoring: 18
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The report includes a Competent Persons Declaration by Colin McMillan, a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, confirming JORC 2012 compliance.
Evidence · text
“The information included in the report that relates to Exploration is a fair representation of available information compiled by Colin McMillan B.Sc., MAusIMM, a competent person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.”
JORC Compliantpositive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The exploration results are reported under the JORC 2012 edition by a Competent Person.
Evidence · text
“to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code of Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 18. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (18)
Fact 1View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- GGR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company made a new investment in Actif Resources, indicating ongoing assessment of strategic opportunities in the resource sector.
Positive factors
- Strategic Investment
Evidence · text
“The Group has entered into a capital commitment recently via the investment of $80,000 into Actif Resources.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- GGR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company successfully completed an oversubscribed $8.5 million IPO, providing significant funding for its exploration activities and strengthening its financial position.
Positive factors
- Successful Capital Raise
- Oversubscribed Offering
- Strengthened Balance Sheet
Evidence · text
“Since listing on the ASX on 31 October 2025 following a successful and oversubscribed $8.5 million Initial Public Offering”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NG001Dooloo Creek · copperGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NG001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.38 m
- From
- 53.62 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.62 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NG001:53.62-61
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate copper grade over a moderate width was intersected, confirming mineralization in the targeted skarn system.
Positive factors
- Moderate Grade
- Moderate Width
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · text
“7.38 metres at 0.55% Cu and 0.46g/t Au from 53.62 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Moderate GradeRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.55% Cu is a moderate grade for a porphyry-style deposit, which is a reasonable proxy for skarn in this context.
Evidence · text
“0.55% Cu”
Moderate WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 7.38 metres is a moderate intercept length.
Evidence · text
“7.38 metres”
NG001Dooloo Creek · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NG001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.38 m
- From
- 53.62 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.62 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NG001:53.62-61
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold grade over a moderate width was intersected, confirming mineralization in the targeted skarn system.
Positive factors
- Moderate Width
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Weak Grade
Evidence · text
“7.38 metres at 0.55% Cu and 0.46g/t Au from 53.62 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Weak GradeRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.46 g/t Au is a weak grade for a porphyry-style deposit, which is a reasonable proxy for skarn in this context.
Evidence · text
“0.46g/t Au”
Moderate WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 7.38 metres is a moderate intercept length.
Evidence · text
“7.38 metres”
NG001Dooloo Creek · copperGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NG001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 53.62 m
- To
- 54.62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.62 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NG001:53.62-54.62
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade copper intercept was reported within a broader zone, indicating a bonanza grade zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional Grade
- Bonanza Intercept
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
Evidence · text
“including 1.0 metre at 2.74% Cu and 2.6g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Exceptional GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 2.74% Cu is an exceptional grade for a porphyry-style deposit, which is a reasonable proxy for skarn in this context.
Evidence · text
“2.74% Cu”
Narrow WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 1.0 metre is a narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.0 metre”
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The 1.0 metre at 2.74% Cu and 2.6g/t Au is an exceptionally high-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Evidence · text
“including 1.0 metre at 2.74% Cu and 2.6g/t Au”
NG001Dooloo Creek · goldGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NG001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 53.62 m
- To
- 54.62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.62 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NG001:53.62-54.62
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold grade intercept was reported within a broader zone, indicating a bonanza grade zone.
Positive factors
- Strong Grade
- Bonanza Intercept
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
Evidence · text
“including 1.0 metre at 2.74% Cu and 2.6g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Strong GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 2.6 g/t Au is a strong grade for a porphyry-style deposit, which is a reasonable proxy for skarn in this context.
Evidence · text
“2.6g/t Au”
Narrow WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 1.0 metre is a narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“1.0 metre”
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The 1.0 metre at 2.74% Cu and 2.6g/t Au is an exceptionally high-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Evidence · text
“including 1.0 metre at 2.74% Cu and 2.6g/t Au”
NG001Dooloo Creek · copperGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NG001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.18 m
- From
- 53.62 m
- To
- 55.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.62 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NG001:53.62-55.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- bismuth
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong copper grade over a narrow width was intersected, but the presence of elevated bismuth values introduces a potential penalty element.
Positive factors
- Strong Grade
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
- Deleterious Elements Present
Evidence · text
“2.18 metres at 1.66% Cu and 1.67g/t Au, accompanied by elevated bismuth values.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Strong GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 1.66% Cu is a strong grade for a porphyry-style deposit, which is a reasonable proxy for skarn in this context.
Evidence · text
“1.66% Cu”
Narrow WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 2.18 metres is a narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“2.18 metres”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: The intercept is accompanied by elevated bismuth values, which can be a penalty element.
Evidence · text
“elevated bismuth values.”
NG001Dooloo Creek · goldGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- NG001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.18 m
- From
- 53.62 m
- To
- 55.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.62 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- NG001:53.62-55.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- bismuth
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a narrow width was intersected, but the presence of elevated bismuth values introduces a potential penalty element.
Positive factors
- Strong Grade
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
- Deleterious Elements Present
Evidence · text
“2.18 metres at 1.66% Cu and 1.67g/t Au, accompanied by elevated bismuth values.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Strong GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 1.67 g/t Au is a strong grade for a porphyry-style deposit, which is a reasonable proxy for skarn in this context.
Evidence · text
“1.67g/t Au”
Narrow WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 2.18 metres is a narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“2.18 metres”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: The intercept is accompanied by elevated bismuth values, which can be a penalty element.
Evidence · text
“elevated bismuth values.”
EB001Dooloo Creek · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 45.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- EB001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 45.55 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 137.55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- EB001:92-137.55
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A long continuous intercept with weak copper grade was reported, indicating broad but low-grade mineralization.
Positive factors
- Continuous Intercept
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Weak Grade
Evidence · text
“45.55 metres at 0.07% Cu and 0.43g/t Au from 92.0 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Weak GradeRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.07% Cu is a weak grade for a porphyry deposit.
Evidence · text
“0.07% Cu”
Continuous InterceptRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 45.55 metres is a continuous intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.
Evidence · text
“45.55 metres”
EB001Dooloo Creek · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 45.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- EB001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 45.55 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 137.55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- EB001:92-137.55
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A long continuous intercept with moderate gold grade was reported, indicating broad mineralization and supporting further testing.
Positive factors
- Moderate Grade
- Continuous Intercept
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · text
“45.55 metres at 0.07% Cu and 0.43g/t Au from 92.0 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Moderate GradeRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.43 g/t Au is a moderate grade for a porphyry deposit.
Evidence · text
“0.43g/t Au”
Continuous InterceptRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 45.55 metres is a continuous intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.
Evidence · text
“45.55 metres”
EB001Dooloo Creek · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- EB001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 98 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- EB001:92-98
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate copper grade was intersected over a narrow width within the broader mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Moderate Grade
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
Evidence · text
“6.0 metres at 0.28% Cu and 2.18g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Moderate GradeRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.28% Cu is a moderate grade for a porphyry deposit.
Evidence · text
“0.28% Cu”
Narrow WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 6.0 metres is a narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“6.0 metres”
EB001Dooloo Creek · goldGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- EB001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 98 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- EB001:92-98
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold grade was intersected over a narrow width within the broader mineralized zone, contributing to the overall prospectivity.
Positive factors
- Strong Grade
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
Evidence · text
“6.0 metres at 0.28% Cu and 2.18g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Strong GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 2.18 g/t Au is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit.
Evidence · text
“2.18g/t Au”
Narrow WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 6.0 metres is a narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“6.0 metres”
EB001Dooloo Creek · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.61 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- EB001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 92.61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- EB001:92-92.61
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate copper grade was intersected over a very narrow width, representing a bonanza grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Moderate Grade
- Bonanza Intercept
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
Evidence · text
“0.61 metres at 0.47% Cu and 6.5g/t Au.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Moderate GradeRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.47% Cu is a moderate grade for a porphyry deposit.
Evidence · text
“0.47% Cu”
Narrow WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.61 metres is a very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.61 metres”
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The 0.61 metre at 0.47% Cu and 6.5g/t Au is an exceptionally high-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Evidence · text
“0.61 metres at 0.47% Cu and 6.5g/t Au.”
EB001Dooloo Creek · goldGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.61 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- EB001
- Project
- Dooloo Creek
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 92.61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- EB001:92-92.61
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade gold intercept was reported over a very narrow width, representing a bonanza grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Exceptional Grade
- Bonanza Intercept
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
Evidence · text
“0.61 metres at 0.47% Cu and 6.5g/t Au.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Exceptional GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 6.5 g/t Au is an exceptional grade for a porphyry deposit.
Evidence · text
“6.5g/t Au”
Narrow WidthRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.61 metres is a very narrow intercept length.
Evidence · text
“0.61 metres”
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The 0.61 metre at 0.47% Cu and 6.5g/t Au is an exceptionally high-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Evidence · text
“0.61 metres at 0.47% Cu and 6.5g/t Au.”
Fact 15Ridler Creek · copperGrade: 4.22Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ridler Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.22
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very high-grade copper rock chip sample was collected, indicating significant surface mineralization at Ridler Creek.
Positive factors
- High Grade
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · text
“4.22% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 4.22% Cu is a very high grade for a surface rock chip sample.
Evidence · text
“4.22% Cu”
Fact 16Ridler Creek · copperGrade: 2.29Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ridler Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.29
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade copper rock chip sample was collected, supporting the presence of a significant copper-gold system.
Positive factors
- High Grade
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · text
“2.29% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High GradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 2.29% Cu is a high grade for a surface rock chip sample.
Evidence · text
“2.29% Cu”
Fact 17Ridler Creek · copperGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ridler Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade copper rock chip sample was collected, contributing to the understanding of the mineralized system.
Positive factors
- Moderate Grade
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · text
“1.12% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Moderate GradeRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 1.12% Cu is a moderate grade for a surface rock chip sample.
Evidence · text
“1.12% Cu”
Fact 18Ridler Creek · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ridler Creek
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- GGR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak-grade copper rock chip sample was collected, providing further data for the exploration program.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Weak Grade
Evidence · text
“0.29% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Weak GradeRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Reason: 0.29% Cu is a weak grade for a surface rock chip sample.
Evidence · text
“0.29% Cu”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.